Avrupa Hukuk Enstitüsü’nün üstesinden gelmesi gereken zorluklar

Öz

Bu metin, 1 Haziran 2011 günü Avrupa Hukuk Enstitüsü’nün kuruluş kongresinde konuşma olarak sunulmuştur. Avrupa Hukuk Enstitüsü’nün üstesinden gelmesi gereken bazı zorluklara değinilmesi suretiyle okuyucunun Enstitü’nün temel özellikleri hakkında bilgilendirilmesi amaçlanmıştır. Bu zorluklar özellikle Enstitü’nün her meslekten hukukçuyu, çeşitli hukuk dallarını ve farklı hukuk kültürlerini kapsamak istemesinden kaynaklanmaktadır. Ayrıca hukuk geleneği kavramına ve dil ve hukuk arasındaki ilişkiye özel bir önem verilmiştir. Son olarakta Avrupa Hukuk Enstitüsü’nün hukukun yeknesaklaştırılmasını amaçlayan mevcut ağlar, organizasyonlar ve Avrupa Birliği’nin resmi organları karşısındaki

Anahtar Kelimeler

• -

Challenges for the European Law Institute

Öz

This is the text of a speech given on the occasion of the Inaugural Congress of the European Law Institute in Paris on 1 June 2011. It attempts to familiarize the audience with essential features of that Institute and it does so by highlighting a number of specific challenges facing the Institute. These challenges arise, inter alia, from the Institute's ambition to be comprehensive, as far as legal professions, legal disciplines, and legal traditions are concerned. Specific attention is devoted to the notion of legal tradition(s) and the relationship between law and language. Finally, the position of the European Law Institute vis-à-vis other existing "networks" and organizations, the official organs of the European Union, and other organizations, worldwide, aiming at the harmonization of law, is highlighted. Throughout the speech, reference is made to the American Law Institute and the question is asked to what extent it can serve as a model for the European Law Institute

Anahtar Kelimeler

• European Law Institute, American Law Institute, law and language, legal tradition, European Jurists' Forum

Kaynakça

1. Bermann, Harold J. (1983). Law and Revolution: The Formation of the Western Legal Tradition. (1. bs.). Harward: Harward University Press.
2. van Caenegem, Raoul. (1987). Judges, Legislators and Professors: Chapters in European Legal History. (1.bs.). Belgium: Cambridge University Press.
3. David, Renè /Jauffrett-Spinosi, Camille. (2002). Les grands systemes de droit contemporains. (11.bs.). Paris: Dalloz.
4. Fauvarque-Cosson, Benedicte. (2008). Comparative Law in France. The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Law, Mathias Reimann and Reinhard Zimmermann (eds). (1.bs.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
5. Glenn, H. Patrick. (2010). Legal Traditions of the World: Sustainable Diversity in Law. (4.bs.). New York: Oxford University Press.
6. Gretton, G L. (2000). Trust without equity. 49 ICLQ 599. (1.bs.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
7. Hattenhauer, Hans. (2002). Thibaut und Savigny: Ihre programmatischen Schriften, (2.bs.). München: Verlag Vahlen.
8. Jansen, Nils (2010). The Making of Legal Authority: Non-Legislative Codifications in Historical and Comparative Perspective. (1.bs.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

9. Lando, Ole / Beale, Hugh (eds.). (2000). Principles of European Contract Law, Parts I and II. Hague: Kluwer Law International.
10. Lando, Ole/ Clive, Eric/ Prüm, Andrè /Zimmermann, Reinhard (eds.). (2003). Principles of European Contract Law, Part III. Hague: Kluwer Law International.
11. Panofsky, Erwin. (1955). Meaning in the Visual Arts. (1. bs.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
12. Pothier, Robert Joseph/ William, David Evans S. (1806). A treatise on the Law of Obligations or Contracts. (1. bs.). London: Joseph Butterworth.
13. Reid, Kenneth G. C./ de Waal, Marius J./ Zimmermann, Reinhard. (2011). Testamentary Formalities. (1.bs.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
14. von Savigny, Frederich Carl. (1814). Vom Beruf unserer Zeit für Gesetzgebung und Rechtswissenschaft. (1.bs.). Heidelberg: Mohr und Zimmer.
15. Weber, Max. (1972). Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft. (5.bs.). Tübingen: Mohr Verlag. Zweigert, Konrad / Kötz, Hein. (1996). Einführung in die Rechtsvergleichung, (3.bs.). Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck.
16. http://www.ali.org/doc/charter.pdf