Uluslararası Hukukta suçluların iadesi ve suçluları kovusturma yükümlülüğü

Öz

Çağımızda iade veya geri verme işleminde insan hakları önemli bir konuma sahiptir. Bugün kişi, adil olmayan yargılama, ölüm cezası, işkence ya da insanlık dışı ve küçültücü muamele ya da cezaya maruz kalma riski olan bir ülkeye gönderilemez. Ancak, kendisinden kişinin gönderilmesi talep edilen bir devlet, belirli hususlarda yeterli teminat alması halinde kişinin gönderilmesine karar verebilir. Çalışmanın amacı suçluların iadesi ve suçluları kovuşturma yükümlülüğünü inceleyerek iade kurumunun kaynakları, kapsamı ve bu kurumun en önemli istisnası olarak insan haklarının ihlâli sonucu suçluları iade etmeme yükümlülüğü konusunu değerlendirmektir

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Suçluların Đadesi, Adlî Yardımlaşma, Suçluları Kovuşturma Yükümlülüğü, Uluslararası Hukuk, Đnsan Hakları

Extradition and the Obligation to Prosecute of Offenders in International Law (aut dedere aut judicare)

Öz

In modern times, human rights has an important position in extradition process. Today, if the offence for which extradition is requested is punishable by death, unfair trial, torture or inhuman and degrading treatment or punishment under the law of the requesting party, extradition may be refused unless the requesting party gives such assurance as the requested party considers sufficient that the death-penalty will not be carried out. The purpose of this study is to evaluate extradition and the obligation to prosecute offenders with the study of the sources and scope of the institution of extradition and by observing the duty of non-refoulement as the most important exception to this institution and a result of violation of human rights

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Extradition, Judicial Assistance, The Duty To Prosecute Offenders, International Law, Human Rights

Kaynakça

1. Aydın, Devrim. (2006). Uluslararası Ceza Mahkemesi Temel Belgeler Derlemesi, Ankara: Kapasite Geliştirme Derneği Yayınları.
2. Bassiouni, M. Cherif and WİSE, E.M. (1995). Aut Dedere Aut Judicare: The Duty Dortrecht/Boston/London: M. Nijhoff Pub. or Prosecute in International Law;
3. Broomhall, Bruce. (2003). International Justice and the International Criminal Court, Between Sovereignty and the Rule of Law, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
4. Cassese, Antonio. (2003). International Criminal Law, London: Oxford University Press.
5. Deeks, Ashley. (2008). Promises Not to Torture: Diplomatic Assurances in U.S. Courts, American Society of International Law Publishers.
6. Eralp, Özgen. (1962). Suçluların Geri Verilmesi, Ankara Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Yayınları, No.167, Ankara: Ajans-Türk Matbaası.
7. Gölcüklü, A. Feyyaz ve Gözübüyük, A. Şeref. (2007). Avrupa İnsan Hakları Mahkemesi Sözleşmesi ve Uygulaması, 9. Bası, Ankara: Turhan Kitabevi.
8. Gözübüyük, Abdullah Pulat. (1949). “Suçluların Geri Verilmesi Hukukununu Birleştirlmesi ve Geriverme Umumi Andlaşma Tasarısı”, Yeni Cezaevi Basımevi, Ankara.

9. Grotius, Hugo. (1628). The Law of War and Peace (1625), Translated into English by Francis W. Kelsey with the collaboration of Arthur E. R. Boak, Henry A. Sanders, Jesse S. Reeves and Herbert F. Wright, Book II, Chap. XXI.
10. İçel, Kayıhan ve Donay, Süheyl. (2005). Karşılaştırmalı ve Uygulamalı Ceza Hukuku, İstanbul: Beta Yayınevi.
11. Önder, Ayhan. (1992). Ceza Hukuku Dersleri, İstanbul: Filiz Kitapevi.
12. Önder, Ayhan. (1991). Ceza Hukuku Genel Hükümler, Cilt I, İstanbul: Beta Yayınları.
13. Özgen, Eralp. (1962). Suçluların Geri Verilmesi, Ankara: Ajans Türk Matbaası.
14. Nadya Sadat, Leila. (2002). The International Criminal Court and the Transformation of International Law: Justice for the New Millennium, Transnational Publishers.
15. Tahir Taner, Mehmet. (1953). Ceza Hukuku: Umumi Kısım, 3. Basım, İstanbul: DÜHF Yayını.
16. Tufan Yüce, Turhan. (1985). Ceza Hukuku Temel Kavramlar, Ankara: Turhan Kitabevi.
17. Yılmaz, Alia. (2001). Uluslararası Ceza Hukuku, 2. Bası, İstanbul: Beta Yayıncılık.
18. A. Schabas, William. (1999). “The Follow Up to Rome: Preparing for Entry into Force of the International Criminal Court Statute”, Human Rights Law Journal, Vol. 20, No. 4-6, ss. 157-166.
19. A. Schabas, William. (1997). “War Crimes, Crimes Against Humanity and the Death Penalty”, Albany Law Journal, Vol. 60, No. 3, ss. 733-770.
20. Allain, Jean and R.W. D. Jones, John. (1997). “A Patchwork of Norms: A Commentary on the 1996 Draft Code of Crimes Against the Peace and Security of Mankind”, EJIL, Vol. 8, No. 1, ss. 100-117.
21. Alp Durak, Cenk. (1999). “Suçluların İadesine Dair Avrupa Sözleşmesi”, Ankara Barosu Dergisi, C.56, Ankara, ss. 49-60.
22. Arriza, N. Roht. (1990). “State Responsibility to Investigate and Prosecute Grave Human Rights Violations in International Law”, California Law Review, Vol. 78, ss. 449-513.
23. Bottini, Gabriel. (2004). “Universal Jurisdiction After the Creation of the International Criminal Court” International Law and Politics, Vol. 36, ss. 503-562.
24. Broomhall, Bruce. (2001). “Towards the Development of an Effective System of Universal Jurisdiction for Crimes under International Law”, New England Law Review, Vol. 35, ss. 399-420.
25. Brown, C. Enache & Fried, Ari. (1998). “Universal Crime, Jurisdiction and Duty: The Obligation of Aut Dedere Aut Judicare in International Law”, McGill Law Journal, Vol. 43, ss. 614- 613.
26. C. Joyner, Christopher. (2003). “International Extradition and Global Terrorism: Bringing International Criminals to Justice”, Loy. L.A. Int’l & Comp. L. Rev ,Vol. 25, ss. 493-541.
27. De Londras, Fiona. (2009). “Shannon, Saadi and İreland’s Reliance on Diplomatic Assurances Under Article 3 of The ECHR”, Irish Yearbook Of International Law 2007, Oxford: Hart Publications, ss. 1-14.
28. Donay, Süheyl. (1984). “Suçluların İadesinde Gelişmeler”, İ.Ü.H.F.M., C. 50, S. I-IV, ss. 239-274.
29. Dugard, John & Van Den Wyngaert, Christine. (1998). “Reconciling Extradition With Human Rights”, AJIl; Vol. 92. 2, ss. 187-212.
30. Hadi Armaoğlu, Fahir. (1951). “Belçika Kaidesi ve Siyasi Suçluların İadesi Meselesi”, Adalet Dergisi, ss. 1590-1607.
31. J. Fenmck, William. (1999). “Should Crimes Against Humanity Replace War Crimes?”, Columbia Journal of Transnational Law, Vol. 37, ss. 767-785.
32. K. Martin, Mary. (1999). “One -Way Ticket Back to the United States: The Collision of International Extradition Law and the Death Penalty”, Capital Defense Journal, Vol. 11, Issue: 2, ss. 243-262.
33. Kocaoğlu, Serhat Sinan. (2005). “Evrensel Yetki”, TBB Dergisi, Sayı 60, ss. 189-213.
34. Kömürcü, Mehmet & Çalişkan, Yusuf. (1999). “Suçluların İadesinin Uluslararası Hukukta Düzenlenişi ve Siyasi Suç İstisnasının Terörizmle Mücadeledeki Rolü”, Ankara Barosu Dergisi, C. 56, ss. 75-94.
35. Mahoney, Paul. (2004). “Right to a Faır Trial in Criminal Matters Under Article 6 E.C.H.R.”, Judicial Studies Institute Journal, No. 4:2, ss. 107- 129.
36. Plachta, Michael. (1999). “Aut Dedere Aut Judicare: an Overview of Modes of Implementation and Approaches”, MJEC, Vol. 6, No. 4, ss. 331-365.
37. Roberge, Marie Claude. (1997). “Jurisdiction of ad hoc Tribunals for the Former Yugoslavia and Rwanda over Crimes Against Humanity and Genocide”, IRRC. Vol. 37, No. 321, ss. 651-664.
38. Rozakıs, Christos. (2004). “The Right to a Fair Trial in Civil Cases”, Judicial Studies Institute Journal, Vol. 4: 2, ss. 96-116.
39. Scheu, Harald Christian & Sulcova, Zuzana. (2004). “International Legal Aspects of the Fight Against Terrorism”, Legal Aspects of Terrorism, Volume 2, Prague, Information Centre for the Questions of the Fight Against Terrorism, ss. 1-34.
40. Van Den Wyngaret, Christine. (1990). “Applying the European Convention on Human Rights to Extradition: Opening Pandor's Box?”, Int’l & Comp. L. Q, Vol. 32, ss. 757-779.
41. Convention Against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishmen, Adopted And Opened For Signature, Ratification And Accession By General Assembly Resolution 39/46 of 10 December 1984, Entry Into Force 26 June 1987.
42. Convention for the Suppression of Unlawful Acts against the Safety of Civil Aviation, Signed at Montreal on 23 September 1971.
43. Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide, Done at New York on 9 December 1948, Entry into Force: 12 January 1951, in Accordance With Article XIII.
44. Convention (I) for the Amelioration of the Condition of the Wounded and Sick in Armed Forces in the Field, Geneva, 12 August 1949.
45. Convention (II) for the Amelioration of the Condition of Wounded, Sick and Shipwrecked Members of Armed Forces at Sea, Geneva, 12 August 1949.
46. Convention (III) Relative to the Treatment of Prisoners of War, Geneva, 12 August 1949.
47. Convention (IV) Relative to the Protection of Civilian Persons in Time of War, Geneva, 12 August 1949.
48. European Convention on Extradition, Paris, 13.XII. 1957. Opening for signature in Paris. 13/12/1957. Entry into force, conditions: 3 ratifications. 18/04/1960.
49. Human Rights Committee, General Comment, No. 6 (1982).
50. International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, Adopted by the General Assembly of the United Nations on 19 December 1966.
51. Protocol Additional to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949, and Relating to the Protection of Victims of International Armed Conflicts (Protocol I), 8 June 1977.
52. Protocol Additional to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949, and Relating to the Protection of Victims of International Armed Conflicts (Protocol I).8 June 1977.
53. Protocol Additional to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949, and relating to the Protection of Victims of Non-International Armed Conflicts (Protocol II), 8 June 1977.
54. Protocol Additional to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949, and Relating to the Adoption of an Additional Distinctive Emblem (Protocol III), 8 December 2005.
55. Rules of Procedure of the Human Rights Committee (2001), UN doc. CCPR/C/3/Rev.G,Rule.86.
56. Second Additional Protocol to the European Convention on Extradition, Strasbourg, 17.03.1978. http://www.unhcr.org/refworld/docid/3ae6b37e1c.html. original metni için bkz.
57. The European Convention on Human Rights, Done at ROME on 4 November 1950, Entry into Force: 3 September 1953.
58. United Nations Convention Against Corruption, Done at New York on 31 October 2003, A/58/422, Entered into Force on 14 December 2005.
59. UN Model Treaty on Extradition, A/RES/45/116, 68th Plenary Meeting,14 December http://www.un.org/documents/ga/res/45/a45r116.htm. [28/09/2012]. anlaşmanın orijinal metni için bkz.
60. Historical Survey of the Question of International Crimıial Jurisdiction, A/CN.4/7/Rev.l, United Nations Publications, No: 1949. V. 8, Newyork, http://untreaty.un.org/ilc/documentation/english/a_cn4_7_rev1.pdf. [20/09/2012]. erişim için bkz.
61. Case Concerning Questions of Interpretation and Application of The 197 1 Montreal Convention Arising From The Aerial Incident at Lockerbie (Libyan Arab Jamahiriya v. United States of America), Provisional Measures, Order of 14 April 1992, ICJ Reports, 1992.
62. Case of Kindler v. Cananda (470/1991), 30 Julay 1993, UN doc. CCPR/C/48/D/470/1991.
63. Case of A.R.J v. Austria (692/1996), 11 August 1997, UN doc, CCPR/C/60/D/692/1996.
64. Case of Çinar v. Turkey (Application No. 41855/999), ECHR, 15 January 2004.
65. Case of Chipana v. Venezuela (110/1998), 10 November 1998, UN doc. CAT/C/21/D/110/1998.
66. Case of Drozd & Janousek v. France & Spain (Application No. 12747/87), ECHR , 26 June 1992.
67. Case of Ireland v. United Kingdom, (Application No. 5310/71) ECHR, 18 January 1978.
68. Case of Keshmiri v. Turkey (Application No. 36370/08) ECHR, 13 April 2010.
69. Case of M.B. & Others v. Turkey (Application No. 36009/08) ECHR 15 June 2010.
70. Case of Piotrimol v. France (Application No. 14032/88), ECHR, 23 November 1993.
71. Case of Soering v. United Kingdom (Application No. 14038/88), ECHR, 7 JULY 1989.
72. Case of Sejdovic v. Italy (Application No. 56581/00), ECHR 620, 10 November 2004.
73. Case of Tehrani and Others v. Turkey (Applications Nos. 32940/08, 41626/08, 43616/08) ECHR, 13 April 2010.
74. Case of Z.N.S. v. Turkey (Application No. 21896/08) ECHR, 19 January 2010.
75. Case of Windisch v. Austria (Application No. 12489/86) ECHR, 27 September 1990.
76. http://www.uhdigm.adalet.gov.tr/genelgeler/genelge.html.
77. http://www1.umn.edu/humanrts/undocs/undocs.htm.
78. http://www.yargitay.gov.tr/abproje/belge/temelbelge/AIHS_tr.pdf.
79. http://www.uhdigm.adalet.gov.tr/sozlesmeler/coktaraflisoz/bm/bm_10.pdf.
80. http://www.unhcr.org/refworld/docid/3ae6b3694.html.
81. http://www.uhdigm.adalet.gov.tr/sozlesmeler/coktaraflisoz/bm/bm_01.pdf.
82. http://www.ihop.org.tr/dosya/ucm/ucm.pdf.
83. http://treaties.un.org/doc/db/Terrorism/Conv3-english.pdf.
84. http://www.avrupakonseyi.org.tr/antlasma/aas_24.htm.
85. http://www.unhcr.org/refworld/docid/4374b9524.html.