BİR KURUCU MECLİSİN İDEAL TASARIMI

Öz

-

Anahtar Kelimeler

• -

The Optimal Design of a Constituent Assembly

Öz

-

Anahtar Kelimeler

• -

Kaynakça

1. AP = Archives Parlementaires, Serie I: 1787-1799, Paris 1875-1888.
2. Beard, C. (1986), An Economic Interpretation of the Constitution of the United States, New York: The Free Press.
3. Bentham, J. (1788), “Lettre d’un Anglois à M. le C. de M. sur l’objet soumisaux notables de 1788”, in Bentham (2001).
4. Bentham, J. (1789), “Considérations d’un Anglois sur la composition des Etats-Généraux y compris réponses aux questions proposées aux notables”, in Bentham (2001).
5. Bentham, J. (1999), Political Tactics, Oxford University Press.
6. Bentham, J. (2001), Rights, Representation and Reform, Oxford University Press.
7. Bryce, J. (1905), Constitutions, Oxford University Press.
8. Castaldo, A. (1989), Les méthodes de travail de la constituante, Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.

9. Condorcet, Marquis de (1785), “Essai sur la constitution et les fonctions des assemblées provinciales”” in Condorcet 1986.
10. Condorcet, Marquis de (1788), “Essai sur l’appliction de l’analyse à la probabilité des decision rendues à la pluralité des voix” in Condorcet 1986.
11. Condorcet, Marquis de (1986), Sur les elections, Paris: Fayard.
12. DeLolme, J. L. 1807), The Constitution of England, London.
13. Dowding, K. and van Hees, M. (12007), “In praise of manipulation”, British Journal of Political Science 38, 1-15.
14. Egret, J. (1950), La révolution des notables, Paris: Armand Colin.
15. Egret, J. (1975), Necker, Ministre de Louis XVI, Paris: Champion.
16. Elster, J. (1986), “The market and the forum”, in J. Elster and A. Hylland (eds.), Foundations of Social Choice Theory, Cambridge University Press.
17. Elster, J. (1993), “Constitutional bootstrapping in Paris and Philadelphia”, Cardozo Law Review 14 549-76.
18. Elster, J. (1995 a), “Transition, constitution-making and separation in Czechoslovakia”, Archives Européennes de Sociologie 36, 105-34.
19. Ekster, J. (1995 b), “Strategic uses of argument”, in K. Arrow et al. (eds.), Barriers to the Negotiated Resolution of Conflict, New York: Norton.
20. Elster, J. (1999), Alchemies of the Mind, Cambridge University Press.
21. Elster, J. (2000), “Arguing and bargaining in two constituent assemblies”, University of Pennsylvania Journal of Constitutional Law 2, 345 ff.
22. Elster, J. (2006), Raison et raisons, Paris: Fayard.
23. Elster, J. (2007 a), Explaining Social Behavior, Cambridge University Press.
24. Elster, J. (2007 b), “The night of August 4 1789: A study of social interaction in collective decision-making”, Revue Européenne des Sciences Sociales 45, 71-94.
25. Farrand, M., ed. (1966), Records of the Federal Convention, New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press.
26. Hoar, R. S. (1917), Constitutional Conventions, Boston: Little, Brown.
27. Huber, E. R. (1978), Deutsche Verfassungsgeschichte seit 1789, vol.5, Stuttgart: Kohlhammer.
28. Jillson, C. (1988), Constitution Making: Conflict and Consensus in the Federal Convention of 1787, New York: Agathon Press.
29. Jouvenel, B. de (1961), “The chairman’s dilemma”, American Political Science Review 44, 368-72.
30. Karotkin, D. and Paroush, J. (2003), “Optimum committee size: Quality- versus-quantity dilemma”, Social Choice and Welfare 20 429-41.
31. Kessel, P. (1969), La nuit du 4 août 1789, Paris: Arthaud.
32. Kline, M.-J. (1978), Gouverneur Morris and the New Nation, 1775-1788, New York: Arno Press.
33. Kruman, M. (1997), Between Authority and Liberty: State Constitution Making in Revolutionary America, Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina Press.
34. Lebègue, E. (1910), Thouret, Paris: Felix Alcan.
35. McDonald, F. (1992), We the People: The Economic Origins of the Constitution. New Brunswick: Transaction Books.
36. Merkl, P. (1963), The Origins of the West German Republic, Oxford University Press.
37. Lenowitz, J. (2007), “Rejected by the people: Failed U. S. state constitutional conventions in the 1960s and 70s”, Unpublished Manuscript, Department of Political Science, Columbia University.
38. Mueller, D. (2003), Public Choice III, Cambridge University Press.
39. Necheles, R. F. (1974), “The Curés in the Estates General of 1789”, Journal of Modern History 46, 425-444.
40. Pillouer, A. le (2003), Les pouvoirs non-constituants des assemblées constituants, Paris: Dalloz.
41. Pole, J. R. (1983), The Gift of Government, Athens, Georgia: University of Georgia Press.
42. Rawls, J. (1999), A Theory of Justice, rev. d., Harvard MA: Cambridge University Press.
43. Rudenfeld. J. (2001), Freedom and Time, New Haven CO: Yale University Press.
44. Russell, P. (1993), Constitutional Odyssey: Can Canadians Become a Sovereign People, rev. ed., University of Toronto Press.
45. Staël, Mme de (2000), Considérations sur la Révolution Française, Paris: Tallandier.
46. Stratmann. T. (1997), “Logrolling”, in D. Mueller (ed.), Perspectives on Public Choice, Cambridge University Press.