ULUSLARARASI VERGİ UYUŞMAZLIKLARININ GİDERİLMESİ: AVRUPA BİRLİĞİ TAHKİM ANLAŞMASI

Öz

Akit devletlerin çifte vergilendirmeyi önleme anlaşmalarının hükümlerini farklı yorumlamaları uluslararası vergi uyuşmazlıklarına neden olabilmektedir. Uluslararası vergi uyuşmazlıkları genellikle, vergi anlaşmalarında düzenlenen karşılıklı anlaşma usulü ile çözümlenmektedir. Vergi uyuşmazlıklarının sayısının zaman içinde artması ve uyuşmazlık konularının giderek karmaşıklaşması karşılıklı anlaşma usulünün sorunun çözümünde yetersiz kalmasına neden olmuştur. Tahkim, bu nedenle bazı uluslararası örgütler ve iş çevreleri tarafından uluslararası vergi uyuşmazlıklarının giderilmesinde alternatif yöntem olarak önerilmektedir. Bu çalışmada Avrupa Birliği Tahkim Anlaşması ve karşılıklı anlaşma usulü inceme konusu yapılmış, bu yöntemlerin uyuşmazlıkları nasıl giderdikleri incelenmiştir. Çalışmanın son kısımda da bu yöntemlerin Türkiye açısından değerlendirilmesine yer verilmiştir

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Uluslararası vergi uyuşmazlıkları, tahkim, Avrupa

Settlement of International Tax Disputes: European Union Arbitration Convention

Öz

International tax disputes arise when contracting states interpret double tax treaties differently. These tax issues have been increasing over time. International tax disputes have generally been resolved by the mutual agreement procedure (MAP). However these issues have become more complex and now involve two or more countries. Because of this complexity, the MAP has been insufficient to resolve all international tax disputes. Arbitration has been suggested by a number of international organizations and business communities to be an alternative method of dispute resolution. In this paper, we study both the EU Arbitration Convention and the MAP to understand how these methods can resolve tax disputes. Lastly we evaluate the issue from the Turkish perspective

Anahtar Kelimeler

• International tax disputes, arbitration, European Union

Kaynakça

1. “Arbitration in International Tax Matters” (ICC Commission on Taxation, May statements/2000/arbitration_tax.asp, Erişim: 15.01.08.
2. http://www.iccwbo.org/home/statements_rules/
3. “International Arbitration best Way to Settle Double Taxation Disputes”, http://www.iccwbo.org/home/news_archives/2000/tax_disputes.asp, Erişim: 15.01.08.
4. “Transfer Pricing is the Most Important Tax Issue According to Ernst & Young http://home.businesswire.com/portal/site/google/index.jsp?ndmViewld= news_view&newsld=20031105005731&newsLang=en, 30.01.08. Businesswire Web Page, Erişim:
5. “Why the OECD Supports Arbitration”, International Tax Review, February 2007.
6. AKINCI, Ziya. Milletlerarası Tahkim, Seçkin, Ankara, 2003.
7. AKTAŞ, Mehmet. “Uluslararası Transfer Fiyatlaması ve Türk Vergi Sistemindeki Konumu-I”, Yaklaşım, Sayı 130, Ekim 2003.
8. BERNATH, Andreas. The Implications of Arbitration Convention, Jönköping International Business School, Jönköping University, Master Thesis in International Law, Maj 2006.

9. ÇAĞAN, Nami. Vergilendirme Yetkisi, Kazancı Hukuk Yayınları, İstanbul, 1982, s. 9-10.
10. CARSTEN, Hans M. “Arbitration in Taxation –Book Review-”, The American Journal of International Law, Vol. 76, No. 2.
11. CHETCUTI, Jean-Philippe. “Arbitration in International Tax Dispute Resolution”, arbitration.htm, Erişim: 15.01.08.
12. http://www.chetcuticauchi.com/jpc/research/tax
13. COLE, Robert. “Keeping the Component Authority Process Effective: Moral Obligation and Arbitration”, Tax Management International Journal, Feb 14, 2003, Vol: 32, No: 2.
14. Commission Staff Working Paper, SEC(2001) 1961, p. 281.
15. Convention 90/486/EEC on the Elimination of Double Taxation in Connection with the Adjustment of Profits of Associated Enterprises, Official Journal of the European Communities, L 225, 20/08/1990.
16. Convention Concerning the Accession of the Republic of Finland and Kingdom of Sweden to Convention on Elimination of Double Taxation in Connection with the Adjustment of Profits of Associated Enterprises, Official Journal of the European Communities, C 26, 13/01/1996.
17. Convention on the Accession of the Czech Republic, the Republic of Estonia, the Republic of Cyprus, the Republic of Latvia, the Republic of Lithuania, the Republic of Hungary, the Republic of Malta, the Republic of Poland, the Republic of Slovenia, and the Slovak Republic to the Convention on the Elimination of Double Taxation in Connection with the Adjustment of Profits of Associated Enterprises, Official Journal of the European Communities, C 160, 08/12/2004.
18. Convention on the Elimination of Double Taxation in Connection with the Adjustment of Profits of Associated Enterprises, Official Journal of the European Communities, L 225, 20/08/1990.
19. FOLEY, Sean F.; BURNS, Paul B. “The APA Program as a Model for Successful Alternative Dispute Resolution”, Tax Management International Journal, Sep 12, 2003, Vol. 32, No. 2.
20. GOUTHIÉRE, Bruno. “The OECD Recommends Arbitration to Improve the Resolution of Tax Treaty Disputes”, International Tax Journal, May- June 2007.
21. JOSEPH, Ghislan T.J. “Transfer Pricing: The EC Arbitration Convention as a Dispute Resolution Mechanism”, The International Tax Journal, Spring 2002, 28, 2.
22. LANG, Michael; ZÜGER, Mario. Settlement of Disputes in Tax Treaty Law, Eucotax Series on International Taxation, Kluwer Law International, 2002.
23. LEVEY, Marc M.; WRAPPE, Steven C.; CHUNG, Kerwin. “The Future of Transfer Pricing Disputes: All Roads Lead to Component Authority”, Tax Management International Journal, Aug 7, Vol. 27, No. 8.
24. MCINTYRE, Michael J. “Developing Countries and International Cooperation on Income Tax Matters: An Historical Review”, http://www.michielse.com/files/mcintyre_intl_cooperation.pdf, Erişim: 10.04.08.
25. OECD, “Improving Resolution of Tax Treaty Disputes” (Report Adopted by the Committee on Fiscal Affairs on 30 January 2007), Centre for Tax Policy and Administration, February 2007.
26. OECD, “Proposals for Improving Mechanisms for the Resolution of Tax Treaty Disputes” (Public Discussion Draft), Centre for Tax Policy and Administration, February 2006.
27. OWENS, Jeffrey. “Resolving International Tax Disputes: The Role of OECD”, Observer, No: 243, May 2004.
28. PARK, William. “Income Tax Treaty Arbitration”, George Mason Law Review, Vol. 10:4, 2002.
29. Proposal for a Council Directive on the Elimination of the Double Taxation in Connection with The Adjustment of Transfers of Profits Between Associated Enterprises (Arbitration Procedure), Official Journal of the European Communities, C 301, 21/12/1976.
30. Protocol Amending the Convention of 23 July 1990 on the Elimination of Double Taxation in Connection with the Adjustment of Profits of Associated Communities, C 202, 16/07/1999. Official Journal of the European
31. SUR, Melda. Uluslararası Hukukun Esasları, Beta, Geliştirilmiş İkinci Baskı, İstanbul 2006.
32. TILLINGHAST, David R. “Arbitration of Disputes Arising under Income Tax Treaties: Has the Time Come?”, Tax Management International Journal, July 11, 2003, Vol.32, No. 7.
33. TUNCER, Selâhattin Çifte Vergileme ve Milletlerarası Vergi Anlaşmaları, Eskişehir İktisadi ve Ticari İlimler Akademisi Yayın No: 112-66, Eskişehir, 1974.
34. VOGELE, Alexander; Brem, MARKUS. “Do APAs Prevent Disputes?”, International Tax Review, December 2002/January 2003, Vol. 14, Iss. 1.
35. Webster’s Third New Dictionary of The English Language Unabridged, Könemann, Merriam-Webster, 1993.
36. YALTI SOYDAN, Billur. “Çokuluslu İşletmeler ve Vergi İdareleri için Transfer Fiyatlaması Rehberi”, Vergi Sorunları, Sayı: 91, Yıl: 1996.
37. YALTI SOYDAN, Billur. “Vergi Anlaşmalarında Yer Alan Karşılıklı Anlaşma Usulünde Anayasaya Aykırılık Sorunu”, Vergi Dünyası, Sayı 160, Aralık 1994.
38. YALTI SOYDAN, Billur. Uluslararası Vergi Anlaşmaları, Beta Basım Yayım Dağıtım, 1. Baskı, İstanbul, Temmuz 1995.
39. ZÜGER, Mario. Arbitration Under Tax Treaties, IBFD Publications, Amsterdam, 2001.