Legal Analysis of the Turkstream Gas Pipeline Project

Öz

Gas pipeline projects are still significant projects as natural gas is increasingly used in electricity generation and LNG is not still cheaper option for most of the countries. Even though pipeline projects are being constructed widely all over the world, there is not parallel advancement in international pipeline legal regime. Turkstream, as one of the latest pipeline projects, clearly shows this lack of unified legal regime whereby the legal regime of Turkstream consists of the intergovernmental agreement (IGA) between Turkey and Russia, host government agreements and some provisions of other international treaties. Considering possible the lack of consistency between legal regimes of different projects, Energy Charter Secreteriat has prepared the model intergovernmental agreement in order to ensure consistency between different IGA’s. In line with this model agreement, in this paper, some prominent institution reports, books and journal articles are used for analysing the legal framework of Turkstream and afterward its consistency with the model agreement is examined in order to assess its strengths and shortcomings. It is found that the legal regime of the Turkstream project is sound and mostly consistent with the model agreement, but lack of some provisions could also bring some problems during the implementation of the project.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Transboundary Pipelines
• Turkstream
• IGA
• Energy Charter Treaty
• UNCLOS

Türkakımı Projesinin Hukuki İncelemesi

Öz

Elektrik üretiminde doğalgazın kullanımının artması ve LNG’nin birçok ülke bakımından henüz ucuz bir seçenek olmamasından dolayı gaz boru hattı projeleri önemini korumaya devam etmektedir. Her ne kadar boru hattı projeleri dünya genelinde yaygın bir biçimde yapılmaya ve uygulanmaya devam etse de, uluslararası boru hattı yasal rejimi konusunda buna mukabil bir gelişme görülmemektedir. En yeni boru hattı projelerinden biri olan ve yasal altyapısı Türkiye ve Rusya arasındaki hükümetler arası anlaşma, ev sahibi hükümet anlaşması ve diğer uluslararası anlaşmaların bazı hükümlerinden oluşan Türkakımı projesi de bu anlamda yekpare bir yasal rejim eksikligini en açık biçimde göstermektedir. Her bir projenin kendine ait bir yasal rejiminin olmasından kaynaklı farklılık ve tutarsızlıkların önüne geçmek amacıyla Enerji Şartı Sekreterligi örnek hükümetler arası anlaşma hazırlamıştır. Bu makalede, işbu örnek anlaşma metni esas olmak üzere çeşitli organizasyon raporları, kitaplar ve dergi makaleleri incelenerek Türkakımı projesi, eksik ve güçlü yönlerini tespit edebilmek amacıyla hukuki açıdan ele alınmıştır. Tüm bu araştırmaların sonucunda Türkakımı projesinin hukuksal olarak sağlam ve örnek anlaşma ile çoğunlukla örtüşmekte olduğu; ancak bazı hükümlerin eksikliğinin projenin gelecekte uygulanması aşamasında birtakım sorunlara yol açabileceği tespit edilmiştir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Sınırötesi Boru Hatları
• Türkakımı
• Hükümetler Arası Anlaşma
• Enerji Şartı Sekreterligi
• UNCLOS

Kaynakça

1. Agreement concerning TurkStream Gas Pipeline between the Government of the Republic of Turkey and the Government of the Russian Federation, Official Gazzette of Republic of Turkey, 24.11.2016, (https://www.resmigazete.gov.tr/eskiler/2016/12/20161224-1.pdf), accessed 25.03.2020.
2. Convention on Environmental Impact Assessment in A Transboundary Context, (adopted in 1991) Art.3-5. (https://www.unece.org/fileadmin/DAM/env/eia/documents/legaltexts/Espoo_Convention_authentic_ENG.pdf), accessed 25.03.2020.
3. Energy Charter Treaty (entered into force 16 April 1998) (https://www.europarl.europa.eu/meetdocs/2014_2019/documents/itre/dv/energy_charter_/energy_charter_en.pdf), accessed 25.03.2020.
4. AZARIA Danae, “Energy Transit under the Energy Charter Treaty and the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade”, Journal of Energy & Natural Resources Law, vol. 27:4, 2009, pages. 559-596.
5. AZARIA Danae, “Transit of Energy via Pipelines in International Law”, Proceedings of the ASIL Annual Meeting, vol. 110, 2016, pages. 131-139.
6. DAMAGH Mehdi Piri/ FAURE Michael, “The Effectiveness of Cross-Border Pipeline Safety and Environmental Regulations (under International Law)”, NCJ Int'l L & ComReg, vol. 40, 55, 2014, pages. 55-134.
7. DOW Stephen/ SIDDIKY Ishrak Ahmed/ AHMMAD Yadgar Kamal, "Cross-border oil and gas pipelines and cross-border waterways: a comparison between the two legal regimes", The Journal of World Energy Law & Business, vol.6, 2013, pages. 107-128.
8. DULANEY Michael/ MERRICK Robert, "Legal Issues in Cross-Border Oil and Gas Pipelines", J Energy & Nat Resources L, vol. 23, 2005, pages. 247- 265.

9. Energy Charter Secretariat, Model Intergovernmental and Host Government Agreements for Cross-Border Pipeline, Second Edition, ECT, 2008.
10. GAYLING Barbara, Intergovernmental Agreements and Host Government Agreements on Oil and Gas Pipelines -A Comparison, Energy Charter Secretariat, 2015.
11. GURBANOV Ilgar, "Perspective for Turkish Stream Project: Possible Scenarios and Challenges", Caucasus International, vol. 6, 2, 2016, pages. 75-95.
12. JAMAL Fazil, "Legal Aspects of Transnational Energy Pipelines: A Critical Appraisal", Eur Networks L & Reg Q, vol. 3, 2, 2015, pages. 103-116.
13. KONOPLYANIK Andrey, "Gas Transit in Eurasia: Transit Issues between Russia and the European Union and the Role of the Energy Charter", Journal of Energy & Natural Resources Law, vol. 27, 3, 2009, pages. 445-486.
14. LANGLET David, "Transboundary Transit Pipelines: Reflections on the Balancing of Rights and Interests in Light of the Nord Stream Project", The International and Comparative Law Quarterly, vol. 63, 4, 2014, pages. 977-995.
15. LEAL-ARCAS Rafael/ PEYKOVA Maria/ CHOUDHURY Tathagata and others, "Energy Transit: Intergovernmental Agreements on Oil and Gas Transit Pipelines", Renewable Energy L &Pol'y Rev, vol.6, 2, 2015, pages. 122-162.
16. LEAL-ARCAS Rafael, Energy Transit Activities: Collection of Intergovernmental Agreements on Oil and Gas Transit Pipelines and Commentary, Energy Charter Secretariat, 583 pages, 2015.
17. LEAL-ARCAS Rafael/ GRASSO Costantino/ RIOS Juan Alemany, Energy Security, Trade and the EU: Regional and International Perspectives, Edward Elgar, 488 pages, 2016.
18. LOTT Alexander, "Marine Environmental Protection and Transboundary Pipeline Projects:A Case Study of the Nord Stream Pipeline", Merkourios-Utrecht J Int'l & EurL, vol.27, 73, 2011, pages. 55-67.
19. METE Gokce, "TurkStream Pipeline Project: An Analysis of Legal, Financial and Technical Aspects", European Centre for Energy and Resource Security ‘Reflections’ Working Paper Series, vol.3, 2017, pages. 36-46.
20. ROBERTS John, The Impact of Turkish Stream on European Energy Security and the Southern Gas Corridor, Atlantic Council, 2015.
21. STERN Jonathan/ PIRANI Simon/ YAFIMAVA Katja, “Does the cancellation of South Stream signal a fundamental reorientation of Russian gas export policy?”, The Oxford Institute For Energy Studies, 2015, (https://www.oxfordenergy.org/wpcms/wp-content/uploads/2015/01/Does-cancellation-of-South-Stream-signal-a-fundamental-reorientation-of-Russian-gas-export-policy-GPC-5.pdf?v=79cba1185463), accessed 25.03.2020.
22. STEVENS Paul, “Cross-Border Oil and Gas Pipelines: Problems and Prospects”, OGEL, vol.4, 2006, (www.ogel.org/article.asp?key=2292), accessed 25.03.2020.
23. TEKAYAK Deniz, “An Overview of Environmental Impact Assessment in Turkey: Issues and Recommendations”, Ankara Avrupa Çalışmaları Dergisi, vol.13, 2, 2014, pages.133-151.
24. VINOGRADOV Sergei, “Challenges of Nord Stream: Streamlining International Legal Frameworks and Regimes for Submarine Pipelines”, German YB Int'l L, vol.52, 2009, pages. 241-292.
25. WALDE Thomas (ed), The Energy Charter Treaty, An East-West Gateway For Investment An: An East-West Gateway for Investment and Trade, International Energy & Resources Law and Policy Series, Kluwer Law International, 1996.
26. Gazprom Information Directorate, “TurkStream gas pipeline officially launched in grand ceremony”, 8.01.2020, (https://www.gazprom.com/press/news/2020/january/article497324/), accessed 25.03.2020.
27. URS Infrastructure & Environment UK Limited, “South Stream OffshorePipeline – Turkish Sector”, Turkstream Info, 17.07.2013, (https://www.south-stream-transport.com/media/documents/pdf/en/2013/07/ssttbv_non-technicalsummary-scoping-report_57_en_20130717.pdf), accessed 25.03.2020.
28. ZUVELA Maja, “Serbia to start building TurkStream pipeline stretch in March or April” Reuters, 7.02.2019, (ttps://www.reuters.com/article/serbia-gas/serbia-to-start-building-turkstream-pipeline-stretch-in-march-or-april-idUSL5N2027BQ), accessed 25.03.2020.
29. “Third energy package” European Commission, 21.05.2019, (https://ec.europa.eu/energy/en/topics/markets-and-consumers/market-legislation/third-energy-package) , accessed 25.03.2020.
30. “Transit Protocol”, 10.04.2015, (https://www.energycharter.org/what-we-do/trade-and-transit/transit-protocol/)