Terrorism and the Political Offence Exception to Extradition The Case of Turkey

Öz

The current situation in Turkey shows that like many other countries, Turkey suffers from a lack of support and sensitivity in the extradition of terrorist suspects. To explain that, in practice, treaties which include a political offence exception protect against the extradition of suspected political criminals of all types, including terrorists; and that restricts the effectiveness of the law in fighting terrorism. Extradition of terrorist suspects also suffers from some serious weaknesses in the form of international arguments. As a result of the lack of agreement and the absence of consistent rules to manage the extradition procedure, this results in intricate negotiations between states. On this foundation, this study examines the extradition process operating through resolutions, cases, and multilateral counter-terrorism. This paper will commence with an introduction containing its main argument, and will then proceed to set this within the appropriate legal context.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• terrorism
• extradition
• political offence exception
• state sovereignty
• extradition cases

Teröristlerin İadesi Davalarında Politik Suç İstisnası Sorunsalı ve Türkiye’nin Durumu

Öz

Türkiye’deki son durum, birçok devlet gibi Türkiye’nin de teröristlerin iadesi konusunda sorun yaşadığını ve diğer devletler tarafından yeterince desteklenmediğini göstermektedir. Teröristlerin iadesine ilişkin sözleşmelerin birçoğu, terör suçlularının iadesine yönelik politik suç istinası getirmektedir. Bu yöndeki düzenlemeler terörle mücadeleye birçok açıdan engel teşkil etmektedir. Teröristlerin iadesi davaları, bu alanda düzenlenen uluslararası sözleşmelerin zayıflığından dolayı da çıkmaza girmektedir ve uzamaktadır. Başka bir deyişle, uluslararası düzenlemelerin eksikliği ve tutarsızlığı, iade talep eden ve talep edilen devlet arasındaki iade sürecini karmaşıklaştırmaktadır. Bu çalışma, teröristlerin iadesi konusunu, Birleşmiş Milletler Güvenlik Konseyi kararları, Türkiye’nin iç hukuku ve uluslararası sözleşmeler ışığında inceleyecektir. Giriş bölümünde teröristlerin iadesi davaları ile ilgili ana sorunlar sunulduktan sonra, ulusal ve uluslararası yasal düzenlemeler altında ayrıntılı bir analiz yapılacaktır. 

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Terör
• teröristlerin iadesi
• politik suç istisnası
• devlet egemenliği
• iade davaları

Kaynakça

1. Aktan, G. (2002). "The European Parliament and Turkey.” New Trends in Turkish Foreign Affairs: Bridges and Boundaries. Lincoln: Writers Club Press.
2. Aktan, G. (2002). "The European Parliament and Turkey.” New Trends in Turkish Foreign Affairs: Bridges and Boundaries. Lincoln: Writers Club Press.
3. Banoff, B. A. and Pyle, C. H. (1983). "To Surrender Political Offenders: The Political Offense Exception to Extradition in United States Law." NYUJ International Law & Policy, 16(2): 169-210.
4. Banoff, B. A. and Pyle, C. H. (1983). "To Surrender Political Offenders: The Political Offense Exception to Extradition in United States Law." NYUJ International Law & Policy, 16(2): 169-210.
5. Baydemir, B. (2011). “The Political Offense Exception to Extradition, the Case of Fehriye Erdal.” Saarbrücken: Lap Lambert Academic Publishing.
6. Baydemir, B. (2011). “The Political Offense Exception to Extradition, the Case of Fehriye Erdal.” Saarbrücken: Lap Lambert Academic Publishing.
7. Bayraktar, K. (1982). Siyasal Suç, İstanbul: İstanbul Universitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Yayınları.
8. Bayraktar, K. (1982). Siyasal Suç, İstanbul: İstanbul Universitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Yayınları.

9. Begorre-Bret, C. (2005). "Definition of Terrorism and the Challenge of Relativism." Cardozo Law Review, 27(5): 1987-2004.
10. Begorre-Bret, C. (2005). "Definition of Terrorism and the Challenge of Relativism." Cardozo Law Review, 27(5): 1987-2004.
11. Blakesley, C. L. (1986). "The Evisceration of the Political Offense Exception to Extradition." Denver Journal of International Law & Policy, 15(1): 109-124.
12. Blakesley, C. L. (1986). "The Evisceration of the Political Offense Exception to Extradition." Denver Journal of International Law & Policy, 15(1): 109-124.
13. Carberry, J. A. (1998). "Terrorism: A global phenomenon mandating a unified international response." Indiana Journal Global Legal Study, 6(2): 685-721.
14. Carberry, J. A. (1998). "Terrorism: A global phenomenon mandating a unified international response." Indiana Journal Global Legal Study, 6(2): 685-721.
15. Cervasio, C. E. (1999). "Extradition and the International Criminal Court: The Future of the Political Offense Doctrine." Pace International Law Review, 11(2): 419-446.
16. Cervasio, C. E. (1999). "Extradition and the International Criminal Court: The Future of the Political Offense Doctrine." Pace International Law Review, 11(2): 419-446.
17. Chiappetta, H. (2001). "Rome, 11/15/1998: Extradition or Political Asylum for the Kurdistan Workers Party's Leader Abdullah Ocalan." Pace International Law Review, 13(1): 117-150.
18. Chiappetta, H. (2001). "Rome, 11/15/1998: Extradition or Political Asylum for the Kurdistan Workers Party's Leader Abdullah Ocalan." Pace International Law Review, 13(1): 117-150.
19. Costello, D. (1975). "International Terrorism and the Development of the Principle aut dedere aut judicare." Journal of International Law & Economics, 10(2-3): 483-502.
20. Costello, D. (1975). "International Terrorism and the Development of the Principle aut dedere aut judicare." Journal of International Law & Economics, 10(2-3): 483-502.
21. Deere, L. L. (1933). "Political Offenses in the Law and Practice of Extradition." American Journal of International Law, 27(2): 247-270.
22. Deere, L. L. (1933). "Political Offenses in the Law and Practice of Extradition." American Journal of International Law, 27(2): 247-270.
23. Devrim, A. (2003) "Terör Eylemlerinin Siyasal Suç Açısından Değerlendirilmesi." (Evaluation of Terrorist Acts with Respect to Political Crime). 39.
24. Devrim, A. (2003) "Terör Eylemlerinin Siyasal Suç Açısından Değerlendirilmesi." (Evaluation of Terrorist Acts with Respect to Political Crime). 39.
25. Dugard, J. (1977). "International terrorism and the Just War." Stanford Journal of International Studies, 12: 21-38.
26. Dugard, J. (1977). "International terrorism and the Just War." Stanford Journal of International Studies, 12: 21-38.
27. Eagleton, C. (1957). International Law Association Meeting at Dubrovnik. Cited in Bassiouni, M. C. (1974). "Theories of Jursidiction and Their Application in Extradition Law and Practice." California Western International Law Journal, 5(1): 1-61.
28. Eagleton, C. (1957). International Law Association Meeting at Dubrovnik. Cited in Bassiouni, M. C. (1974). "Theories of Jursidiction and Their Application in Extradition Law and Practice." California Western International Law Journal, 5(1): 1-61.
29. Ercan, M. (2016). “15 Temmuz Sonrası Türkiye–Ab İlişkileri; İlişkilerin Gelecek Öngörüsü.” (Turkey-EU Relations in the Post 15 July Process: Future Preconditions on the Relations) Akademik Bakış Uluslararası Hakemli Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, (63), 14-28.
30. Ercan, M. (2016). “15 Temmuz Sonrası Türkiye–Ab İlişkileri; İlişkilerin Gelecek Öngörüsü.” (Turkey-EU Relations in the Post 15 July Process: Future Preconditions on the Relations) Akademik Bakış Uluslararası Hakemli Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, (63), 14-28.
31. Feder, L. G. (1985). "In Re Doherty: Distinguishing Terrorist Activities From Politically Motivated Acts Under the Political Offense Exception to Extradition." Temple International & Comparative Law Journal, 1(132): 99-132.
32. Feder, L. G. (1985). "In Re Doherty: Distinguishing Terrorist Activities From Politically Motivated Acts Under the Political Offense Exception to Extradition." Temple International & Comparative Law Journal, 1(132): 99-132.
33. Fish, S. (2002). "Don’t blame relativism." The Responsive Community, 12(3): 27-31.
34. Fish, S. (2002). "Don’t blame relativism." The Responsive Community, 12(3): 27-31.
35. Franck, T. M. and Lockwood, B. B., (1974). "Preliminary Thoughts Towards an International Convention on Terrorism." American Journal of International Law, 68(1): 69-90.
36. Franck, T. M. and Lockwood, B. B., (1974). "Preliminary Thoughts Towards an International Convention on Terrorism." American Journal of International Law, 68(1): 69-90.
37. Ganor, B. (2002). "Defining terrorism: Is one man's terrorist another man's freedom fighter?" Police Practice and Research, 3(4): 287-304.
38. Ganor, B. (2002). "Defining terrorism: Is one man's terrorist another man's freedom fighter?" Police Practice and Research, 3(4): 287-304.
39. Garcia-Mora, M. R. (1962). "Nature of Political Offenses: A Knotty Problem of Extradition Law." Virginia Law Review, 48(7): 1226-1257.
40. Garcia-Mora, M. R. (1962). "Nature of Political Offenses: A Knotty Problem of Extradition Law." Virginia Law Review, 48(7): 1226-1257.
41. Giles, B. (1967). "Extradition and International Law." Auckland University Law Review, 1(4): 111-129.
42. Giles, B. (1967). "Extradition and International Law." Auckland University Law Review, 1(4): 111-129.
43. Goodwin, J. (2006). "A theory of categorical terrorism." Social Forces, 84(4): 2027-2046.
44. Goodwin, J. (2006). "A theory of categorical terrorism." Social Forces, 84(4): 2027-2046.
45. Golder, B. and Williams, G. (2004). "What is' terrorism'? Problems of legal definition." University of New South Wales Law Journal, Volume. 27, No. 2, pp. 270-295.
46. Golder, B. and Williams, G. (2004). "What is' terrorism'? Problems of legal definition." University of New South Wales Law Journal, Volume. 27, No. 2, pp. 270-295.
47. Goldstone, R. J., & Simpson, J. (2003). Evaluating the role of the International Criminal Court as a legal response to terrorism. Harvard Human Rights Journal, 16, 13.
48. Goldstone, R. J., & Simpson, J. (2003). Evaluating the role of the International Criminal Court as a legal response to terrorism. Harvard Human Rights Journal, 16, 13.
49. Greenwood, C. (2002). "International law and the ‘war against terrorism’." International Affairs, 78(2): 301-317.
50. Greenwood, C. (2002). "International law and the ‘war against terrorism’." International Affairs, 78(2): 301-317.
51. Griset, P. L. and Mahan, S. (2003). Terrorism in perspective, California: Sage Publications, Inc.
52. Griset, P. L. and Mahan, S. (2003). Terrorism in perspective, California: Sage Publications, Inc.
53. Guillaume, G. (2004). "Terrorism and international law." International and Comparative Law Quarterly, 53(03): 537-548.
54. Guillaume, G. (2004). "Terrorism and international law." International and Comparative Law Quarterly, 53(03): 537-548.
55. Gürbuz, U. (Ed.). (2013). Future Trends and New Approaches in Defeating the Terrorism Threat (Vol. 111). IOS Press.
56. Gürbuz, U. (Ed.). (2013). Future Trends and New Approaches in Defeating the Terrorism Threat (Vol. 111). IOS Press.
57. Hafizogullari, Z. (2008). Türk Ceza Hukuku Genel Hükümler, Ankara: US-A Yayincilik (“General Provisions of Turkish Criminal Law”. Ankara: USA publishing.)
58. Hafizogullari, Z. (2008). Türk Ceza Hukuku Genel Hükümler, Ankara: US-A Yayincilik (“General Provisions of Turkish Criminal Law”. Ankara: USA publishing.)
59. Haluk, Ç. (1998). Siyasal Suçların 3005 Sayılı Kanuna Göre Yargılanabilmeleri Sorunu. Türkiye Barolar Birliği Dergisi. (The Problem of Prosecution of Political Offences Under The Act of 3005).
60. Haluk, Ç. (1998). Siyasal Suçların 3005 Sayılı Kanuna Göre Yargılanabilmeleri Sorunu. Türkiye Barolar Birliği Dergisi. (The Problem of Prosecution of Political Offences Under The Act of 3005).
61. Hannay, W. M. (1979). "International Terrorism and the Political Offense Exception to Extradition." Columbia Journal of Transnational Law, 18(3): 381-412.
62. Hannay, W. M. (1979). "International Terrorism and the Political Offense Exception to Extradition." Columbia Journal of Transnational Law, 18(3): 381-412.
63. Hassan, Ü. (1943). “Siyasi Suç Kavramı.” Ankara Üniversitesi SBF Dergisi, 26(01). (“The Concept of Political Offence”)
64. Hassan, Ü. (1943). “Siyasi Suç Kavramı.” Ankara Üniversitesi SBF Dergisi, 26(01). (“The Concept of Political Offence”)
65. Haywood, R. and French, J. (2009). "Potential Roles for Nonstate Actors and Nonterritorial Sovereign Organizations in Reducing Armed Violence." One Earth Future Foundation White Paper.
66. Haywood, R. and French, J. (2009). "Potential Roles for Nonstate Actors and Nonterritorial Sovereign Organizations in Reducing Armed Violence." One Earth Future Foundation White Paper.
67. Higgins, R. (1972). "The Advisory Opinion on Namibia: Which UN Resolutions Are Binding under Article 25 of the Charter?" International and Comparative Law Quarterly, 21(02): 270-286.
68. Higgins, R. (1972). "The Advisory Opinion on Namibia: Which UN Resolutions Are Binding under Article 25 of the Charter?" International and Comparative Law Quarterly, 21(02): 270-286.
69. Howard, M. (2002). "What's in a name? How to fight terrorism." Foreign Affairs, 8-13.
70. Howard, M. (2002). "What's in a name? How to fight terrorism." Foreign Affairs, 8-13.
71. Jayasuriya, K. (1999). "Globalization, law, and the transformation of sovereignty: the emergence of global regulatory governance." Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies, 6(2): 425-455.
72. Jayasuriya, K. (1999). "Globalization, law, and the transformation of sovereignty: the emergence of global regulatory governance." Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies, 6(2): 425-455.
73. Jenkins, B. M. (2006). "The new age of terrorism." Terrorism and Political Islam 25.
74. Jenkins, B. M. (2006). "The new age of terrorism." Terrorism and Political Islam 25.
75. Joutsen, M. (2002). "International Cooperation against Transnational Organized Crime: Extradition And Mutual Legal Assistance In Criminal Matters." Annual Report for 2000 And Resource Material Series No. 59: 364.
76. Joutsen, M. (2002). "International Cooperation against Transnational Organized Crime: Extradition And Mutual Legal Assistance In Criminal Matters." Annual Report for 2000 And Resource Material Series No. 59: 364.
77. Joyner, C. C. and Rothbaum, W. P. (1992). "Libya and the aerial incident at Lockerbie: what lessons for international extradition law." Michigan Journal of International Law, 14(2): 222-261.
78. Joyner, C. C. and Rothbaum, W. P. (1992). "Libya and the aerial incident at Lockerbie: what lessons for international extradition law." Michigan Journal of International Law, 14(2): 222-261.
79. Joyner, C. C. (2002). "International Extradition and Global Terrorism: Bringing International Criminals to Justice." Loyola Los Angeles International & Comparative Law Review, 25(3): 493-542.
80. Joyner, C. C. (2002). "International Extradition and Global Terrorism: Bringing International Criminals to Justice." Loyola Los Angeles International & Comparative Law Review, 25(3): 493-542.
81. Kedikli, U. (2006). "Avrupa Birligi'nin Terörizmle Mucadele Politikalari ve Hukuki Boyutu." Review International Law & Politics, 2: 54. (“United Nations Policy to Fight Against Terrorism and Legal Status”).
82. Kedikli, U. (2006). "Avrupa Birligi'nin Terörizmle Mucadele Politikalari ve Hukuki Boyutu." Review International Law & Politics, 2: 54. (“United Nations Policy to Fight Against Terrorism and Legal Status”).
83. Kenneth Watkin, O. M. M. (2016). “Fighting at the Legal Boundaries: Controlling the Use of Force in Contemporary Conflict.” Oxford University Press.
84. Kenneth Watkin, O. M. M. (2016). “Fighting at the Legal Boundaries: Controlling the Use of Force in Contemporary Conflict.” Oxford University Press.
85. Kelly, M. J. (2003). “Cheating Justice by Cheating Death: The Doctrinal Collision For Prosecuting Foreign Terrorists - Passage Of Aut-dedere Aut-judicare Into Customary Law & Refusal to Extradite based on The Death Penalty” 20 Arizona Journal of International Law & Comperative Law.
86. Kelly, M. J. (2003). “Cheating Justice by Cheating Death: The Doctrinal Collision For Prosecuting Foreign Terrorists - Passage Of Aut-dedere Aut-judicare Into Customary Law & Refusal to Extradite based on The Death Penalty” 20 Arizona Journal of International Law & Comperative Law.
87. Kinneally III, J. J. (1987). "The Political Offense Exception: Is the United States-United Kingdom Supplementary Extraditon Treaty the Beginning of the End?" American University International Law Review, 2(1): 4.
88. Kinneally III, J. J. (1987). "The Political Offense Exception: Is the United States-United Kingdom Supplementary Extraditon Treaty the Beginning of the End?" American University International Law Review, 2(1): 4.
89. Köprülü, T. (2005). “Yeni Türk Ceza Kanunu Bakımından Suçluların ve Sanıkların Geri Verilmesi” Hukuki Perspektifler Dergisi, sayı:4, s.221-229. ('Evaluating Extradition in the Light of New Turkish Criminal Code', Legal Perspectives Journal.
90. Köprülü, T. (2005). “Yeni Türk Ceza Kanunu Bakımından Suçluların ve Sanıkların Geri Verilmesi” Hukuki Perspektifler Dergisi, sayı:4, s.221-229. ('Evaluating Extradition in the Light of New Turkish Criminal Code', Legal Perspectives Journal.
91. Larschan, B. (1986). "Extradition, The Political Offense Exception and Terrorism: An Overview of the Three Principal Theories of Law." Boston University International Law of Journal, 4(2): 231-284.
92. Larschan, B. (1986). "Extradition, The Political Offense Exception and Terrorism: An Overview of the Three Principal Theories of Law." Boston University International Law of Journal, 4(2): 231-284.
93. Levitt, K. E. (1991). "International Extradition, the Principle of Speciality, and Effective Treaty Enforcement." Minnesota Law Review, 76(4): 1017-1040.
94. Levitt, K. E. (1991). "International Extradition, the Principle of Speciality, and Effective Treaty Enforcement." Minnesota Law Review, 76(4): 1017-1040.
95. Lubet, S. (1982). "Extradition Reform: Executive Discretion and Judicial Participation in the Extradition of Political Terrorists." Cornell International Law of Journal, 15(2): 247- 292.
96. Lubet, S. (1982). "Extradition Reform: Executive Discretion and Judicial Participation in the Extradition of Political Terrorists." Cornell International Law of Journal, 15(2): 247- 292.
97. Magnuson, W. (2012). "The Domestic Politics of International Extradition." Virginia Journal of International Law, 52: 839-995.
98. Magnuson, W. (2012). "The Domestic Politics of International Extradition." Virginia Journal of International Law, 52: 839-995.
99. Noteboom, A. J. (2002). "Terrorism: I Know It When I See It." Oregon Law Review, 81(2): 553-586.
100. Noteboom, A. J. (2002). "Terrorism: I Know It When I See It." Oregon Law Review, 81(2): 553-586.
101. Özbudun, E. (2007). "Democratization reforms in Turkey, 1993–2004." Turkish Studies, 8(2): 179-196.
102. Özbudun, E. (2007). "Democratization reforms in Turkey, 1993–2004." Turkish Studies, 8(2): 179-196.
103. Perrez, F. X. (1996). "The Relationship between Permanent Sovereignty and the Obligation Not to Cause Transboundary Environmental Damage" Environmental Law, 26(4): 1187-1212.
104. Perrez, F. X. (1996). "The Relationship between Permanent Sovereignty and the Obligation Not to Cause Transboundary Environmental Damage" Environmental Law, 26(4): 1187-1212.
105. Petersen, A. C. (1991). "Extradition and the political offense exception in the suppression of terrorism." Indiana Law Journal, 67(3): 767-796.
106. Petersen, A. C. (1991). "Extradition and the political offense exception in the suppression of terrorism." Indiana Law Journal, 67(3): 767-796.
107. Phillips, R. S. (1996). "The Political Offence Exception and Terrorism: Its Place in the Current Extradition Scheme and Proposals for Its Future" Dickinson Journal of International Law, 15(2): 337-360.
108. Phillips, R. S. (1996). "The Political Offence Exception and Terrorism: Its Place in the Current Extradition Scheme and Proposals for Its Future" Dickinson Journal of International Law, 15(2): 337-360.
109. Polat, D. Ş. (2017). “Uluslararası Terörizmle Mücadele Yaklaşımları.” Ankara Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 6(1).
110. Polat, D. Ş. (2017). “Uluslararası Terörizmle Mücadele Yaklaşımları.” Ankara Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 6(1).
111. Plachta, M. (2003). "European Arrest Warrant: revolution in extradition" European Journal Crime Criminal Law & Criminal Justice, 11(2): 178-194.
112. Plachta, M. (2003). "European Arrest Warrant: revolution in extradition" European Journal Crime Criminal Law & Criminal Justice, 11(2): 178-194.
113. Rachovitsa, A. (2016). On the Sidelines of the Failed Coup d’État in Turkey: Can Greece Extradite the Eight Turkish Military Officers to Turkey?. European Human Rights Law Review, 6: 645-655.
114. Rachovitsa, A. (2016). On the Sidelines of the Failed Coup d’État in Turkey: Can Greece Extradite the Eight Turkish Military Officers to Turkey?. European Human Rights Law Review, 6: 645-655.
115. Rosand, E. (2003). "Security council resolution 1373, the counter-terrorism committee, and the fight against terrorism." The American Journal of International Law, 97(2): 333- 341.
116. Rosand, E. (2003). "Security council resolution 1373, the counter-terrorism committee, and the fight against terrorism." The American Journal of International Law, 97(2): 333- 341.
117. Rubin, A. P. (1987). "Extradition and “terrorist” offenses." Studies in Conflict & Terrorism, 10(2): 83-102.
118. Rubin, A. P. (1987). "Extradition and “terrorist” offenses." Studies in Conflict & Terrorism, 10(2): 83-102.
119. Rumelili, B., & Boşnak, B. (2015). “8 Taking stock of the Europeanization of civil society in Turkey. The Europeanization of Turkey: Polity and Politics, 127.”
120. Rumelili, B., & Boşnak, B. (2015). “8 Taking stock of the Europeanization of civil society in Turkey. The Europeanization of Turkey: Polity and Politics, 127.”
121. Sapiro, M. E. (1986). "Extradition in an era of Terrorism: the Need to Abolish the Political Offense Exception." NYUL Review. 61(4): 654-702.
122. Sapiro, M. E. (1986). "Extradition in an era of Terrorism: the Need to Abolish the Political Offense Exception." NYUL Review. 61(4): 654-702.
123. Saul, B. (2006). "Defining terrorism in international law." New York: Oxford University Press Inc.
124. Saul, B. (2006). "Defining terrorism in international law." New York: Oxford University Press Inc.
125. Schmid, A. P. (1992). "The response problem as a definition problem." Terrorism and Political Violence, 4(4): 7-13.
126. Schmid, A. P. (1992). "The response problem as a definition problem." Terrorism and Political Violence, 4(4): 7-13.
127. Schmid, A. (2004). "Terrorism-the definitional problem." Case Western Reserve Journal of International Law, 36(2-3): 375-420.
128. Schmid, A. (2004). "Terrorism-the definitional problem." Case Western Reserve Journal of International Law, 36(2-3): 375-420.
129. Schmid, A. P. (2012). "The Revised Academic Consensus Definition of Terrorism." Perspectives on Terrorism, 6(2): 158-159.
130. Schmid, A. P. (2012). "The Revised Academic Consensus Definition of Terrorism." Perspectives on Terrorism, 6(2): 158-159.
131. Sloan, F. B. (1948). "Binding Force of a Recommendation of the General Assembly of the United Nations." British Yearbook International Law, 25: 1-33.
132. Sloan, F. B. (1948). "Binding Force of a Recommendation of the General Assembly of the United Nations." British Yearbook International Law, 25: 1-33.
133. Sofaer, A. D. (1986). "The Political Offense Exception and Terrorism." Denver Journal of International Law & Policy, 15(1): 125-134.
134. Sofaer, A. D. (1986). "The Political Offense Exception and Terrorism." Denver Journal of International Law & Policy, 15(1): 125-134.
135. Starke, J. G. (1965). The ANZUS treaty alliance. Melbourne University Press. (Cited in Giles, B. (1967). "Extradition and International Law." Auckland University Law Review, 1(4): 111-129.
136. Starke, J. G. (1965). The ANZUS treaty alliance. Melbourne University Press. (Cited in Giles, B. (1967). "Extradition and International Law." Auckland University Law Review, 1(4): 111-129.
137. Ulutaş, A. (2012). “Avrupa İnsan Hakları Sözleşmesi Işığında Suçluların Geri Verilmesi.” (Extradition in the Light of European Convention on Human Rights) Türkiye Barolar Birliği Yayınları.
138. Ulutaş, A. (2012). “Avrupa İnsan Hakları Sözleşmesi Işığında Suçluların Geri Verilmesi.” (Extradition in the Light of European Convention on Human Rights) Türkiye Barolar Birliği Yayınları.
139. Williams, S. A. (1991). "Double Criminality Rule and Extradition: A Comparative Analysis." Nova Law Review, 15(2): 581-624.
140. Williams, S. A. (1991). "Double Criminality Rule and Extradition: A Comparative Analysis." Nova Law Review, 15(2): 581-624.
141. Yücel, H. (2018). Untangling The Extradition Case of Feto, SETA: Foundation for Political, Economic and Social Research. Anglo-Norwegian Fisheries case, (United Kingdom v. Norway), ICJ Reports, 1951. Danıştay Idari Dava Daireleri Kurulu, Esas No:2006/2824, Karar No:2007/115, Karar Tarihi:22.02.2007 (Turkish Plenary Session of Administrative Law Division, Docket No. 2006/2824, Decree No. 2007/115, Date: 22 February 2007). Available from: http://www.kararara.com/danistay/iddk/danistay6450.htm (Accessed date: 21.06.2012).
142. Yücel, H. (2018). Untangling The Extradition Case of Feto, SETA: Foundation for Political, Economic and Social Research. Anglo-Norwegian Fisheries case, (United Kingdom v. Norway), ICJ Reports, 1951. Danıştay Idari Dava Daireleri Kurulu, Esas No:2006/2824, Karar No:2007/115, Karar Tarihi:22.02.2007 (Turkish Plenary Session of Administrative Law Division, Docket No. 2006/2824, Decree No. 2007/115, Date: 22 February 2007). Available from: http://www.kararara.com/danistay/iddk/danistay6450.htm (Accessed date: 21.06.2012).
143. European Court of Human Rights, Güzelyurtlu And Others V. Cyprus and Turkey – Judgment, Application no. 36925/07, 29 January 2019.
144. European Court of Human Rights, Güzelyurtlu And Others V. Cyprus and Turkey – Judgment, Application no. 36925/07, 29 January 2019.
145. European Court of Human Rights, Case Of Batyrkhaırov V. Turkey- Judgement, Application no. 69929/12, 5 June 2018.
146. European Court of Human Rights, Case Of Batyrkhaırov V. Turkey- Judgement, Application no. 69929/12, 5 June 2018.
147. European Court of Human Rights, Case Of Batyrkhaırov V. Turkey- Judgement, Application no. 69929/12, 5 June 2018.
148. European Court of Human Rights, Case Of Batyrkhaırov V. Turkey- Judgement, Application no. 69929/12, 5 June 2018.
149. European Court of Human Rights, Case Of Parmak and Bakır V. Turkey – Judgement, Applications nos. 22429/07 and 25195/07, 3 December 2019.
150. European Court of Human Rights, Case Of Parmak and Bakır V. Turkey – Judgement, Applications nos. 22429/07 and 25195/07, 3 December 2019.
151. European Court of Human Rights, Case of Öcalan V. Turkey, Application no. 46221/99, 12 May 2005.
152. European Court of Human Rights, Case of Öcalan V. Turkey, Application no. 46221/99, 12 May 2005.
153. Yargitay 6. Ceza Dairesi, Esas No.2006/8782, Karar No. 2007/8971, Karar Tarihi: 12/07/2007 (Penal Department No. 6 of the Supreme Court, Docket No. 2006/8782, Decree No. 2007/8971, Decision Date: 12 July 2007). Available from: http://www.hukukturk.com/fractal/hukukTurk/pages/find_n.jsp?pLayerOk=1&pObjectId= 509&pViewId=483&pMainCategoryId=Yargitay&pMevzuatId=6407&pMaddeId=%23M adde_18_ (Accessed date: 01.07.2012).
154. Yargitay 6. Ceza Dairesi, Esas No.2006/8782, Karar No. 2007/8971, Karar Tarihi: 12/07/2007 (Penal Department No. 6 of the Supreme Court, Docket No. 2006/8782, Decree No. 2007/8971, Decision Date: 12 July 2007). Available from: http://www.hukukturk.com/fractal/hukukTurk/pages/find_n.jsp?pLayerOk=1&pObjectId= 509&pViewId=483&pMainCategoryId=Yargitay&pMevzuatId=6407&pMaddeId=%23M adde_18_ (Accessed date: 01.07.2012).
155. Turkish Constitutional Court, Application of W.S., Case No:2016\5687, 25.10.2017.
156. Turkish Constitutional Court, Application of W.S., Case No:2016\5687, 25.10.2017.