AVRUPA İNSAN HAKLARI SÖZLEŞMESİ KORUMA MEKANİZMASINDA REFORM: 14. Protokol Mahkemenin İş Yükü Derdine Deva Olur mu?

Yıl 2005, Cilt: 54 Sayı: 2, 319 - 345, 01.03.2005

Ali Rıza Çoban

https://doi.org/10.1501/Hukfak_0000000402

Anahtar Kelimeler

--

(Reforming the Control Mechanism of the European Convention on Human Rights: Will Protocol No:14 be a Remedy for the Workload Problem of the European Court of Human Rights?)

Anahtar Kelimeler

-

Kaynakça

• Council of Europe, Explanatory Report to the CETS 194 (Protocol No.14 to the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, amending the control system of the Convention)
• Council of Europe, Committee of Ministers, Decleration on the protection of Human Rights in Europe −Guaranteeing the long−term effectiveness of the European Court of Human Rights, 8 November 2001
• Council of Europe, Committee of Ministers, Decleration on the Court of Human Rights for Europe, 7 November 2002
• Council of Europe, Committee of Ministers, Decleration Guaranteeing the long−term effectiveness of the European Court of Human Rights, 15 May 2003
• Council of Europe, Committee of Ministers, Decleration Ensuring the effectiveness of the implementation of the European Convention on Human Rights at national and European levels, 13 May 2004-09-13
• Council of Europe, Committee of Ministers, Recommendation of the Committee of Ministers on the re−examination or reopening of certain cases at domestic level following judgments of the European Court of Human Rights, 19 January 2000) (Recommendation No. R(2000)2
• Council of Europe, Committee of Ministers, Recommendation of the Committee of Ministers on the publication and dissemination in the member states of the text of the European Convention on Human Rights and of the case-law of the European Court of Human Rights, Recommendation No. (Rec(2002)13)
• Council of Europe, Committee of Ministers, Recommendation of the Committee of Ministers to member states on the European Convention on Human Rights in university education and professional training , 12 May 2004, (Rec(2004)4)
• Council of Europe, Committee of Ministers, Recommendation of the Committee of Ministers to member states on the verification of the compatibility of draft laws, existing laws and administrative practice with the standards laid down in the European Convention on Human Rights, 12 May 2004, (Rec(2004)5)
• Council of Europe, Committee of Ministers, Recommendation of the Committee of Ministers to member states on the improvement of domestic remedies , 12 May 2004, (Rec(2004)6)
• Dembour, Marie−Benedicte (2002) ‘‘Finishing off’ Cases:The Radical Solution to the Problem of the Expanding ECTHR Caseload’’ European Human Rights Law Review, 5, 604−623
• European Court of Human Rights, Survey of Activities 2003 (http://www.echr.coe.int/Eng/EDocs/2003SURVEYCOURT.pdf)
• Evaluation Group, Report of the Evaluation Group to the Committee of Ministers on the European Court of Human Rights, (EG Court(2001)1) 27 September 2001
• Steering Committee for Human Rights (CDDH), Reflection Group on the Reinforcement of the Human rights Protection Mechanism (CDDH−GDR), Activity Report, (CDDH−GDR(2001)010), 15 June 2001
• Steering Committee for Human Rights (CDDH), Interim Report of the CDDH to the Committee of Ministers ‘Guaranteeing the long−term effectiveness of the European Court of Human Rights’, (CM(2002)146), 18 October 2002
• Steering Committee for Human Rights (CDDH), Final Report containing proposals of the CDDH ‘Guaranteeing the long−term effectiveness of the European Court of Human Rights’, (CM(2003)55), 8 April 2003
• Steering Committee for Human Rights (CDDH), Interim Activity Report ‘Guaranteeing the long−term effectiveness of the European Court of Human Rights’− Implementation of the Decleration adopted by the Committee of Ministers at its 122th session, (CDDH(2003)026 Addendum I Final), 26 November 2003
• Steering Committee for Human Rights (CDDH), Final Activity Report of the CDDH to the Committee of Ministers ‘Guaranteeing the long−term effectiveness of the European Court of Human Rights’, (CM(2004)65), 8 April 2004