Hukukbilime Küresel Bir Bakış: William Twining

Yıl 2022, Cilt: 71 Sayı: 3, 1317 - 1335, 20.10.2022

Nadire Özdemir

https://doi.org/10.33629/auhfd.1150272

Öz

Bu çalışma anaakım hukuk felsefesi literatüründen ayrılan görüşlere sahip William Twining’in küresel hukuk yaklaşımını betimleyici bir şekilde tanıtmayı amaçlamaktadır. Çok mercekli, eleştirel, bağlamsal ve olguya dayalı bir bakış açısını temel alan Twining, küreselleşmenin ortaya çıkardığı sorunları ele almak üzere hukuk biliminin nasıl bir çerçeve sunması gerektiğini tartışmaktadır. Söz konusu çerçeve, 21. yüzyılın kendine özgü sorunlarıyla şekillenen hukuki meselelere çözüm sunmak açısından önem arz etmektedir. Çalışma Twining’in yaklaşımına ilişkin ana hatları çizmeyi amaçlamakta olup bu doğrultuda yazarın üzerinde durduğu temel kavram ve esaslar ele alınacaktır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

William Twining,, küresel hukuk, hukuk felsefesi, hukuk bilimi, kozmopolit hukuk

A Global View of Jurisprudence: William Twining

Öz

This study aims to introduce William Twining's global view of law,
which is shaped through the criticisms of the mainstream legal philosophy.
Based on a multi-lensed, critical, contextual, and empirical perspective,
Twining discusses what kind of framework should jurisprudence offer to
address the problems posed by globalization. This framework is also
important in terms of providing solutions to the legal problems shaped by the
characteristics of the 21st century. The study aims to highlight the main points
of Twining's approach, in this regard, the basic concepts and principles
emphasized by the author will be discussed. In this direction, the author's
concern to explain where he stands and evaluates, his criticisms of mainstream
jurisprudence, and the outlines of the global jurisprudence approach he put
forward in line with these criticisms will be discussed. The term "standpoint",
which Twining uses to emphasize that the researcher's background and
position shapes his perspective on the subject he researches, and the term
"travel well", which he uses for the meaningful replacement of (legal)
concepts between different legal cultures, will be discussed within the scope
of the subject. 

Anahtar Kelimeler

William Twining, global law, jurisprudence, legal philosophy, cosmopolitan law.

Kaynakça

• Fehmiye Ceren Akçabay, “Feminist Hukuk Metodolojisi: Hukuk Uygulaması, Feminizm ve Politika”, Hukuk ve Toplumsal Cinsiyet Çalışmaları içinde, Ed. G. Uygur/N. Özdemir, Ankara: Seçkin, 2022: 17-56.
• Sururi Aktaş, “Hukuk Kavramının Analizi”, Ankara Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi, 67 (2) 2018: 227-252.
• Sas Ansari, "Globalisation and Legal Scholarship: William Twining's Call for Revolutionary Jurisprudence," Transnational Legal Theory 4, no. 4 (2013): 660-685.
• Manuel Atienza and Raymundo Gama, “An intellectual journey with William Twining: an interview”, Law’s Ethical, Global and Theoretical Contexts, Essays in Honour of William Twining içinde, Edited by U. Baxi, C. McCrudden and A. Paliwala, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2015: 1-17.
• Roger Cotterrell, Hukukbiliminin Politikası: Hukuk Felsefesine Eleştirel Bir Giriş, Çev. Saim Üye, İstanbul: Pinhan Yayıncılık, 2018.
• DJ Galligan, "Concepts the Currency of Social Understanding of Law: A Review Essay on the Later Work of William, Twining," Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 35, no. 2 (Summer 2015): 373-402.
• Furkan Kararmaz, Dilara Buket Tatar, “Dünyanın Hukuk Kuramı”, Hukuk Kuramı, C. 3, S. 2, Mart-Nisan 2016: 20-42.
• “Standpoint theory”, https://www.britannica.com/topic/standpoint-theory, (Erişim tarihi: 8.6.2022).
• “Travel well” [https://www.collinsdictionary.com/dictionary/english/travel-well (Erişim tarihi: 15.06.2022)].
• William Twining, "Have Concepts, Will Travel: Analytical Jurisprudence in a Global Context," International Journal of Law in Context 1, no. 1 (March 2005): 5-40.
• William Twining, "Human Rights: Southern Voices - Francis Deng, Abdullahi An-Na'im, Yash Ghai, Upendra Baxi," Review of Constitutional Studies 11, no. 2 (2006): 203-280.
• William Twining, General Jurisprudence: Understanding Law from a Global Perspective, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009.
• Wiliam Twining; David Miers, How to Do Things with Rules, New York: Cambridge University Press, 2010.
• William Twining, “Normative and Legal Pluralism: A Global Perspective”, Duke Journal of Comparative & International Law, Vol 20, 2010: 473-517.
• William Twining, "Responding to Globalization," Osgoode Hall Law Journal 49, no. 2 (2011): 353-374.
• William Twining, Jurist in Context: A Memoir, New York: Cambridge University Press, 2019.
• Maria Panezi, "Mapping the Territory: Contextual Jurisprudence, Legal Pluralism and WTO Law and Development: A Response to William Twining's Internal Critique Thesis from the Point of Transnational Jurisprudence," Transnational Legal Theory 4, no. 4 (2013): 574-606.
• Dennis Patterson, "Twining's Complaint," University of Miami International & Comparative Law Review 15, no. 1 (2007): 61-68.
• Sol Picciotto, "Review Essay", International Journal of Law in Context 1, no. 4 (December 2005): 427-434.
• Walter Probert, "Twining on Legal Theory," Law and Society Review 21, no. 5 (1988): 849-852.
• Peter Tillers, "Introduction of William Twining," Seton Hall Law Review 38, no. 3 (2008): 871-878.
• Basil Ugochukwu, "From Reaction to Agency: A Subaltern Response to William Twining's Globalisation and Legal Scholarship," Transnational Legal Theory 4, no. 4 (2013): 549-565.
• Peer Zumbansen, "Why Global Law Is Transnational; Remarks on the Symposium around William Twining's Montesquieu Lecture" Transnational Legal Theory 4, no. 4 (2013): 463-475.
• Peer Zumbansen, “Theorizing as activity: transnational legal theory in context”, Law’s Ethical, Global and Theoretical Contexts: Essays in Honour of William Twining içinde, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2015: 280-302.