An Alternative Model for Islamic Religious Education: Critical Religious Education

Öz

Approach Critical Religious Education has been developed by Andrew Wright in the UK. According to this approach, religious education should aim at pursuing ‘truth’ and cultivating ‘truthfulness’. Critical Religious Education is grounded on the three premises of the Philosophy of Critical Realism: ontological realism, epistemic relativism and judgemental rationality. Furthermore, this approach adopts the Variation Theory as a learning theory. In Critical Religious Education, the primary aim of religious education is to develop learners’ religious literacy by providing them with rational, critical and reflective thinking skills, thus helping them to make sense of their faith identity as well as those of other religious and secular worldviews in the modern world. Although being developed in a Western-liberal society, this approach is claimed also to be applied into confessional contexts. This article includes a literature review examining, first, the theological, philosophical and pedagogical basis of Critical Religious Education, then, its contributions to Islamic Religious Education

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Critical Religious Education, Critical Realism, Variation Theory, Truth Claims

İslam din eğitimi için alternatif bir model: eleştirel din eğitimi yaklaşımı

Öz

Eleştirel Din Eğitimi yaklaşımı Andrew Wright tarafından İngiltere’de geliştirilen pedagojik bir din eğitimi yaklaşımıdır. Bu yaklaşım fenomenolojik ve yapılandırmacı din eğitimi yaklaşımlarını eleştirerek din eğitimin temelinde ‘hakikati arama’ ve ‘hakikat üzere yaşama’ ideallerinin olması gerektiğini ileri sürer. Eleştirel Din Eğitimi, Eleştirel Realizm felsefesinin ontolojik realizm, epistemik rölativizm ve yargısal rasyonalite prensipleri üzerine temellendirilmiştir. Ayrıca bir öğrenme teorisi olarak Değişkenlik Teorisi benimsenmektedir. Din öğretiminde temel amaç, öğrencilere akılcı, eleştirel ve yansıtıcı düşünme becerileri kazandırarak onların dini okuryazarlık geliştirmeleri, böylece modern dünyada kendi inançları ve farklı dini ve seküler dünya görüşlerini anlamlandırabilmeleri olarak belirlenmiştir. Eleştirel Din Eğitiminin liberal eğitim sistemleri dışında, bir din veya mezhep odaklı din eğitimi sistemlerine de uygulanabileceği ileri sürülmektedir. Bu çalışmanın amacı Eleştirel Din Eğitimi yaklaşımının İslam Din Eğitimi’nde öğretim ve öğrenmenin geliştirilmesindeki rolünü incelemektir. Çalışma, Eleştirel Din Eğitimi’nin teolojik, felsefi ve pedagojik temellerini, sonrasında da bu yaklaşımın İslam Din Eğitimi’ne yansımalarını merkeze alan alan bir literatür araştırmasını içermektedir

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Eleştirel Din Eğitimi, Eleştirel Realizm, Değişkenlik Teorisi, Hakikat

Kaynakça

1. Barnes, L. Philip. “Developing a New Post‐liberal Paradigm for British Religious Education,” Journal of Beliefs & Values 28:1 (2007), ss.17-32.
2. Barnes, L. Philip ve Andrew Wright. “Romanticism, Representations of Religion and Critical Religious Education,” British Journal of Religious Education 28:1 (2006), ss.65-77.
3. Bhaskar, Roy. A Realist Theory of Science. Londra ve New York: Routledge, 2008.
4. Demirel, Ayse. “Improving Teaching and Learning in Islamic Religious Education via an Application of Critical Religious Education, Variation Theory and the Learning Study Model,” Yayınlanmamış doktora tezi, King’s College London, Londra, 2016.
5. Demirel Uçan, Ayşe ve Serkan Uçan, “Öğrenme ve Öğretimin Geliştirilmesinde “Öğrenme Çalışması” (Learning Study) Modeli: Bir Derleme Çalışması,” Uluslararası Eğitim Programları ve Öğretim Çalışmaları Dergisi 7:13 (2017), ss.89-110.
6. Erricker, Clive ve Jane Erricker. Reconstructing Religious, Spiritual, and Moral Education. Londra & New York: Routledge, 2000.
7. Erricker, Clive. Religious Education: A Conceptual and Interdisciplinar Approach for Secondary Level. Londra: Routledge, 2010.
8. Gearon, Liam. MasterClass in Religious Education: Transforming Teaching and Learning. New York: Bloomsbury Publishing Plc., 2013.

9. Genç, Muhammet Fatih. “Hollanda Okullarında Müslüman Çocukların Din Eğitimi ve İslam Okulları,” Atatürk Üniversitesi İlahiyat Fakültesi Dergisi 38 (2012), ss.361-377.
10. Goodman, Angela. “Critical Religious Education (CRE) in Practice: Evaluating the Reception of an Introductory Scheme of Work,” British Journal of Religi- ous Education 40:2 (2016), ss.1-10.
11. Hay, David. “Suspicion of the Spiritual: Teaching Religion in a World of Secular Experience,” British Journal of Religious Education 7:3 (1985), ss.140- 147.
12. Hella, Elina. “Developing Students’ Worldview Literacy through Variation: Peda- gogical Prospects of Critical Religious Education and the Variation Theory of Learning for Further Education,” Journal of Chaplaincy in Further Edu- cation 5:1 (2009), ss.4-11.
13. Hella, Elina ve Andrew Wright. “Learning ‘about’ and ‘from’ Religion: Phenome- nography, the Variation Theory of Learning and Religious Education in Finland and the UK,” British Journal of Religious Education 31:1 (2009), ss.53-64.
14. Ipgrave, Julia. “Including Pupils’ Faith Background in Primary Religious Educa- tion,” Support for Learning 19:3 (2004), ss.114-118.
15. İlköğretim DKAB Dersi Öğretim Programı ve Kılavuzu. Ankara: MEB Yayınları, 2007.
16. Jackson, Robert. Rethinking Religious Education and Plurality: Issues in Diversity and Pedagogy. Oxon: RoutledgeFalmer, 2004.
17. ---------. “Contextual Religious Education and the Interpretive Approach,” British Journal of Religious Education 30:1 (2008), ss.13-24.
18. Kaymakcan, Recep. “Türkiye’de Din Eğitiminde Çoğulculuk ve Yapılandırmacılık: Yeni Ortaöğretim Din Kültürü ve Ahlak Bilgisi Programı Bağlamında Bir Değerlendirme,” Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Bilimleri / Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice 7:1 (2007), ss.177-210.
19. Lo, Mun Ling. Variation Theory and the Improvement of Teaching and Learning. Göteborg: Acta Universitatis Gothoburgensis, 2012.
20. Marton, Ference ve Shirley Booth. Learning and Awareness. Mahwah, NJ: Lawren- ce Erlbaum Associates, Inc., 1997.
21. Marton, Ference, Ula Runesson ve Amy B. M. Tsui. “The Space of Learning,” Fe- rence Marton ve Amy B. M. Tsui (ed.), Classroom Discourse and the Spa- ce of Learning (Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc., 2004) içinde, ss.3-43.
22. Moore, James R. “Why Religious Education Matters: The Role of Islam in Multicul- tural Education,” Multicultural Perspectives 11:13 (2009), ss.139-145.
23. Pang, Ming Fai. “The Use of Learning Study to Enhance Teacher Professional Lear- ning in Hong Kong,” Teaching Education 17:1 (2006), ss.27-42.
24. Pang, Ming Fai ve Ference Marton. “Learning Theory as Teaching Resource: En- hancing Students’ Understanding of Economic Concepts,” Instructional Science 33:2 (2005), ss.159-191.
25. Pang, Ming Fai ve Wah Ki Wing. “Revisiting the Idea of ‘Critical Aspects’,” Scan- dinavian Journal of Educational Research 60:3 (2016), ss.323-336.
26. Panjwani, Farid. “Religion, Citizenship and Hope: Civic Virtues and Education about Muslim Traditions,” James Arthur, Ian Davies ve Carole Hahn (ed.), Handbook of Education for Citizenship and Democracy (Londra & Thou- sand Oaks: Sage, 2008) içinde, ss.292-305.
27. Teece, Geoff. “Traversing the Gap: Andrew Wright, John Hick and Critical Religi- ous Education,” British Journal of Religious Education 27:1 (2005), ss.29- 40.
28. Thobani, Shiraz. “Pedagogic Discourses and Imagined Communities: Knowing Islam and Being Muslim,” Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education 32:4 (2011), ss.531-545.
29. Wilkinson, Matthew L. “Introducing Islamic Critical Realism: A Philosophy for Underlabouring Contemporary Islam,” Journal of Critical Realism 12:4 (2013), ss.419-442.
30. ---------. A Fresh Look at Islam in a Multi-Faith World: A Philosophy for Success Through Education. Londra: Routledge, 2015.
31. Wright, Andrew. Discerning the Spirit: Teaching Spirituality in the Religious Edu- cation Classroom. Abingdon ve Oxford: Culham College Institute, 1999.
32. ---------. Spirituality and Education. Londra: RoutledgeFarmer, 2000.
33. ---------. “The Spiritual Education Project: Cultivating Spiritual and Religious Lite- racy through a Critical Pedagogy of Religious Education,” Michael Grim- mit (ed.), Pedagogies of Religious Education: Case Studies in the Research and Development of Good Pedagogical Practice in RE (Great Wakering, Essex: McCrimmons, 2000) içinde, ss.170-187.
34. ---------. Religion, Education and Post-modernity. Londra: RoutledgeFarmer, 2004.
35. ---------. Critical Religious Education, Multiculturalism and the Pursuit of Truth. Cardiff: University of Wales Press, 2007.
36. ---------. “Contextual Religious Education and the Actuality of Religions,” British Journal of Religious Education 30:1 (2008), ss.3-12.
37. ---------. “Education for Theological, Religious, and Spiritual Literacy: The Chal- lenge of Critical Realism,” Lena Roos ve Jenny Berglund (ed.), Your Heri- tage and Mine: Teaching in a Multi-Religious Classroom: Studies on Inter- Religious Relations (Uppsala: Swedish Science Press, 2008) içinde, ss.37- 52.
38. ---------. Religious Education and Critical Realism: Knowledge, Reality and Religi- ous Literacy. Oxon ve New York: Routledge, 2016.
39. Yousif, Ahmad. “Islam, Minorities and Religious Freedom: A Challenge to Modern Theory of Pluralism,” Journal of Muslim Minority Affairs 20:1 (2000), ss.29-41.