Din Sosyolojisi

Yıl 2006, , 215 - 235, 01.08.2006

İhsan Çapcıoğlu

https://doi.org/10.1501/Ilhfak_0000000051

Cited By: 1

Öz

larýn uzantýlarýnýn neler olabileceðini anlama çabasýna yönelmiþtir. Uzun bir süre boyunca, sekülerleþme ile ilgilenen sosyal bilimciler, din üzerinde düþünme konusunda tembellik etmiþlerdir. Þu anda ise, dinin toplumsal alandaki öneminin giderek daha çok farkýna varmamýz ile birlikte, bu konu- daki bilgimizin artmasý için daha fazla deneye dayalý ve kuramsal çalýþma

Kaynakça

• Ammerman, N. (ed.) (1997). Congregation and Community. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
• Anheier, H. ve Salamon, L. (eds) (1998). The Nonprofit Sector in the Developing World: a Comparative Analysis. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
• Ariarajah, S. W. (1991). Hindus and Christians. Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans.
• Berger, P. L. (1983). “From the crisis of religion to the crisis of secularity”. In M. Douglas and S. Tipton (eds), Religion and America. Boston: Beacon Press.
• Blau ve diðerleri (1993). “Ethnocultural cleavages and growth of church membership in the United States, 1860-1930”. Sociological Forum, 8, 609-37.
• Brandon, N. (1994). The Six Pillars of Self-esteem. New York: Bantam.
• Breault, K. (1989). “New evidence on religious pluralism, urbanism, and religious partici- pation”. American Sociological Review, 54, 1048-53.
• Chaves, M. ve meslektaþlarý (1999). “The national congregations study: background, met- hods, and selected results”. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 38, 458-76.
• Clydesdale, T. (1999). “Toward understanding the role of Bible belief and higher education in American attitudes toward eradicating powerty, 1964-1996”. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 38, 103-18.
• Davis, M. ve Robinson, R. (1999). “Their brothers’ keepers? Orthodox religionists , moder- nists, and economic justice in Europe”. American Journal of Sociology, 104, 1631- 65.
• DiMaggio ve diðerleri (1996). “Have Americans’ social attitudes become more polarized?”, American Journal of Sociology, 102, 690-755.
• Ebaugh, H. R. ve Chafetz, J. (2000). Religion and the New Immigrants: Continuities and Adaptations in Immigrant Congregations. Valnut Creek, CA: AltaMira Pres.
• Ellis, A. (1992). Reason and Emotion in Pyschotherapy. Secaucus, NC: Lyle Stuart.
• Ellison, C. ve Levin, J. S. (1998). “The religion-health connection: evidence, theory, and future directions”. Health Education and Behavior, 25, 700-20.
• Finke, R. and E. Stark (1992). The Churching of America. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
• Gallagher, S. ve Smith, C. (1999). “Symbolic traditionalism and pragmatic egalitarianism: contemporary evangelicals, families, and gender”. Gender and Society, 13, 211-33.
• Gay, D. A. ve diðerleri (1996). “In search of denominational subcultures: religious affilia- tion and “pro-family” issues revisited”. Review of Religious Research, 38, 3-17.
• George, Linda (1999). Religion and physical health. Paper presented at the American So- ciological Assocation annual meeting, Chicago.
• Gorsuch, R. L. (1988). “Pyschology of Religion”. Annual Review of Pyschology, 39, 201-21.
• Green ve diðerleri (1996). Religion and the Culture Wars: Dispatches from the Front. Lan- ham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.
• Hastings, A. (ed.) (1999). A World History of Christianity. Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans.
• Hunter, J. D. (1991). Culture Wars. New York: Basic Books.
• Huntington, S. (1996). The Clash of Civilizations and the Remaking of World Order. New York: Simon and Schuster.
• Hutchison, W. (1987). Errand to the World: American Protestant Thought and Foreign Missi- ons. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
• Iannaconne, L. (1993). “Heirs to the Protestant ethic? The economics of American funda- mentalism”. In M. Marty ve S. Appleby (eds), Fundamentalism and the State. Chica- go: University of Chicago Press.
• Iannaconne, L. (1994). “Why strict churches are strong”. American Journal of Sociology, 99, 1180-212.
• Idler, E. ve diðerleri (1977). National Institute on Aging/Fetzer Institute Working Group Brief Measure of Religiousness and Spirituality: Conceptual Development. Unpub- lished manuscript.
• James, E. (1987). “The nonprofit sector in comparative perspective”. In W. Powel (ed.), The Nonprofit Sector: a Research Handbook. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
• Land ve diðerleri (1991). “Religious pluralism and church membership”. American Socio- logical Review, 56, 237-49.
• Leege, D. ve Kellstedt, L. A. (1993). Rediscovering the Religious Factor in American Politics. Armonk, NY: M. E. Sharpe.
• Leege, D. ve Welch, M. (1988). “Religious predictors of Catholic parishioners’ socio-politi- cal attitudes”. Journal fort the Scientific Study of Religion, 27, 536-52.
• Leege, D. ve Welch, M. (1991). “Dual reference groups and political orientation”. Ameri- can Journal of Political Science, 35, 28-56.
• Moffett, S. H. (1992). A History of Christianity in Asia, Volume 1: Beginnings to 1500. San Francisco: Harper San Francisco.
• Neill, S. (1986). A History of Christian Missions. New York: Penguin.
• Olson, D. (1998). “Religious pluralism in contemporary US counties”. American Sociologi- cal Review, 63, 759-61.
• Robinson, R. ve Johnson, W. (1997). The Buddhist Religion. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
• Sanneh, L. (1989). Translating the Message: the Missionary Impact on Culture. Maryknoll, NY: Orbis.
• Sherkat, D. E. ve Ellison, C. G. (1999). “Recent developments and current contreversies in the sociology of religion”. Annual Review of Sociology, 25, 363-94.
• Sigmund, F. (1927). The Future of an Illusion. New York: Norton (1961).
• Skilton, A. (1997). A Concise History of Buddhism. Birmingham: Windhouse.
• Smith, C. (1996a). Disruptive Religion: the Force of Faith in Social Movement Activism. New York: Routledge.
• Smith, C. (1996b). Resisting Reagan: the US Central American Peace Movement. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
• Smith, C. (2000). Christian America? What Evangelicals Really Want. Berkeley: University of California Press.
• Smith, Christian ve meslektaþlarý (1998). American Evangelicalism: Embattled and Thri- ving. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
• Stark, R. ve Finke, R. (2000). The Human Side of Religion. Berkeley: University of Califor- nia Press.
• Steensland ve diðerleri (2000). “The measure of American religion: toward improving the state of the art”. Social Forces (in the press).
• Stevens-Arroyo, A. ve Cadena, G. (1995). Old Masks, New Faces: Religion and Latino Iden- tities. New York: Bildner Center Books.
• Wallace, A. (1966). Religion: An Anthropological View. New York: Random House.
• Warner, R. S. (1993). “Work in progress toward a new paradigm for the sociological study of religion in the United States”. American Journal of Sociology, 98, 1044-93.
• Warner, R. S. ve Wittner, J. G. (eds) (1998). Gatherings in Diaspora: Religious Communities and the New Immigration. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
• Wilcox, B. (1998). “Conservative Protestant childrearing”. American Sociological Review, 63, 796-809.
• Woodberry, R. D. (1998). Religiosity: does one “size” fit all? Unpublished paper.
• Woodberry, R. D. ve Smith, C. S. (1998). “Fundamentalism at all. Conservative Protestant- s in America”. Annual Review of Sociology, 24, 25-56.
• Wuthnow, R. (1998). After Heaven. Berkeley: University of California Press.
• Young, L. (1997). Rational Choice Theory and Religion: Summary and Assesment. New York: Routledge.