Yatırım Kaynaklı Kapsam 3 Emisyonları: Sahiplik, Finansal Kontrol ve Hesaplama Yöntemleri

Öz

Bu çalışma, yatırım kaynaklı Kapsam 3 emisyonlarının hesaplanması ve yönetilmesi konusunu ele almakta ve finans sektöründeki özkaynak yatırımları bağlamında senaryo bazlı bir analiz sunmaktadır. Artan sera gazı (GHG) açıklama gereklilikleri doğrultusunda, finansal kurumların yatırım portföylerinden kaynaklanan emisyonları hesaplaması gerekmektedir. Ancak, metodolojik belirsizlikler ve sektörel farklılıklar, emisyon raporlamasının standartlaştırılmasını zorlaştırmaktadır. Özellikle, finansal yatırımcıların portföyleri aracılığıyla dolaylı olarak neden olduğu emisyonları belirlemesi ve bu emisyonların etkin bir şekilde yönetilmesi, sürdürülebilir finans politikaları açısından kritik bir gereklilik haline gelmiştir. Bu araştırma, yatırıma özgü ve ortalama veri yöntemlerini senaryolar üzerinden karşılaştırarak, bu yöntemlerin sahiplik yapısı ve finansal kontrol düzeyine göre uygulanabilirliğini değerlendirmektedir. Bulgular, finansal kontrolün emisyon tahsisini belirleyici bir faktör olduğunu göstermektedir. Çoğunluk hissesine sahip yatırımcılar, doğrudan emisyonları (Kapsam 1 ve Kapsam 2) raporlarken, azınlık hissedarlarının sektör bazlı tahminlere dayanarak Kapsam 3 dahilinde raporlama yapmaları gerekmektedir. Ayrıca, yatırım kararlarının çevresel etkilerini tam olarak değerlendirebilmek için finansal kurumların daha şeffaf ve tutarlı raporlama yapması gerekmektedir. Bu bağlamda, çalışmada ele alınan farklı hesaplama yöntemleri ve sunulan senaryolar, yatırımcıların ve düzenleyici kurumların daha bilinçli kararlar almasına yardımcı olabilecek stratejik değerlendirmeler sunmaktadır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Kapsam 3 Emisyonları
• Yatırım Kaynaklı Emisyonlar
• Karbon Muhasebesi
• Sahiplik Yapısı
• Sera Gazı Açıklamaları

Investment-Related Scope 3 Emissions: Ownership, Financial Control, and Calculation Methods

Öz

This study examines the calculation and management of investment-related Scope 3 emissions, presenting a scenario-based analysis within the context of equity investments in the financial sector. In line with increasing greenhouse gas (GHG) disclosure requirements, financial institutions must account for the emissions associated with their investment portfolios. However, methodological uncertainties and sectoral differences complicate the standardization of emission reporting. In particular, identifying and effectively managing emissions that financial investors indirectly contribute to through their portfolios has become a critical necessity for sustainable finance policies. This research compares the investment-specific and average-data methods through scenarios, evaluating their applicability based on ownership structure and financial control levels. The findings indicate that financial control is a key determinant in emission allocation. While majority shareholders report direct emissions (Scope 1 and Scope 2), minority shareholders must rely on sector-based estimates to report under Scope 3. Furthermore, financial institutions must adopt more transparent and consistent reporting practices to fully assess the environmental impact of their investment decisions. In this regard, the different calculation methods analyzed in this study, along with the presented scenarios, provide strategic insights that can help investors and regulatory bodies make more informed decisions.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Scope 3 Emissions
• Investment-Related Emissions
• Carbon Accounting
• Ownership Structure
• GHG Disclosure

Kaynakça

1. Borghesi, S., Costantini, V., D'Amato, A., Dibattista, I., Koundouri, P., Li, Q. C., Mazzarano, M., Sterner, T., Tiwari, M. M., Vis, P., & Xepapadeas, A. (2025). Reforming ESG: A European and Global South perspective. Environment and Development Economics. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1355770X24000366
2. Brans, E., & Peters, M. (2024). Liability of non-state actors for Scope 3 emissions. Journal for European Environmental & Planning Law, 21(2), 116-134. https://doi.org/10.1163/18760104-21020004
3. Buchenau, N., Oetzel, J., & Hechelmann, R.-H. (2025). Category-specific benchmarking of Scope 3 emissions for corporate clusters. Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews, 208, 115019. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2024.115019
4. Butt, A. S., Alghababsheh, M., Sindhwani, R., & Gwalani, H. (2025). Role of supplier engagement to reduce Scope 3 emissions in circular supply chains. Business Strategy and the Environment, 34(1), 598-611. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.3994
5. Downie, J., & Stubbs, W. (2013). Evaluation of Australian companies' Scope 3 greenhouse gas emissions assessments. Journal of Cleaner Production, 56, 156–163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2011.09.010
6. Ellram, L. M., Tate, W. L., & Saunders, L. W. (2022). A legitimacy theory perspective on Scope 3 freight transportation emissions. Journal of Business Logistics, 43(4), 472–498. https://doi.org/10.1111/jbl.12299
7. Hakovirta, M., Kovanen, K., Sarén, H., Martikainen, S., & Manninen, J. (2024). Investment firms’ carbon targets and their alignment with power and utility assets: A portfolio view to energy transition strategy. Environmental Challenges, 15, 100916. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envc.2024.100916
8. Hertwich, E. G., & Wood, R. (2018). The growing importance of Scope 3 greenhouse gas emissions from industry. Environmental Research Letters, 13(10), 104013. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aae19a

9. Huang, Y. A., Weber, C. L., & Matthews, H. S. (2009). Categorization of Scope 3 emissions for streamlined enterprise carbon footprinting. Environmental Science & Technology, 43(22), 8509-8515. https://doi.org/10.1021/es901643a
10. Huo, X. J., Wan, Y. H., Cheng, H., Liu, Z. J., & Luo, Y. F. (2014). Risk decision analysis for power suppliers under the carbon emission trading environment. Sustainable Development of Industry and Economy, Advanced Materials Research, 869-870, 356+. https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.869-870.356
11. Jain, A. (2024). Analysing the Scope 3 emissions of the cement industry. International Journal for Multidisciplinary Research, 6(3). https://doi.org/10.36948/ijfmr.2024.v06i03.23951
12. Kenway, S. J., Pamminger, F., Yan, G., Hall, R., Lam, K. L., Skinner, R., Olsson, G., Satur, P., & Allan, J. (2023). Opportunities and challenges of tackling Scope 3 indirect emissions from residential hot water. Water Research X, 21, 100192. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wroa.2023.100192
13. Lee, C.-H., & Ma, H.-W. (2013). Improving the integrated hybrid LCA in the upstream Scope 3 emissions inventory analysis. International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 18(1), 17–23. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-012-0469-9
14. Li, M., Wiedmann, T., & Hadjikakou, M. (2020). Enabling full supply chain corporate responsibility: Scope 3 emissions targets for ambitious climate change mitigation. Environmental Science & Technology, 54(1), 400-411. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.9b05245
15. Liu, M., Wu, H., & Wang, H. (2023). Will trade protection trigger a surge in investment-related CO₂ emissions? Evidence from multi-regional input-output model. Sustainability, 15(13), 10033. https://doi.org/10.3390/su151310033
16. Mejia, C., & Kajikawa, Y. (2024). Estimating Scope 3 greenhouse gas emissions through the shareholder network of publicly traded firms. Sustainability Science, 19(4), 1409–1425. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-023-01460-8
17. Nguyen, Q., Diaz-Rainey, I., Kitto, A., McNeil, B. I., Pittman, N. A., & Zhang, R. (2023). Scope 3 emissions: Data quality and machine learning prediction accuracy. PLOS Climate, 2(11), e0000208. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pclm.0000208
18. Panjwani, A., Melin, L., & Mercereau, B. (2023). Do Scope 3 carbon emissions impact firms’ cost of debt? Journal of Portfolio Management, 50(2), 175–198. https://doi.org/10.3905/jpm.2023.1.010
19. Pasiouras, F., Rjiba, H., & Samet, A. (2024). Financed emissions and the cost of bank equity. SSRN. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4703104
20. Popescu, I. S., Gibon, T., Hitaj, C., Rubin, M., & Benetto, E. (2023). Are SRI funds financing carbon emissions? An input-output life cycle assessment of investment funds. Ecological Economics, 212, 107918. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2023.107918
21. Sadhukhan, J. (2022). Net-zero action recommendations for Scope 3 emission mitigation using life cycle assessment. Energies, 15(15), 5522. https://doi.org/10.3390/en15155522
22. Schmidt, M., Nill, M., & Scholz, J. (2022). Determining the Scope 3 emissions of companies. Chemical Engineering & Technology, 45(7), 1218-1230. https://doi.org/10.1002/ceat.202200181
23. Shmelev, S. E., & Gilardi, E. (2025). Corporate environmental, social, and governance performance: The impacts on financial returns, business model innovation, and social transformation. Sustainability, 17(3), 1286. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17031286
24. Swinkels, L., & Markwat, T. (2024). Corporate carbon emissions data for equity and bond portfolios. Managerial Finance, 50(1), 118–139. https://doi.org/10.1108/MF-02-2023-0077
25. Tian, J., Jia, F., Chen, L., & Xing, X. (2025). The impact of ISSB's Scope 3 GHG emissions validation on US manufacturers' stock valuations: Analyzing the role of supplier complexity. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 193, 103850. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tre.2024.103850
26. Wang, H. R., Feng, T. T., Kong, J. J., Cui, M. L., & Xu, M. (2024). Grappling with the trade-offs of carbon emission trading and green certificate: Achieving carbon neutrality in China. Journal of Environmental Management, 360, 121101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.121101
27. World Resources Institute & WBCSD. (2013). Technical guidance for calculating Scope 3 emissions (Version 1.0): Supplement to the corporate value chain (Scope 3) accounting & reporting standard. Greenhouse Gas Protocol. https://ghgprotocol.org/sites/default/files/standards/Scope3_Calculation_Guidance_0.pdf
28. Xia, M. Y., & Cai, H. H. (2023). The driving factors of corporate carbon emissions: An application of the LASSO model with survey data. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 30(19), 56484–56512. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-023-26081-7