Elektrikli Scooter Kiralamada Algılanan Tüketici Faydası: Tüketici Yenilikçiliğin Rolü

Öz

Dünya genelindeki nüfus artışı ve nüfus yoğunluğunun büyük şehirlerde toplanması kıt kaynakların dikkatli kullanımını ve mevcut sistemlerin sürdürülebilirliğini en önemli kavramlar haline getirmiştir. Bireylerin daha konforlu yaşamak ve çalışmak için şehirleri seçmesi şehirlerin nüfus yoğunluğunu artırmaktadır. İnsanoğlu ömrü boyunca sahip olduğu en değerli varlığı olan zaman ve doğal kaynakları verimli kullanmak için yeni çözümler aramaktadır. Bu çerçevede yüksek nüfuslu şehirlerde ulaşımda yenilikçi bir yaklaşım getiren elektrikli scooterın kullanımı gittikçe yaygınlaşmaktadır. Bu araştırma, yenilikçi bir ürün olan elektrikli scooterın bireyler tarafından yaygın kullanılma niyetini etkileyen faktörlerin belirlenmesi amacıyla gerçekleştirilmiştir. Tüketiciler tarafından algılanan fayda ve yenilikçiliğin kullanma niyeti üzerindeki rolünü test etmek için literatüre dayanan 2 temel hipotez geliştirilmiş ve bu kapsamda ampirik bir çalışma gerçekleştirilmiştir. Araştırma kapsamında 311 kişiden veri toplanmış, yapısal eşitlik modellemesi ile tüketici yenilikçiliğinin ve kullanım sırasında algılanan faydanın elektrikli scooter kullanma niyeti üzerindeki etkileri test edilmiştir. Elde edilen araştırma bulguları üzerinden teorik ve pratik tavsiyeler verilmeye çalışılmıştır. Bu çalışma sayesinde bireylerin günlük yaşamlarının içine giren teknolojik ürünlerin seçimini etkileyen algılanan fayda, tüketici yeniliği ve niyet faktörlerinin arasında bulunan ilişkinin ‘elektrikli scooter’ özelinde açıklanmasıyla Türkçe literatürün zenginleşmesine bir katkı sağlanması hedeflenmiştir. Ulaşılan bulgularda, meydana gelen yeniliklerin kullanıcılar veya tüketiciler tarafından benimsenmesi ile bireyler tarafından elektrikli scooter kullanma niyeti üzerinde algılanan faydanın, tüketici yenilikçiliğine oranla daha fazla etkisinin olduğu gözlenmiştir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Kullanma niyeti
• Tüketici yenilikçiliği
• Algılanan fayda
• Elektrikli scooter
• Doğal çevre
• Paylaşım ekonomisi

Perceived Benefits of Customer in Renting Electric Scooter : The Role of Consumer Innovativeness

Öz

Parallel with the increase in world population, effective and careful use of scarce resources along with ensuring the sustainability of the systems have become more crucial. In this respect, electric scooters are prevailing as an innovative transportation medium especially in highly populated regions. This study aimed to investigate the factors influencing the intentions to use electric scooters. Data were collected from 311 respondents and the influence of consumer innovativeness and perceived benefits on willingness to use electric scooters were tested by utilizing a structural equation modelling. The study findings revealed that perceived benefits affected intention to use electric scooters to a greater extent than consumer innovativeness. Based on the findings, theoretical and practical implications were suggested.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Consumer Innovativeness
• Perceived benefits
• Intention to use
• Electric scooter
• Natural environment
• Sharing economy

Kaynakça

1. Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior And Human Decision Processes, 50, 179-211.
2. Aktan, M., Aydogan, S., & Aysuna, C. (2016). Web advertising value and students’ attitude towards web advertising. European Journal of Business and Management, 8(9), 86-97.
3. Akturan, U. & Tezcan, N. (2012). Mobile banking adoption of the youth market. Marketing Intelligence and Planning, 30(4), 444-459.
4. Akyol, B., & Ünlüönen, K., (2020). Paylaşım ekonomisinin turizm sektörüne etkileri: Kırıkkale üniversitesi öğrencileri üzerine bir araştırma. Journal of Tourism and Gastronomy Studies, 2020, 8 (1), 623-625
5. Al-Somali, S.A., Gholami, R. & Clegg, B. (2009). An investigation into the acceptance of online banking in Saudi Arabia. Technovation, 29, 130-141.
6. Assink, M. (2006). Inhibitors of disruptive innovation capability: A conteptual model. European Journal of Innovation Management, 9(2), 215-233.
7. Aydoğan, S., Güvendik, Ö., & Ayar, B. (2019). Innovative consumers of the digital age: Opinion seeking on instagram, Busıness & Management Studies: An International Journal, 7(2), 614-615 Başar, E. E. & Yapraklı, Ş. (2013). Tüketici yenilikçiliği ve genişletilmiş teknoloji kabul modelinin E-CRM üzerinde etkileri: Bankacılık sektöründe bir uygulama. The Journal of Academic Social Science Studies, 6(6), 149-180.
8. Belk, R. (2010). Sharing. Journal of Consumer Research, 36(5), 715-734.

9. Belk, R. (2014). You are what you can access: Sharing and collaborative consumption online. Journal of Business Research, 67(8), 1595-1630.
10. Bellin, H. (2017). Some managerial thinking about the sharing economy. Journal of Marketing Channels, 24, 97-99
11. Benkler, Y. (2004). Sharing nicely: On shareable goods and the emergence of sharing as a modality of economic production. https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/5ec4/4580bb892bab906ee7ac64dec4c318f4e56c.pdf
12. Bhatnagar, A., Misra, S., & Rao, H.R. (2000). On risk, convenience, and ınternet shopping behavior. Communications of The ACM, 43(11), 98-105.
13. Bilici, F. & Özdemir, E. (2020). Tüketicilerin artırılmış gerçeklik teknolojilerini kullanma niyeti üzerinde teknolojik hazır bulunuşluluğun rolü, International Social Mentality and Researcher Thinkers Journal, Issn:2630-631X, 6(37), 2046-2060.
14. Botsman, R. & Rogers, R. (2010). What’s mine is yours: The rise of collaborative consumption. New York, Harper Collins.
15. Böcker, L. & Meelen, T., (2017). Sharing for people, planet or profit? Analysing motivations for intended sharing economy participation. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 23, 28-39.
16. Chao, C.W., Reid, M. & Mavondo, F.T., 2012. Consumer innovativeness influence on really new product adoption. Aust. Mark. J. 20 (3), 211–217. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. ausmj.
17. Chauhan, V., Yadav, R. & Choudhary, V., 2019. Analyzing The Impact Of Consumer Innovativeness And Perceived Risk In Internet Banking Adoption: A Study Of Indian Consumers, International Journal of Bank Marketing, 37(1): 323-339.
18. Cheng, M. (2016). Current sharing economy media discourse in tourism. Annals of Tourism Research, 60, 111-114.
19. Cheng, M. (2016). Sharing economy: A review and agenda for future research. International Journal Of Hospitality Management, 57, 60-70. Bardhi ve Eckhardt, 2012:881
20. Cheng, T.C.E., Lam, D.Y.C. & Yeung, A.C.L. (2006). Adoption of internet banking: An emprical study in Hong Kong. Decision Support Systems, 42(3), 1558-1572.
21. Chhikara, S. (2010). Identification of variables and factors ımpacting consumer behavior in on-line shopping in India: An empirical study. E-business Technology and Strategy, 292-304.
22. Chong, A.Y.L., Keng-Boon, O., Binshan L. & Boon-In T. (2010). Online banking adoption: An empirical analysis. International Journal of Bank Marketing, 28 (4), 267-287.
23. Chuttur, M.Y. (2009). Overview of the technology acceptance model: Origins, developments and future directions. Indiana University, USA.Sprouts:Working Papers on Information Systems, 9(37).
24. Citrin, A.D. (2000). Adoption of internet shopping: The role of consumer innovativeness. Industrial Management and Data Systems, 100(July), 294-300.
25. Cowart, K.O., Gavin L.F. & Andrew E.W. (2007). A Structural look at consumer innovativeness and self-congruence in new product purchases. Psychology & Marketing, 25(12), 1111-1130.
26. Crabbe, M., Standing, C., Standing, S. & Karjaluoto, H. (2009). An adoption model for mobile banking in Ghana. International Journal of Mobile Communications, 7 (5), 515-543.
27. Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS quarterly, 319-340.
28. Deniz, A. & Erciş, A. (2016) Tüketici yenilikçiliğinin boyutları ve yenilikçiliği etkileyen faktörler arasındaki ilişkiler. KAÜİİBFD 7(14), 461-475.
29. Dickerson, M.D. & Gentry, J.W. (1983). Characteristics of adopters and non-adopters of home computers. Journal of Consumer Research, Vol. 10 No. 2, 225-235.
30. Dobre, C., Dragomir, A. & Preda, G. (2009). Consumer innovaveness: A marketing approach. Management & Marketing, Vol:4, No:2, 19-34.
31. Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1977). Belief, attitude, intention, and behavior: An introduction to theory and research. Philosophy and Rhetoric, 10(2).
32. Gansky, L. (2010). The mesh why the future of business is sharing. https://informationdj.files.wordpress.com/2012/01/future-of-business-is lisagansky.pdf
33. Geissinger A., Laurell C., Öberg C. & Sandström C. (2018). How sustainable is the sharing economy? On the sustainability connotations of sharing economy platforms. Journal of Cleaner Production, 206, 419-429.
34. Goldsmith, R.E., Kim, D., Flynn, L.A. & Kim, W.M. (2005). Price sensitivity and innovativeness for fashion among Korean consumers. The Journal of Social Psychology. 145 (5), 501-508.
35. Gu, J., Lee, S. & Suh, Y. (2009). Determinants of behavioral intention to mobile banking. Expert Systems with Applications, 36, 11605-11616.
36. Guritno, S., & Siringoringo, H. (2013). Perceived usefulness, ease of use, and attitude towards online shopping usefulness towards online airlines ticket purchase, Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 81, 212-216.
37. Habibi R. M. Davidson A. & Laroche M. (2017). What managers should know about the sharing economy. Business Horizons, 60, 113-121.
38. Hair, J.F., Black, W.C., Babin, B.J., & Anderson, R.E. (2010). Multivariate data analysis. electronic book: Prentice Hall.
39. Hamari J., Sjöklint M. & Ukkonen A. (2016). The sharing economy: Why people participate in collaborative consumption. Journal of The Association for Information Science and Technology, 67, 2047-2059.
40. Hanafizadeh, P., Behboudi, M., Koshksaray A.A. & Shirkhani Tabar, M.J., 2014, Mobile Banking Adoption By Iranian Bank Clients. Telematics and Informatics, 31(1), 62-78.
41. Heo Y.C., 2016, Sharing Economy And Prospects In Tourism Research. Annals Of Tourism Research, 58, 166-170.
42. Heremobility, 2020, Smart City Mobility: 7 Major Cities Getting It Right. https://mobility.here.com/learn/smart-city-mobility/smart-city-mobility-7-major-cities-getting-it-right, Erişim tarihi: 03.05.2021.
43. Hwang J., Sun-Bai C. & Kim W., 2019, Consequences Of Psychological Benefits Of Using Eco-Friendly İn The Context Of Drone Food Delivery Services, Journal of Travel & Tourism Marketing, DOI: 10.1080/10548408.2019.1586619.
44. Im, S., Bayus, B.L. & Mason, C.H., 2003, An Empirical Study Of İnnate Consumer İnnovativeness, Personal Characteristics, And New-Product Adoption Behavior. J. Acad. Mark. Sci. 31(1), 61–73. https://doi.org/10.1177/0092070302238602.
45. Im, M., Song, M.R. & Chu, W., 2019, Effects of Consumer Innovativeness on Environment-Friendly Product Satisfaction. The Journal of Distribution Science, 17(10), 125-134. doi.org/10.15722/jds.17.10.201910.125. Information technology. MIS Q. 13 (3), 318–330. https://doi.org/10.2307/249008.
46. Jabeen, G., Ahmad, M. and Zhang, Q., 2021. Factors Influencing Consumers’ Willingness to Buy Green Energy Technologies in a Green Perceived Value Framework. Energy Sources, Part B: Economics, Planning, and Policy, 16(7), pp.669-685.
47. Jahangir N. & Begum N., 2008, The Role Of Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease Of Use, Security And Privacy, And Customer Attitude To Engender Customer Adaptation İn The Context of Electronic Banking, African Journal of Business Management, 2 (1), 32-40.
48. Jonathan, J., 2020, How Green And Profitable Are E-Scooters?. https://www.bbc.com/news/business-55107754 (Erişim Tarihi : 28.04.221 22:43)
49. Kalyoncuoğlu, S., 2018, Tüketicilerin Online Alışverişlerindeki Sanal Kart Kullanımlarının Teknoloji Kabul Modeli İle İncelenmesi, Afyon Kocatepe Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 20(2), 193-213.
50. Kanter, R. M., 1983, The Change Masters: İnnovation For Productivity İn The American Corporation, New York: Simon & Schuster., 20.
51. Kaya, S., & Şenel, P.T., 2003, Zonguldak İlindeki Bazı Hastanelerde Çalışan Doktorların Elektronik Tıbbi Kayıtlara Hazırlık Durumlarının Değerlendirilmesi, http://ab.org.tr /ab05/ tammetin / 187.doc
52. Kırmızı Z, Kolağasıoğlu M.Ş & Çalışkan F.T, 2012, Kentiçi Ulaşım Terimleri Sözlüğü, İstanbul: Cinius Yayınları.
53. Kim, Y.H. (2008), An empirical examination of consumers’ innovation adoption: The role of innovativeness, fashion orientation and utilitarian and hedonic consumers attitudes, Master of Science, The Faculty of the Graduate School at The University of North Carolina, Greensboro.
54. Kim, J. J., Choe, J. Y. J. & Hwang, J., 2020, Application Of Consumer Innovativeness To The Context Of Robotic Restaurants, International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, DOI 10.1108/IJCHM-06-2020-0602.
55. Kjolberg, T., 2015, Copenhagen Connecting, https://www.dailyscandinavian.com/copenhagen-connecting/, Erişim tarihi: 03.05.2021.
56. Kotler, P., 1997, Marketing Management: Analysis, Planing, İmplementation And Control, 9th. Prencite Hall, New Jersey.
57. Köker, N.E. & Maden, D., 2017, Tüketici Yenilikçinin, Öz Saygı Ve Sosyal Kimlik Boyutları Temelinde İncelenmesi: İtalya ve Türkiye Üzerine Bir Araştırma, Hitit Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, Yıl 10, Sayı 2, Aralık 2017, 835-854
58. Kumar, R., Jha, A., Damodaran, A., Bangwal, D., & Dwivedi, A., 2020, Addressing The Challenges To Electric Vehicle Adoption Via Sharing Economy: An Indian Perspective. Management of Environmental Quality: An International Journal, doi:10.1108/meq-03-2020-0058
59. Laamanen M., Wahlen S. & Lorek S., 2017, A Moral Householding Perspective On The Sharing Economy. Journal Of Cleaner Production, 202, 1220-1227.
60. Labrecque, L.I., Vor Dem Esche, J., Mathwick, C., Novak, T.P., & Hofacker, C.F. (2013). Consumer power: evolution in the digital age, journal of interactive marketing, 27(4), 257-269.
61. Lassar, W.M., Manolis, C. & Lassar, S.S., (2005). The relationship between consumer innovativeness, personal characteristics, and online banking adoption. International Journal of Bank Marketing, 23 (2), 176–199. https://doi.org/10.1108/02652320510584403.
62. Lee, Y.K., Park, J.H., Chung, N., & Blakeney, A. (2012). A unified perspective on the factors influencing usage intention toward mobile financial services. Journal of Business Research, 65(11), 1590-1599.
63. Lewis, N.K., Palmer, A. & Moll, A. (2010). Predicting young consumers’ take up of mobile banking services. International Journal of Bank Marketing, 28(5), 410-432.
64. Lu, J., Yao, J.E. & Yu, C.S. (2005). Personal innovativeness, social influences and adoption of wireless internet services via mobile technology, Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 14, 245-268.
65. Luarn, P. & Lin, H. (2005). Toward an understanding of the behavioral intention to use mobile banking. Computers in Human Behavior, 21, 873-891. Management (IJSM), III (3) 36-51.
66. Mandilas, A., Karasavvoglou, A., Nikolaidis, M. & Tsourgiannis, L. (2013). Predicting consumer’s perceptions in on-line shopping, Procedia Technology, 8, 435-444. Meeddubai (2020). https://twitter.com/meeddubai, Erişim tarihi: 03.05.2021.
67. Midgley, D.F. & Dowling, G.R. (1978). Innovativeness: The concept and its measurement. Journal of Consumer Research. 4 (4), 229–242.
68. Nasri, W. & Charfeddine, L. (2012). Factors affecting the adoption of internet banking in Tunisia: An integration theory of acceptance model and theory of planned behavior. The Journal of High Technology Management Research, 23(1), 1-14.
69. Olson, E.L. (2018). Lead market learning in the development and diffusion of electric vehicles. Journal of Cleaner Production, 172, 3279-3288.
70. Önder, H.G., & Ulkavak, M. (2020). Yerel yönetimler için çok modlu taşımacılıkta akıllı hareketlilik önerileri. Türkiye Coğrafi Bilgi Sistemleri Dergisi, 2(2), 83-89
71. Özdemir, E. & Sönmezay, M., Factors affecting consumers’ technology acceptance and use on behavioural ıntention ın omnichannel retailing, BMIJ, (2020), 8(5), 3936-3970 doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.15295/bmij.v8i5.1596
72. Phatthana W., Mat & N.K.N. (2011). The application of Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) on health tourism E-Purchase intention predictors in Thailand, 2010 International Conference on Business and Economics Research, IACSIT Press, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, vol.1 2011, 196-199.
73. Polatoğlu, V.N. & Ekin, S. (2001). An empirical ınvestigation of the turkish consumers’ acceptance of internet banking services, International Journal of Bank Marketing, 19 (4), 156-165.
74. Ramayah, T. & Ignatius, J. (2005). Impact of perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use and perceived enjoyment on the ıntention to shop online, ICFAI Journal of Systems
75. Revels J., Tojib D. & Tsarenko Y., (2010). Understanding consumer intention to use mobile services, Australasian Marketing Journal, 18 (2010), 74-80.
76. Rifkin, J. (2000). The age of access: A new culture of hypercapitalism. http://90.146.8.18/en/archiv_files/20021/E2002_043.pdf
77. Ritter, M. & Schanz, H. (2018). The sharing economy: A comprehensive business model framework. Journal of Cleaner Production, 213, 320-331.
78. Roehrich, G. (2004). Consumer innovativeness: Concepts and measurements. Journal of Business Research, 57, 671-677.
79. Rogers, E. & Shoemaker, F. (1971), Communication of innovations: A Cross Cultural Approach, New York: Free Press.
80. Rogers, E.M., (1995). Diffusion of Innovations. Free Press, New York.
81. Rogers, E.M. (2003). Diffusion of innovations. New York, A Division Of Simon & Schuster, Inc.,22.
82. Sagnier C., Loup-Escande E., Lourdeaux D., Thouvenin I. & Valléry G. (2020): User acceptance of virtual reality: An extended technology acceptance model, International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, DOI: 10.1080/10447318.2019.1708612
83. Sims, R., Schaeffer, R., Creutzig, F., Cruz-Núñez, X., D’Agosto, M., Dimitriu, D., ... & Tiwari, G. (2014). Transport. Climate change, 440.
84. Schauer, J.J., Sperling, D. & Tiwari, G. Transport in: Climate change 2014: Mitigation of Climate Change. Contribution of Working Group III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA
85. Steenkamp, J., Benedıct E.M., Hofstede, F. & Wedel, M. (1999), A cross national investigation into the individual and national cultural antecedens of consumer innovativeness, Journal of Marketing, 63 (2), 55-69.
86. Tan, M. & Teo, T.S.H. (2000). Factors influencing the adoption of internet banking, Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 1 (5), 22-38.
87. Taylor, S. & Todd, P.A. (1995). Understanding information technology usage: A test of competing models. Information Systems Research, 6, 144-176.
88. Tellis, G., Yin, E. & Bell, S. (2009), Global consumer innovativeness: cross-country differences and demographic commonalities. Journal of International Marketing, Vol:17 No:2, 1-22. Theory and Research. Addison-Wesley, Reading.
89. Turan, B. (2011). Bilgi ve iletişim teknolojileri kullanımının teknoloji kabul modeli ile incelenmesi ve sınıf öğretmenleri üzerinde bir uygulama. Bilecik Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü İşletme Anabilim Dalı. Yüksek Lisans Tezi. Bilecik.
90. Turan, B., & Haşit, G. (2014). Teknoloji kabul modeli ve sınıf öğretmenleri üzerinde bir uygulama. Uluslararası Alanya İşletme Fakültesi Dergisi, 6(1), 109-119. Urban Mobility (2018). https://urbanmobilitycompany.com/content/daily/what-is-smart-mobility (Erişim tarihi: 2 Mayıs 2021)
91. Venkatesh, V. & Davis, F.D. (2000). A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: four longitudinal feld studies. Management Science, 46(2), 186-204.
92. Venkatesh, V., Morris, M., Davis, G. & Davis, F., (2003). User acceptance of information technology: toward a unified view. MIS Q. 27 (3), 425–478. https://doi.org/10. 2307/30036540.
93. Vilpponen, A., Winter, S., & Sundqvist, S. (2006). Electronic word-of-mouth in online environments: Exploring referral networks structure and adoption behavior. Journal of Interactive Advertising, 6(2), 8-77.
94. Wessels, L. & Drennan, J. (2010). An investigation of consumer acceptance of m-banking. International Journal of Bank Marketing, 28 (7), 547-568.
95. Yoon, H.Y. (2016). User acceptance of mobile library applications in academic libraries: An application of the technology acceptance model. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 42 (6), 687-693.
96. Yu, C.S. (2012). Factors affecting individuals to adopt mobile banking: Empirical evidence from the UTAUT model. Journal of Electronic Commerce Research, 31(2), 104-121.
97. Zhang F., Sun S. & Victor C. (2020), Consumer innovativeness, product innovation and smart toys, Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 41-100974.
98. Zervas G., Proserpio D. & Byers W. J. (2016). The rise of the sharing economy: Estimating the impact of airbnb on the hotel industry. Journal of Marketing Research, 54 (5)
99. https://www.airbnb.com/about
100. https://www.blog.blablacar.com.tr/about-us
101. https://www.zipcar.com/about