Yerel Yönetimler ve Göçmen Yanlısı Toplumsal Hareketler: Belediye Aktivizmi, Sığınak Kentler ve Mülteci Kentleri

Elif Topal Demiroğlu

doi:10.18037/ausbd.1136378

Yerel Yönetimler ve Göçmen Yanlısı Toplumsal Hareketler: Belediye Aktivizmi, Sığınak Kentler ve Mülteci Kentleri

Öz

Kentlerin göç ve göçmenlik alanında artan rolleri ile yerel yönetimler de kimi zaman yasal sorumlulukları gereği kimi zaman da karşılaştıkları yoğun nüfusa cevap verebilme amacıyla göçmenlere yönelik farklı uygulamalar geliştirmektedir. Bu uygulamaların başında kamusal hizmetlerin sunumu ve entegrasyon faaliyetleri gelirken, yerel yönetimlerin farklı politika girişimleri, göçmen yanlısı inisiyatifleri ve göçmenlerin aktif vatandaşlığa dahil edilmesine varan ölçeklerde geniş bir uygulama alanı mevcuttur. Bu geniş çerçevede, yerel yönetimlerin çoğunlukla ulusal yönetime ve politikaların aksine daha kapsayıcı ve çoğulcu politikalarının bir toplumsal hareket çerçevesinde değerlendirilebileceği düşünülmektedir. Bu çalışma da belediye aktivizmi tartışmaları ışığında ve yerelde politika girişimciliğinin birer örneği olarak, yerel yönetimlerin göçmen yanlılığı bakımından üstlendiği bu rollerini toplumsal hareket çerçevesinde değerlendirmektedir. Amerika Birleşik Devletleri’nde (ABD) başlayan ve daha sonra Avrupa kentlerinde de hayat bulan Sığınak Kentler hareketi ile İspanya’nın Barcelona kentinde bir dizi toplumsal hareketin bir parçası olarak değerlendirilen ve diğer Avrupa kentlerine de yayılan Mülteci Kentleri hareketini göçmen yanlısı toplumsal hareketler olarak ele alarak, bu iki hareket arasındaki ilişkiyi tartışmıştır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Kaynakça

Agustín, Ó. ve Jørgensen, M. (2019). Solidarity cities and cosmopolitanism from below: Barcelona as a refugee city. Social Inclusion, 7(2), 198-207. doi:10.17645/si.v7i2.2063
Ataç, I. Rygiel, K. ve Stierl, M. (2016). Introduction: The contentious politics of refugee and migrant protest and solidarity movements: Remaking citizenship from the margins. Citizenship Studies, 20(5), 527–544. doi: 10.1080/13621025.2016.1182681
Barber, B. R. (2013). If mayors ruled the world: Dysfunctional nations, rising cities. New Haven: Yale University Press. Baumgartner, D., Pütz, M. ve Seidl, I. (2013). What kind of entrepreneurship drives regional development in European non-core regions? A literature review on empirical entrepreneurship research, European Planning Studies, 21(8), 1095–1127. doi: 10.1080/09654313.2012.722937 Baubök, R. (2003). Reinventing urban citizenship. Citizenship Studies, 7(2), 139–160. doi: 10.1080/1362102032000065946 Bauder, H. (2017). Sanctuary cities: Policies and practices in international perspective. International Migration, 55(2), 174–87. doi: 10.1111/imig.12308 Caponio, T. (2010). Conclusion: Making sense of local migration policy arenas. T. Caponio ve M. Borkert (Ed.) The Local Dimension of Migration Policymakingiçinde (s.161–195). Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press. Caponio, T. (2018). Immigrant integration beyond national policies? Italian cities’ participation in European city networks. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 44(12), 2053–2069. doi: 10.1080/1369183X.2017.1341711
Carrera, S. ve Parkin J. (2011). Protecting and delivering fundamental rights of irregular migrants at local and regional levels in the European Union. Brussels: Committee of the Regions, Erişim adresi:http://cor.europa.eu/en/documentation/studies/Documents/protecting-fundamental-rights-irregular-migrants.pdf
Castles, S. (2004). The factors that make and unmake migration policies. International Migration Review, 38(3), 852–884. doi: 10.1111/j.1747-7379.2004.tb00222.x. Castles, S., de Haas, H. ve Miller, M. J. (2014). Introduction. S. Castles ve J. Miller (Ed.), The age of migration international population movements in the modern World içinde (s. 1–22). Basingstoke: Palgrave and Macmillan.
Coleman, D. (2012). The changing face of Europe. J. A. Goldstone, E. P. Kaufmann ve M. D. Toft (Ed.) Political demography: How population changes are reshaping international security and national politics içinde (s.176-193). Boulder: Paradigm Publishers.
Cress, D. ve Snow, D. A. (2000). The outcomes of homeless mobilization: The influence of organization, disruption, political mediation, and framing. American Journal of Sociology, 105(4), 1063-1104. Erişim adresi: https://www.jstor.org/stable/3003888
Danış. D. ve Şenol. D. (2019). Göçü yerelden yönetmek, Saha. Yurttaşlık Derneği, 6, 56-63. Erişim adresi: https://hyd.org.tr/attachments/article/718/saha6.pdf

Darling, J. (2017). Forced migration and the city: Irregularity, informality, and the politics of presence, Progress in Human Geography, 41(27), 178-198. doi: 10.1177/0309132516629004
Dauvergne, C. (2016). The new politics of immigration and the end of settler societies. New York: Cambridge University Press. De Graauw, E. (2014). Municipal ID cards for undocumented immigrants: Local bureaucratic membership in a federal system. Politics & Society, 42, 309–330. doi: 10.1177/0032329214543256 Dekker, R., Emilsson, H, Krieger, B. ve Scholten, P. (2015). A local dimension of integration policies? A comparative study of Berlin, Malmö and Rotterdam, International Migration Review, 49(3).633-658. doi: 10.1111/imre.12133.
Dao, L.L. (2015, 9 Eylül). Citizen action for migrants pushes Madrid to act, YahooNews, Erişim adresi: http://news.yahoo.com/citizen-action-migrants-pushes-madrid-act-133043411.html?soc_src =social-sh&soc_trk=ma
Diani, M. (1992). The concept of social movement. The Sociological Review, 40(1), 1–25. doi: doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-954X.1992.tb02943.x
Delgado, M. (2019). Sanctuary cities, communities, and organizations: A nation at a crossroads. New York: Oxford University Press.
Garcés-Mascareñas, B. ve Gebhardt, D. (2020). Barcelona: Municipalist policy entrepreneurship in a centralist refugee reception system. Comparative Migration Studies, 8(15), doi: 10.1186/s40878-020-0173-z
Garcés, M. B. ve Eitel. K. (2019). Sanctuary cities: A global perspective (Rapor). CIDOB Barcelona Center for International Affairs web sayfasından erişildi https://www.cidob.org/en/articulos/anuario_internacional_cidob/2019/sanctuary_cities_a_global_perspective
Gebhardt, D. (2015). Cities and immigrant citizenship: a comparison of local citizenship policies in Barcelona and Munich. GRITIM-UPF Working Paper Series n. 26 (Winter, 2015), Erişim adresi: https://www.upf.edu/documents/3329791/3455370/WPS26_gebhardt.pdf/7180b32c-1fd8-4769-a9be-124bf5633aa8
Gebhardt, D. (2016). Re-thinking urban citizenship for immigrants from a policy perspective: The case of Barcelona, Citizenship Studies, 20(6-7), 846-866. doi:10.1080/13621025.2016.1191431
Genç, H. D. (2018). Responding to irregular migration: High potential of local governments in Turkey. International Migration, 56(3), 73-87. doi:10.1111/imig.12424
Harvey, D. (2012). Rebel cities: From the right to the city to the urban revolution. New York: Verso Books. Hepburn. E ve Zapata-Barrero, R. (2014). The politics of immigration in multi-level states. Houndmills. Basingstoke: Palgrave/MacMillan. Hutter, S. ve Grande, E. (2014). Politicizing Europe in the national electoral arena: A comparative analysis of five West European countries 1970-2010. Journal of Common Market Studies, 52(5), 1002–1018. Global Migration Indicators 2018 (2021, Aralık), IOM Global Migration Data Analysis Center, Erişim adresi: https://publications.iom.int/system/files/pdf/global_migration_indicators_2018.pdf Irgil, E. (2016). Multi-level governance as an alternative: The Municipality of Barcelona and the Ciutat Refugi Plan. Glocalism: Journal of Culture, Politics and Innovation, 3 (September), 1-21. doi: 10.12893/gjcpi.2016.3.1. Kaufmann, D. (2019). Comparing urban citizenship, sanctuary cities, local bureaucratic membership, and regularizations, Public Administration Review, 79(3), 443–446. doi: 10.1111/puar.13029. Kuge, J. (2019). Uncovering sanctuary cities: between policy, practice, and politics. H. Bauder ve J. Darling (Ed.) Rescaling migration, citizenship, and rightsiçinde (s.50-76). Manchester University Press. Lippert, R., ve Rehaag, S. (2012). Introduction: Sanctuary across countries, institutions, and disciplines (Ed.), Sanctuary practices in international perspectives: migration, citizenship and social movements (s.1-12) içinde. Ney York: Routledge.
Manfredi-Sánchez, J. L. (2020). Sanctuary cities: what global migration means for local governments, Social Sciences, 9(8), 1-16. doi: 10.3390/socsci9080146 Mayer, M. (2018). Cities as sites of refuge and resistance. European Urban and Regional Studies, 25(3), 232–249. doi: 10.1177%2F0969776417729963
McAdam, D., Tarrow, S. ve Tilly, C. (2001). Dynamics of contention. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Michael, Z. (2019). Politicization compared: at national, European, and global levels. Journal of European Public Policy, 26(7), 977-995. doi:10.1080/13501763.2019.1619188
Mintrom, M. ve Norman, P. (2009). Policy entrepreneurship and policy change. Policy Studies Journal, 37(4), 649–667. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-0072.2009.00329.x
Nail, T. (2015). Migrant cosmopolitanism. Public Affairs Quarterly, 29(2), 187–199. Erişim adresi: http://www.jstor.org/stable/44713986 Naldi, L., Johan, P. Larsson ve Westlund, H. (2020). Policy entrepreneurship and entrepreneurial orientation in vulnerable Swedish municipalities,Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 32(7-8), 473-491. doi: 10.1080/08985626.2020.1798557 Nicholls, W. J. (2011). Fragmenting citizenship: dynamics of cooperation and conflict in France’s immigrant rights movement. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 36(4), 611-631. doi: 10.1080/01419870.2011.626055 Oliver, C. R., Dekker, Geuijen, K. ve Broadhead, J. (2020). Innovative strategies for the reception of asylum seekers and refugees in European cities: multi-level governance, multi-sector urban networks and local engagement. Comparative Migration Studies, 8(1), doi: 10.1186/s40878-020-00189-y Oomen, B. (2019). Cities of refuge: rights, culture and the creation of cosmopolitan citizenship. R. Buikema, A. Buyse ve A. C. G. Robben (Ed.) Cultures, Citizenship and Human Rights içinde (s.121-136). London: Routledge.
Pew Araştırma Merkezi (2019, Kasım). Europe’s inauthorized Immigrant population peaks in 2016, Then levels off, Erişim adresi: https://www.pewresearch.org/global/2019/11/13/europes-unauthorized-immigrant-population-peaks-in-2016-then-levels-off/
Purcell, M. (2003). Citizenship and the right to the global city: reimagining the capitalist world order. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research,27(3), 564–590. doi: 10.1111/1468-2427.00467 Purcell, M. (2006). Urban democracy and the local trap. Urban Studies, 43(11), 1921–1941. doi:10.1080/00420980600897826 Riverstone-Newell, L. (2013). The diffusion of local bills of rights resolutions to the states, State and Local Government Review, 45(1), 14–24. doi: 10.1177/0160323X12473123
Rodríguez, C. M. (2008). The significance of the local in immigration regulation, Michigan Law Review, 106(4), 567-642. Erişim adresi: https://www.jstor.org/stable/40041632
Roth, L. (2019, 2 Haziran). Which municipalism? Let’s be choosy, Open Democracy, Erişim adresi: https://www.opendemocracy.net/en/can-europe-make-it/which-municipalism-lets-be-choosy/ Rucht, D. (2000). Distant issue movements in Germany: Empirical description and theoretical reflections. J. Guidry, J, M. Kennedy ve M. Zald, (Ed.) Globalizations and Social Movements içinde (s.76-105). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
Russell, B. (2019). Beyond the local trap: New municipalism and the rise of the fearless cities. Antipode, 51(3), 989–1010. doi: 10.1111/anti.12520
Sassen, S. (1998). Globalization and its discontents: Essays on the new mobility of people and money. New York: New Press. Scholten, P. ve Penninx. R. (2016). The multilevel governance of migration and integration. B. Garcés-Mascarenas ve R. Penninx (Ed.) Integration Processes and Policies in Europe içinde (s.91-108). Berlin and Heidelberg: IMISCOE, Springer. Singer, A. (2012). Migration and the metropolis (Ed.), R. Omidvar, Practice to policy. Lessons from local leadership on ımmigrant ıntegration (s.9-10) içinde, Toronto: Maytree Foundation. Spencer, S. ve Delvino, N. (2019). Municipal activism on irregular migrants: The framing of inclusive approaches at the local level. Journal of Immigrant and Refugee Studies, 17(1), 27–43. doi: 10.1080/15562948.2018.1519867 Staeheli, L. (2003). Cities and citizenship. Urban Geography, 24(2), 97–102. doi:10.2747/0272-3638.24.2.97 Tilly, C. (1978). From mobilization to revolution. London: Longman Higher Education.
Tilly, C. (2004). Social movements: 1768-2004. Boulder, CO: Paradigm.
Tilly, C. ve Tarrow, S. (2007). Contentious politics. Boulder: Paradigm Publishers.
United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs. (2018). Sustainable cities, human mobility and international migration. Erişim adresi: https://www.un-ilibrary.org/content/books/9789210473231/read
Van der Brug, W., D’Amato, G., Ruedin, D. ve Berkhout, J. (2015). The politicisation of migration, London: Routledge.
Varsanyi, M. W. (2006). Interrogating “Urban Citizenship” vis-à-vis undocumented migration, Citizenship Studies, 10(2),229-249. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/13621020600633168
Vasi, I. B. ve Strang, D. (2009). Civil liberty in America: the diffusion of municipal bill of rights resolutions after the passage of the USA PATRIOT Act. American Journal of Sociology, 114(6), 1716–1764, doi: 10.1086/597177 Verhoeven, I. ve Bröer, C. (2015). Contentious governance. Local governmental players as social movement actors. W. Duyvendak ve J. Jasper, (Ed.) Breaking down the state. Protestors engaged, içinde (s.95-110). Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
Verhoeven, I. ve Duyvendak, J. W. (2017). Understanding governmental activism. Social Movement Studies, 16(5), 564-577. doi:10.1080/14742837.2017.1338942 Walia, H. (2014, 2 Haziran). Sanctuary city from below: Dismantling the City of Vancouver. The Mainlander, Erişim adresi: http://themainlander.com/2014/06/02/sanctuary-city-from-below-dismantling-the-city-of-vancouver/ Wonders, N. A. ve Fernández-Bessa, C. (2021). Border struggles, political unity, and the transformative power of the local: US sanctuary cities and Spain’s cities of refuge. International Journal for Crime, Justice and Social Democracy, 10(3), 1-15. doi: doi.org/10.5204/ijcjsd.2037 Wonders, N. A. ve Jones, L. C. (2019). Doing and undoing borders: The multiplication of citizenship, citizenship performances, and migration as social movement. Theoretical Criminology, 23(2), 136–155. doi: 10.1177%2F1362480618802297 Ziller, C. ve Wallace-Goodman, S. (2020). Local government efficiency and anti-immigrant violence. The Journal of Politics, 82(3), 895-907. doi:10.1086/707399

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil

Türkçe

Konular

-

Bölüm

Derleme

Yazarlar

Elif Topal Demiroğlu
Türkiye

Yayımlanma Tarihi

27 Haziran 2022

Gönderilme Tarihi

12 Mart 2022

Kabul Tarihi

30 Mayıs 2022

Yayımlandığı Sayı

Yıl 2022 Cilt: 22 Sayı: 2

DOI

https://doi.org/10.18037/ausbd.1136378

IZ

https://izlik.org/JA68DB22WP

Kaynak Göster

RIS / Bibtex

APA

Topal Demiroğlu, E. (2022). Yerel Yönetimler ve Göçmen Yanlısı Toplumsal Hareketler: Belediye Aktivizmi, Sığınak Kentler ve Mülteci Kentleri. Anadolu Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 22(2), 629-650. https://doi.org/10.18037/ausbd.1136378

AMA

1.Topal Demiroğlu E. Yerel Yönetimler ve Göçmen Yanlısı Toplumsal Hareketler: Belediye Aktivizmi, Sığınak Kentler ve Mülteci Kentleri. AÜSBD. 2022;22(2):629-650. doi:10.18037/ausbd.1136378

Chicago

Topal Demiroğlu, Elif. 2022. “Yerel Yönetimler ve Göçmen Yanlısı Toplumsal Hareketler: Belediye Aktivizmi, Sığınak Kentler ve Mülteci Kentleri”. Anadolu Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi 22 (2): 629-50. https://doi.org/10.18037/ausbd.1136378.

EndNote

Topal Demiroğlu E (01 Haziran 2022) Yerel Yönetimler ve Göçmen Yanlısı Toplumsal Hareketler: Belediye Aktivizmi, Sığınak Kentler ve Mülteci Kentleri. Anadolu Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi 22 2 629–650.

IEEE

[1]E. Topal Demiroğlu, “Yerel Yönetimler ve Göçmen Yanlısı Toplumsal Hareketler: Belediye Aktivizmi, Sığınak Kentler ve Mülteci Kentleri”, AÜSBD, c. 22, sy 2, ss. 629–650, Haz. 2022, doi: 10.18037/ausbd.1136378.

ISNAD

Topal Demiroğlu, Elif. “Yerel Yönetimler ve Göçmen Yanlısı Toplumsal Hareketler: Belediye Aktivizmi, Sığınak Kentler ve Mülteci Kentleri”. Anadolu Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi 22/2 (01 Haziran 2022): 629-650. https://doi.org/10.18037/ausbd.1136378.

JAMA

1.Topal Demiroğlu E. Yerel Yönetimler ve Göçmen Yanlısı Toplumsal Hareketler: Belediye Aktivizmi, Sığınak Kentler ve Mülteci Kentleri. AÜSBD. 2022;22:629–650.

MLA

Topal Demiroğlu, Elif. “Yerel Yönetimler ve Göçmen Yanlısı Toplumsal Hareketler: Belediye Aktivizmi, Sığınak Kentler ve Mülteci Kentleri”. Anadolu Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, c. 22, sy 2, Haziran 2022, ss. 629-50, doi:10.18037/ausbd.1136378.

Vancouver

1.Elif Topal Demiroğlu. Yerel Yönetimler ve Göçmen Yanlısı Toplumsal Hareketler: Belediye Aktivizmi, Sığınak Kentler ve Mülteci Kentleri. AÜSBD. 01 Haziran 2022;22(2):629-50. doi:10.18037/ausbd.1136378