Interview Method in State Capitalism Literature: Main Issues and Suggestions

Öz

Interview technique is one of the widely used methods in social sciences. This article examines how the interview method is applied in state capitalism literature. First, using the ISI Web of Science (WoS) database, it identifies 25 articles (among 177) that used the interview method in their analyses on state capitalism. The keyword “state capitalism” is searched in all SSCI articles (titles, abstracts, keywords, etc.) to find contributions on state capitalism (WoS categories of Political Science, Public Administration, Economics, International Relations, and Sociology). Then, the article investigates how the method is applied in these works. It highlights that practitioners of the interview method seldom engage with the related methodological literature. Despite intriguing debates and valuable contributions, how the interview method is drawn on to support analyses and drive main arguments are not generally clear. Thus, more engagement with the methodological literature would be useful in more explicitly and systematically describing (i) the execution of the method (date, length, mode, etc.), (ii) elaboration of saturation, and (iii) how the interview data are analyzed and presented to the readers, including coding, use of software, and use of direct quotations.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• State Capitalism
• Methodology
• Interview Method
• International Political Economy
• Political Economy of Development

Kaynakça

1. Aberbach, J. D. and Rockman, B. A. (2002). Conducting and coding elite interviews. PS: Political Science and Politics, 35(4), 673–676. doi: 10.1017/S1049096502001142.
2. Alami, I., Babic, M., Dixon, A. D. and Liu, I. T. (2022). Special issue introduction: What is the new state capitalism? Contemporary Politics, 28(3), 245–263. doi: 10.1080/13569775.2021.2022336.
3. Amsden, A. H. (1989). Asia’s next giant: South Korea and late industrialization. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
4. Baer, W., Newfarmer, R. and Trebat, T. (1976). State capitalism in Brazil: Some new issues and questions. Inter-American Economic Affairs, 30(3), 69–91.
5. Balaam, D. N. and Dillman, B. (2016). Introduction to international political economy. The US: Routledge.
6. Beamer, G. (2002). Elite interviews and state politics research. State Politics and Policy Quarterly, 2(1), 86–96. doi: 10.1177/153244000200200106.
7. Belesky, P. and Lawrence, G. (2019). Chinese state capitalism and neomercantilism in the contemporary food regime: Contradictions, continuity and change. The Journal of Peasant Studies, 46(6), 1119–1141. doi:10.1080/03066150.2018.1450242.
8. Berry, J. M. (2002). Validity and reliability issues in elite interviewing. Political Science and Politics, 35(4), 679–682. doi: 10.1017/S1049096502001166.

9. Bleich, E. and Pekkanen, R. (2013). How to report interview data. L. Mosley (Ed.), Interview research in political science (pp. 84–105). Ithaca and London: Cornell University Press.
10. Block, F. (2008). Swimming against the current: The rise of a hidden developmental state in the United States. Politics and Society, 36(2), 169–206. doi: 10.1177/0032329208318731.
11. Bowen, G. A. (2008). Naturalistic inquiry and the saturation concept: A research note. Qualitative Research, 8(1), 137–152. doi: 10.1177/1468794107085301.
12. Charmaz, K. (2008). Grounded theory as an emergent method. S. N. Hesse-Biber and P. Leavy (Eds.), Handbook of emergent methods (pp. 133–170). New York: Guilford Press.
13. Chen, H. and Rithmire, M. (2020). The rise of the investor state: State Capital in the Chinese economy. Studies in Comparative International Development, 55(3), 257–277. doi: 10.1007/s12116-020-09308-3.
14. Chuang, J. and Yasuda, J. (2022). Polanyi and the peasant question in China: State, peasant, and land relations in China, 1949–present. Politics and Society, 50(2), 311–347. doi: 10.1177/00323292211032753.
15. Clark, G. L. (1998). Stylized facts and close dialogue: Methodology in economic geography. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 88(1), 73–87. doi: 10.1111/1467-8306.00085.
16. Diefenbach, T. (2009). Are case studies more than sophisticated storytelling?: Methodological problems of qualitative empirical research mainly based on semi-structured interviews. Quality and Quantity, 43(6), 875–894. doi: 10.1007/s11135-008-9164-0.
17. DuBois, F. L. and Primo, M. A. M. (2016). State capitalism and clusters: The case of Brazilian shipbuilding. International Journal of Emerging Markets, 11(2), 214–231. doi: 10.1108/IJoEM-03-2012-0023.
18. Eldh, A. Catrine, Årestedt, L. and Berterö C. (2020). Quotations in Qualitative Studies: Reflections on Constituents, Custom, and Purpose. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 19, 1-6. doi: 10.1177/1609406920969268.
19. Erdogdu, M. M. (1999). The developmental capacity and role of states in technological change: An analysis of the Turkish and South Korean car manufacturing industries. Manchester: University of Manchester.
20. Evans, P. (1995). Embedded autonomy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
21. Haley, U. C. V. and Haley, G. T. (2013). Subsidies to Chinese industry: State capitalism, business strategy, and trade policy. OUP USA.
22. Hopewell, K. (2021). Strategic narratives in global trade politics: American hegemony, free trade, and the hidden hand of the state. The Chinese Journal of International Politics, 14(1), 51–86. doi: 10.1093/cjip/poaa020.
23. Hu, H. W., Cui, L. and Aulakh, P. S. (2019). State capitalism and performance persistence of business group-affiliated firms: A comparative study of China and India. Journal of International Business Studies, 50(2), 193–222. doi: 10.1057/s41267-018-0165-5.
24. Jie Peng, R. (2021). Transnational migrant labor, split labor markets, and workers’ boundary-making practices in a Chinese state-sponsored workplace in Ecuador. International Journal of Comparative Sociology, 62(6), 443–465. doi: 10.1177/00207152221085563.
25. Johnson, C. (1982). MITI and the Japanese miracle: The growth of industrial policy, 1925-1975. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
26. Kalinowski, T. (2015). Crisis management and the diversity of capitalism: Fiscal stimulus packages and the East Asian (neo-)developmental state. Economy and Society, 44(2), 244–270. doi: 10.1080/03085147.2015.1013354.
27. Kinossian, N. and Morgan, K. (2022). Authoritarian state capitalism: Spatial planning and the megaproject in Russia. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 0308518X221104824. doi: 10.1177/0308518X221104824.
28. Kutlay, M. (2020). The politics of state capitalism in a post-liberal international order: The case of Turkey. Third World Quarterly, 41(4), 683–706. doi:10.1080/01436597.2019.1699400.
29. Lamberty, J. and Nevers, J. (2022). The entrepreneurial state in action: The Danish robotics cluster and the role of the public sector. Enterprise and Society, 23(1), 68–98. doi: 10.1017/eso.2020.36.
30. Lee, C.-C., He, Z. and Huang, Y. (2006). ‘Chinese party publicity Inc.’ conglomerated: The case of the Shenzhen press group. Media, Culture and Society, 28(4), 581–602. doi: 10.1177/0163443706065031.
31. Liu, H. and Lim, G. (2022). When the state goes transnational: The political economy of China’s engagement with Indonesia. Competition and Change, 10245294221103068. doi: 10.1177/10245294221103069.
32. Liu, I. T. and Dixon, A. D. (2022). What does the state do in China’s state-led infrastructure financialisation? Journal of Economic Geography, 22(5), 963–988. doi: 10.1093/jeg/lbac009.
33. Maggor, E. (2021). The politics of innovation policy: Building Israel’s “neo-developmental” state. Politics and Society, 49(4), 451–487. doi:10.1177/0032329220945527.
34. Mazzucato, M. (2013). The entrepreneurial state: Debunking public vs. private sector Myths. UK and US: Anthem Press.
35. Meckling, J., Kong, B. and Madan, T. (2015). Oil and state capitalism: Government-firm coopetition in China and India. Review of International Political Economy, 22(6), 1159–1187. doi: 10.1080/09692290.2015.1089303.
36. Milhaupt, C. and Zheng, W. (2015). Beyond ownership: State capitalism and the Chinese firm. UF Law Faculty Publications, 665–722. Erişim adresi: https://scholarship.law.ufl.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1693&context=facultypub
37. Mosley, L. (Ed.). (2013a). Interview research in political science. Ithaca and London: Cornell University Press.
38. Mosley, L. (2013b). Introduction: “Just talk to people”? Interviews in contemporary political science. L. Mosley (Ed.), Interview research in political science (pp. 1–30). Ithaca and London: Cornell University Press.
39. Musacchio, A. and Lazzarini, S. G. (2014). Reinventing state capitalism: Leviathan in business, Brazil and beyond. Harvard: Harvard University Press.
40. Naughton, B. and Tsai, K. S. (Eds.). (2015). State capitalism, institutional adaptation, and the Chinese miracle. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
41. Negoita, M. and Block, F. (2012). Networks and public policies in the Global South: The Chilean case and the future of the developmental network state. Studies in Comparative International Development, 47(1), 1–22. doi: 10.1007/s12116-012-9097-4.
42. Oakley, A. (1981). Interviewing women: A contradiction in terms. H. Roberts (Ed.), Doing feminist research (pp. 30–61). Routledge.
43. Öniş, Z. (1991). The logic of the developmental state. Comparative Politics, 24(1), 109–126. doi: 10.2307/422204.
44. Öniş, Z. (2019). Turkey under the challenge of state capitalism: The political economy of the late AKP era. Southeast European and Black Sea Studies, 19(2), 201–225. doi: 10.1080/14683857.2019.1594856.
45. O’Riain, S. (2004). The politics of high tech growth: Developmental network states in the global economy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
46. Polanska, D. and Weldon, T. (2020). In search of urban commons through squatting: The role of knowledge sharing in the creation and organization of everyday utopian spaces in Sweden. Participation and Conflict, 3(13), 1355–1372. Erişim adresi: https://www.commoncity.net/uploads/2021/07/2020-paco-w-weldon.pdf
47. Reboredo, R. (2021). Rebuilding hegemony: Passive revolution, state transformation and South Africa’s steel sector. Review of African Political Economy, 48(169), 352–368. doi: 10.1080/03056244.2021.1937091.
48. Skalamera Groce, M. and Köstem, S. (2021). The dual transformation in development finance: Western multilateral development banks and China in post-Soviet energy. Review of International Political Economy, 0(0), 1–25. doi: 10.1080/09692290.2021.1974522.
49. Tansey, O. (2007). Process tracing and elite interviewing: A case for non-probability sampling. PS: Political Science and Politics, 4, 765–772. doi:10.1017/S1049096507071211.
50. Telford, L. and Briggs, D. (2022). Targets and overwork: Neoliberalism and the maximisation of profitability from the workplace. Capital and Class, 46(1), 59–76. doi: 10.1177/03098168211022208.
51. Töpfer, L.-M. (2017). Institutional change in Chinese cross-border finance: Foreign investors, the party-state and power resources. Review of International Political Economy, 24(1), 144–175. doi: 10.1080/09692290.2016.1273842.
52. Wright, M., Wood, G., Musacchio, A., Okhmatovskiy, I., Grosman, A. and Doh, J. P. (2021). State capitalism in international context: Varieties and variations. Journal of World Business, 56(2), 101160. doi: 10.1016/j.jwb.2020.101160.
53. Yağcı, Mustafa. 2017. The political economy of AK Party rule in Turkey: From a regulatory to a developmental State? Insight Turkey, 19(2), 89–113. doi:10.25253/99.2017192.06.
54. Yasuda, J. K. (2021). Regulatory state building under authoritarianism: Bureaucratic competition, global embeddedness, and regulatory authority in China. Comparative Politics, 54(1), 123–149. doi: 10.5129/001041521X16132233742534.
55. Yildiz, E. (2020). A reassessment of Turkey’s import substitution strategy: Bureaucracy, politics, and the international organizations. İstanbul University Journal of Sociology, 40(2), 599–623. doi: 10.26650/SJ.2020.40.2.0100.
56. Zadorian, A. (2021). Practicing (state) capitalism at petrobras and rosneft. International Journal of Public Administration, 44(14), 1241–1252. doi:10.1080/01900692.2021.1964082.