The Impact of Economic Size of Government on Income Distribution: Evidence from OECD Countries

Turgay Ceyhan; Ahmet Köstekçi; Abdullah Göv

doi:10.18037/ausbd.959294

The Impact of Economic Size of Government on Income Distribution: Evidence from OECD Countries

Öz

In this study, the relationship between taxes and public expenditures, that show the governmentˈs economic size and income distribution, is analyzed. In the study covering the period 2000-2017 for 24 OECD countries, the Two-Step System Generalized Method of Moments and the bootstrap version of Dumitrescu-Hurlin (2012) panel causality test were used. According to the results of the Two-Step System Generalized Method of Moments, the expansion in the governmentˈs economic size increases the inequality. Findings of the panel causality test show unidirectional causality from taxes and expenditures to Gini.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Kaynakça

Afonso, A., Schuknecht, L. & Tanzi, V. (2008). Income distribution determinants and public spending efficiency. ECB Working Paper, No:861. Access address: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1083986
Aktan, C.C. & Vural, İ. Y. (2002). Makro-ekonomik politikalar, gelir dağılımı ve yoksulluk [Macroeconomic policies, income distribution and poverty]. Yoksullukla Mücadele Stratejileri, C.C. Aktan (Ed.), Ankara: Hak-İş Konfederasyonu Yayınları:1-31. Access address: http://www.canaktan.org/ekonomi/yoksulluk/birinci-bol/aktan-vural-makro-ekonomi.pdf
Alonso-Borrego, C. & Arellano, M. (1996). Symmetrically normalised instrumental-variable estimation using panel data. CEMFI Working Paper, No:9612. Access address: https://www.cemfi.es/research/publications/index.asp
Anderson, E., d'Orey, M.A.J, Duvendack, M. & Esposito, L. (2018). Does government spending affect income poverty? A meta-regression analysis. World Development, 103, 60-71. doi: 10.1016/j.worlddev.2017.10.006.
Arellano, M. & Bond, S. (1991). Some tests of specification for panel data: Monte Carlo evidence and an application to employment equations. The Review of Economic Studies, 58(2), 277-297. doi: 10.2307/2297968
Arellano, M. & Bover, O. (1995). Another look at the instrumental variable estimation of error-components models. Journal of Econometrics, 68(1), 29-51. doi: 10.1016/0304-4076(94)01642-D
Blundell, R. & Bond, S. (1998). Initial conditions and moment restrictions in dynamic panel data models. Journal of Econometrics, 87(1), 115-143. doi: 10.1016/S0304-4076(98)00009-8
Blundell, R. & Bond, S. (2000). GMM estimation with persistent panel data: An application to production functions. Econometric Reviews, 19(3), 321-340. doi: 10.1080/07474930008800475

Callan, T., Doorley, K. & Savage, M. (2018). Inequality in EU crisis countries: How effective were automatic stabilisers? IZA Discussion Paper, No:11439. Access address: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/180457
Demir, M. & Geyik, O. (2019). Evaluation of the impact of globalization on health expenditures in terms of public finance. D. Demirdizen Çevik & O. Geyik (Ed.), in Contemporary Issues in Labor, Public Finance & Administration (p.59-70), London: IJOPEC Publication.
Dickey, D.A. & Fuller, W.A. (1979). Distribution of the estimators for autoregressive time series with a unit root. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 74(366), 427-431. doi: 10.2307/2286348
Doerrenberg, P. & Peichl, A. (2014). The impact of redistributive policies on inequality in OECD countries. Applied Economics, 46(17), 2066-2086. doi: 10.1080/00036846.2014.892202
Dotti, V. (2020). Income inequality, size of government, and tax progressivity: A positive theory. European Economic Review, 121, 1-26. doi: 10.1016/j.euroecorev.2019.103327
Dumitrescu, E.I. & Hurlin, C. (2012). Testing for granger noncausality in heterogeneous panels. Economic Modelling, 29(4), 1450-1460. doi: 10.1016/j.econmod.2012.02.014
Ersezer, D. (2006). Gelir dağılımı politikası ve araçları [Income distribution policy and its tools]. Fırat Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 16(1), 255-268. Access address: http://web.firat.edu.tr/sosyalbil/dergi/arsiv/cilt16/sayi1/255-268.pdf
FredrickSolt (2020). FredrickSolt income inequality statistics. Access address: https://fsolt.org/swiid/swiid_source/
Guzi, M. & Kahanec, M. (2018). Income inequality and the size of government: A causal analysis. IZA Discussion Paper, No:12015. Access address: http://ftp.iza.org/dp12015.pdf
Hausman, J.A. (1978). Specification tests in econometrics. Econometrica, 46(6), 1251-1271. doi: 10.2307/1913827
Im, K.S., Lee, J. & Tieslau, M. (2010). Panel LM unit root tests with trend shifts. FDIC Center for Financial Research Working Paper, No:2010-1. Access address: https://www.fdic.gov/analysis/cfr/2010/wp2010/2010-01.pdf
Im, K.S., Pesaran, H. & Shin, Y. (2003). Testing for unit roots in heterogeneous panels. Journal of Econometrics, 115(1), 53-74. doi:10.1016/S0304-4076(03)00092-7
İlgün, M.F. (2015). Kamu sosyal harcamalarının gelir dağılımı üzerindeki etkisi: OECD ülkelerine yönelik panel veri analizi [The impact of public social expenditures on income distribution: Panel data analysis for OECD countries]. Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 17(4), 493-516. doi:10.16953/deusbed.80724
Kahanec, M. & Zimmermann, K.F. (2008). International migration, ethnicity, and economic inequality. IZA Discussion Paper, No:3450. Access address: http://ftp.iza.org/dp3450.pdf
Kanca, O.C. & Bayrak, M. (2014). Kamu kesiminin ekonomik büyüklüğüne Türkiye ve OECD ülkeleri açısından bir bakış [A glance of the economic size of the public sector in terms of Turkey and OECD countries]. Sayıştay Dergisi, 95, 29-48. Access address: https://dergipark.org.tr/en/download/article-file/1713880
Karataş, M. (2019). Gelir dağılımının teorik yapısı [Theoretical structure of income distribution]. Hak-İş Uluslararası Emek ve Toplum Dergisi, 8(21), 52-79. doi:10.31199/hakisderg.546147
Kaya, İ.G. (2014). Türkiye’de kamu sektörünün optimal büyüklüğü [The optimal size of the public sector in Turkey]. Maliye ve Finans Yazıları, 28(101), 132-157. Access address: https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/mfy/issue/16279
Koç, A. & Gürsoy, S. (2020). Amerikan Merkez Bankası FED’in para politikası araçları ve bağımsızlığı [American Central Bank FEDˈs monetary policy tools and independence]. Econder International Academic Journal, 4(2), 421-447. doi:10.35342/econder.665074
Lee, J. & Strazicich, M. (2009). LM unit root tests with trend breaks at unknown dates. Mimeo.
Lindert, P. (1996). What limits social spending? Explorations in Economic History, 33(1), 1-34. doi:10.1006/exeh.1996.0001
Luo, W., Pickering, A. & Monterio, P.S. (2017). Inequality and the size of government. University of York Discussion Papers in Economics, No:17/02. Access address: https://econpapers.repec.org/paper/yoryorken/17_2f02.htm
Martinez-Vazquez, J., Moreno-Dodson, B. & Vulovic, V. (2012). The impact of tax and expenditure policies on income distribution: Evidence from a large panel of countries. Georgia State University International Center for Public Policy Working Paper, No:12-25. Access address: https://scholarworks.gsu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?referer=http://scholar.google.com.tr/&httpsredir=1&article=1073&context=icepp
Meltzer, A.H. & Richard, S.F. (1981). A rational theory of the size of government. Journal of Political Economy, 89(5), 914-927. doi:10.1086/261013
Meltzer, A.H. & Richard, S.F. (1983). Tests of a rational theory of the size of government. Public Choice, 41(3), 403-418. doi:10.1007/BF00141072
Milanovic, B. (2000). The median-voter hypothesis, income inequality, and income redistribution: An empirical test with the required data. European Journal of Political Economy, 16(3), 367-410. doi:10.1016/S0176-2680(00)00014-8
OECD (2020). OECD statistics. Access address: https://stats.oecd.org/
Pesaran, M.H. (2007). A simple panel unitroot test in the presence of cross section dependence. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 22(2), 265-312. doi:10.1002/jae.951
Pesaran, M.H., Ullah, A. & Yamagata, T. (2008). A bias-adjusted LM test of error cross-section independence. The Econometrics Journal, 11(1), 105-127. doi:10.1111/j.1368-423X.2007.00227.x
Roine, J., Vlachos, J. & Waldenström, D. (2009). The long-run determinants of inequality: What can we learn from top income data? Journal of Public Economics, 93(7–8), 974–988. doi: 10.1016/j.jpubeco.2009.04.003
Sargan, J.D. (1958). The estimation of economic relationships using instrumental variables. Econometrica, 26(3), 393-415. doi:10.2307/1907619
Sargan, J.D. (1988). Testing for misspecification after estimating using instrumental variables. E. Maasoumi (Ed.), in Contributions to Econometrics, England: Cambridge University Press.
Teyyare, E. & Sayaner, K. (2018). Türkiye’de gelir eşitsizliğinin maliye politikası araçları ve kurumsal faktörler açısından analizi ve çözüm önerileri [Analysis of income inequality in terms of fiscal policy tools and institutional factors in Turkey and solution offers]. Bingöl Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 8(16), 309-334. doi:10.29029/busbed.454029
Tuğcu, C.T. (2018). Panel data analysis in the energy-growth nexus (EGN). A.N. Menegaki (Ed.), in The Economics and Econometrics of the Energy-Growth Nexus (p.255-271), England: Cambridge Academic Press.
Ürper, T. (2018). Kamu harcamalarının gelir dağılımı üzerindeki etkisi: Türkiye örneği [The impact of public expenditures on income distribution: The case of Turkey]. (Yayımlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi). Hacettepe Üniversitesi, Ankara.
Wu, D. (1974). Alternative tests of independence between stochastic regressors and disturbances: Finite sample results. Econometrica, 42(3), 529-546. doi:10.2307/1911789
Young Chu, K., Davoodi, H. & Gupta, S. (2000). Income distribution and tax and government social spending policies in developing countries. IMF Working Paper, No:00/62. doi:10.5089/9781451848281.001
Yumuşak, İ.G. & Bilen, M. (2000). Gelir dağılımı-beşeri sermaye ilişkisi ve Türkiye üzerine bir değerlendirme [Income distribution-human capital nexus and an evaluation on Turkey]. K.Ü. Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 1(1), 77-87. Access address: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/23747501

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil

Türkçe

Konular

-

Bölüm

Araştırma Makalesi

Yazarlar

Turgay Ceyhan Bu kişi benim
Türkiye

Ahmet Köstekçi Bu kişi benim
Türkiye

Abdullah Göv
Türkiye

Yayımlanma Tarihi

29 Haziran 2021

Gönderilme Tarihi

31 Mart 2021

Kabul Tarihi

3 Haziran 2021

Yayımlandığı Sayı

Yıl 2021 Cilt: 21 Sayı: 2

DOI

https://doi.org/10.18037/ausbd.959294

IZ

https://izlik.org/JA97WY92ZJ

Kaynak Göster

RIS / Bibtex

APA

Ceyhan, T., Köstekçi, A., & Göv, A. (2021). The Impact of Economic Size of Government on Income Distribution: Evidence from OECD Countries. Anadolu Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 21(2), 655-676. https://doi.org/10.18037/ausbd.959294

AMA

1.Ceyhan T, Köstekçi A, Göv A. The Impact of Economic Size of Government on Income Distribution: Evidence from OECD Countries. AÜSBD. 2021;21(2):655-676. doi:10.18037/ausbd.959294

Chicago

Ceyhan, Turgay, Ahmet Köstekçi, ve Abdullah Göv. 2021. “The Impact of Economic Size of Government on Income Distribution: Evidence from OECD Countries”. Anadolu Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi 21 (2): 655-76. https://doi.org/10.18037/ausbd.959294.

EndNote

Ceyhan T, Köstekçi A, Göv A (01 Haziran 2021) The Impact of Economic Size of Government on Income Distribution: Evidence from OECD Countries. Anadolu Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi 21 2 655–676.

IEEE

[1]T. Ceyhan, A. Köstekçi, ve A. Göv, “The Impact of Economic Size of Government on Income Distribution: Evidence from OECD Countries”, AÜSBD, c. 21, sy 2, ss. 655–676, Haz. 2021, doi: 10.18037/ausbd.959294.

ISNAD

Ceyhan, Turgay - Köstekçi, Ahmet - Göv, Abdullah. “The Impact of Economic Size of Government on Income Distribution: Evidence from OECD Countries”. Anadolu Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi 21/2 (01 Haziran 2021): 655-676. https://doi.org/10.18037/ausbd.959294.

JAMA

1.Ceyhan T, Köstekçi A, Göv A. The Impact of Economic Size of Government on Income Distribution: Evidence from OECD Countries. AÜSBD. 2021;21:655–676.

MLA

Ceyhan, Turgay, vd. “The Impact of Economic Size of Government on Income Distribution: Evidence from OECD Countries”. Anadolu Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, c. 21, sy 2, Haziran 2021, ss. 655-76, doi:10.18037/ausbd.959294.

Vancouver

1.Turgay Ceyhan, Ahmet Köstekçi, Abdullah Göv. The Impact of Economic Size of Government on Income Distribution: Evidence from OECD Countries. AÜSBD. 01 Haziran 2021;21(2):655-76. doi:10.18037/ausbd.959294

Cited By

Vergilerin Sosyal Harcamalar Özelinde Topluma Geri Dönüşü: Türkiye Üzerine Bir Analiz

Aksaray Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi

https://doi.org/10.52791/aksarayiibd.971658