The Relationship between R&D Expenditures, Patent Applications and Growth: A Dynamic Panel Causality Analysis for OECD Countries

Yıl 2016, Cilt: 16 Sayı: 1, 39 - 48, 25.04.2016

Asst. Prof. Dr. Salih Türedi

Öz

The causality relationship of economic growth with R&D expenditures and patent applications for the 23 OECD member countries is investigated in this study by utilising from the data belonging the period of 1996-2011. To that aim, GMM (Generalized Method of Moments) approach developed by Arellano-Bond (1991) and Wald test are used. Panel causality estimation results put forth a two-way and positive causality between R&D expenditures and economic growth, and a one-way and positive causality from patent applications to economic growth. Hence, on the ground of these results, it can be argued that it is important for the countries aiming to achieve a sustainable and high rate of growth to allocate more resources for R&D activities and establish an efficient patent system.

Anahtar Kelimeler

R&D Expenditures, Patent Applications, Growth, Panel Causality

Kaynakça

• Ayhan, A. (2002). Dünden Bugüne Türkiye’de Bilim ve Teknoloji ve Geleceğin Teknolojileri. İstanbul: Beta Yayınevi.
• Akçay, S. (2011). Toplam Ar-Ge Yatırımları ile Ekonomik Büyüme Arasında Nedensellik ilişkisi: Amerika Birleşik Devletlerinden Kanıt. Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 16 (1), 79-92.
• Akıncı, M., Sevinç, H. (2013). Ar-Ge Harcamaları ile Ekonomik Büyüme Arasındaki İlişki: 1990 – 2011 Türkiye Örneği. Uluslararası Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi, 6 (27), 7-17.
• Altın, O., Kaya, A. (2009). Türkiye’de Ar-Ge Harcamaları ve Ekonomik Büyüme Arasındaki Nedensel İlişkinin Analizi. Ege Akademik Bakış, 9 (1), 251- 259.
• Arellano, M., Bond, S. (1991). Some Tests of Specification for Panel Data: Monte Carlo Evidence and An Application to Employment Equations. The Review of Economic Studies, 58 (2), 277-297.
• Bai, J., Ng, S. (2004). A Panic Attack on Unit Roots and Cointegration. Econometrica, 72 (4), 1127-1178.
• Baltagi, H. B. (2007). Comments on Panel Data Analysis-Advantage and Challenges. Test 16 (1), 28-30.
• Braconier, H. (2000). Do Higher Per Capita Incomes Lead to More R&D Expenditure?, Review of Development Economics, 4 (3), 244–257.
• Breuer, B., McNown, R., Wallace, M. (2002). Series- Specific Unit Root Test with Panel Data. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics. 64, 527-546.
• Breusch, T. S., Pagan, A. R. (1980). The Lagrange Multiplier Test and Its Applications to Model Specifications Tests in Econometrics. Review of Economic Studies, 47, 239-253.
• Choi, I. (2001). Unit Root Tests for Panel Data. Journal of International Money and Finance, 20, 249-272.
• Crosby, M. (2000). Patents, Innovation and Growth. The Economic Record, 16 (234), 255-262.
• Gengenbach, C., Palm, F. C., Urbain, J. P. (2010). Panel Unit Root Tests in the Presence of Cross-Sectional Dependencies: Comparison and Implications for Modelling. Econometric Reviews, 29 (2), 111-145.
• Gittleman, M., Wol , E. N. (1995). R&D Activity and Cross Country Growth Comparisons. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 19, 189-207.
• Grossman, G.M., Helpman, E. (1994). Endogenous Innovation in the eory of Growth. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 8, 23-44.
• Guo, Y., Wang, B. (2013). Study on the Economic Growth of Patent Output in the Hightech Industry. Journal of Management and Sustainability, 3 (1), 103-107.
• Gyekye, A. B., Oseifuah, E. K., Quarshie, V. (2012). The Impact of Research and Development on Socio-Economic Development: Perspectives from Selected Developing Economies. Journal of Emerging Trends in Economics and Management Sciences, 3 (6), 915-922.
• Hadri, K. (2000). Testing for Stationary in Heterogeneous Panel Data. Econometrics Journal, 3, 148-161.
• Holtz-Eakin, D., Newey W., Rosen, S. H. (1988). Estimating Vector Autoregressions with Panel Data. Econometrica, 56 (6), 1371–1395.
• Hsiao, C. (2003). Analysis of Panel Data (Second Editi- on). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Hsiao, C. (2006). Panel Data Analysis Advantage and Challenges. WISE Working Paper Series No: 0602.
• Im, K. S., Pesaran, M. H., Shin, Y. (2003). Testing for Unit Roots in Heterogeneous Panels. Journal of Econometrics, 115, 53-74.
• Işık, C. (2014). Patent Harcamaları ve İktisadi Büyüme Arasındaki İlişki. Sosyo Ekonomi, 1, 69-86.
• Josheski, D., Koteski, C. (2011). The Causal Relationship between Patent Growth and Growth of GDP with Quarterly Data in the G7 Countries: Cointegration, ARDL and Error Correction Models. MPRA Paper No: 33153.
• Jung, H., Kwon, H. U. (2007). An Alternative System GMM Estimation in Dynamic Panel Models. Hi- Stat Discussion Paper Series, No: 217.
• Kim, T., Maskus, E., Oh, Y. (2009). Effects of Patents on Productivity Growth in Korean Manufacturing: A Panel Data Analysis. Pacific Economic Review, 14 (2), 137-154.
• Levin, A., Lin, C. F., Chu, J. S. (2002). Unit Root Tests in Panel Data: Asymptotic and Finite-Sample Properties. Journal of Econometrics, 108 (1), 1-24.
• Lichtenberg, F. (1993). R&D Investment and International Productivity Di erences. NBER Working Paper Series, No: 61.
• Mehran, M., Reza, M. (2011). A Comparative Investigation of the Relation of R&D Expenditures to Economic Growth in a Group of the Less Developed Countries and OECD Countries. Journal of Social and Development Sciences, 2 (4), 188-195.
• OECD (1993). The Measurement of Scientific and Technological Activities: Standard Practice for Surveys of Research and Experimental Development – Frascati Manual 1993.
• Ortiz, J. M. (2009). Patents and Economic Growth in the Long Term: A Quantitative Approach. Brussels Economic Review, 52, 305-340.
• Pesaran, N. H. (2004). General Diagnostic Tests for Cross Section Dependence in Panels. University of Cambridge Working Papers in Economics No: 0435.
• Pesaran, M. H. (2007). A Simple Panel Unit Root Test in the Presence of Cross-Section Dependence. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 22, 265-312.
• Pesaran, M. H., Yamagata, T. (2008). Testing Slope Homogeneity in Large Panels. Journal of Econometrics, 142 (1), 50-93.
• Pesaran, M. H., Smith, L. V., Yamagata, T. (2013). Panel Unit Root Tests in the Presence of Multifactor Error Structure. Journal of Econometrics, 175, 94-115.
• Romer, M. P. (1986). Increasing Returns and Long- Run Growth. the Journal of Political Economy, 94 (5), 1002-1037.
• Rouygari, A., Kızıltan, A. (2014). Economic Growth and Research-Development Costs. MAGNT Research Report, 2 (3), 31-47.
• Saini, A. K., Jain, S. (2011). the Impact of Patent Applications Filed on Sustainable Development of Selected Asian Countries. International Journal of Information Technology, 3 (2), 358-364.
• Samimi, A. J., Alerasoul, M. S. (2009). R&D and Economic Growth: New Evidence from Some Developing Countries. Australian Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences, 3 (4), 3464-3469.
• Saygılı, Ş. (2003). Bilgi Ekonomisine Geçiş Sürecinde Türkiye Ekonomisinin Dünyadaki Konumu. DPT Yayın No: 2675.
• Sinha, D. (2008). Patents, Innovations and Economic Growth in Japan and South Korea: Evidence from Individual Country and Panel Data. Applied Eco- nometrics and International Development, 8 (1), 181-188.
• Taylor, M., Sarno, L. (1998). the Behaviour of Real Exchange Rates during the Post-Bretton Woods Period. Journal of International Economics, 46, 281-312.
• Üzümcü, A. (2012). İktisadi Büyüme (1. Baskı). İstanbul: Beta Yayıncılık.
• Yanyun, Z., Mingqian, Z. (2004). R& D and Economic Growth: Panel Data Analysis in ASEAN+3 Countries” A Joint Conference of AKES, RCIE and KDI: Korea and the World Economy, III, July 3-4, Sungkyunkwan.
• Zhang, H. (2014). Patent Institution, Innovation and Economic Growth in China, Deepening Reform for China’s Long-term Growth and Development. Can- berra: ANU Press.