Statü Tüketiminin Fiyat Duyarlılığına Etkisini Belirlemeye Yönelik Bir Araştırma

Yıl 2019, Cilt: 19 Sayı: 2, 151 - 170, 17.06.2019

Polat Can

https://doi.org/10.18037/ausbd.579290

Öz

Birey kendisi için anlam ve değeri yüksek olan öğeleri toplum içerisinde ifade etmek ve iletmek

için çeşitli işaret ve simgeler kullanmaktadır. Bu bağlamda, günümüzde ise özellikle refah seviyesi

olarak gelişmiş ülkelerde tüketici, statüsünü gösteren ürünleri satın almayı tercih etmektedir.

Statü tüketimi, tüketicinin otorite kazanmak için başkalarının önem verdiği ve statülerinin

göstergesi olan ürünleri satın alıp diğerlerine karşı toplumsal konumlarını gü.lendirmeye

yönlendirilen motive edici süre.tir. Statüsüne uygun satın alım yapan tüketici için ürünün kalite

ve işlevselliğinden çok satın aldığı fiyat önemlidir. Bu çalışmada, statülerine uygun alışveriş yapan

tüketiciler açısından, statü tüketiminin fiyat duyarlılığına olan etkisi belirlenmeye çalışılmıştır.

Bu amaç doğrultusunda Uşak il merkezinde yaşayan devlet memurlarına anket uygulanmıştır.

Verilerin analizinde, frekans dağılımı, güvenilirlik analizi, aritmetik ortalama, standart sapma,

doğrulayıcı faktör analizi ve yapısal eşitlik modelleme (path) analizi kullanılmıştır. Analizler

sonucunda, statü tüketiminin tüketici ilgilenimi, tüketici yenilikçiliği ve marka bağlılığı üzerinde

etkili olduğu belirlenmiştir. Tüketici yenilikçiliği ile marka bağlılığının fiyat duyarlılığı üzerinde

etkisi tespit edilirken tüketici ilgileniminin fiyat duyarlılığı üzerinde etkisinin olmadığı

g.rülmüştür.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Tüketici Davranışı, Statü Tüketimi, Tüketici İlgilenimi, Tüketici Yenilikçiliği

Kaynakça

• Aaker, D. A. (1991). Managing Band Equity, New York: Free.
• Alves, H., Ferreira, J. J. & Fernandes, C. I. (2016). Customer’s operant resources effects on co-creation activities. Journal of Innovation and Knowledge, 1, 69-80.
• Amaldoss, W. & Jain, S. (2005). Conspicuous consumption and sophisticated thinking. Management Science, 51(10), 1449-1466.
• Aslay, F., Ünal, S. & Akbulut, Ö. (2013). Materyalizmin statü tüketimi üzerindeki etkisini belirlemeye yönelik bir araştırma. Atatürk Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi, 27(2), 43-62.
• Assael, H. (2004). Consumer Behavior: A Strategic Approach, Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
• Barnett, J. M. (2005). Shopping for Gucci on Canal Street: Reflections on status consumption, intellectual property and the incentive thesis. Virginia Law Review, 91(6), 1381-1423.
• Bartels, J. & Reinders, M. J. (2011). Consumer innovativeness and its correlates: A propositional inventory for future research. Journal of Business Research, 64(6), 601-609.
• Beatty, S. E. & Kahle, L. R. (1988). Alternative hierarchies of the attitude-behavior relationship: The impact of brand commitment and habit. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 16(Summer), 1-10.
• Bin, G. (2013). A reasoned action perspective of user innovation: Model and empirical test. Industrial Marketing Management, 42(4), 608-619.
• Borgogno, M., Favotto, S., Corazzin, M., Cardello, A. V. & Piasentier, E. (2015). The role of product familiarity and consumer involvement on liking and perceptions of fresh meat. Food Quality and Preference, 44, 139-147.
• Brockhoff, K. (2003). Customers’ perspectives of involvement in new product development. International Journal of Technology Management, 26, 464-481.
• Chao, A. & Schor, J.B. (1998). Empirical tests of status consumption: Evidence from women’s cosmetics. Journal of Economic Psychology, 19(1), 107-131.
• Charles, K.K., Hurst, E. & Roussanov, N. (2009). Conspicuous consumption and race. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 124(2), 425-467.
• Chen, J. & Kim, S. (2013). A comparison of Chinese consumers’ intentions to purchase luxury fashion brands for self-use and for gifts. Journal of International Consumer Marketing, 25, 29–44.
• Clark, R., Zboja, J. & Goldsmith, R. (2007). Status consumption and rolerelaxed consumption: a tale of two retail consumers. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 14, 45-59.
• Coopers, P. W. (2012). South African Retail and Consumer Products Outlook 2012-2016. PWC, South Africa.
• Cronje, A., Jacobs, B. & Retief, A. (2016). Black urban consumers’ status consumption of clothing brands in the emerging South African market. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 40, 754-764.
• Dmitrovic, T., Vida, I. & Reardon, J. (2009). Purchase behavior in favor of domestic products in the Western Balkans. International Business Review, 18(5), 523-535.
• Dubois, D., Rucker, D. D. & Galinsky, A. D. (2012). Super size me: Product size as a signal of status. Journal of Consumer Research, 38(6), 1047-1062.
• Eastman, J. K., Goldsmith, R. E. & Flynn, L. R. (1999). Status consumption in consumer behavior: Scale development and validation. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 7(3), 41-51.
• Eastman, J. K. & Liu, J. (2012). The impact of generational cohorts on status consumption: an exploratory look at generational cohort and demographics on status consumption. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 29, 93-102.
• Eastman, J. K. ve Eastman, K. L. (2015). Conceptualizing a model of status consumption theory: An exploration of the antecedents and consequences of the motivation to consume for status. Psychology & Marketing, 33(9): 761-776.
• Flynn, L. R., Goldsmith, R. E. & Kim, W. M. (2000). A cross-cultural validation of three new marketing scales for fashion research: Involvement, opinion seeking and knowledge. Journal of Fashion Marketing and Management, 4(2), 110-120.
• Flynn, L. R., Goldsmith, R. E. & Pollitte, W. (2016). Materialism, status consumption and market involved consumers. Psychology & Marketing, 33(9), 761-776.
• Fournier, S. (1998). Consumers and their brands: Developing relationship theory in consumer research. Journal of Consumer Research, 24(4), 343-373.
• Gabriel, Y. & Lang, T. (2006). The Unmanageable Consumer, (2. Baskı), Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
• Gao, H., Winterich, K. P. & Zhang, Y. (2016). All that glitters is not gold: How others’ status influences the effect of power distance belief on status consumption. Journal Of Consumer Research, 43, 265-281.
• Gardyn, R. (2002). Oh, the good life. American Demographics, 24(10), 30-35.
• Goldsmith, R. E. & Hofacker, C. F. (1991). Measuring consumer innovativeness. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 19(3), 209-221.
• Goldsmith, R. E., Flynn, L. R. & Eastman, J. K. (1996), Status consumption and fashion behavior: An exploratory study. in Proceedings of the Association of Marketing Theory and Practice, 5, 309–316.
• Goldsmith, R. E. & Newell, S. J. (1997). Innovativeness and price sensitivity: Managerial, theoretical and methodological issues. Journal of Product and Brand Management, 6(3), 163-174.
• Goldsmith, R. E., Flynn, L. R. & Kim, D. (2010). Status consumption and price sensitivity. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 18(4), 323-338.
• Han, Y. J., Nunes, J. C. & Dreze, X. (2010). Signaling status with luxury goods: The role of brand prominence. Journal of Marketing, 74, 15-30.
• Heffetz, O. (2011). A test of conspicuous consumption: visibility and income elasticities. Review of Economics and Statistics, 93, 1101-1117.
• Hong, J. C, Lin, P. H. & Hsieh, P. C. (2016). The effect of consumer innovativeness on perceived value and continuance intention to use smartwatch. Computers in Human Behavior, 67, 264-272.
• Hussain, S. & Rashidi, M. Z. (2015). Consumer innovativeness leading to innovation adoption. Pakistan Business Review, 17(3), 562-580.
• Iyer, R., Eastman, J. K., Sharma, R. W. & Eastman, K. L. (2017). The impact of cognitive age on materialism, status consumption and loyalty proneness on the Indian elderly. The Marketing Management Journal, 27(1), 48-62.
• İslamoğlu, A. H. & Alnıaçık, Ü. (2013). Sosyal Bilimlerde Araştırma Yöntemleri, İstanbul: Beta.
• Kotler, P. (2000). Pazarlama Yönetimi. Nejat Muallimoğlu (Çev.). İstanbul: Beta.
• Kwon, Y. & Kwon, K. (2013). Cultural omnivores’ consumption: strategic and inclusively exclusive. International Journal of Marketing Studies, 5, 118-127.
• Lau, M. M., Chang, M. T., Moon, K. L. & Liu, W.S. (2006). The brand loyalty of sportswear in Hong Kong. Journal of Textile and Apparel, Technology and Management, 5(1), 1-13.
• Lertwannawit, A. ve R. Mandhachitara (2012). Interpersonal effects on fashion consciousness and status consumption moderated by materialism in metropolitan men. Journal of Business Research, 65, 1408-1416.
• Lin, M. J. J., Tu, Y. C., Chen, D. C., & Huang, C. H. (2013). Customer participation and new product development outcomes: The moderating role of product innovativeness. Journal of Management & Organization, 19, 314-337.
• Mann, B. J. S. & Sahni, S. K. (2015). Exploring the drivers of status consumption for the wedding occasion. International Journal of Market Research, 57(2), 179-202.
• Minton, E. A., Kahle, L. R., Jiuan, T. S. & Tambyah, S. K. (2016). Addressing criticisms of global religion research: A consumption-based exploration of status and materialism, sustainability and volunteering behavior. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 55(2), 365-383.
• Mishra, A. A. (2015). Consumer innovativeness and consumer decision styles: a confirmatory and segmentation analysis. The International Review of Retail, Distribution and Consumer Research, 25(1), 35-54.
• Mittal, B. & Lee, M. S. (1989). A causal model of consumer involvement. Journal of Economic Psychology, 10(3), 363-389.
• Morton, C., Anable, J. & Nelson, J. D. (2016). Exploring consumer preferences towards electric vehicles: The influence of consumer innovativeness. Research in Transportation Business & Management, 18, 18-28.
• Mullarkey, G. W. (2001). The influence of brands in the fashion purchasing process. University of Auckland Business Review, 3(1), 56-71.
• Munnukka, J. (2005). Dynamics of price sensitivity among mobile service customers. Journal of Product and Brand Management, 14(1), 65-73.
• Naehyun, J., Line, N. D & Merkebu, J. (2016). Examining the impact of consumer innovativeness and innovative restaurant image in upscale restaurants. Cornell Hospitality Quarterly, 57(3), 268-281.
• Nelissen, R. M. A. & Meijers, R. M. A. (2011). Social benefits of luxury brands as costly signals of wealth and status. Evolution and Human Behaviour, 32, 343-355.
• O’Cass, A. & Frost, H. (2002). Status brands: Examining the effects of non-product-related brand associations on status and conspicuous consumption. Journal of Product and Brand Management, 11(2), 67-88.
• O’Cass, A. & McEwen, H. (2004). Exploring consumer status and conspicuous consumption. Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 4, 25-39.
• Park, H. J. & Rabolt, N. J. (2006). Brand loyalty and price sensitivity: Moderating effect of fashion innovativeness. paper presented at the International Textile and Apparel Association, San Antonio, TX, November 1-6.
• Phau, I. & Cheong, E. (2009). How young adult consumers evaluate diffusion brands: Effects of brand loyalty and status consumption. Journal of International Consumer Marketing, 21, 109-123.
• Rahbariana, H. & Meshkanib, F. A. (2014). Consumer involvement profiles: An application of consumer involvement in mobile industry. Management Science Letters, 4, 617-620.
• Ramirez, E. & Goldsmith, R. E. (2009). Some antecedents of price sensitivity. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 17(3), 199-213.
• Raskovic, M., Ding, Z., Skare, V., Dosen, D. O. & Zabkar, V. (2015). Comparing consumer innovativeness and ethnocentrism of young-adult consumers. Journal of Business Research, 69, 3682-3686.
• Roehrich, G. (2004). Consumer innovativeness: Concepts and measurements. Journal of Business Research, 57, 671-677.
• Schermelleh-Engel, K., Moosbrugger, H. & Müler, H. (2003). Evaluating the fit of structural equation models: Tests of significance and descriptive goodness-of-fiteasures. Methods of Psychological Research, 8, 23-74.
• Schimpfossl, E. (2014). Russia’s social upper class: from ostentation to culturedness. British Journal of Sociology, 64, 63-81.
• Segal, B. & Podoshen, J. (2013). An examination of materialism, conspicuous consumption and gender differences. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 37, 189-198.
• Shukla, P. (2010). Status consumption in cross-national context. Sociopsychological, brand and situational antecedents. International Marketing Review, 27, 108-129.
• Sundie, J., Griskevicius, V., Vohs, K., Kendrick, D., Tybur, J. & Beal, D. (2011). Peacocks, Porches and Thorstein Veblen: conspicuous consumption as a sexual signalling system. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 100, 664–680.
• Tellis, G. J., Yin, E. & Bell, S. (2009). Global consumer innovativeness: Cross-country differences and demographic commonalities. Journal of International Marketing, 17(2), 1-22.
• Tsai, S. (2005). Impact of personal orientation on luxury-brand purchase value: An international investigation. International Journal o f Market Research, 47(4), 429-454.
• Trigg, A. (2001). Veblen, Bourdieu, and conspicuous consumption. Journal of Economic Issues, 35, 99-115.
• Wang, Y. & Griskevicus, V. (2014). Conspicuous consumption, relationships and rivals: Women’s luxury products as signals to other women. Journal of Consumer Research, 40(February), 834-851.
• Wetlaufer, S. (2001). The perfect paradox of star brands: An interview with bernard arnault of LVMH. Harvard Business Review, 79(9), 116-123.
• Wilson, A. E. (2006). Brand loyalty as a moderator of the price sensitivity-heavy users relationship. Society for Marketing Advances, 104-107.
• Wingfield, N. (2005). You have reached the next level. Wall Street Journal (November 11), W1.
• Xie, X. & Jia, Y. (2016). Consumer involvement in new product development: A case study from the online virtual community. Psychology&Marketing, 33(12), 1187-1194.
• Yun, W. & Hira, C. (2012). The effect of fashion innovativeness on consumer’s online apparel customization. International Journal of Organizational Innovation, 5(2), 263-83.