“Friendly Tyrants” as the Constant Impasse of US Foreign Policy: The Case of Egypt and the “Fear of Worse”

Öz

Throughout history, the primary determinant of US foreign policy has long been the inherent dilemma arising from the tension between commitment to liberal values and the requirements of security interests. These two oft-contradicting elements have been at the heart of the country's preferences at the international level and sometimes generated controversial decisions. This article focuses on the origins and contemporary reflections of the friendly tyrants problem -an inevitable product of the inherent dilemma of US foreign policy. The impasse, nurtured by the constant tendency of the USA to form its foreign policy strategy through opposition to an "other", which is mostly demonized, and the resulting "fear of worse", became particularly evident during the Cold War. Based on the process-tracing method, this study examines the evolution of the friendly tyrants problem and analyzes its current reflections through the Egyptian example. The changes observed in the US-Egypt relations after the Arab Spring are far from creating a radical transformation at the root of the impasse. The friendly tyrants problem, influenced by international dynamics as well as the American political culture, its widespread foreign policy tendencies, and the long-standing behavioral pattern, maintains its central position today, especially regarding the Middle East-related issues. Therefore, the question of friendly tyrants has become a permanent problematic for US foreign policy, regardless of time, space, and the dynamics of the period under consideration. As such, the impasse is not limited to any period, region, or administration.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Arab Spring
• Egypt
• Friendly Tyrants
• Middle East
• US Foreign Policy

Amerikan Dış Politikasının Daimî Açmazı “Dost Despotlar”: Mısır Örneği ve “Beterin Beteri Korkusu”

Öz

Tarih boyunca ABD dış politikasının temel belirleyicisi, liberal değerlere bağlılık ve güvenlik çıkarlarının gereklilikleri arasındaki gerginlikten kaynaklanan içsel ikilem olagelmiştir. Zaman zaman örtüşse de genelde çelişen bu iki unsur, ülkenin uluslararası seviyedeki tercihlerinin temelinde yer alırken, zor seçimleri ve tartışmalı hamleleri de beraberinde getirmektedir. Bu ikilemden beslenen sorunların başında gelen dost despotlar açmazının kökenleri ve günümüzdeki yansımaları, bu makalenin odağını oluşturmaktadır. ABD’nin, dış politika stratejisini ekseriyetle şeytanileştirilen bir “öteki”ye karşıtlık üzerinden oluşturulması yönündeki daimî eğilimi ve buna bağlı olarak doğan “beterin beteri korkusu”ndan kaynaklanan bu açmaz, özellikle Soğuk Savaş döneminde oldukça belirginleşmiştir. Süreç izleme tekniğine yaslanan bu çalışma, dost despotlar ikileminin evrimini inceleyerek bugüne yansımalarını Mısır örneği üzerinden analiz etmektedir. Arap Baharı sonrasında ABD-Mısır ilişkilerinde gözlemlenen değişimler, açmazın kökeninde radikal bir dönüşüm yaratmaktan çok uzaktır. ABD’nin siyasal kültüründen, dış politikadaki yaygın eğilimlerinden ve tarih içerisinde şekillenen davranış modelinden beslendiği kadar uluslararası dinamiklerin etkisine de açık olan dost despotlar sorunu, günümüzde, özellikle Orta Doğu ile ilişkili meselelerde merkezi konumunu korumaktadır. Söz konusu açmaz, zaman, mekân ve ortaya çıktığı dönemin dinamiklerinden bağımsız biçimde daimî bir dış politika sorunsalı haline gelmiştir. Bu haliyle dost despotlar, ABD dış politikasının tarihsel bir gerçeğidir ve herhangi bir dönem, bölge veya yönetimle sınırlı değildir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Amerikan Dış Politikası
• Arap Baharı
• Dost Despotlar
• Mısır
• Orta Doğu

Kaynakça

1. Abrams, Elliott (2017), Realism and Democracy: American Foreign Policy after the Arab Spring (New York: Cambridge University Press).
2. BBC News (2012), "Egypt’s Islamist Parties Win Elections to Parliament", 21 Ocak, https://www.bbc.com/news/world-middle-east-16665748 (14.11.2021).
3. Beach, Derek ve Rasmus Brun Pedersen (2013), Process-Tracing Methods: Foundations and Guidelines (Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press).
4. Bush, George W. (2002), "State of the Union Address", https://georgewbush-whitehouse.archives.gov/news/releases/2002/01/20020129-11.html (24.10.2021).
5. Clinton, Hillary Rodham (2014), Hard Choices (New York: Simon & Schuster).
6. Cohen, Warren (2015), The New Cambridge History of American Foreign Relations: Challenges to American Primacy, 1945 to the Present (New York: Cambridge University Press).
7. Coşkun, Bezen Balamir (2020), "Dış Politika Analizinde Bir Yöntem Olarak Süreç İzleme", Coşkun, Bezen Balamir ve İnan Rüma (Ed.), Dış Politika Analizi: Konu, Kuram, Yöntem (İstanbul: İstanbul Bilgi Üniversitesi Yayınları): 77-96.
8. Dueck, Colin (2008), Reluctant Crusaders: Power, Culture, and Change in American Grand Strategy. (Princeton: Princeton University Press).

9. Dueck, Colin (2015), The Obama Doctrine: American Grand Strategy Today (New York: Oxford University Press).
10. Duman, Ahmed Hayri (2020), "Leaders and Egyptian Foreign Policy: Individual Factors During Nasser and Morsi Periods", Ortadoğu Etütleri, 12 (2): 369-390.
11. Egypt: Background and U.S. Relations (2021), RL3300330, 30 Eylül, (Congressional Research Service).
12. Fabbrini, Sergio ve Amr Yossef (2015), "Obama’s Wavering: US Foreign Policy on the Egyptian Crisis, 2011–13", Contemporary Arab Affairs, 8 (1): 65-80.
13. Fisher, Max (2013), "Another Reason Why the U.S. Hasn’t Condemned Egypt’s Coup: One High-Level Personal Relationship", Washington Post, 11 Temmuz, https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/worldviews/wp/2013/07/11/another-reason-why-the-u-s-hasnt-condemned-egypts-coup-one-high-level-personal-relationship/ (14.11.2021).
14. Fitzgerald, David ve David Ryan (2014), Obama, US Foreign Policy and the Dilemmas of Intervention (New York: Palgrave Macmillan).
15. Forsythe, David P. (2011), "US Foreign Policy and Human Rights: Situating Obama", Human Rights Quarterly, 33 (3): 767-789.
16. Garfinkle, Adam (1991), "Friendly Tyrants: Historical Reckoning", Pipes, Daniel ve Adam Garfinkle (Ed.), Friendly Tyrants: An American Dilemma (London: Macmillan): 221-251.
17. Gelvin, James L. (2012), The Arab Uprisings: What Everyone Needs to Know (New York: Oxford University Press).
18. George, Alexander L. ve Andrew Bennett (2005), Case Studies and Theory Development in the Social Sciences (Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press).
19. Haass, Richard (2021), "Present at the Disruption: How Trump Unmade U.S. Foreign Policy", Foreign Affairs, September/October 2020, https://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/united-states/2020-08-11/present-disruption (04.11.2021).
20. Haass, Richard (1991), "Friendly Tyrants: A Policy Primer", Pipes, Daniel ve Adam Garfinkle (Ed.), Friendly Tyrants: An American Dilemma (London: Macmillan): 507-519.
21. Hamid, Shadi (2011), "The Rise of the Islamists: How Islamists Will Change Politics, and Vice Versa", Foreign Affairs, 90 (3): 40-47.
22. Harding, James (2011), "Henry Kissinger: My Friends and Enemies", The Times, 14 Mayıs, https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/henry-kissinger-my-friends-and-enemies-wt03mg7pwmc (06.11.2021).
23. Hartz, Louis (1991), The Liberal Tradition in America: An Interpretation of American Political Thought Since the Revolution (San Diego: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich).
24. Hoffmann, Stanley (1989), "What Should We Do in the World?", The Atlantic, Ekim, https://www.theatlantic.com/past/docs/politics/foreign/hoffman.htm (15.10.2021).
25. Hofstadter, Richard (2008), The Paranoid Style in American Politics and Other Essays (New York: Vintage Books).
26. Hudson, John (2013), "Obama Administration Won’t Call Egypt’s Coup a Coup", Foreign Policy, https://foreignpolicy.com/2013/07/08/obama-administration-wont-call-egypts-coup-a-coup/ (14.11.2021).
27. Huntington, Samuel P. (1996), The Clash of Civilizations and the Remaking of World Order (New York: Simon & Schuster).
28. Jonas, Manfred (2002), "Isolationism", DeConde, Alexander, Richard Dean Burns, ve Fredrik Logevall (Ed.), Encyclopedia of American Foreign Policy Vol. II (New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons): 337-351.
29. Kagan, Robert ve William Kristol (2000), "Introduction: National Interest and Global Responsibility", Kagan, Robert ve William Kristol (Ed.), Present Dangers: Crisis and Opportunity in American Foreign and Defense Policy (San Francisco: Encounter Books): 3-24.
30. Kirkpatrick, David D. (2018), Into the Hands of the Soldiers: Freedom and Chaos in Egypt and the Middle East (New York: Viking).
31. Kirkpatrick, Jeane J. (1979), "Dictatorships & Double Standards", Commentary, Kasım. https://www.commentary.org/articles/jeane-kirkpatrick/dictatorships-double-standards/ (03.11.2021).
32. Kissinger, Henry (2015), World Order: Reflections on the Character of Nations and the Course of History (London: Penguin Books).
33. Kristol, Irving (1983), "Toward a Moral Foreign Policy", Wall Street Journal, 15 Kasım. https://scholar.google.com.tr/scholar?cluster=16322135103105477478&hl=en&as_sdt=2005&sciodt=0,5 (17.12.2019).
34. Kristol, Irving (1990), "In Search of Our National Interest", Wall Street Journal, 7 Haziran, https://www.proquest.com/docview/398156489/abstract/274E9EF9C1124716PQ/1 (04.11.2021).
35. Mandelbaum, Michael (1991), "Reflections on the Friendly Tyrants Dilemma Today", Pipes, Daniel ve Adam Garfinkle (Ed.), Friendly Tyrants: An American Dilemma (London: Macmillan): 257-262.
36. Mandelbaum, Michael (2016), Mission Failure: America and the World in the Post-Cold War Era (New York: Oxford University Press).
37. McBride, James (2018), "How Does the U.S. Spend Its Foreign Aid?", https://www.cfr.org/backgrounder/how-does-us-spend-its-foreign-aid (06.11.2021).
38. McCormick, James M. (2018), "Introduction: The Domestic Sources of American Foreign Policy", McCormick, James M. (Ed.), The Domestic Sources of American Foreign Policy: Insights and Evidence Seventh edition. (Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield): 1-18.
39. McFaul, Michael (2018), From Cold War to Hot Peace: The Inside Story of Russia and America (London: Allen Lane).
40. Mead, Walter Russell (2002), Special Providence: American Foreign Policy and How It Changed the World (New York: Routledge).
41. Mead, Walter Russell (2009), "Review of Habits of Empire: A History of American Expansion, by Walter T. K. Nugent", Foreign Affairs, 87 (6). https://www.foreignaffairs.com/reviews/capsule-review/2008-11-06/habits-empire-history-american-expansion (25.05.2021).
42. Mead, Walter Russell (2020), "Transcript: Dialogues on American Foreign Policy and World Affairs: A Conversation with Former Deputy Secretary of State Antony Blinken", The Hudson Institute, 9 Temmuz, https://s3.amazonaws.com/media.hudson.org/Transcript-%20Dialogues%20on%20American%20Foreign%20Policy%20and%20World%20Affairs-%20A%20Conversation%20with%20Former%20Deputy%20Secretary%20of%20State%20Antony%20Blinken.pdf (14.11.2021).
43. Mearsheimer, John J. (2001), The Tragedy of Great Power Politics (New York: Norton).
44. Momani, Bessma (2003), "Promoting Economic Liberalization in Egypt: From U.S. Foreign Aid to Trade and Investment", Middle East Review of International Affairs, 7 (3): 88-101.
45. Morsy, Soheir A. (1986), "U.S. Aid to Egypt: An Illustration and Account of U.S. Foreign Assistance Policy", Arab Studies Quarterly, 8 (4): 358-389.
46. Nafi, Basheer M (2017), The Islamists: A Contextual History of Political Islam (Johannesburg: Afro-Middle East Center). https://muse.jhu.edu/book/60246/ (06.11.2021).
47. National Security Strategy (2002), http://nssarchive.us/national-security-strategy-2002/ (04.11.2021).
48. Obama, Barack H. (2011), "All Governments Must Maintain Power through Consent, Not Coercion", 28 Ocak, https://obamawhitehouse.archives.gov/blog/2011/01/28/president-obama-situation-egypt-all-governments-must-maintain-power-through-consent- (06.11.2021).
49. Patrick, Stewart (2009), Best Laid Plans: The Origins of American Multilateralism and the Dawn of the Cold War (Lanham, Md: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers).
50. Perkins, Dexter (1962), The American Approach to Foreign Policy Revised Edition. (Cambridge: Harvard University Press).
51. Pipes, Daniel ve Adam Garfinkle (Ed.) (1991a), Friendly Tyrants: An American Dilemma (London: Macmillan).
52. Pipes, Daniel ve Adam Garfinkle (1991b), "Introduction", Pipes, Daniel ve Adam Garfinkle (Ed.), Friendly Tyrants: An American Dilemma (London: Macmillan): xv-xxv.
53. Powaski, Ronald E. (2019), Ideals, Interests, and U.S. Foreign Policy from George H. W. Bush to Donald Trump (New York: Palgrave Macmillan).
54. Reagan, Ronald (1983), "The “Evil Empire” Speech", https://voicesofdemocracy.umd.edu/reagan-evil-empire-speech-text/ (24.10.2021).
55. Reuters (2011), "US Urges Restraint in Egypt, Says Government Stable", 25 Ocak, https://www.reuters.com/article/ozatp-egypt-protest-clinton-20110125-idAFJOE70O0KF20110125 (06.11.2021).
56. Reuters (2020), "Biden Aide Blinken Voices Concern About Rights Group in Egypt", 20 Kasım, https://www.reuters.com/article/us-egypt-rights-biden-idUSKBN2802UJ (14.11.2021).
57. Rogan, Eugene L. (2018), The Arabs: A History (London: Penguin Books).
58. Schweigler, George (2003), "Domestic Sources of US Foreign Policy", May, Bernhard ve Michaela Hönicke (Ed.), The Uncertain Superpower: Domestic Dimensions of U.S. Foreign Policy After the Cold War (Berlin: Springer Fachmedien Weisbaden): 57-66.
59. Singh, Robert (2012), Barack Obama’s Post-American Foreign Policy: The Limits of Engagement (London: Bloomsbury Academy).
60. The New York Times (2020), "The New World Order That President Biden Will Inherit", 16 Kasım, https://www.nytimes.com/2020/11/15/opinion/biden-foreign-policy-international-relations.html (14.11.2021).
61. The White House Office of the Press Secretary (2009), "Remarks by the President at Cairo University", 4 Haziran, https://obamawhitehouse.archives.gov/the-press-office/remarks-president-Cairo-university-6-04-09 (14.11.2021).
62. The White House Office of the Press Secretary (2013), "Statement by President Barack Obama on Egypt", 3 Temmuz, https://obamawhitehouse.archives.gov/the-press-office/2013/07/03/statement-president-barack-obama-egypt (14.11.2021).
63. United States Department of State (2021), "Secretary Blinken’s Meeting with Egyptian Foreign Minister Shoukry", 8 Kasım, https://www.state.gov/secretary-blinkens-meeting-with-egyptian-foreign-minister-shoukry-2/ (14.11.2021).
64. Vennesson, Pascal (2008), "Case Studies and Process Tracing: Theories and Practices", Porta, Donatella Della ve Michael Keating (Ed.), Approaches and Methodologies in the Social Sciences: A Pluralist Perspective (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press): 223-239.
65. Walt, Stephen M. (2019), "The End of Hubris", Foreign Affairs, 98 (3): 26-35. https://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/2019-04-16/end-hubris (27.10.2021).
66. Washington, George (1796), "Farewell Address", https://www.ourdocuments.gov/doc.php?flash=false&doc=15&page=transcript (24.10.2021).
67. Wiarda, Howard J. (1991), "Friendly Tyrants and American Interests", Pipes, Daniel ve Adam Garfinkle (Ed.), Friendly Tyrants: An American Dilemma (London: Macmillan): 3-20.
68. Wiarda, Howard J. (2011), American Foreign Policy in Regions of Conflict: A Global Perspective (New York: Palgrave Macmillan).
69. Wittkopf, Eugene R., Christopher M. Jones ve Charles W. Kegley (2008), American Foreign Policy: Pattern and Process (Belmont: Thomson/Wadsworth).
70. Zakaria, Fareed (1998), From Wealth to Power: The Unusual Origins of America’s World Role (Princeton: Princeton University Press).