Hizmet Sunumu ve Örgütlenmesi Temelinde İngiltere'de Demiryolu Hizmetinin Özelleştirilmesi

Yıl 2015, , 903 - 930, 16.12.2015

Levent Demirelli

https://doi.org/10.1501/SBFder_0000002376

Öz

İngiltere‟de iktidarda olduğu 1980'li ve 1990'lı yıllarda Muhafazakâr Parti, demiryolu hizmetinin
özelleştirilmesinin rekabet, verimlilik oranları ve hizmet kalitesindeki artışlar, kamu harcamalarında düşüşler
ile sonuçlanacağını ileri sürmüştür. Fakat pratikte Muhafazakâr Parti'nin bu rüyası gerçekleşmemiştir. Aksine
özelleştirme, yeni tekeller, hizmet ve altyapı kalitesinde düşüşler, taşımacılık, işletme maliyetleri, kamu
sübvansiyonlarında artışlar ve güvenlik sorunları üretmiştir. Bu çalışma, 1979 yılında başlayan M. Thatcher
ve 2010 yılında sonlanan G. Brown dönemleri arasında kalan sürede özelleştirme sürecini ve sonuçlarını
incelemektedir. Yapılan inceleme, hizmet sunumu ve örgütlenmesi temelinde gerçekleştirilmiştir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Demiryolu hizmeti, British Rail, özelleştirme, hizmet sunumu, hizmet örgütlenmesi

The Privatization of the Railway Service in Britain on the basis of the Provision and the Organization of the Service

Öz

Conservative Governments of Britain in 1980s and 1990s claimed that the privatization of the railway service would result in higher competition, efficiency rates and quality of the services and in
reduction of the public expenditures. In practice, however, these dreams of Conservatives have not come true entirely. Privatization has resulted in new monopolies, reduction of the quality of services and of infrastructure and in increase of the transportation prices, operation costs of the private enterprises, and the public subsidies. It has also caused security problems. This paper discusses the privatization process and its results between 1979 (the year that M. Thatcher came to power) and 2010 (the end of G. Brown‟s government) on the basis of provision and organization of the service

Anahtar Kelimeler

Railway service, British Rail, privatization, provision of the service, organization of service

Kaynakça

• Barda, Süleyman (1964), Münakale Ekonomisi (İstanbul: İstanbul Üniversitesi İktisat Fakültesi Yayını).
• Bradshaw, W. P. (1997), “Competition In The Rail Industry”, Oxford Review Of Economic Policy, 13 (1): 93-103.
• Casson, Mark (2004), “The Future Of The UK Railway System: Michael Brooke‟s Vision”, International Business Review, 13: 181-214.
• Charlton, Clive, Richard Gibb, Jon Shaw (1997), “Regulation And Continuing Monopoly On Britain‟s Railways”, Journal Of Transport Geography, 5 (2): 147-153.
• Cole, Bart ve Christine Cooper (2006), “Deskilling In The 21st Century: The Case Of Rail Privatisation”, Critical Perspectives On Accounting, 17: 601-625.
• Crompton, Gerald ve Robert Jupe (2003), “„A Lot Of Friction At The Interfaces‟: The Regulation Of Britain‟s Privatised Railway System”, Financial Accountability & Management, 19 (4): 397-418.
• Crompton, Gerald ve Robert Jupe (2007), “Network Rail – Forward Or Backward? Not-For-Profit In British Transport”, Business History, 49 (6): 908-928.
• Curwen, Peter (1997), “The End of the Line for British Rail”, Public Money & Management, 17 (4): 55-67.
• Denham, Andrew ve Mark Garnett (1998), British Think-Tanks And The Climate Of Opinion (London: UCL Press).
• Dixon, John ve Melanie Joyner (2000), “Privatization Of British Rail: The Holy Grail Or A Poisoned Chalice?”, Administrative Theory & Praxis, 22 (3): 630-634.
• Else, Peter (1996), “Subsidy Requirements In A Restructured Rail Network With Particular Reference To British Rail”, Transport Policy, 3 (½): 13-15.
• Evans, Andrew W. (2007), “Rail Safety and Rail Privatisation in Britain”, Accident Analysis and Prevention, 39: 510-523.
• Gibb, Richard, Theresa Lowndes, Clive Charlton (1996), “The Privatization Of British Rail”, Applied Geography, 16 (1): 35-51.
• Glaister, Stephen (2002), “UK Transport Policy 1997-2001, Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 18 (2): 154-186.
• Haywood, Russ (2007), “Britain‟s National Railway Network: Fit For Purpose In The 21st Century?”, Journal of Transport Geography, 15: 198-216.
• Jupe, Robert (2009), “New Labour, Network Rail And The Third Way”, Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 22 (5): 709-735.
• Jupe, Robert (2009a), “New Labour, Public-Private Partnerships And Rail Transport Policy”, Economic Affairs, 29 (1): 20-25.
• Jupe, Robert (2010), “A Model Or A Policy Muddle? An Evaluation Of Rail Franchising In The UK”, Public Money & Management, 30 (6): 347-354.
• Jupe, Robert (2011), “„A Poll Tax On Wheels‟: Might The Move To Privatise Rail In Britain Have Failed?”, Business History, 53 (3): 324-343.
• Jupe, Robert (2012), “Evolutionary Change? An Evaluation Of The McNulty Report On Rail”, Public Money & Management, 32 (3): 177-184.
• Jupe, Robert ve Gerald Crompton (2006), “‟A Deficient Performance‟: The Regulation of the Train Operating Companies in Britain‟s Privatised Railway System, Critical Perspectives on Accounting, (17): 1035-1065.
• Karahanoğulları, Onur (2004), Kamu Hizmeti (Kavram ve Hukuksal Rejim) (Ankara: Turhan Kitabevi, 2. Baskı).
• Karahanoğulları, Onur (2011), “Kamu Hizmetleri Piyasa İlişkisinde Dördüncü Tip: Eksik İmtiyaz (Kamu-Özel Ortaklığı)”, Ankara Üniversitesi SBF Dergisi, 66 (3): 177-215.
• Karasu, Koray (2009), “Yeni „Kamusal‟ Örgütler: Kamu Yararı Şirketleri”, Ankara Üniversitesi SBF Dergisi, 64 (3): 117-147.
• Knill, Christoph ve Dirk Lehmkuhl (2000), “An Alternative Route Of European Integration: The Community‟s Railways Policy”, West European Politics, 23 (1): 65-88. Legislation.gov.uk
• (http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1921/55/pdfs/ukpga_19210055_en.pdf, 15.04.2014).
• Lobina, Emanuele ve David Hall (2001), “UK Water Privatisation – A Briefing”, http://www.archives.gov.on.ca/en/e_records/walkerton/part2info/partieswithstanding/pdf/C UPE18UKwater.pdf (15.4.2014). Martin, Brendan http://www.publicworld.org/docs/britrail.pdf (15.04.2014). Rail
• Privatisation: What Went Wrong?”,
• McCartney, Sean ve John Stittle (2006), “„Not Our Problem‟: UK Government‟s Fiscal Obligations Towards The Privatised Railway Network”, Accounting Forum, 30: 139-153.
• McCartney, Sean ve John Stittle (2011), “„Carry On Up The East Coast‟ – A Case Study In Railway Franchising”, Public Money & Management, 31 (2): 123-130.
• Shaoul, Jean (1997), “A Critical Financial Analysis Of The Performance Of Privatised Industries: The Case Of The Water Industry In England And Wales”, Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 8: 479-505.
• Shaoul, Jean (2007), “Leasing Passenger Trains: The British Experience”, Transport Reviews, 27 (2): 189-212.
• Shaw, Jon, William Walton, John Farrington (2003), “Assessing The Potential For A „Railway Renaissance‟ In Great Britain”, Geoforum, 34: 141-156.
• Shoaul, Jean (2006), “The Cost of Operating Britain‟s Privatized Railways”, Public Money & Management, 26 (3): 151-158.
• Stittle, John (2004), “Accounting For UK Rail Freight Track Charges: Privatisation, Politics And The Pursuit Of Private Sector Vested Interests”, Accounting Forum, 28: 403-425.
• The Secretary Of State For Transport (1992), New Opportunities For The Railways: The Privatisation Of British Rail (London: HSMO, Cm 2012).
• Tyrrall, David ve David Parker (2005), “The Fragmentation of A Railway: A Study of Organizational Change”, Journal of Management Studies, 42 (3): 507-537.
• Tyrrall, David (2004), “The Uk Railway Privatisation: Failing To Succeed?”, Economic Affairs, 24 (3): 32-38.
• Whitehouse, Lisa (2003), “Railtrack is Dead – Long Live Network Rail? Nationalization Under the Third Way”, Journal Of Law and Society, 30 (2): 217-235.