Emperyal Dil Oyunları ve Güvensizliğin İnşası: Trump Döneminde ABD’nin Ulusal Güvenlik Stratejilerindeki Dönüşümler

Öz

Ulusal güvenlik strateji belgelerinin metinsel kurgusu, tehditleri nesnel olarak tanımlamak yerine, kimi ulusları “ötekileştirmeyi” amaçlayan kasıtlı dil oyunları aracılığıyla subjektif olarak inşa etmektedir. Bu bağlamda Trump yönetimi de önceki yönetimlerin ulus inşası ve liberal enternasyonalizm eksenli müdahaleci politikalarını, “Önce Amerika” ve “Amerika’yı Yeniden Büyük Yap” sloganları altında milliyetçi-popülist bir forma dönüştürmüş, böylece ABD’nin ulusal güvenlik söyleminde doktriner anlamda bir değişim yaratmıştır. Her ne kadar Trump döneminde emperyal müdahalelerde bir geri çekilme olmasa da küresel Güney’i hedef alan saldırılar giderek daha görünür şekilde enerji hakimiyeti ve kritik sanayilerin yerlileştirilmesi eksenli olarak yeniden yapılandırılmaktadır. Bu politika, pratikte liberal uluslararası düzenin “evrenselci” iddialarını aşındırmakta ve onu liberal-olmayan bir emperyal söylem içinde yeniden üretmektedir. Bu çerçevede makale, ABD’nin 11 Eylül sonrası dönemi şekillendiren ulusal güvenlik stratejileri ile Trump yönetiminin güvenliğe dair söylem ve pratiklerini karşılaştırmalı olarak incelemektedir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Ulusal Güvenlik Strateji Belgeleri
• Liberal Uluslararası Düzen
• Emperyal Söylem
• Askeri Müdahaleler
• ABD

Imperial Language Games and the Construction of Insecurity: Shifts in US National Security Discourse in the Trump Era

Öz

The textual construction of national security strategy documents, rather than defining threats objectively, constructs them subjectively through deliberate language games that aim to “other” certain nations. In this context, the Trump administration transformed the interventionist policies of previous administrations—centred on nation-building and liberal internationalism—into a nationalist-populist form under the slogans of “America First” and “Make America Great Again,” thereby creating a doctrinal shift in US national security discourse. Although there has been no withdrawal from imperial interventions in the Trump era, assaults targeting the Global South are increasingly and more visibly restructured around energy dominance and the reshoring of critical industries. In practice, this policy undermines the “universalist” claims of the liberal international order, yet reproduces it within an illiberal imperial discourse. Within this framework, the article comparatively examines the national security strategies that shaped the post-9/11 era and the security discourses and practices of the Trump administration.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• National Security Strategy Documents
• Liberal International Order
• Imperial Discourse
• Military Interventions
• USA

Kaynakça

1. Anghie, A. (2005). Imperialism, sovereignty and the making of international law. Cambridge University Press.
2. Barkawi, T. (2004). On the pedagogy of “small wars.” International Affairs, 80(1), 19-37. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2346.2004.00363.x
3. Barkawi, T., & Laffey, M. (2006). The postcolonial moment in Security Studies. Review of International Studies, 32(2), 329-352. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0260210506007054
4. Bilgin, P. (2010). The ‘western-centrism’ of Security Studies: ‘Blind spot’ or constitutive practice? Security Dialogue, 41(6), 615-622. https://doi.org/10.1177/0967010610388208
5. Borradori, G. (2008). Terör günlerinde felsefe: Jürgen Habermas ve Jacques Derrida ile diyaloglar. Yapı Kredi Yayınları.
6. Burke, J. P. (2018). Struggling with standard order: Challenges and performance of the Trump national security council system. Presidential Studies Quarterly, 48(4), 640-666. https://doi.org/10.1111/psq.12493
7. Bush, G. W. (2002). President delivers state of the union address. https://georgewbush-whitehouse.archives.gov/news/releases/2002/01/20020129-11.html
8. Cordesman, A. H. (2018). U.S. national security strategy in the MENA region. Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS). http://www.jstor.org/stable/resrep22440

9. Foster, J. B. (2025). The Trump doctrine and the new MAGA imperialism. Monthly Review, 77(2), 1-25. https://doi.org/10.14452/MR-077-02-2025-06_1
10. Foucault, M. (2002). Archaeology of knowledge. Routledge.
11. Griffiths, M. (2004). Beyond the Bush doctrine: American hegemony and world order. Australasian Journal of American Studies, 23(1), 63-75. https://www.jstor.org/stable/41053967
12. Henderson, C. (2010). The 2010 United States national security strategy and the Obama doctrine of ‘necessary force’. Journal of Conflict & Security Law, 15(3), 403-434. https://doi.org/10.1093/jcsl/krq025
13. Kellner, D. (2004). 9/11, spectacles of terror, and media manipulation: A critique of Jihadist and Bush media politics. Critical Discourse Studies, 1(1), 41-64. https://doi.org/10.1080/17405900410001674515
14. Knudsen, B. B. (2012). Developing a national security policy/strategy: A roadmap. Security and Peace, 30(3), 135-140. https://www.jstor.org/stable/24233939
15. Lake, D. A. (2018). International legitimacy lost? Rule and resistance when America is first. Perspectives on Politics, 16(1), 6-21. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1537592717003085
16. Malik, J. M. (2026). America first, rules second: Trump’s national security rewrite. Comparative Strategy, 1-21. https://doi.org/10.1080/01495933.2026.2655350
17. Menéndez, D. C., Koops, J. A., & Weggemans, D. (2021). A country of immigrants no more? The securitization of immigration in the national security strategies of the United States of America. Global Affairs, 7(1), 1-26. https://doi.org/10.1080/23340460.2021.1888652
18. Nayak, M. V., & Malone, C. (2009). American orientalism and American exceptionalism: A critical rethinking of US hegemony. International Studies Review, 11(2), 253-276. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2486.2009.00848.x
19. OHCHR. (2026, 12 Mart). UN experts denounce aggression on Iran and Lebanon, warn of devastating regional escalation. https://www.ohchr.org/en/press-releases/2026/03/un-experts-denounce-aggression-iran-and-lebanon-warn-devastating-regional
20. Parmar, I. (2025). US national security strategies: Trump pushes hard-power global primacy, overt racism in foreign policy. The Wire. https://thewire.in/world/us-national-security-strategies-trump-pushes-hard-power-global-primacy-overt-racism-in-foreign-policy
21. Posen, B. R. (2020). Scarcity and strategy: The foreign policy of the Biden administration. İçinde S. Biscop & A. Gromyko (Der.), Biden’s world? Views from the United States, China, Russia, and the European Union (Security Policy Brief No. 132). Egmont Institute.
22. Said, E. W. (2016). Kültür ve emperyalizm. Hil Yayın.
23. Sanger, D. E., Pager, T., Rogers, K., & Kanno-Youngs, Z. (2026, 8 Ocak). Trump lays out a vision of power restrained only by ‘my own morality’. The New York Times. https://nytimes.com/2026/01/08/us/politics/trump-interview-power-morality.html
24. Sigmon, E. B. (2025). Trump 2.0’s foreign policy in the Americas. Análisis Carolina. https://www.fundacioncarolina.es/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/AC_8_2025EN.pdf
25. Sluiter, G. (2026). The abduction and criminal prosecution of Maduro: A few observations from an international and criminal law perspective. Hague Journal on the Rule of Law. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40803-026-00268-9
26. Szalai, M. (2023). Norm localisation in the process of crafting national security strategies–the case of the Visegrád countries. European Security, 32(2), 210-232. https://doi.org/10.1080/09662839.2022.2124370
27. The White House. (2002). The national security strategy of the United States of America. https://2009-2017.state.gov/documents/organization/63562.pdf
28. The White House. (2006). The national security strategy of the United States of America. https://history.defense.gov/Portals/70/Documents/nss/nss2006.pdf
29. The White House. (2010). National security strategy. https://obamawhitehouse.archives.gov/sites/default/files/rss_viewer/national_security_strategy.pdf
30. The White House. (2015). National security strategy. https://obamawhitehouse.archives.gov/sites/default/files/docs/2015_national_security_strategy_2.pdf
31. The White House. (2017). National security strategy of the United States of America. https://trumpwhitehouse.archives.gov/wp-content/uploads/2017/12/NSS-Final-12-18-2017-0905.pdf
32. The White House. (2022). National security strategy. https://bidenwhitehouse.archives.gov/wp-content/uploads/2022/10/Biden-Harris-Administrations-National-Security-Strategy-10.2022.pdf
33. The White House. (2025). National security strategy of the United States of America. https://whitehouse.gov/wp-content/uploads/2025/12/2025-National-Security-Strategy.pdf
34. The White House. (2026a, 1 Mart). Peace through strength: President Trump launches Operation Epic Fury to crush Iranian regime, end nuclear threat. https://whitehouse.gov/releases/2026/03/peace-through-strength-president-trump-launches-operation-epic-fury-to-crush-iranian-regime-end-nuclear-threat/
35. The White House. (2026b, 1 Nisan). President Trump’s clear and unchanging objectives drive decisive success against Iranian regime. https://whitehouse.gov/releases/2026/04/president-trumps-clear-and-unchanging-objectives-drive-decisive-success-against-iranian-regime/
36. UNGA. (1981, 9 Aralık). Declaration on the inadmissibility of intervention and interference in the internal affairs of states (A/RES/36/103). https://docs.un.org/en/A/RES/36/103
37. Wæver, O. (1989). Security, the speech act: Analysing the politics of a word. Paper presented at the Research Training Seminar, Sostrup Manor, June 1989.
38. Wæver, O. (2007). Securitization and desecuritization. İçinde B. Buzan & L. Hansen (Der.), International security, vol. III (ss. 66-98). Sage Publications.
39. Walt, S. M. (1991). The Renaissance of Security Studies. International Studies Quarterly, 35(2), 211-239. https://doi.org/10.2307/2600471
40. Walt, S. M. (2019). The end of hubris and the new age of American restraint. Foreign Affairs, 98(3), 26-35. https://www.jstor.org/stable/26798150
41. Weaver, J. M. (2018). The 2017 national security strategy of the United States. Journal of Strategic Security, 11(1), 62-71. https://doi.org/10.5038/1944-0472.11.1.1655
42. Weinraub, B. (1985, 9 Temmuz). President accuses 5 ‘outlaw states’ of world terror. The New York Times. https://nytimes.com/1985/07/09/world/president-accuses-5-outlaw-states-of-world-terror.html
43. Wodak, R., & Meyer, M. (2001). Methods of critical discourse analysis. SAGE Publications.