Organization of University in a Changing University-Industry Relationship

Öz

Restructuring of higher education is one of the most lively debated topics in Turkey. Most universities in Turkey expressed their opinions on restructuring of higher education by approaching the issue in a more general way. In this paper, we approach this issue from a more specific angle by focusing on university-industry relations. Technological advancement and globalization have substantial effects on the structure of the university and the industry. How should the university system be organized in such an environment? This paper aims at answering this question by making suggestions that could be useful in the ongoing debate about restructuring of higher education system in Turkey.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• University-industry cooperation
• university organization
• research centers
• researcher
• restructuring of higher education.

Değişen Üniversite-Sanayi İşbirliğinde Üniversite Örgütlenmesi

Öz

Yükseköğretim sisteminin yeniden yapılandırılması Türkiye’deki en hararetli tartışma konularından birisidir. Pek çok üniversite bu konudaki görüşlerini, genel yapılanmanın ne şekilde olması gerektiği konusunda ayrıntılı bilgiler içeren raporlar vasıtasıyla açıklamışlardır. Bu makale geleceğin üniversite örgütlenmesine üniversite-sanayi ilişkileri özelinde yaklaşmaktadır. Teknolojik gelişme ve küreselleşme hem üniversitenin hem de sanayinin işleyişinde köklü değişikliklere neden olmaktadır. Bu ortamda üniversite örgütlenmesi nasıl olmalıdır? Bu makalede yükseköğretim sisteminin yeniden yapılandırılması konusundaki tartışmalara katkısı olacağını düşündüğümüz önerilerde bulunarak bu soruya yanıt aranmaktadır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Üniversite-sanayi işbirliği
• üniversite örgütlenmesi
• araştırma merkezleri
• araştırmacı
• yükseköğretimin yeniden yapılandırılması

Kaynakça

1. Altbach, Philip G., Liz Reisberg ve Laura E. Rumbley (2009), “Trends in Global Higher Education: Tracking an Academic Revolution”, UNESCO 2009 World Conference on Higher Education için hazırlanan rapor.
2. Akçomak, İ.Semih ve Erol Taymaz (2007), “Assessing the Effectiveness of Incubators: The case of Turkey”, Ramani, V. Venkata ve A.V. Bala Krishna (eds.), Business Incubation: An Introduction (Hyderabad: Icfai University Press): 234-265.
3. Akçomak, İ.Semih (2011), “Incubators As Tool For Entrepreneurship Promotion in Developing Countries”, Naude, Wim, Adam Szirmai ve Micheline Goedhuys (eds). Entrepreneurship, Innovation and Economic Development (Oxford: Oxford University Press): 228-264.
4. Akçomak, İ.Semih (2012), “İş Gücü Piyasasındaki Güncel Dinamikler: Teknoloji, Küreselleşme ve İthal Girdi Kullanımı”, TEKPOL working paper series No: 1202.
5. Aghion, Philippe ve Peter Howitt (1992) “A Model of Growth through Creative Destruction”, Econometrica, 60 (2): 323-351.
6. Antràs, Pol, Luis Garicano ve Esteban Rossi-Hansberg (2006), “Offshoring in a Knowledge Economy”, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 121 (1) : 31-77.
7. Baldwin, Richard (2009), “Integration of the North American Economy and New-Paradigm Globalisation”, Centre for Economic Policy Research (CEPR) Discussion Paper No: 7523.
8. Bercovitz, Janet ve Maryann Feldman (2006), “Entrepreneurial Universities and Technology Transfer: A Conceptual Framework for Understanding Knowledge-Based Economic development”, Journal of Technology Transfer, 31 (1):75-188.

9. Blinder, Alan S. (2006), “Offshoring: The next industrial revolution”, Foreign Affairs, 85: 113-128.
10. Bok, Derek (2003), Universities in the Marketplace: The Commercialization of Higher Education (Princeton: Princeton University Press).
11. Boardman, Craig ve Barry Bozeman (2007), “Role Strain in University Research Centers”, The Journal of Higher Education, 78 (4): 430-463.
12. Boardman, Craig ve Denis Gray (2010), “The New Science and Engineering Management: Cooperative Research Centers As Government Policies, Industry Strategies and organizations”, Journal of Technology Transfer, 35 (5): 445-459.
13. Borras, Susanna (2011), “Universities That Create Value Through Research”, http://susanaborras.com/2011/11/20/universities-that-create-value-through-research/.
14. Brint, Steven (2005), “Creating the future: ‘new directions’ in American research universities”, Minerva, 43 (1) : 23-50.
15. Carayannis, Elias G., Jeffrey Alexander ve Anthony Ioannidis (2000), “Leveraging Knowledge, Learning, and Innovation in Forming Strategic Government–University–Industry (GUI) R&D partnerships in the US, Germany and France”, Technovation, 20 (9): 477–488.
16. Ceyhan, Murat (2010), Dynamics of knowledge production and the social formation of the university, Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Bilim ve Teknoloji Politikası Çalışmaları, Orta Doğu Teknik Üniversitesi, Ankara.
17. Clark, Burton R., (1998), Creating the Entrepreneurial University: Pathways to Transformation, (London: Oryx Press).
18. Cowan, William, Robin Cowan ve Patrick Llerena (2008), “Running the Marathon” UNU-MERIT Working Paper No: 2008-14.
19. Deem, Rosemary, Ka Ho Mok ve Lisa Lucas (2008), “Transforming Higher Education in Whose Image? Exploring the Concept of the ‘World-Class’ University in Europe and Asia”, Higher Education Policy, 21: 83–97.
20. Dennison, George M. (2010), “Reform and Re-Invention in Public Higher Education”, Innovation in Higher Education, 35 (2): 75-78.
21. Dosi, Giovanni, Patrick Llerena ve Mauro Sylos Labini (2006), “The Relationship Between Science, Technologies and Their Exploitation: An Illustration Through the Myths and Realities of the So-Called “European Paradox”, Research Policy, 35 (10): 1450-1464.
22. DPT (1963), Birinci Beş Yıllık Kalkınma Planı, 1963-1967 (Ankara).
23. DPT (1968), İkinci Beş Yıllık Kalkınma Planı, 1968-1972 (Ankara).
24. DPT (1973), Üçüncü Beş Yıllık Kalkınma Planı, 1973-1977 (Ankara).
25. DPT (1979), Dördüncü Beş Yıllık Kalkınma Planı, 1979-1983 (Ankara).
26. DPT (1985), Beşinci Beş Yıllık Kalkınma Planı, 1985-1989 (Ankara).
27. DPT (1990), Altıncı Beş Yıllık Kalkınma Planı, 1990-1994 (Ankara).
28. DPT (1996), Yedinci Beş Yıllık Kalkınma Planı, 1996-2000 (Ankara).
29. DPT (2001), Sekizinci Beş Yıllık Kalkınma Planı, 2001-2005 (Ankara).
30. DPT (2007), Dokuzuncu Kalkınma Planı, 2007-2013 (Ankara).
31. Duderstadt, James J. (1997), “The Future of University in an Era of Change”, Association of the Collegiate Schools of Planning, Georgia Institute of Technology’de 1997 yılında yapılan bir sunuş http://milproj.ummu.umich.edu/publications/change/download/change.pdf.
32. Etzkowitz, Henry (1983), “Entrepreneurial Scientists and Entrepreneurial Universities in American Academic System”, Minerva, 21 (2-3): 198-233.
33. Etzkowitz , Henry (1998), “The Norms of Entrepreneurial Science: Cognitive Effects of the New University–Industry Linkages”, Research Policy, 27(8):823–833.
34. Etzkowitz, Henry, Andrew Webster, Christiane Gebhardt, Branca Regina Cantisano Terraa (2000), “The Future of the University and the University of the Future: evolution of ivory tower to entrepreneurial paradigm”, Research Policy, 29 (2): 313-330.
35. European Commision (2011), “Science, Technology and Innovation in Europe, Edition 2011”, Eurostat Pocketbooks, http://epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/cache/ITY_OFFPUB/KS-31-11- 118/EN/KS-31-11-118-EN.PDF
36. Gaughan, Monica ve Elizabeth A. Corley (2010), “Science Faculty At US Research Universities: The Impact of University Research Center-Affiliation and Gender on Industrial Activities”, Technovation, 30 (3): 215-222.
37. Geisler, Eliezer ve Albert H. Rubenstein (1982), “University-Industry Relations: A review of Major Issues”, Albert B. Link ve Gregory Tassey (eds), Cooperative Research and Development: The Industry, University and Government Relationship (USA: Kluwer Academic Publishers): 43-62
38. Geuna, Aldo (1999), Resource allocation and knowledge production: Studies in the economics of university research (Aldershot and Lyme, NH: Edward Elgar)
39. Grocock, Anne (2002), “Universities in the Future”, Journal of the Royal Society Medicine, 95(1): 48-49.
40. Grossman, Gene M. ve Helpman, Elhanan (1991), Innovation and Growth in the Global Economy, (Cambridge-MA:MIT Press)
41. Grossman, Gene M. ve Esteban Rossi-Hansberg (2006), “The Rise of Offshoring: It’s Not Wine For Cloth Anymore”, Kansas Fed, Merkez Bankacılar için Jackson Hole konferansında sunulan bildiri. http://www.princeton.edu/~pcglobal/research/papers/grossman_rise_ offshoring_0602.pdf
42. Grossman, Gene M. ve Esteban Rossi-Hansberg (2008), “Trading Tasks: A Simple Theory of Offshoring”, American Economic Review, 98(5): 1978-1997.
43. Hannan, Andrew (2005), “Innovating in Higher Education: Contexts For Change in Learning Technology”, British Journal of Educational Technology, 36 (6): 975–985
44. Houghton, Walter. E. (1941), “The History of Trades: Its Relation to Seventeenth-Century Thought: As Seen in Bacon, Petty, Evelyn, and Boyle”, Journal of the History of Ideas, 2(1), 33-60.
45. Kezar, Adrianna J. (2004) “Obtaining Integrity? Reviewing and Examining the Charter between Higher Education and Society”, The Review of Higher Education, 27 (4): 429-459
46. Kiper, Mahmut (2010), Dünyada ve Türkiye’de Üniversite-Sanayi İşbirliği (Ankara: TTGV Yayınları).
47. Kirkland, John (2008), “University Research Management: An Emerging Profession in the Developing World”, Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 20 (6) : 717–726
48. Kirp, David L. (2003), Shakespeare, Einstein and the Bottom Line: The Marketing of Higher Education, (Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press)
49. Lach, Saul ve Mark Schankerman (2008), “Incentives and Invention in Universities”, RAND Journal of Economics, 39 (2): 403-433.
50. Lee, Sooho ve Barry Bozeman (2005), “The Impact of Research Collaboration on Scientific Productivity”, Social Studies of Science, 35(5) : 673-702
51. Lundvall, Beng Ake (1992), National Innovation Systems: Towards a theory of innovation and interactive learning, (London: Pinter).
52. Mokry, Joel (2011), The Enlightened Economy, (New Haven: Yale University Press).
53. Norman, Colin (1982), “Audit May Cost UC Millions”, Science, Nisan 16 (4543):279.
54. Privateer, Paul Michael (1999) “Academic Technology and the Future of Higher Education: Strategic Paths Taken and Not Taken”, The Journal of Higher Education, 70 (1) : 60-79
55. Readings, Bill (1996), The Universities in Ruins (Cambridge: Harvard University Press).
56. Roessner, David, Lynne Manrique ve Jongwon Park (2010), “The economic impact of engineering research centers: preliminary results of a pilot study”, Journal of Technology Transfer, 35 (5): 475-493.
57. Romer, Poul M. (1990), “Endogenous technological change”, Journal of Political Economy, 98 (5) :71-102.
58. Santoro, Michael D. ve Shanthi Gopalakrishnan (2001), “Relationship Dynamics Between University Research Centers and Industrial Firms: Their Impact on Tehcnology Transfer”, The Journal of Technology Transfer, 26 (1-2): 163-171.
59. Schartinger, Doris, Andreas Schibany ve Helmut Gassler (2001), “Interactive Relations between Universities and Firms: Empirical Evidence for Austria”, The Journal of Technology Transfer, 26 (3): 255-268
60. Scott, John C. (2006), “The Mission of the University: Medieval to Postmodern Transformations”, The Journal of Higher Education, 77 (1) : 1-39
61. Stehr, Nico (1994), Knowledge Societies (London: Sage).
62. Stokols, Daniel, Kara L. Hall, Brandie K. Taylor ve Richard P. Moser, (2008), “The Science of Team Science: Overview of the Field and Introduction to the Supplement”, American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 35 (2) :77-89.
63. Sydow, Jörg, Lars Lindkvist ve Robert DeFillippi (2004), “Project-Based Organizations, Embeddedness and Repositories of Knowledge: Editorial”, Organization Studies, 25(9): 1475–1489
64. Türkcan, Ergun (2010), Dünya’da ve Türkiye’de Bilim, Teknoloji ve Politika (İstanbul: İstanbul Bilgi Üniversitesi Yayınları).
65. Whitley, Richard (2008), "Universities as Strategic Actors: Limitations and variations" Lars Engwall and Denis Weaire (eds), The University in the Market, (London: Portland Press): 23-37
66. Youtie, Jan, Dirk Libaers ve Barry Bozeman (2006), “Institutionalization of University Research Centers: The Case of the National Cooperative Program in Infertility Research”, Technovation, 26 (9): 1055-1063.