PDF EndNote BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster

TÜRK FİRMALARININ ORGANİZASYONEL İNOVASYON YETENEĞİNİ ETKİLEYEN FAKTÖRLER ÜZERİNE BİR ARAŞTIRMA

Yıl 2011, Cilt 66, Sayı 04, 1 - 20, 01.04.2011
https://doi.org/10.1501/SBFder_0000002229

Öz

Kaynakça

  • Acs, Z. J., ve Audretsch, B. D. (1990), Innovation and Small Firms (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press).
  • Anderson, N., ve King, N. (1993), “Innovation in organizations”, International Review of Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 8: 1-34.
  • Armbruster, H., Bikfalvi, A., Kinkel, S., ve Lay, G. (2008), “Organizational innovation: The challenge of measuring non-technical innovation in large-scale surveys”, Technovation, 28: 644- 657.
  • Azzone, G., ve Noci, G. (1998), "Identifying effective PMSs for the deployment of “green” manufacturing strategies", International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 18(4): 308-335.
  • Barney, J. B. (1986), “Organizational Culture: Can It be a Source of Sustained Competitive Advantage?” Academy of Management Review, 11, July: 656-665.
  • Barney, J. B. (1991), “Firm Resources and Sustainable Competitive Advantage”, Journal of Management, 17: 99-120.
  • Birchall, D.W., Chanaron, J.J., ve Soderquist, K. (1996), “Managing innovation in SMEs: A comparison of companies in the UK, France and Portugal”, International Journal of Technology Management 12(3): 291–305.
  • Caroli, E., ve Van Reenen, J. (2001), “Skill biased organizational change? Evidence from a panel of British and French establishment”, The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 116(4): 1149-1192.
  • Chesbrough, H. (2003), Open Innovation: The New Imperative for Creating and Profiting from Technology (Boston, Harvard Business School Press).
  • Daft, R. L. (1978), “A dual-core model of organizational innovation”, Academy of Management Journal, 21: 193-210.
  • Damanpour F. (1992), “Organizational Size and Innovation”, Organization Studies, 13: 375-402.
  • Damanpour, F. (1987), “The adoption of technological, administrative and ancillary innovations: Impact of organizational factors”, Journal of Management, 13: 675-688.
  • Damanpour, F. (1991), “Organizational innovation: A meta-analysis of effects of determinants and moderators”, Academy of Management Journal, 34(3): 555-590.
  • Damanpour, F., Szabat, K.A., ve Evan, W.M. (1989), “The relationship between types of innovation and organizational performance”, Journal of Management Studies, 26(6): 587-601.
  • Damanpour, F., ve Evan, W. M. (1984), “Organizational innovation and performance: The problem of organizational lag”, Administrative Science Quarterly, 29: 392-409.
  • Demirguc-Kunt, A., ve V. Maksimovic (1998), "Law, Finance and Firm Growth", The Journal of Finance 53(6): 2107-2137.
  • Dougherty D., ve Bowman E.H. (1996), “The Effects of Organizational Downsizing on Product Innovation”, Journal of Product Innovation Management, 4 (4): 179-185.
  • Faems, D., Van Looy, B., ve Debackere, K. (2005), “Interorganizational Collaboration and Innovation: Toward A Portfolio Approach”, Journal of Product Innovation Management 22(3): 238–250.
  • Fagerberg, J., Mowery, D.C. Nelson, R.R. (2005), The Oxford Handbook of Innovation (Oxford, Oxford University Press).
  • Fıkırkoca A. (2008) “Türkiye’de Holdinglerin Stratejik Gelişimi ve İnovasyon Süreci” 16. Ulusal
  • Freeman, C., ve Soete, L. (1997), The Economics of Industrial Innovation (London, Pinter Publishers).
  • Goldman, S., Nagel, R., Preiss, K. (1995), Agile Competitors and Virtual Organisations: Strategies for Enriching the Customer (New York, NY., Van Nostrand Reinhold).
  • Greenan, N. (2003), “Organizational change, technology, employment and skills: An empirical study of French manufacturing”, Cambridge Journal of Economics, 27: 287-316.
  • Hage, J. T. (1980), Theories of Organizations (New York, Wiley).
  • Hage, J. T. (1999), “Organizational innovation and organizational change”, Annual Review of Sociology, 25: 597-622.
  • Hambrick D.C. (1983), “Some Tests of the Effectiveness and Functional Attributes of Miles and Snow’s Strategic Types”, Academy of Management, 26: 5-26.
  • Hammer, M., ve Champy, J. (1993), Reengineering the Corporation (New York, Harper Business).
  • Hidalgo, A., ve Jose, A. (2008), “Innovation Management Techniques and Tools: A Review From Theory and Practice”, R&D Management, 38(2): 113-127.
  • Ishikawa, K. (1985), What Is Total Quality Control? The Japanese Way (Englewood Cliffs, NJ., Prentice-Hall).
  • Kaminski, P.C., deOliveira, A.C., ve Lopes, T.M. (2008), “Knowledge transfer in product development processes: a case study in small and medium enterprises (SMEs) of the metal-mechanic sector from Sao Paulo, Brazil”, Technovation 28(1-2): 29-36.
  • Lam, A. (2005), “Organizational innovation”, Fagerberg, J., D.C. Mowery, R.R. Nelson (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Innovation (Oxford, Oxford University Press).
  • Laursen, K., ve A. Salter (2004), “Searching Low and High: What Types of Firms Use Universities as a Source of Innovation?”, Research Policy, Vol 33(8): 1201-1215.
  • Link A.N., ve Siegel D.S. (2007), Innovation, Entrepreneurship and Technological Change (New York, Oxford University Press).
  • Lukas B.A. ve Ferrell O.C. (2000): ”The Effect of Market Orientation on Product Innovation” Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 28(2): 239-247.
  • Massa, S., ve Testa, S. (2008), “Innovation and SMEs: misaligned perspectives and goals among entrepreneurs, academics, and policy makers”, Technovation 28(7): 393-407.
  • Miles, R., Snow, C. (1997), “Organizing in the knowledge age: anticipating the cellular form”, Academy of Management Executive 11(4): 7-24.
  • Miller, Damian; Garnsey, Elizabeth. (2000), “Entrepreneurs and Technology Diffusion, How Diffusion Research Can Benefit from a Greater Understanding of Entrepreneurship”, Technology in Society, 22: 445-465.
  • Nada, N., Kholeif, M., Elbadawy, A., ve Yanık, T. (2010), “An integrated innovation management framework”, Proceedings of International Workshop on Innovation & Entrepreneurship Congress, November 11-12, İzmir.
  • Nijssen, E.J., ve Frambach, R.T. (2000), “Determinants of the adoption of new product development tools by industrial firms”, Industrial Marketing Management, 29: 121-131.
  • OECD (2005), The Measurement of Scientific and Technological Activities, Oslo Manual: Guidelines for Collecting and Interpreting Innovation Data, 3rd Ed. (Paris, OECD).
  • OECD (Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development) (2000), Science, Technology and Innovation in the New Economy, Policy Brief, (Paris, OECD).
  • Oerlemans, L.A.G., Meeus, M.T.H., ve Boekema, F.W.M. (1998), “Do networks matter for innovation: the usefulness of the economic network approach in analysing innovation”, Journal of Economic and Social Geography 89(3): 298-309.
  • Pinchot, G., Pinchot, E. (1993), The End of Bureaucracy and the Rise of Intelligent Organization (San Francisco, Berret-Koehler Publishers).
  • Piva, M., ve Vivarelli, M. (2002), “The skill bias: Comparative evidence and an econometric test”, International Review of Applied Economics, 16(3): 347-358.
  • Porter, M. (1980), Competitive Strategy: Techniques for Analyzing Industry and Competitors (New York, The Free Press).
  • Porter, M. (1985), Competitive Advantage (New York, The Free Press).
  • Prahalad, C. K., and Hamel, G. (1990), “The Core Competence of the Corporation”, Harvard Business Review, 68, May-June: 79-91.
  • Russell R. (1990), “Innovation in Organizations: Toward an Integrated Model”, Review of Business, 12(2): 19-25.
  • Sauvage T. (2003) “The Relationship Between Technology and Logistics Third-Party Providers” International Journal of Physical Distribution&Logistics Management 33(3): 236-253.
  • Schumpeter, J.A. (1983), Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy (New York, Harper&Row Publishing).
  • Senge, P. (1990), The Fifth Discipline: The Art and Practice of the Learning Organization (New York, Doubleday).
  • Tidd J., Bessant, J., ve Pavitt, K. (2001), Managing Innovation Integrating Technological, Market, and Organizational Change, Second Edition (New York, John Wiley&Sons).
  • Totterdell, P., Leach, D., Birdi, K., Clegg, C., ve Wall, T. (2002), “An investigation of the contents and consequences of major organizational innovations”, International Journal of Innovation Management, 6(4): 343-368.
  • Tuzcu A. (2008) “Türkiye’de Holding Çatısı Altındaki Şirketlerde İnovasyon Yetkinliği” 16. Ulusal
  • Wernerfelt, B. (1995), “The Resource-Based View of Firm: Ten Years After”, Strategic Management Journal, 16: 171-174.
  • Wolfe, RA. (1994), “Organizational Innovation: Review, Critique and Suggested Research Directions”, Journal of Management Studies 31(3): 405-431.
  • Womack, J., Jones, D., ve Roos, D. (1990), The Machine that Changed the World: The Story of Lean Production (New York, Harper Parennial).

TÜRK FİRMALARININ ORGANİZASYONEL İNOVASYON YETENEĞİNİ ETKİLEYEN FAKTÖRLER ÜZERİNE BİR ARAŞTIRMA

Yıl 2011, Cilt 66, Sayı 04, 1 - 20, 01.04.2011
https://doi.org/10.1501/SBFder_0000002229

Öz

İnovasyon, firmaların rekabet avantajı sağlayabilmesi ve pazar içerisinde hayatta kalabilmesi açısından önemli bir yer tutmaktadır. İnovasyon çeşitleri arasında sayılan önemli bir konu da organizasyonel inovasyondur. Ancak uluslararası literatürde firmaların organizasyonel inovasyonlarının belirleyicilerini tespit etmek üzere yapılmış çok sınırlı araştırma olması ve ulusal literatürde ise böyle bir çalışma olmaması, ülkesel bazda inovasyon stratejisi geliştirilebilmesini kısıtlamaktadır. Bu eksikliği gidermek üzere tasarlanan bu araştırmada, Türkiye İstatistik Kurumu’nun 2008 yılı Yenilik Anketi verileri kullanılarak, Türk firmalarının organizasyonel inovasyonlarını etkileyen faktörler tespit edilmeye çalışılmıştır. Araştırma bulguları organizasyonel inovasyonun oluşumunda bilgi, iş birliği, ağ geliştirme potansiyeli ve pazar büyüklüğünün en önemli faktörler olduğunu göstermektedir.

Kaynakça

  • Acs, Z. J., ve Audretsch, B. D. (1990), Innovation and Small Firms (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press).
  • Anderson, N., ve King, N. (1993), “Innovation in organizations”, International Review of Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 8: 1-34.
  • Armbruster, H., Bikfalvi, A., Kinkel, S., ve Lay, G. (2008), “Organizational innovation: The challenge of measuring non-technical innovation in large-scale surveys”, Technovation, 28: 644- 657.
  • Azzone, G., ve Noci, G. (1998), "Identifying effective PMSs for the deployment of “green” manufacturing strategies", International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 18(4): 308-335.
  • Barney, J. B. (1986), “Organizational Culture: Can It be a Source of Sustained Competitive Advantage?” Academy of Management Review, 11, July: 656-665.
  • Barney, J. B. (1991), “Firm Resources and Sustainable Competitive Advantage”, Journal of Management, 17: 99-120.
  • Birchall, D.W., Chanaron, J.J., ve Soderquist, K. (1996), “Managing innovation in SMEs: A comparison of companies in the UK, France and Portugal”, International Journal of Technology Management 12(3): 291–305.
  • Caroli, E., ve Van Reenen, J. (2001), “Skill biased organizational change? Evidence from a panel of British and French establishment”, The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 116(4): 1149-1192.
  • Chesbrough, H. (2003), Open Innovation: The New Imperative for Creating and Profiting from Technology (Boston, Harvard Business School Press).
  • Daft, R. L. (1978), “A dual-core model of organizational innovation”, Academy of Management Journal, 21: 193-210.
  • Damanpour F. (1992), “Organizational Size and Innovation”, Organization Studies, 13: 375-402.
  • Damanpour, F. (1987), “The adoption of technological, administrative and ancillary innovations: Impact of organizational factors”, Journal of Management, 13: 675-688.
  • Damanpour, F. (1991), “Organizational innovation: A meta-analysis of effects of determinants and moderators”, Academy of Management Journal, 34(3): 555-590.
  • Damanpour, F., Szabat, K.A., ve Evan, W.M. (1989), “The relationship between types of innovation and organizational performance”, Journal of Management Studies, 26(6): 587-601.
  • Damanpour, F., ve Evan, W. M. (1984), “Organizational innovation and performance: The problem of organizational lag”, Administrative Science Quarterly, 29: 392-409.
  • Demirguc-Kunt, A., ve V. Maksimovic (1998), "Law, Finance and Firm Growth", The Journal of Finance 53(6): 2107-2137.
  • Dougherty D., ve Bowman E.H. (1996), “The Effects of Organizational Downsizing on Product Innovation”, Journal of Product Innovation Management, 4 (4): 179-185.
  • Faems, D., Van Looy, B., ve Debackere, K. (2005), “Interorganizational Collaboration and Innovation: Toward A Portfolio Approach”, Journal of Product Innovation Management 22(3): 238–250.
  • Fagerberg, J., Mowery, D.C. Nelson, R.R. (2005), The Oxford Handbook of Innovation (Oxford, Oxford University Press).
  • Fıkırkoca A. (2008) “Türkiye’de Holdinglerin Stratejik Gelişimi ve İnovasyon Süreci” 16. Ulusal
  • Freeman, C., ve Soete, L. (1997), The Economics of Industrial Innovation (London, Pinter Publishers).
  • Goldman, S., Nagel, R., Preiss, K. (1995), Agile Competitors and Virtual Organisations: Strategies for Enriching the Customer (New York, NY., Van Nostrand Reinhold).
  • Greenan, N. (2003), “Organizational change, technology, employment and skills: An empirical study of French manufacturing”, Cambridge Journal of Economics, 27: 287-316.
  • Hage, J. T. (1980), Theories of Organizations (New York, Wiley).
  • Hage, J. T. (1999), “Organizational innovation and organizational change”, Annual Review of Sociology, 25: 597-622.
  • Hambrick D.C. (1983), “Some Tests of the Effectiveness and Functional Attributes of Miles and Snow’s Strategic Types”, Academy of Management, 26: 5-26.
  • Hammer, M., ve Champy, J. (1993), Reengineering the Corporation (New York, Harper Business).
  • Hidalgo, A., ve Jose, A. (2008), “Innovation Management Techniques and Tools: A Review From Theory and Practice”, R&D Management, 38(2): 113-127.
  • Ishikawa, K. (1985), What Is Total Quality Control? The Japanese Way (Englewood Cliffs, NJ., Prentice-Hall).
  • Kaminski, P.C., deOliveira, A.C., ve Lopes, T.M. (2008), “Knowledge transfer in product development processes: a case study in small and medium enterprises (SMEs) of the metal-mechanic sector from Sao Paulo, Brazil”, Technovation 28(1-2): 29-36.
  • Lam, A. (2005), “Organizational innovation”, Fagerberg, J., D.C. Mowery, R.R. Nelson (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Innovation (Oxford, Oxford University Press).
  • Laursen, K., ve A. Salter (2004), “Searching Low and High: What Types of Firms Use Universities as a Source of Innovation?”, Research Policy, Vol 33(8): 1201-1215.
  • Link A.N., ve Siegel D.S. (2007), Innovation, Entrepreneurship and Technological Change (New York, Oxford University Press).
  • Lukas B.A. ve Ferrell O.C. (2000): ”The Effect of Market Orientation on Product Innovation” Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 28(2): 239-247.
  • Massa, S., ve Testa, S. (2008), “Innovation and SMEs: misaligned perspectives and goals among entrepreneurs, academics, and policy makers”, Technovation 28(7): 393-407.
  • Miles, R., Snow, C. (1997), “Organizing in the knowledge age: anticipating the cellular form”, Academy of Management Executive 11(4): 7-24.
  • Miller, Damian; Garnsey, Elizabeth. (2000), “Entrepreneurs and Technology Diffusion, How Diffusion Research Can Benefit from a Greater Understanding of Entrepreneurship”, Technology in Society, 22: 445-465.
  • Nada, N., Kholeif, M., Elbadawy, A., ve Yanık, T. (2010), “An integrated innovation management framework”, Proceedings of International Workshop on Innovation & Entrepreneurship Congress, November 11-12, İzmir.
  • Nijssen, E.J., ve Frambach, R.T. (2000), “Determinants of the adoption of new product development tools by industrial firms”, Industrial Marketing Management, 29: 121-131.
  • OECD (2005), The Measurement of Scientific and Technological Activities, Oslo Manual: Guidelines for Collecting and Interpreting Innovation Data, 3rd Ed. (Paris, OECD).
  • OECD (Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development) (2000), Science, Technology and Innovation in the New Economy, Policy Brief, (Paris, OECD).
  • Oerlemans, L.A.G., Meeus, M.T.H., ve Boekema, F.W.M. (1998), “Do networks matter for innovation: the usefulness of the economic network approach in analysing innovation”, Journal of Economic and Social Geography 89(3): 298-309.
  • Pinchot, G., Pinchot, E. (1993), The End of Bureaucracy and the Rise of Intelligent Organization (San Francisco, Berret-Koehler Publishers).
  • Piva, M., ve Vivarelli, M. (2002), “The skill bias: Comparative evidence and an econometric test”, International Review of Applied Economics, 16(3): 347-358.
  • Porter, M. (1980), Competitive Strategy: Techniques for Analyzing Industry and Competitors (New York, The Free Press).
  • Porter, M. (1985), Competitive Advantage (New York, The Free Press).
  • Prahalad, C. K., and Hamel, G. (1990), “The Core Competence of the Corporation”, Harvard Business Review, 68, May-June: 79-91.
  • Russell R. (1990), “Innovation in Organizations: Toward an Integrated Model”, Review of Business, 12(2): 19-25.
  • Sauvage T. (2003) “The Relationship Between Technology and Logistics Third-Party Providers” International Journal of Physical Distribution&Logistics Management 33(3): 236-253.
  • Schumpeter, J.A. (1983), Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy (New York, Harper&Row Publishing).
  • Senge, P. (1990), The Fifth Discipline: The Art and Practice of the Learning Organization (New York, Doubleday).
  • Tidd J., Bessant, J., ve Pavitt, K. (2001), Managing Innovation Integrating Technological, Market, and Organizational Change, Second Edition (New York, John Wiley&Sons).
  • Totterdell, P., Leach, D., Birdi, K., Clegg, C., ve Wall, T. (2002), “An investigation of the contents and consequences of major organizational innovations”, International Journal of Innovation Management, 6(4): 343-368.
  • Tuzcu A. (2008) “Türkiye’de Holding Çatısı Altındaki Şirketlerde İnovasyon Yetkinliği” 16. Ulusal
  • Wernerfelt, B. (1995), “The Resource-Based View of Firm: Ten Years After”, Strategic Management Journal, 16: 171-174.
  • Wolfe, RA. (1994), “Organizational Innovation: Review, Critique and Suggested Research Directions”, Journal of Management Studies 31(3): 405-431.
  • Womack, J., Jones, D., ve Roos, D. (1990), The Machine that Changed the World: The Story of Lean Production (New York, Harper Parennial).

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil Türkçe
Bölüm Araştırma Makaleleri
Yazarlar

Serhat BURMAOĞLU Bu kişi benim


Harun ŞEŞEN Bu kişi benim

Yayımlanma Tarihi 1 Nisan 2011
Başvuru Tarihi 31 Temmuz 2014
Kabul Tarihi
Yayınlandığı Sayı Yıl 2011, Cilt 66, Sayı 04

Kaynak Göster

Bibtex @ { ausbf42514, journal = {Ankara Üniversitesi SBF Dergisi}, issn = {0378-2921}, eissn = {1309-1034}, address = {}, publisher = {Ankara Üniversitesi}, year = {2011}, volume = {66}, number = {04}, pages = {1 - 20}, doi = {10.1501/SBFder\_0000002229}, title = {TÜRK FİRMALARININ ORGANİZASYONEL İNOVASYON YETENEĞİNİ ETKİLEYEN FAKTÖRLER ÜZERİNE BİR ARAŞTIRMA}, key = {cite}, author = {Burmaoğlu, Serhat and Şeşen, Harun} }
APA Burmaoğlu, S. & Şeşen, H. (2011). TÜRK FİRMALARININ ORGANİZASYONEL İNOVASYON YETENEĞİNİ ETKİLEYEN FAKTÖRLER ÜZERİNE BİR ARAŞTIRMA . Ankara Üniversitesi SBF Dergisi , 66 (04) , 1-20 . DOI: 10.1501/SBFder_0000002229
MLA Burmaoğlu, S. , Şeşen, H. "TÜRK FİRMALARININ ORGANİZASYONEL İNOVASYON YETENEĞİNİ ETKİLEYEN FAKTÖRLER ÜZERİNE BİR ARAŞTIRMA" . Ankara Üniversitesi SBF Dergisi 66 (2011 ): 1-20 <https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/ausbf/issue/3066/42514>
Chicago Burmaoğlu, S. , Şeşen, H. "TÜRK FİRMALARININ ORGANİZASYONEL İNOVASYON YETENEĞİNİ ETKİLEYEN FAKTÖRLER ÜZERİNE BİR ARAŞTIRMA". Ankara Üniversitesi SBF Dergisi 66 (2011 ): 1-20
RIS TY - JOUR T1 - TÜRK FİRMALARININ ORGANİZASYONEL İNOVASYON YETENEĞİNİ ETKİLEYEN FAKTÖRLER ÜZERİNE BİR ARAŞTIRMA AU - SerhatBurmaoğlu, HarunŞeşen Y1 - 2011 PY - 2011 N1 - doi: 10.1501/SBFder_0000002229 DO - 10.1501/SBFder_0000002229 T2 - Ankara Üniversitesi SBF Dergisi JF - Journal JO - JOR SP - 1 EP - 20 VL - 66 IS - 04 SN - 0378-2921-1309-1034 M3 - doi: 10.1501/SBFder_0000002229 UR - https://doi.org/10.1501/SBFder_0000002229 Y2 - 2022 ER -
EndNote %0 Ankara Üniversitesi SBF Dergisi TÜRK FİRMALARININ ORGANİZASYONEL İNOVASYON YETENEĞİNİ ETKİLEYEN FAKTÖRLER ÜZERİNE BİR ARAŞTIRMA %A Serhat Burmaoğlu , Harun Şeşen %T TÜRK FİRMALARININ ORGANİZASYONEL İNOVASYON YETENEĞİNİ ETKİLEYEN FAKTÖRLER ÜZERİNE BİR ARAŞTIRMA %D 2011 %J Ankara Üniversitesi SBF Dergisi %P 0378-2921-1309-1034 %V 66 %N 04 %R doi: 10.1501/SBFder_0000002229 %U 10.1501/SBFder_0000002229
ISNAD Burmaoğlu, Serhat , Şeşen, Harun . "TÜRK FİRMALARININ ORGANİZASYONEL İNOVASYON YETENEĞİNİ ETKİLEYEN FAKTÖRLER ÜZERİNE BİR ARAŞTIRMA". Ankara Üniversitesi SBF Dergisi 66 / 04 (Nisan 2011): 1-20 . https://doi.org/10.1501/SBFder_0000002229
AMA Burmaoğlu S. , Şeşen H. TÜRK FİRMALARININ ORGANİZASYONEL İNOVASYON YETENEĞİNİ ETKİLEYEN FAKTÖRLER ÜZERİNE BİR ARAŞTIRMA. Ankara Üniversitesi SBF Dergisi. 2011; 66(04): 1-20.
Vancouver Burmaoğlu S. , Şeşen H. TÜRK FİRMALARININ ORGANİZASYONEL İNOVASYON YETENEĞİNİ ETKİLEYEN FAKTÖRLER ÜZERİNE BİR ARAŞTIRMA. Ankara Üniversitesi SBF Dergisi. 2011; 66(04): 1-20.
IEEE S. Burmaoğlu ve H. Şeşen , "TÜRK FİRMALARININ ORGANİZASYONEL İNOVASYON YETENEĞİNİ ETKİLEYEN FAKTÖRLER ÜZERİNE BİR ARAŞTIRMA", Ankara Üniversitesi SBF Dergisi, c. 66, sayı. 04, ss. 1-20, Nis. 2011, doi:10.1501/SBFder_0000002229