ÖRGÜTLERDE BİLGİ PAYLAŞIM DAVRANIŞI: SOSYAL SERMAYE BOYUTUNDAN BİR BAKIŞ

Öz

Anahtar Kelimeler

• -

ÖRGÜTLERDE BİLGİ PAYLAŞIM DAVRANIŞI: SOSYAL SERMAYE BOYUTUNDAN BİR BAKIŞ

Öz

Örtülü bilgi paylaşımının örgüt için yaşamsal öneminden hareketle çalışmanın odağı sosyal sermaye boyutları ile örtülü bilgi paylaşım davranışı ilişkisine yönelmiştir. Bu çerçevede çalışma, bir araştırma modeli yoluyla iki temel soruya cevap aramaktadır. (1) Sosyal sermaye boyutları örtülü bilgiyi paylaşma davranışını etkiletmekte midir? ve (2) içsel ve dışsal kontrollülük örtülü bilgi paylaşım davranışını etkilemekte midir? Örtülü bilginin yoğun olarak üretildiği, paylaşıldığı ve ustalıkların 6 yıl boyunca öğrencilere aktarılması sürecini kapsayan tıp eğitimi, çalışmanın uygulama alanı olarak seçilmiş ve bir üniversite hastanesi intörnleri üzerinde çalışma gerçekleştirilmiştir. Çalışmanın sonucunda, sosyal sermaye boyutlarının ve içsel kontrolün örtülü bilgiyi paylaşım davranışını olumlu yönde etkilediği istatistikî olarak kanıtlanmış, buna karşın dışsal kontrolün örtülü bilgi paylaşımı ile istatistikî bir ilişkisi bulunamamıştır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Sosyal sermaye, örtülü bilgi, örtülü bilgi paylaşma davranışı, denetim merkezi, dışsal kontrol

Kaynakça

1. Ajzen, I. (1991), “The Theory of Planned Behavior,” Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50: 179-211.
2. Ajzen, I. (2002), “Perceived Behavior Control, Self-Efficacy, Locus of Control and the Theory of Planned Behavior,” Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 32: 665-683.
3. Ajzen, I. (1985), “From Intention to Behavior: A Theory of Planned Behavior,” J. Kunl ve J. Beckman (eds.), Action Control: From Cognitions To Behaviors, 11-39 (New York: Springer).
4. Alavi, M., ve D. E. Leidner(2001), “Knowledge Management And Knowledge Management Systems: Conceptual Foundations and Research Issues,” MIS Quarterly, 25(1): 107–136.
5. Armitage, C. J., Conner, M., Loach, J., ve D.Willetts (1999), “Different Perceptions of Control: Applying An Extended Theory of Planned Behavior to Legal and Illegal Drug Use,” Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 21(4), 301-316.
6. Armitage, C. J. ve M.Conner (2001), “Efficacy of the Theory of Planned Behavior: Ameta-Analytic Review,” British Journal of Social Psychology, 40: 471-499.
7. Berger, P. L. ve T.Luckman (1966), The Social Construction of Reality (London: Penguin Press).
8. Berman, S. L., J. Down ve C. W. L. Hill (2002), “Tacit Knowledge as a Source of Competitive Advantage in the National Basketball Association,” Academy of Management Journal, 45(1): 13-31.

9. Bock, G. W., R. W. Zmud, R, Y. G. Kim ve J.N. Lee (2005), “Behavioral Intention Formation In Knowledge Sharing: Examining The Roles of Extrinsic Motivators, Social–Psychological Forces, And Organizational Climate,” MIS Quarterly, 29(1): 1-26.
10. Bolino, M. C., W. H Turnley,. ve J. M. Bloodgood (2002), “Citizenship Behavior An The Creation of Social Capital In Organizations,” Academy of Management Review, 27(4): 505-522.
11. Brashear, T. G., , J. S. Boles Bellenger ve C. M. Brooks (2003), “An Empirical Test of Trust-Building Processes and Outcomes in Sales Manager–Salesperson Relationships,” Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 31(2): 189–200.
12. Burt, R. S. (1992), Structural Holes: The Social Structure of Competition (Cambridge, Ma: Harvard University Press).
13. Burt, R. S. (1997), “The Contingent Value of Social Capital,” Administrative Science Quarterly, 42: 339-365.
14. Choi, B., ve H.Lee (2003). “An Empirical Investigation of Km Styles and Their Effect on Corporate Performance,” Information & Management, 40: 403-417.
15. Coleman, J. S. (1988), “Social Capital in The Creation Of Human Capital,” American Journal of Sociology, 94: 95-120.
16. Coleman, J. S. (1990), Foundations Of Social Theory (Cambridge, Ma: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press).
17. Conner, M., ve C. J. Armitage (1998), “Extending The Theory of Planned Behavior: A Review For Further Research,” Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 28: 1429-1464.
18. Fahey, L., ve L. Prusak (1998). “The Eleven Deadliest Sins of Knowledge Management,” California Management Review, 40(3): 265-276.
19. Fitch, J. L., ve E. C. Ravlin, E. C. (2005), “Willpower and Perceived Behavioral Control: Influences on the Intention Behavior Relationship and Postbehavior Attributions,” Social Behavior And Personality, 33(2): 05-124.
20. Granovetter, M. S. (1973), “The Strength of Weak Ties,” American Journal of Sociology, 78: 1360- 1380.
21. Hoegl, M. ve A. Schulze A. (2005), “How to Support Knowledge Creation in New Product Development: An Investigation of Knowledge Management Methods,” European Management Journal, 23(3): 262-273
22. Käser, P. A. W. ve R. E Miles (2002), “Understanding Knowledge Activists’ Successes and Failures,” Long Range Planning, 35: 9-28.
23. Krackhardt, D. (1989), “Graph Theoretical Dimensions of Informal Organization,” Paper Presented at the Annual Meeting of the Academy of Management (Washington, Dc).
24. Leana, C. R. ve H. J Van Buren (1999), “Organizational Social Capital And Employement Practices,” Academy of Management Review, 24: 538-555.
25. Mcallister, D. J. (1995), “Affect and Cognition Based Trust as Foundations For Interpersonal Cooperation in Organizations,” Academy of Management Journal, 38(1): 24-59.
26. Moran, P, ve S. Ghoshal (1996), “Value Creation By Firms,” J.B. Keys ve L. N. Dosier (Eds.), Academy of Management Best Paper Proceedings: 41-45.
27. Nahapiet, J., ve S.Ghoshal (1998), “Social Capital, Intellectual Capital, and the Organizational Advantage,” Academy of Management Review, 23(2): 242-266.
28. Nohria, N. (1992), “Information and Search in the Creation of New Business Ventures,” N. Nohria ve R. G. Eccles (eds.), Networks And Organizations: Structure, Form And Action (Boston: Harvard Business School Press): 240-261.
29. Nonaka, I. (1994), “A Dynamic Theory of Organizational Knowledge Creation,” Organization Science, 5(1): 14-37.
30. Nonaka, I., ve H. Takeuchi (1995), The Knowledge Creating Company (New York: Oxford University Press).
31. Osterloh, M. ve B. S. Frey (2000), “Motivation, Knowledge Transfer, and Organizational Forms,” Organization Science, 11(5): 538–550.
32. Polanyi, M. (1967), The Tacit Dimension (London: Routledge And Keoan Paul).
33. Pondy, L. R., ve I. I. Mitroff (1979), “Beyond Open Systems Models of Organizations,” Staw, B M. (ed.),. Research in Organization Behavior (Greenwich, Ct: Jai Press), 1: 3-39.
34. Putnam, R. D. (1993), “The Prosperous Community: Social Capital and Public Life,” American Prospect, 13: 35-42.
35. Putnam, R. D. (1995), “Bowling Alone: America's Declining Social Capital,” Journal of Democracy, 6: 65-78.
36. Scott, J. (1991), Social Network Analysis: A Handbook (London: Sage, Simon, H). Smedlund, A. (2008), “The Knowledge System of A Firm:Social Capital Capital for Explict and Potential Knowledge,” Journal of Knowledge Management, 12(1): 63-77.
37. Tichy, N. M., M. L. Tushman ve C. Fombrun (1979), “Social Network Analysis For Organizations,” Academy of Management Review, 4: 507-519.
38. Tsai,W., ve S. Ghoshal (1998), “Social Capital And Value Creation: The Role of Intrafirm Networks,” Academy of Management Journal, 41(4): 464–476.
39. Wasserman, S., ve K. Faust (1994), Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications (Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press).
40. Wegner, D. M. (1987), “Transactive Memory: A Contemporary Analysis of The Group Mind,” Mullen, B. ve G. R. Goethasis (eds.), Theories of Group Behavior New York: Springer-Verlag): 185- 208.
41. Wegner, D. M., R. Erber, ve P. Raymond (1991), “Transactive Memory in Close Relationships,” Journal of Personality And Social Psychology, 61: 923-929.
42. Wegner, D. M., Giuliano ve P. T. Hertel (1985), “Cognitive Interdependence in Close Relationships,” Icke,W. J. (Ed.), Compatible And Incompatible Relationships (New York: Springer-Verlag): 253-276.
43. Weick, K. E., ve K. H. Roberts (1993), “Collective Mind in Organizations: Heedful Interrelating on Flight Decks,” Administrative Science Quarterly, 38: 357- 381.
44. Yang, S. C. ve C. K. Fam (2009), “Social Capital, Behavioural Control, and Tacit Knowledge Sharing-A Multi- Informant Design,” International Journal of Information Management, 29: 210-218.