Reconsidering Secularization Theory in International Politics

Yıl 2025, Cilt: 16 Sayı: 1, 55 - 73, 30.06.2025

Duygu Dersan Orhan

https://doi.org/10.54688/ayd.1528347

Öz

Secularization theory holds that religion's impact on public and political life decreases with society's modernization. The widespread return of religion, however, calls into question this idea and forces researchers to reevaluate its presumptions and consequences. The conceptual analysis of secularization, the origins of secularism in international relations, the approach taken by theories of international relations to secularization, the criticisms leveled against secularization theory in the literature, and the applicability of secularization theory in modern global politics are the main topics covered by this study. This article argues that the most important shortcomings of secularization theory is that it is too Western-centric due to its origins in Western Enlightenment thought and that it is insufficient to explain the increasing number of non-state religious actors and transnational religious networks due to globalization. It is suggested that even though secularization theory offers valuable information about the modernizing process and the separation of governmental and religious authority, there is a need to revise and expand the theory in order to address the emergence of religiously oriented politics.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Secularization theory , International relations , politics , religion

RECONSIDERING SECULARIZATION THEORY IN INTERNATIONAL POLITICS

Öz

Secularization theory holds that religion's impact on public and political life decreases with society's modernization. The widespread return of religion, however, calls into question this idea and forces researchers to reevaluate its presumptions and consequences. The conceptual analysis of secularization, the origins of secularism in international relations, the approach taken by theories of international relations to secularization, the criticisms leveled against secularization theory in the literature, and the applicability of secularization theory in modern global politics are the main topics covered by this study. This article argues that the most important shortcomings of secularization theory is that it is too Western-centric due to its origins in Western Enlightenment thought and that it is insufficient to explain the increasing number of non-state religious actors and transnational religious networks due to globalization. It is suggested that even though secularization theory offers valuable information about the modernizing process and the separation of governmental and religious authority, there is a need to revise and expand the theory to address the emergence of religiously oriented politics.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Secularization theory , International Relations , Politics , Religion

Kaynakça

• Berger, P. L. (1969). The Sacred Canopy: Elements of a Sociological Theory of Religion. Anchor Books.
• Berger, P. L. (1999). World Politics and The Desecularization of the World. Ethics and Public Policy Center.
• Berger, P. L. (2000). Secularism in Retreat, Azam Tamimi and John Esposito (eds), Islam and Secularism in the Middle East. New York University Press, 38-51.
• Calhoun, C. (2011). Secularism, citizenship and the public sphere. C. Calhoun, M. Juergensmeyer, & J. VanAntwerpen (Eds.), Rethinking secularism. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
• Casanova, J. (1994). Public Religions in the Modern World. University of Chicago Press.
• Derek, C. (1999) The Peace of Westphalia of 1648 and the Origins of Sovereignty. The International History Review, 21(3), 569-591.
• Esposito, J. L. (1999). The Islamic Threat: Myth or Reality? Oxford University Press.
• Gramsci, A. (1971). Selections from the Prison Notebooks. International Publishers.
• Hadden, J. K. (1987). Toward desacralizing secularization theory. Social Forces, 65(3), 587-611.
• Hobbes, T. (2008). Leviathan (J. C. A. Gaskin, Ed.). Oxford University Press.
• Huntington, S. (1993). The Clash of Civilizations. Foreign Affairs, 72(3), 22-49.
• Hurd, E. S. (2010). Debates within a Single Church: Secularism and IR Theory. Zeitschrift für Internationale Beziehungen, 17 (1), 135-148.
• Hurd, E.S. (2017). Narratives of de-secularization in international relations, Intellectual History Review, 27 (1), 97-113.
• Ikenberry, G. J. (2011). Liberal Leviathan: The Origins, Crisis, and Transformation of the American World Order. Princeton University Press.
• Juergensmeyer, M. (2003). Global Rebellion: Religious Challenges to the Secular State. International Journal of Politics, Culture, and Society, 17 (1), 1-20.
• Kerry, J. (2015). Religion and Diplomacy: Toward a Better Understanding of Religion and Global Affairs. America, September 14, 2015. http://www.americamagazine.org/issue/religion-and diplomacy.
• Keohane, R. O. (1984). After Hegemony: Cooperation and Discord in the World Political Economy. Princeton University Press.
• Krasner, S. D. (1993). Westphalia and All That. J. Goldstein and R. Keohane (eds.), Ideas and Foreign Policy, Cornell University Press, 235-264.
• Lesaffer, R. (2004). Peace Treaties and International Law in European History: From the Late Middle Ages to World War One. Cambridge University Press.
• Machiavelli, N. (1981). The Prince. Penguin Books.
• Martin, D. (2005). On Secularization: Towards a Revised General Theory. Ashgate.
• Mavelli, Luca. (2011). Security and Secularization in International Relations, European Journal of International Relations 18(1) 177–199.
• McLeod, H. (2000). Secularization in Western Europe, 1848-1914. Mcmillan. Morgenthau, H. J. (1946). Scientific Man vs. Power Politics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
• Modongal, S. (2023). The resurgence of religion in international relations: How theories can accommodate it?, Cogent Social Sciences (2023), 9.
• Morgenthau, H.J. (2005). Politics Among Nations: The Struggle for Power and Peace. 7th edition, McGraw-Hill.
• Norris, P. & Inglehart, R. (2004). Sacred and Secular: Religion and Politics Worldwide. Cambridge University Press.
• Philpott, D. (2000). The Religious Roots of Modern International Relations. World Politics, 52 (2), 206-245.
• Philpott, D. (2002) The Challenge of September 11 to Secularism in International Relations World Politics. 55 (1), 66-95,
• Philpott, D. (2009), Has the Study of Global Politics Found Religion? Annual Review of Political Science, 12, 183-202.
• Ramadan, T. (2012). The Arab Awakening: Islam and the New Middle East. London: Penguin Books.
• Roy, O. (2017). Political Islam After the Arab Spring, Foreign Affairs, 96 (6), 127-132.
• Rawls, J. (1999). The Law of Peoples. Harvard University Press.
• Rodney S. (1999). Secularization R.I.P. (Rest in Peace). Sociology of Religion, 60, 249-273.
• Roy W.& Bruce S. (1992). Secularization: The Orthodox Model” Steve Bruce (ed), Religion and Modernization: Sociologists and Historians Debate the Secularization Thesis. Clarendon Press.
• Sandal, N.A. & Fox, J. (2013). Religion in international relations theory: interactions and possibilities. New York: Routledge.
• Scharffs, B. G. (2011). Four views of the citadel: The consequential distinction between secularity and secularism. Religion and Human Rights, 6, 109–126.
• Sheikh, A.M. & Yosofi, S.H. (2019). Journal of Advances and Scholarly Researches in Allied Education, 16(2), 161-167.
• Solarz, A.M .(2020). Religion and International Relations in the Middle East as a Challenge for International Relations (IR) Studies, Religions. 11 (150).
• Taylor, C. (1998). Modes of Secularism, Rajeev Bhargava (ed.), Secularism and its Critics. Delhi: Oxford University Press.
• Waltz, K. (1979). Theory of International Politics. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
• Watson, A. (1993). The Evolution of International Society: A Comparative Historical Analysis. Routledge.
• Weiss&Hassan. (2015). ISIS: Inside the Army of Terror. Regan Arts: New York.
• Wendt, A. (1999). Social Theory of International Politics. Cambridge University Press.