N-11 ÜLKELERİNDE POLİTİK İSTİKRARIN ÇEVRESEL BOZULMA ÜZERİNDEKİ ETKİSİ

Orhan Cengiz

N-11 ÜLKELERİNDE POLİTİK İSTİKRARIN ÇEVRESEL BOZULMA ÜZERİNDEKİ ETKİSİ

Öz

Politik istikrar günümüzde ekonomik gelişmenin ayrılmaz unsurlarından birisidir. Demokratik sistemlerde karar alma sürecinde özel çıkar gruplarının varlığı politik istikrarı yakından etkileyerek kaynak dağılımını ve kamusal politikaların verimliliğini etkilemektedir. Kamusal politikaların etkilediği alanların başında çevre düzenlemeleri gelmektedir. Bunun yanında gelişme sürecinde toplumların yaşam standardının iyileştirilmesi bağlamında çevre kalitesinin artırılmasına yönelik talepleri de artış göstermektedir. Bu noktada çevresel kaliteyle kurumsal kalite göstergelerinden politik istikrar ilişkisi ayrı bir önem kazanmaktadır. Bu çalışmada 2000-2015 dönemi verileri kullanılarak N-11 ülkelerinde (Bangladeş, Mısır, Endonezya, Iran, Güney Kore, Meksika, Nijerya, Pakistan, Filipinler, Türkiye ve Vietnam) politik istikrarın çevresel bozulmaya etkisi incelenmiştir. Elde edilen bulgular, politik istikrar arttıkça çevresel bozulmanın azaldığını göstermektedir. Buna göre politik istikrar çevre kalitesini iyileştirmektedir. Ayrıca ekonomik büyüme, çevresel bozulmayı olumlu etkilerken yenilebilir enerji tüketimi, çevresel bozulmayı olumsuz etkilemektedir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Çevresel Bozulma, Çevresel Kalite, Politik İstikrar, Kurumsal Kalite

Kaynakça

Alesina, A., Özler, S., Roubini, N. & Swagel, P. (1996). Political instability and economic growth. Journal of Economic growth, 1(2), 189-211.
Aytun, C. & Akın C. S. (2016). Interaction of instutions and environmental degredation. International Journal of Advanced Research, 4(12), 63-70.
Azam, M., Liu, L. & Ahmad, N. (2020). Impact of institutional quality on environment and energy consumption: Evidence from developing world. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 1-22. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-020-00644-x.
Bernauer, T. & Koubi, V. (2009). Effects of political institutions on air quality. Ecological Economics, 68, 1355-1365.
Buitenzorgy, M. & Mol, A. P. J. (2011). Does democracy lead to a better environment? Deforestation and the democratic transition peak. Environmental and Resource Economics, 48, 59-70.
Carlsson, F. & S. Lundström (2003). Political and economic freedom and the environment: The case of CO2 Emissions. Working Papers in Economics, No 29 (Revised version), February 2003, Department of Economics, Göteborg University, 80-94.
Cole, M. A. (2007). Corruption, income and the environment: An empirical analysis. Ecological Economics, 62, 637-647.
Erdem, E., Guloglu, B. & Nazlioglu, S. (2010). The macroeconomy and Turkish agricultural trade balance with the EU countries: Panel ARDL analysis. Journal of Economic & Management Perspectives, 4(1), 371-379.
Ewharieme, W. & Cocodia, J. (2011). Corruption and environmental degradation in Nigeria and its Niger Delta. Journal of Alternative Perspectives in the Social Sciences, 3(3), 446-468.
Fredriksson, P. G. & Svensson, J. (2003). Political instability, corruption and policy formation: The case of environmental policy. Journal of Public Economics, 87, 1383-1405.

Fredriksson, P. G. (1997). The political economy of pollution taxes in a small open economy. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 33(1), 44-58.
Gallagher, K. P. & Thacker, S. C. (2008). Democracy, income, and environmental quality. PERI Working Papers, Number 164, 1-27.
Goel, R. K., Herrala, R. & Mazhar, U. (2013). Institutional quality and environmental pollution: MENA countries versus the rest of the world. Economic Systems, 37, 508-521.
Grossman, G.M. & A.B. Krueger (1991). Environmental Impacts of A North American Free Trade Agreement. NBER Working Paper Series, 3914.
Habib, S., Abdelmonen, S. & Khaled, M. (2020). The effect of corruption on the environmental quality in African countries: A panel quantile regression analysis. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 11, 788-804.
Koçbulut, Ö. & Altıntaş, H. (2016). İkiz açıklar ve Feldstein-Horioka hipotezi: OECD ülkeleri üzerine yatay kesit bağımlılığı altında yapısal kırılmalı panel eşbütünleşme analizi. Erciyes Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 48, 145-174.
Lau, L. S., Choong, C. K. & Eng, Y. K. (2014). Carbon dioxide emission, institutional quality, and economic growth: Empirical evidence in Malaysia. Renewable Energy, 68, 276-281.
Li, Q. & R. Reuveny (2006). Democracy and environmental degradation. International Studies Quarterly, 50, 935-56.
Liao, X., Dogan, E. & Baek, J. (2017). Does corruption matter for the environment? Panel evidence from China. Economics: The Open-Access, Open-Assessment E-Journal, ISSN 1864-6042, Kiel Institute for the World Economy (IfW), Kiel, Vol. 11, Iss. 2017-27, 1-12. http://dx.doi.org/10.5018/economics-ejournal.ja.2017-27.
Lisciandra, M. & Migliardo, C. (2017). An empirical study of the impact of corruption on environmental performance: Evidence from panel data. Environmental and Resource Economics, 68, 297-318.
Mak Arvin, B. & Lew, B. (2011). Does democracy affect environmental quality in developing countries?. Applied Economics, 43(9), 1151-1160.
Margolis, J. E. (2010). Understanding political stability and instability. Civil Wars, 12(3), 326-345.
Olson, M. (1993). Dictatorship, democracy and development. American Political Science Review, 87(3), 567-576.
Pesaran, M. H. (2004). General diagnostic tests for cross section dependence in panels. CESifo Working Paper, No. 1229, Center for Economic Studies and ifo Institute (CESifo), Munich.
Pesaran, M. H. (2007). A simple panel unit root test in the presence of cross‐section dependence. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 22, 265-312.
Pesaran, M. H., Shin, Y. & Smith, R. P. (1999). Pooled mean group estimation of dynamic heterogeneous panels. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 94(446), 621-634.
Purcel, A. A. (2019). Does political stability hinder pollution? Evidence from developing states. Economic Research Guardian, 9(2), 75-98.
Purcel, A. A. (2020). Environmental degradation and political stability: A comparative study of civil and common law developing economies. Review of Economic Studies and Research Virgil Madgearu, 13(1), 93-113. doi: 10.24193/RVM.2020.13.54.
Ramadhan, A. A., Jian, Z. H., Henry, K. K.. & Pacific, Y. K. T. (2016). Does political stability accelerate economic growth in Tanzania? A time series analysis. Global Business Review, 17(5), 1026-1036.
Romuald, K. S. (2019). Democracy and Environmental Quality: Accounting for Transmission Channels. Journal of Economic Development, 44(2), 1-27.
Sachs, G. (2007). Beyond the BRICs: A look at the Next 11. Beyond BRICS; Goldman Sachs Global Economic Group: New York, NY, USA, 161-164.
Sahli, I. & Rejeb, J. B. (2015). The environmental Kuznets curve and corruption in the MENA region. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 195, 1648-1657.
Sinha, A., Gupta, M., Shahbaz, M. & Sengupta, T. (2019). Impact of corruption in public sector on environmental quality: Implications for sustainability in BRICS and next 11 countries. Journal of Cleaner Production, 232, 1379-1393.
Swamy, P. A. (1970). Efficient inference in a random coefficient regression model. Econometrica, 38(2), 311-323.
Tamazian, A. & Rao, B. B. (2010). Do economic, financial and institutional developments matter for environmental degradation? Evidence from transitional economies. Energy Economics, 32, 137-145.
Theglobaleconomy (2021). 01.01.2021, https://www.theglobaleconomy.com/.
Tohamy, A. (2018). Democracy and environmental degradation in the MENA region 1972-2015. Middle East Reasearch Journal, 47, 1-20.
Winslow, M. (2005). Is democracy good for the environment?. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 48(5), 771-783. https://doi.org/10.1080/09640560500183074.
World Bank (2021). 01.01.2021, https://data.worldbank.org/indicator.
Wu, W. L. (2017). Institutional quality and air pollution: International evidence. International Journal of Business & Economics, 16(1), 49-74.
Yahaya, N. S., Mohd‐Jali, M. R. & Raji, J. O. (2020). The role of financial development and corruption in environmental degradation of Sub-Saharan African countries. Management of Environmental Quality: An International Journal, 31( 4), 895-913.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil

Türkçe

Konular

Ekonomi

Bölüm

Araştırma Makalesi

Yazarlar

Orhan Cengiz ^*
0000-0002-1883-4754
Türkiye

Yayımlanma Tarihi

15 Haziran 2021

Gönderilme Tarihi

21 Ocak 2021

Kabul Tarihi

31 Ocak 2021

Yayımlandığı Sayı

Yıl 2021 Cilt: 12 Sayı: 1

IZ

https://izlik.org/JA42ZY64HY

APA

Cengiz, O. (2021). N-11 ÜLKELERİNDE POLİTİK İSTİKRARIN ÇEVRESEL BOZULMA ÜZERİNDEKİ ETKİSİ. Journal of Academic Approaches, 12(1), 1-17. https://izlik.org/JA42ZY64HY

AMA

1.Cengiz O. N-11 ÜLKELERİNDE POLİTİK İSTİKRARIN ÇEVRESEL BOZULMA ÜZERİNDEKİ ETKİSİ. Journal of Academic Approaches. 2021;12(1):1-17. https://izlik.org/JA42ZY64HY

Chicago

Cengiz, Orhan. 2021. “N-11 ÜLKELERİNDE POLİTİK İSTİKRARIN ÇEVRESEL BOZULMA ÜZERİNDEKİ ETKİSİ”. Journal of Academic Approaches 12 (1): 1-17. https://izlik.org/JA42ZY64HY.

EndNote

Cengiz O (01 Haziran 2021) N-11 ÜLKELERİNDE POLİTİK İSTİKRARIN ÇEVRESEL BOZULMA ÜZERİNDEKİ ETKİSİ. Journal of Academic Approaches 12 1 1–17.

IEEE

[1]O. Cengiz, “N-11 ÜLKELERİNDE POLİTİK İSTİKRARIN ÇEVRESEL BOZULMA ÜZERİNDEKİ ETKİSİ”, Journal of Academic Approaches, c. 12, sy 1, ss. 1–17, Haz. 2021, [çevrimiçi]. Erişim adresi: https://izlik.org/JA42ZY64HY

ISNAD

Cengiz, Orhan. “N-11 ÜLKELERİNDE POLİTİK İSTİKRARIN ÇEVRESEL BOZULMA ÜZERİNDEKİ ETKİSİ”. Journal of Academic Approaches 12/1 (01 Haziran 2021): 1-17. https://izlik.org/JA42ZY64HY.

JAMA

1.Cengiz O. N-11 ÜLKELERİNDE POLİTİK İSTİKRARIN ÇEVRESEL BOZULMA ÜZERİNDEKİ ETKİSİ. Journal of Academic Approaches. 2021;12:1–17.

MLA

Cengiz, Orhan. “N-11 ÜLKELERİNDE POLİTİK İSTİKRARIN ÇEVRESEL BOZULMA ÜZERİNDEKİ ETKİSİ”. Journal of Academic Approaches, c. 12, sy 1, Haziran 2021, ss. 1-17, https://izlik.org/JA42ZY64HY.

Vancouver

1.Orhan Cengiz. N-11 ÜLKELERİNDE POLİTİK İSTİKRARIN ÇEVRESEL BOZULMA ÜZERİNDEKİ ETKİSİ. Journal of Academic Approaches [Internet]. 01 Haziran 2021;12(1):1-17. Erişim adresi: https://izlik.org/JA42ZY64HY