Akçadağ (Malatya) Yöresinde Yetişen Alıç Genetik Kaynaklarının Şeker İçerikleri

Öz

Amaç: Bu çalışmada Akçadağ (Malatya) yöresinde yetişen alıç genetik kaynaklarının şeker içeriklerinin belirlenmesi amaçlanmıştır. Materyal ve Yöntem: Çalışmada 5 alıç türüne ait 15 genotip incelenmiştir. İncelenen genotiplerde glikoz, fruktoz, sukroz ve toplam şeker içerikleri belirlenmiştir. Araştırma Bulguları: İncelenen özellikler bakımından çalışılan türler ve genotipler arasında geniş bir varyasyon belirlenmiştir. Türler bazında, Crataegus pontica glikoz, fruktoz ve toplam şeker içerikleri (sırasıyla, 11.0 g 100 g-1, 12.7 g 100 g-1 ve 26.1 g 100 g-1), Crataegus aronia ise sukroz içeriği (3.7 g 100 g-1) bakımından öne çıkmıştır. Genotiplere bağlı olarak, en yüksek glikoz, fruktoz ve toplam şeker içerikleri (sırasıyla, 21.0, 23.6 ve 45.0 g 100 g-1) H-1 genotipinde, en yüksek sukroz içeriği (3.7 g 100 g-1) ise H-15 genotipinde belirlenmiştir. Temel bileşen analiz sonuçlarına göre, oluşan ilk iki bileşen toplam varyasyonun %99.8’ini açıklamıştır. 1. bileşen glikoz, fruktoz ve toplam şeker içerikleri ile ilişkili iken, 2. bileşen ise sukroz içeriği ile ilişkili bulunmuştur. Sonuç: İncelenen alıç genetik kaynaklarının şeker içerikleri bakımından önemli bir potansiyele sahip olduğu ve bu yönüyle ıslah çalışmalarında genetik materyal olarak kullanılabileceği düşünülmektedir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Alıç
• genetik kaynak
• fruktoz
• glikoz
• sukroz

The sugar composition of hawthorn germplasm grown in Akçadağ (Malatya) region

Abstract

Objective: In this study was aimed to determine the sugar contents of hawthorn genetic resources grown in the Akçadağ (Malatya) region. Materials and Methods: The study material was consisted in 15 genotypes belonging 5 different hawthorn species. In investigated hawthorn genotypes, glucose, fructose, sucrose and total sugar content were determined. Results: A wide variation was determined between the species and genotypes studied in terms of investigated characteristics. Based on species, Crataegus pontica stood out in terms of glucose, fructose, and total sugar content (11.0 g 100 g-1, 12.7 g 100 g-1, and 26.1 g 100 g-1, respectively), and Crataegus aronia in terms of sucrose content (3.7 g 100 g-1). Depending on the genotypes, the highest glucose, fructose, and total sugar content (21.0, 23.6, and 45.0 g 100 g-1, respectively) were determined in the H-1 genotype, and the highest sucrose content (3.7 g 100 g-1) was determined in the H-15 genotype. According to the principal component analysis results, the first two components explained 99.8% of the total variation. While the first component was related to glucose, fructose, and total sugar contents, the second component was related to sucrose. Conclusion: It is thought that the examined hawthorn genetic resources have significant potential in terms of sugar content and can be used as genetic material in breeding studies.

Keywords

• Hawthorn
• genetic resource
• fructose
• glucose
• sucrose

Kaynakça

1. Arrieta, J., Siles-Barrios, D., García-Sánchez, J., Reyes-Trejo, B., & Sánchez-Mendoza, M. E. (2010). Relaxant effect of the extracts of Crataegus mexicana on guinea pig tracheal smooth muscle. Pharmacognosy Journal, 2(17), 40-46. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0975-3575(10)80008-2
2. Balta, M. F., Celik, F., Turkoglu, N., Ozrenk, K., & Ozgokce, F. (2006). Some fruit traits of hawthorn (Crataegus spp.) genetic resources from Malatya, Türkiye. Research Journal of Agriculture and Biological Sciences, 2(6), 531-536.
3. Balta, M. F., Karakaya, O., Yaman, İ., Uzun, S., & Kırkaya, H. (2021). Taşova (Amasya) Yöresinde Yetiştirilen ‘Ekmek’Ayva Çeşidinin Fiziksel ve Biyokimyasal Özellikleri. Yüzüncü Yıl Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü Dergisi, 26(3), 155-162. https://doi.org/10.53433/yyufbed.967975
4. Barceloux, D.G. (2008). Hawthorn (Crataegus Species). In Medical toxicology of natural substances: foods, fungi, medicinal herbs, plants, and venomous animals. New York: John Willy and Sons.
5. Bignami, C., Paolocci, M., Scossa, A., & Bertazza, G. (2003). Preliminary evaluation of nutritional and medicinal components of Crataegus azarolus fruits. Acta Horticulturae, 597, 95-100. https://doi.org/10.17660/ActaHortic.2003.597.11
6. Bostan, S. Z., & Gökçen, B. (2021). Seçilmiş Bazı Alıç (Crataegus spp.) Genotiplerinin Organik Asit ve Şeker İçerikleri. Manas Journal of Agriculture Veterinary and Life Sciences, 11(1), 21-27.
7. Chang, Q., Zuo, Z., Chow, M. S., & Ho, W. K. (2006). Effect of storage temperature on phenolics stability in hawthorn (Crataegus pinnatifida var. major) fruits and a hawthorn drink. Food Chemistry, 98(3), 426-430. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2005.06.015
8. Chang, Q., Zuo, Z., Harrison, F., & Chow, M. S. S. (2002). Hawthorn. The Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, 42(6), 605-612. https://doi.org/10.1177/00970002042006003

9. Ercisli, S. (2004). A short review of the fruit germplasm resources of Türkiye. Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution, 51(4), 419-435. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:GRES.0000023458.60138.79
10. Gökbunar, L. (2007). Alıç (Crataegus spp.)’ ın in vitro mikroçoğaltımı. (Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Kahramanmaraş Sütçü İmam Üniversitesi, Kahramanmaraş). Erişim adresi https://tez.yok.gov.tr/UlusalTezMerkezi/tezSorguSonucYeni.jsp
11. Gundogdu, M., Ozrenk, K., Ercisli, S., Kan, T., Kodad, O., & Hegedus, A. (2014). Organic acids, sugars, vitamin C content and some pomological characteristics of eleven hawthorn species (Crataegus spp.) from Türkiye. Biological Research, 47(1), 1-5. https://doi.org/10.1186/0717-6287-47-21
12. Karadeniz, T. (2004). Şifalı Meyveler. Ordu: Burcan Ofset Matbaacılık.
13. Leung, A.Y., & Foster, S. (1996). Encyclopedia of common natural ingredients used in food, drugs, and cosmetics. Journal of the American Chemical Society, 118(37), 8988.
14. Liu, P. (2012). Composition of hawthorn (Crataegus spp.) fruits and leaves and emblic leafflower (Phyllanthus emblica) fruits. (Doctoral dissertation, University of Turku, Finland). Erişim adresi https://www.utupub.fi/bitstream/handle/10024/76646/PhD_Thesis_Pengzhan_Liu.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y
15. Liu, P., Yang, B., & Kallio, H. (2010). Characterization of phenolic compounds in Chinese hawthorn (Crataegus pinnatifida Bge. var. major) fruit by high performance liquid chromatography–electrospray ionization mass spectrometry. Food Chemistry, 121(4), 1188-1197. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2010.02.002
16. Ljubuncic, P., Azaizeh, H., Portnaya, I., Cogan, U., Said, O., Saleh, K. A., & Bomzon, A. (2005). Antioxidant activity and cytotoxicity of eight plants used in traditional Arab medicine in Israel. Journal of Ethnopharmacology, 99(1), 43-47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jep.2005.01.060
17. Muradoğlu, F., Gürsoy, S., & Güler, E. (2021). Multivariate Analysis Revealed the Morphological Variability Among Crataegus Species. Yuzuncu Yıl University Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 31(4), 961-972. https://doi.org/10.29133/yyutbd.974538
18. Muradoğlu, F., Gürsoy, S., & Yıldız, K. (2019). Quantification analysis of biochemical and phenolic composition in hawthorn (Crataegus spp.) fruits. Erwerbs-Obstbau, 61(2), 189-194. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10341-018-00415-z
19. Payne, J.A., & Krewer, G.W. (1990). Mayhaw: a new fruit crop for the south. Advances in new crops. Portland: Timber Press.
20. Tadić, V. M., Dobrić, S., Marković, G. M., Ðorđević, S. M., Arsić, I. A., Menković, N. R., & Stević, T. (2008). Anti-inflammatory, gastroprotective, free-radical-scavenging, and antimicrobial activities of hawthorn berries ethanol extract. Journal of agricultural and food chemistry, 56(17), 7700-7709. https://doi.org/10.1021/jf801668c
21. Tang, X., Kälviäinen, N., & Tuorila, H. (2001). Sensory and hedonic characteristics of juice of sea buckthorn (Hippophae rhamnoides L.) origins and hybrids. LWT-Food Science and Technology, 34(2), 102-110. https://doi.org/10.1006/fstl.2000.0751
22. Total sugar test (glucose and fructose). (2022, 23 Haziran). Erişim adresi https://www.merckmillipore.com/TR/tr/product/Total-Sugar-Test-glucose-and-fructose, MDA_CHEM-116136#anchor_APPL.
23. Yang, B., Liu, P., & Kallio, H. (2012). Sugars, Acids, and Phenolic Compounds in Chinese Hawthorn (Crataegus spp.) Fruits of Different Origins. In Emerging Trends in Dietary Components for Preventing and Combating Disease. B.S. Patil, G.K. Jayaprakasha, K.N.C. Murthy, N.P. Seeram (Ed.), American Chemical Society (pp. 275-286). Washington: ACS Symposium Series. https://doi.org/10.1021/bk-2012-1093.ch015
24. Yaviç, A., Taylan, A., Balci, H., & Encu, T. (2016). Biochemical and Pomological Characteristics of Hawthorn (Crataegus spp.) Fruits Grown in Şemdinli, Hakkari. Yuzuncu Yıl University Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 26(4), 500-504. https://doi.org/10.29133/yyutbd.282735
25. Yilmaz, K. U., Yanar, M., Ercisli, S., Sahiner, H., Taskin, T., & Zengin, Y. (2010). Genetic relationships among some hawthorn (Crataegus spp.) species and genotypes. Biochemical genetics, 48(9), 873-878. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10528-010-9368-6
26. Zhang, Z., Ho, W. K., Huang, Y., & Chen, Z. Y. (2002). Hypocholesterolemic activity of hawthorn fruit is mediated by regulation of cholesterol-7α-hydroxylase and acyl CoA: cholesterol acyltransferase. Food Research International, 35(9), 885-891. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0963-9969(02)00099-6