THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN UNDERGRADUATE STUDENTS’ USE OF LANGUAGE LEARNING STRATEGIES AND THEIR ATTITUDE TOWARDS ENGLISH

Yıl 2019, Cilt: 6 Sayı: 1, 158 - 171, 31.12.2019

Çilem Aydoğdu

Öz

The purpose of this study is to investigate the relationship between attitude towards English language and language learning strategy use. The sample group of the present quantitative study is 100 preparatory class students from Bingöl University. The scales used in the present study are Attitude towards English as a foreign Language Scale consisting of 30 items (Aydoslu, 2005), and Language Learning Strategy Scale (Oxford, 1990) with 52 items. The data collected were analyzed by SPSS program. The main finding is that students with more positive attitudes towards English language use language learning strategies more frequently compared to those who have less positive attitude. Another result of the present study is that participants with more positive attitudes used memory, cognitive, metacognitive and social strategies respectively while no significant difference was found between participants’ attitude and use of compensation and affective strategies.
Bu çalışmanın amacı, İngilizce diline karşı tutum ile dil öğrenme stratejisi kullanımı arasındaki ilişkiyi incelemektir. Mevcut niteliksel araştırmanın örneklem grubu Bingöl Üniversitesi'nden 100 hazırlık sınıfı öğrencisinden oluşmaktadır. Bu öğrenciler rastgele seçilmiştir. Bu çalışmada kullanılan ölçekler 30 maddeden oluşan İngilizce ’ye Yönelik Tutum Ölçeği (Aydoslu,2005) ve 52 maddeden oluşan Dil Öğrenme Stratejisi Ölçeğidir (Oxford, 1990).Toplanan veriler SPSS programı ile analiz edilmiştir.
Bu çalışmanın temel bulgusu, İngilizce diline karşı daha yüksek tutumları olan öğrencilerin, daha düşük tutum düzeyine sahip olanlara kıyasla dil öğrenme stratejilerini daha sık kullanmasıdır. Bu çalışmanın bir başka sonucu ise, daha olumlu tutumları olan katılımcıların sırasıyla hafıza, bilişsel, üst bilişsel ve sosyal stratejileri kullandıkları, tutum düzeyleri ile telafi ve duygusal stratejilerin kullanımı arasında da anlamlı bir fark bulunmadığıdır

Anahtar Kelimeler

Attitude, Language learning strategies

Kaynakça

• Aydın, E. (2007). An analysis of motivation attitudes, and perceptions of the students at TOBB university of economics and technology toward learning, English as a foreign language. Unpublished Master’s Thesis. Ankara: Hacettepe University Institute of Social Sciences. Aydoslu, U. (2005). Öğretmen adaylarının yabancı dil olarak ingilizce dersine ilişkin tutumlarının incelenmesi.Unpublished Master’s Thesis. Social Sciencies Institue of Süleyman Demirel University, Isparta. Chamber G. N. (1999). Motivating language learners. Clevedon. Multinlingual MatterS. Chamot, A.U. & Kupper, L. (1989). Learning strategies in foreign language instruction. Foreign Language Annals, 22, 13-24 Dornyei, Z. (2005). The psychology of the language learner. Mahwah, N.J.: Erlbaum Dornyei, Z. & Skehan, P. (2003). Individual differences in second language learning. In Doughty C. and Long M. (Eds.). Handbook of Second Language Acquisition, Oxford: Blackwell. Gan, Z. (2004). Attitudes and strategies as predictors of self-directed language learning in an EFL context. International Journal of Applied Linguistics. 14(3). Gardner, R.C. (1985). Social psychology and second language learning, the role of attitudes and motivation. London: Edward Arnold. Gardner, C. R. & Lambert, E. W. (1972). Attitudes and motivation in second- language learning. Newbury House Publishers/ Rowley, Massachusets 01961. Griffiths, C. (2008). Lessons from good language learners. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Reid, J.M. (1987). The learning style preferences of ESL students. Tesol Quarterly, 21(1),87- 110. Jabbari, M. (2014). The relationship between efl learners' language learning attitudes and language learning strategies. International Journal of Linguistics. 6(3),161- 167.doi:10.5296/ijl.v6i3.5837 Karahan, F. (2007). Language attitudes of Turkish students towards the English language and its use in Turkish context. Journal of Arts and Sciences, 7, 73-87. Levine, G. ( 2003). Student and instructor beliefs and attitudes about target language use, first language use, and anxiety: Report of a questionnaire study. The Modern Language Journal, Volume 87, Issue 3. MacIntyre, P. D. (1999). Language anxiety: a review of literature for language teachers. In D. J. Young (Ed.), Effect in foreign language and second language learning. 24 – 43. New York: Mc Graw Hill Companies. Naiman, N., Frohlich, M., Stern, H. H., & Todesco, A. (1978). The good language learner. Toronto, Canada: Ontario Institute for Studies in Education Oxford, R. L. (1990). Language learning strategies. What every teacher should know. N. Y. New Boston: Heinle & Heinle. Özseven, S. (1993). The relationship between language learning strategies and oral performance of Turkish EFL graduate science participants in preparatory programs.Unpublished M.A. Thesis, Bilkent University, Ankara. Rubin, J. (1975). What the good language learner can teach us. Tesol Quartely, 9(1), 41-51. Sadighi, F. & Zarafshan, M. (2006). Effects of attitude and motivation on the use of language learning strategies by Iranian EFL university students. Journal of Social sciences & Humanities of Shiraz University. 23(1). Spolsky, B. (1971). Reduced redundancy as a language testing tool. in G. E. Perren & J. L. M. Trim (Eds.), Applications of linguistics: Selected papers of the Second International. TESOL Quarterly, 12, 427-37 Stern, H. (1975). What can we learn from the good language learner? Canadian Modern Language Review. 31, 304-318 Ushioda, E. (2003). Motivation and good language learners. in lessons from good language learners. 19- 34, Editors: Griffiths, C. (9780521889636) Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Vann, R.J. & Abraham, R.G. (1990). Strategies of unsuccessful language learners. TESOL Quarterly. 24, 177-198. Wenden, A.L. (1987). Conceptual background and utility. A.L. Wenden and J.Rubin Learner Strategies in Language Learning. Pp.3-13.London: Prentice Hall Int. .