Avrupa Savunma Entegrasyonu: İlk Evre ve Günümüze Mirası, Lizbon Öncesi (1999–2009) Birleşme ve Satın Alma Dalgasının Avrupa Savunma Mimarisine Etkisi

Öz

Bu makale, Soğuk Savaş sonrasında 1999’da kurumsallaşan Avrupa Güvenlik ve Savunma Politikası’nın (AGSP/ESDP), Lizbon Antlaşması’nın 2009’da yürürlüğe girmesiyle hukuki metinlere tam olarak dâhil edilerek Ortak Güvenlik ve Savunma Politikası (OGSP/CSDP) adını aldığı dönemde, savunma sanayisindeki ilk dalga şirket birleşmelerini ele almakta ve bu süreci inşacı bir perspektiften stratejik, ekonomik ve politik boyutlarıyla incelemektedir. Temel araştırma sorusu: Bu Birleşme ve Satın Almalar (M&A), Avrupa Birliği’nin stratejik özerklik arayışını ve küresel bir güvenlik aktörü olarak ortaya çıkışını ne ölçüde desteklemiştir? M&A yalnızca ekonomik ve teknolojik bir süreç olarak değil, aynı zamanda AB seviyesinde kimlik ve norm inşasının bir mekanizması olarak da görülmektedir. Metodolojik açıdan çalışma; literatür taraması, BAE Systems, EADS/Airbus, Thales ve MBDA üzerine vaka analizleri ile Fransa, Almanya, İtalya ve Birleşik Krallık’taki stratejik kültürlerin karşılaştırmalı analizini kapsamaktadır. Bulgular, 1999-2009 dönemindeki birleşmelerin yenilik, verimlilik ve kısmi Avrupalılaşmayı artırdığını, ancak devletlerin farklı stratejileri ve korumacılık nedeniyle etkilerinin sınırlı kaldığını göstermektedir. Genel olarak birleşmeler, AB’nin güvenlik entegrasyonunu güçlendirirken stratejik kültürlerin kalıcı rolünü de vurgulamaktadır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Avrupa Savunma Sanayi
• Birleşme ve Satın Almalar (M&A)
• İnşacılık
• Stratejik Kültür
• Stratejik Özerklik
• Avrupa Güvenliği.

European Defence Integration: The First Phase and Its Legacy, The Impact of the Pre-Lisbon (1999–2009) M&A Wave on Europe’s Contemporary Defence Architecture

Öz

This article examines the first wave of corporate mergers in the European defence industry during the period in which the European Security and Defence Policy (ESDP), institutionalised in 1999, was fully incorporated into the EU’s legal framework and renamed the Common Security and Defence Policy (CSDP) with the entry into force of the Lisbon Treaty in 2009. The central research question asks: to what extent did these mergers and acquisitions (M&A) support the European Union’s pursuit of strategic autonomy and its emergence as a global security actor? M&A are understood not only as economic and technological processes but also as mechanisms of identity and norm construction at the EU level. Methodologically, the study employs a literature review, case studies of BAE Systems, EADS/Airbus, Thales and MBDA, and a comparative analysis of strategic cultures in France, Germany, Italy and the United Kingdom. The findings indicate that mergers between 1999 and 2009 enhanced innovation, efficiency and partial Europeanisation, yet their overall impact remained constrained by divergent national strategies and protectionist practices. Overall, these mergers strengthened the EU’s security integration while underscoring the enduring influence of national strategic cultures.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• European Defence Industry
• Mergers and Acquisitions (M&A)
• Constructivism
• Strategic Culture
• Strategic Autonomy
• European Security

Kaynakça

1. Akgül-Açıkmeşe, S. (2023). Güvenlik, güvenlik çalışmaları ve güvenlikleştirme [Security, security studies and securitization]. In E. Balta (Ed.), Küresel siyasete giriş: Uluslararası ilişkilerde kavramlar, teoriler, süreçler (pp. 277-294). İletişim Yayınları.
2. Angelov, K. O. (2015). The integration role of European defense procurement in achieving a more competitive and stronger European defense equipment market (Master’s thesis). Naval Postgraduate School, Monterey, CA. https://apps.dtic.mil/sti/tr/pdf/ADA632293.pdf
3. Baumann, R., & Hellmann, G. (2001). Germany and the use of military force: ‘Total war’, the culture of restraint and the quest for normality. German Politics, 10(1), 61-82.
4. Bellais, R. (2021). MBDA’s Industrial Model and European Defence. Defence and Peace Economics, 33(7), 876–893. https://doi.org/10.1080/10242694.2021.1926176
5. Benavente, E. M. (2017, November 15). Time for the sleeping beauty to wake: Whether Europe will be able to make a difference in foreign policy depends on whether member states can fulfil PESCO’s commitments. European Council on Foreign Relations (ECFR). https://ecfr.eu/article/commentary_time_for_the_sleeping_beauty_to_wake/
6. Biava, A., Drent, M., & Herd, G. P. (2011). Characterizing the European Union's strategic culture: An analytical framework. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, 49, 1227–1248. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5965.2011.02195.x
7. Biscop, S. (2018). EU-NATO relations: A long-term perspective. Nação e Defesa, 150, 85-93.
8. Bitzinger, R. A. (2014). Globalization revisited: Internationalizing armaments production. In A. T. H. Tan (Ed.), The global arms trade - A handbook (pp. 208-220). Routledge.

9. Blockmans, S., & Crosson, D. M. (2021). PESCO: A force for positive integration in EU defence. European Foreign Affairs Review, 26(SI), 87–110.
10. Blockmans, S., & Wessel, R. A. (2009). The European Union and crisis management: Will the Lisbon Treaty make the EU more effective? Journal of Conflict & Security Law, 14(2), 265-308.
11. Booth, K. (2005). Strategic culture: Validity and validation. Oxford Journal on Good Governance, 2(1), 25-28.
12. Briani, V. (2013). Armaments duplication in Europe: A qualitative assessment (CEPS Policy Brief No. 297). Brussels: Centre for European Policy Studies (CEPS). https://aei.pitt.edu/42860/1/PB_297_Briani_Duplication_in_EU_armed_forces_-.pdf
13. Briani, V., Marrone, A., Mölling, C., & Valasek, T. (2013). The development of a European defence technological and industrial base (EDTIB). Directorate-General for External Policies of the Union, Directorate B – Policy Department. European Union. https://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/etudes/join/2013/433838/EXPO-SEDE_ET(2013)433838_EN.pdf
14. Brockmann, S., & Trommler, F. (Eds.). (1996). Revisiting zero hour 1945: The emergence of postwar German culture (Vol. 1). Washington, DC: American Institute for Contemporary German Studies, The Johns Hopkins University.
15. Brzoska, M. (2014). Defence industry restructuring and consolidation in Europe. In A. T. H. Tan (Ed.), The global arms trade – A handbook (pp. 221-234). Routledge.
16. Brzuska, K. (2025). The economies of scale of joint defence procurement. FINABEL. https://finabel.org/the-economies-of-scale-of-joint-defence-procurement/
17. Bulmer, S., Parker, O., Bache, I., George, S., & Burns, C. (2020). Common foreign and security policy. In Politics in the European Union (Chapter 25). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/hepl/9780199689668.003.0026
18. Calcara, A. (2017). Italy’s defence policy in the European context: The case of the European Defence Agency. Contemporary Italian Politics, 9(3), 277-301.
19. Calcara, A. (2020). European defence decision-making: Dilemmas of collaborative arms procurement. London: Routledge.
20. Caruso, R., & Locatelli, A. (2013). Company survey series II: Finmeccanica amid international market and state control: A survey of Italian defence industry. Defence and Peace Economics, 24(1), 89-104.
21. Checkel, J. T. (1998). The constructivist turn in international relations theory. World Politics, 50(2), 324-348. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0043887100008133
22. Chin, W. (2019). Technology, war and the state: Past, present and future. International Affairs, 95(4), 765-783. https://doi.org/10.1093/ia/iiz106
23. Cornish, P. (2006). EU and NATO: Co-operation or competition? (Briefing Paper, Directorate-General for External Policies of the Union, Directorate B – Policy Department). Brussels: European Parliament. https://www.europarl.europa.eu/meetdocs/2004_2009/documents/dv/eunatorelations_/eunatorelations_en.pdf
24. Council of the European Union. (2003, December 12). A secure Europe in a better world: European Security Strategy (ESS). Brussels. https://www.consilium.europa.eu/ueDocs/cms_Data/docs/pressdata/en/reports/78367.pdf
25. Council of the European Union. (2004, July 12). Council Joint Action 2004/551/CFSP on the establishment of the European Defence Agency (Official Journal of the European Union, L 245/17–L 245/28, 17 July 2004). https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:32004E0551
26. Council of the European Union. (2008, December 11). Report on the implementation of the European Security Strategy: Providing security in a changing world (S407/08). Brussels: Council of the European Union. https://www.consilium.europa.eu/uedocs/cms_data/docs/pressdata/en/reports/104630.pdf
27. Council of the European Union. (2009). European security strategy: A secure Europe in a better world (Report presented by Javier Solana). Brussels: Council of the European Union.
28. Council of the European Union. (2017, December 11). Council Decision (CFSP) 2017/2315 establishing permanent structured cooperation (PESCO) and determining the list of participating Member States (Official Journal of the European Union, L 331/57–L 331/77, 14 December 2017).
29. Council of the European Union. (2025, May). EU defence readiness: Council launches 6th wave of new PESCO projects. https://www.consilium.europa.eu/en/press/press-releases/2025/05/27/eu-defence-readiness-council-launches-6th-wave-of-new-pesco-projects/pdf/
30. Damen, M. (2022, July). EU strategic autonomy 2013-2023: From concept to capacity (EU Strategic Autonomy Monitor, PE 733.589). Brussels: European Parliamentary Research Service (EPRS), Strategic Foresight and Capabilities Unit.
31. De Vasconcelos, Á. (Ed.). (2009, February 1). The European Security Strategy 2003-2008: Building on common interests. European Union Institute for Security Studies (EUISS).
32. De Vestel, P. (1995). Defence markets and industries in Europe: Time for political decisions? (Chaillot Paper No. 20). Paris: Institute for Security Studies, Western European Union (WEU).
33. Demirkıran, Ö. (2007). Fransa’nın güvenlik politikası: De Gaulle dönemi (1958-1969) [France’s security policy: The De Gaulle era (1958-1969)]. Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 3(5), 79-92.
34. Devaux, J.-P., & Ford, R. (2018). Scalp EG/Storm Shadow: Lessons from a successful cooperation (Recherches & Documents No. 10/2018). Fondation pour la Recherche Stratégique. https://www.frstrategie.org/sites/default/files/documents/publications/recherches-et-documents/2018/201810.pdf
35. Dunne, J. P., Sköns, E., & Tian, N. (2020). The economics of global arms production. PRISM Working Paper 2020-2. Cape Town: Policy Research on International Services and Manufacturing, University of Cape Town.
36. Eliassen, K. A. (2002). European defence procurement and industrial policy: The case of France. Oslo: Centre for European and Asian Studies, Norwegian School of Management.
37. European Aeronautic Defence and Space Company (EADS). (2001). Annual report 2001. https://www.airbus.com/sites/g/files/jlcbta136/files/2021-07/eads-annual-report-2001.pdf
38. European Council. (1999, December 10–11). Helsinki European Council: Presidency conclusions. https://www.europarl.europa.eu/summits/hel1_en.htm
39. European Defence Agency. (2010). EDA annual report 2009. Brussels: European Defence Agency. https://eda.europa.eu/docs/documents/Annual_Report_2009.pdf
40. European Defence Agency. (2020). EDA annual report 2020. https://eda.europa.eu/docs/default-source/eda-annual-reports/eda-annual-report-2020.pdf
41. European External Action Service. (2021). Permanent Structured Cooperation (PESCO): Deepening defence cooperation among EU Member States [Factsheet]. https://www.eeas.europa.eu/sites/default/files/pesco_factsheet_2021-12.pdf
42. European External Action Service. (2024, March). Annual progress report on the implementation of the Strategic Compass for security and defence: Report of the High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy to the Council. https://www.eeas.europa.eu/eeas/2024-progress-report-implementation-strategic-compass-security-and-defence-0_en
43. European Union. (2008, May 9). Protocol (No. 10) on permanent structured cooperation established by Article 42 of the Treaty on European Union (Consolidated version of the Treaty on European Union, Official Journal C 115, pp. 275–277). https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/HTML/?uri=CELEX:12008M/PRO/10
44. European Union. (2012, October 26). Consolidated version of the Treaty on European Union (Official Journal of the European Union, C 326/15 - C 326/45). https://eur-lex.europa.eu/resource.html?uri=cellar:2bf140bf-a3f8-4ab2-b506-fd71826e6da6.0023.02/DOC_1&format=PDF
45. Federal Ministry of Defence (Germany). (2003, May 21). Defence policy guidelines. Berlin: Federal Ministry of Defence. https://www.files.ethz.ch/isn/157025/Germany_English2003.pdf
46. Finnemore, M., & Sikkink, K. (1998). International norm dynamics and political change. International Organization, 52(4), 887-917. https://doi.org/10.1162/002081898550789
47. Fiott, D. (2014). An industrious European Council on defence? (Security Policy Brief No. 53). Egmont Institute. https://www.egmontinstitute.be/app/uploads/2014/03/SPB53.pdf?type=pdf
48. Fiott, D. (2018, June 25). EU defence capability development: Plans, priorities, projects. Paris: European Union Institute for Security Studies (EUISS).
49. Franck, C., Lewis, I., & Udis, B. (2010). Global cooperation and competition in the defense and aerospace industries (Sponsored Report). Naval Postgraduate School, Graduate School of Business & Public Policy. https://apps.dtic.mil/sti/tr/pdf/ADA529445.pdf
50. Freedman, L. (1998). International Security: Changing Targets. Foreign Policy, (110), 48-63.
51. Fritz-Assmus, D., & Zimmermann, K. (1990). West German demand for defence spending. In K. Hartley & T. Sandler (Eds.), The economics of defence spending: An international survey (pp. 118-147). London: Routledge.
52. Gray, C. S. (1984). Comparative strategic culture. Parameters: US Army War College Quarterly, 14(1), 26-33. https://doi.org/10.55540/0031-1723.1352
53. Gregory, S. (2000). French defence policy into the twenty-first century. London: Macmillan Press.
54. Grevi, G., Helly, D., & Keohane, D. (Eds.). (2009). European security and defence policy: The first ten years (1999-2009) (Vol. 10). Paris: European Union Institute for Security Studies (EUISS).
55. Guay, T. R. (2005). The transatlantic defense industrial base: Restructuring scenarios and their implications. Carlisle, PA: US Army War College Press. https://press.armywarcollege.edu/monographs/750
56. Hartley, K. (2012). Company survey series: I: BAE Systems PLC. Defence and Peace Economics, 23(4), 331-342. https://doi.org/10.1080/10242694.2011.593353
57. Hayward, K. (1997). Towards a European weapons procurement process: The shaping of common European requirements for new arms programmes (Chaillot Paper No. 27, p. 5). Paris: Institute for Security Studies, Western European Union (WEU).
58. Hayward, K. (1998). Smart procurement: The European dimension. The RUSI Journal, 143(2), 47-50. https://doi.org/10.1080/03071849808446250
59. Heuninckx, B. (2009). The European Defence Agency Capability Development Plan and the European Armaments Cooperation Strategy: Two steps in the right direction. Public Procurement Law Review, 18(4).
60. Howorth, J. (1997). National defence and European security integration: An illusion inside a chimera? In J. Howorth & A. Menon (Eds.), The European Union and national defence policy (pp. 11-22). London: Routledge.
61. Howorth, J. (2003). France, Britain and the Euro-Atlantic crisis. Survival, 45(4), 173-192. https://doi.org/10.1080/00396338.2003.9687570
62. Howorth, J. (2009). NATO and ESDP: Institutional complexities and political realities. Politique étrangère, 2009(5, Special Issue), 95-106.
63. Howorth, J. (2017). Strategic autonomy and EU-NATO cooperation: Squaring the circle (Security Policy Brief No. 85). Brussels: Egmont - Royal Institute for International Relations.
64. Jones, S. G. (2006). The rise of a European defense. Political Science Quarterly, 121(2), 241–267. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1538-165X.2006.tb00571.x
65. Kolodziej, E. A. (1987). Making and marketing arms: The French experience and its implications for the international system. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
66. Kulichkina, M. (2017). European defence industry in times of austerity (Unpublished Master’s thesis). Charles University in Prague, Faculty of Social Sciences, International Economic and Political Studies.
67. Lachmann, N. (2010). The EU-CSDP-NATO relationship: Asymmetric cooperation and the search for momentum. Studia Diplomatica, 63(3-4), 185-202.
68. Lavery, S., McDaniel, S., & Schmid, D. (2022). European strategic autonomy: New agenda, old constraints. In M. Babić, A. D. Dixon, & I. T. Liu (Eds.), The political economy of geoeconomics: Europe in a changing world (pp. 57-80). Palgrave Macmillan.
69. Lindstrom, G. (2007). Enter the EU Battlegroups (Chaillot Paper No. 97). Paris: European Union Institute for Security Studies (EUISS).
70. Lippert, B., von Ondarza, N., & Perthes, V. (Eds.). (2019). European strategic autonomy: Actors, issues, conflicts of interests (SWP Research Paper 4). Berlin: Stiftung Wissenschaft und Politik (SWP).
71. Longhurst, K. (2004). Germany and the use of force: The evolution of German security policy 1990-2003. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
72. Longhurst, K. (2018). Germany and the use of force. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
73. Margaras, Vasilis. (2010). Common security and defence policy and the Lisbon Treaty fudge: No common strategic culture, no major progress (EPIN Working Paper No. 28). Centre for European Policy Studies (CEPS). https://www.files.ethz.ch/isn/117469/WP%20028.pdf
74. Mawdsley, J. L. (2000). The changing face of European armaments cooperation: Continuity and change in British, French and German armaments policy 1990-2000 (Unpublished PhD thesis). University of Newcastle upon Tyne, Department of Politics.
75. Mawdsley, J. L. (2003). The European Union and defense industrial policy (BICC Paper No. 31). Bonn: Bonn International Center for Conversion (BICC).
76. Mawdsley, J. L. (2008). European Union Armaments Policy: Options for Small States? European Security, 17(2–3), 367–385. https://doi.org/10.1080/09662830802525923
77. MBDA. (2023). Sustainability report 2023. https://www.mbda-systems.com/sites/mbda/files/2024-09/MBDA_SustainabilityReport2023_webfriendly.pdf
78. Mejino-Lopez, J., & Wolff, G. (2024). A European defence industrial strategy in a hostile world (Policy Brief No. 29/2024). Bruegel. https://www.bruegel.org/sites/default/files/2024-11/PB%2029%202024.pdf
79. Meyer, C. O. (2005). Convergence Towards a European Strategic Culture? A Constructivist Framework for Explaining Changing Norms. European Journal of International Relations, 11(4), 523-549. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354066105057899
80. Meyer, C. O. (2006). The quest for a European strategic culture: Changing norms on security and defence in the European Union. London: Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230598218
81. Miskimmon, A. (2004). Continuity in the face of upheaval—British strategic culture and the impact of the Blair government. European Security, 13(3), 273-299. https://doi.org/10.1080/09662830490499975
82. Missiroli, A. (2004). ESDP: How it works. In N. Gnesotto (Ed.), EU security and defence policy: The first five years (1999-2004) (pp. 55-72). Paris: EU Institute for Security Studies (ISS).
83. Nones, M., & Silvestri, S. (2009, September). European security and the role of Italy (Documenti IAI No. 09|21, 12 p.). Rome: Istituto Affari Internazionali (IAI).
84. Norheim-Martinsen, P. M. (2012). The European Union and military force: Governance and strategy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
85. Onuf, N. (1989). World of our making: Rules and rule in social theory and international relations. Columbia, SC: University of South Carolina Press.
86. Panagiotakopoulos, P., & Tourkantonis, K. (2009). Market perception of consolidations in the European defense industry from 2001 to 2009: A case of event studies (MBA professional report). Naval Postgraduate School, Monterey, CA.
87. Pierson, C. (2004). The modern state. Routledge.
88. Quille, G. (2008). The Lisbon Treaty and its implications for CFSP/ESDP. Brussels: European Parliament, Directorate-General for External Policies of the Union, Directorate B – Policy Department.
89. Rehrl, J., & Weissert, H.-B. (Eds.). (2012). Handbook on CSDP: The Common Security and Defence Policy of the European Union. Vienna: Federal Ministry of Defence and Sports of the Republic of Austria.
90. Retter, L., Pezard, S., Flanagan, S., Germanovich, G., Grand-Clement, S., & Paille, P. (2021). European strategic autonomy in defence: Transatlantic visions and implications for NATO, US and EU relations. Santa Monica, CA & Cambridge, UK: RAND Corporation / RAND Europe.
91. Rohde, J. (2004). Armaments in Europe: Constraints and opportunities to optimize European armaments process (SWP Research Paper No. 25). Berlin: Stiftung Wissenschaft und Politik (SWP).
92. Schmidt, C., Pilandon, L., & Aben, J. (1990). Defence spending in France: The price of independence. In K. Hartley & T. Sandler (Eds.), The economics of defence spending: An international survey (pp. 93-117). London: Routledge.
93. Schmitt, B. (2000). From cooperation to integration: Defence and aerospace industries in Europe. Paris: Institute for Security Studies (ISS), Western European Union.
94. Schmitt, O. (2017). The reluctant Atlanticist: France’s security and defence policy in a transatlantic context. Journal of Strategic Studies, 40(4), 463-474.
95. Sherman, A. J., & Hart, M. A. (2006). Mergers & acquisitions from A to Z. AMACOM.
96. Sköns, E., & Weidacher, R. (2002). Arms production. In SIPRI yearbook 2002: Armaments, disarmament and international security (pp. 323-353). Oxford: Oxford University Press / Stockholm International Peace Research Institute (SIPRI).
97. Smith, R. (1990). Defence spending in the United Kingdom. In K. Hartley & T. Sandler (Eds.), The economics of defence spending: An international survey (pp. 76-92). London: Routledge.
98. Solana, J. (2004). Preface. In N. Gnesotto (Ed.), EU security and defence policy: The first five years (1999-2004). Paris: EU Institute for Security Studies (ISS).
99. Stockholm International Peace Research Institute (SIPRI). (2007). Appendix 9A: The 100 largest arms-producing companies, 2005. In SIPRI Yearbook 2007: Armaments, disarmament and international security. https://www.sipri.org/sites/default/files/YB07%20374%2009A.pdf
100. Sweeney, S. (2015). Explaining the European Union’s Common Security and Defence Policy (CSDP): Power, bureaucratic politics and grand strategy (Unpublished PhD thesis). University of Leeds.
101. Tempest Project. (2024, January 22). Tempest Future Combat Air System (FCAS) aircraft. Airforce Technology. https://www.airforce-technology.com/projects/tempest-future-combat-air-system-fcas-aircraft-uk/?cf-view
102. Tertrais, B. (2004). Destruction assurée: The origins and development of French nuclear strategy, 1945-1981. In H. D. Sokolski (Ed.), Getting MAD: Nuclear mutual assured destruction, its origins and practice (pp. 51-122). Carlisle, PA: Strategic Studies Institute, US Army War College.
103. Tewes, H. (2001). Germany, civilian power and the new Europe: Enlarging NATO and the European Union. New York: Springer.
104. Theofilis, A. (2025). The emergence of a comprehensive EU’s strategic culture: A neofunctional approach. In F. Asderaki, G. Panfil, A. Molnar, & S. Paile-Calvo (Eds.), The Common Security and Defence Policy: New developments and challenges. ESDC Autumn University Book 2021 (pp. 56–67). Publications Office of the European Union. https://doi.org/10.2855/3056225
105. United Kingdom & France. (1998, December 4). Joint Declaration on European Defence: Joint Declaration issued at the British-French Summit (Saint-Malo, 4 December 1998) [Fransız-İngiliz St. Malo Bildirgesi]. Foreign and Commonwealth Office of the United Kingdom. https://www.cvce.eu/content/publication/2008/3/31/f3cd16fb-fc37-4d52-936f-c8e9bc80f24f/publishable_en.pdf
106. Valášek, T. (2011). Surviving austerity: The case for a new approach to EU military collaboration. London: Centre for European Reform.
107. Varga, T. C. (2024). Reinforcing European defence industry for times of great power conflicts. In K. Zombory & J. E. Szilágyi (Eds.), Shielding Europe with the Common Security and Defence Policy: The EU legal framework for the development of an innovative European defence industry in times of a changing global security environment (pp. 73–108). Miskolc–Budapest: Central European Academic Publishing. https://doi.org/10.54237/profnet.2024.zkjeszcodef_2
108. Wendt, A. (1992). Anarchy is what states make of it: The social construction of power politics. International Organization, 46(2), 391-425. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818300027764
109. Whitman, R. G. (2008). Foreign, security and defence policy and the Lisbon Treaty: Significant or cosmetic reforms? (Global Europe Papers No. 2008/1).
110. Winter, A. C. (2010). The Lisbon Treaty and its implications for the Common Security and Defence Policy in the light of the emerging strategic partnership between NATO and the EU (Master’s thesis, U.S. Army Command and General Staff College). Fort Leavenworth, KS.
111. Wolters, J. (2016). Institutional frameworks and economic performance in the French defense industry (Working paper). Cologne: Cologne Center for Comparative Politics, Institute for Political Science and European Affairs, University of Cologne.
112. Zandee, D., Deen, B., Kruijver, K., & Stoetman, A. (2020, December). European strategic autonomy in security and defence: Now the going gets tough, it’s time to get going (Clingendael Report). The Hague: Clingendael Institute. https://www.clingendael.org/sites/default/files/2020-12/Report_European_Strategic_Autonomy_December_2020.pdf