Güçlendirici Liderliğin Örgütsel Gelişime Etkisi: Eğitim Çıktılarının İyileştirilmesi

Öz

Araştırmanın amacı öğretmenlerin güçlendirici liderlik algılarının örgütsel gelişmişlik düzeyine etkisini incelenmektir. Araştırmanın evrenini Rize ilinde Milli Eğitim Bakanlığına bağlı kurumlarda görev yapan öğretmenler oluşturmaktadır. Çalışmada basit tesadüfi örnekleme yöntemi kullanılmış olup 228 öğretmen araştırmaya katılmıştır. Araştırmanın verileri ‘‘Güçlendirici Liderlik Ölçeği’’ ve ‘‘Örgütsel Gelişim Düzeyi Belirleme Ölçeği’’ kullanılarak toplanmıştır. Elde edilen verilerin analizinde t testi, tekyönlü varyans analizi (ANOVA) ve basit doğrusal regresyon analizi kullanılmıştır. Bulgular, güçlendirici liderlik algısının cinsiyete ve mevcut okul yöneticisiyle birlikte çalışma süresine göre farkılaştığını göstermektedir. Ayrıca öğretmenlerin örgütsel gelişime yönelik algılarının cinsiyete ve çalışılan okul türüne göre farklılaştığı bulgusuna da ulaşılmıştır. Öğretmenlerin güçlendirici liderlik algılarının örgütsel gelişim algıları ile yüksek düzeyde ilişkili olduğu ve güçlendirici liderliğin örgütsel gelişimin önemli bir yordayıcısı olduğu sonucuna ulaşılmıştır. Elde edilen bulgular, güçlendirici liderlik yaklaşımını benimsemenin okulların gelişim düzeylerini artırabileceğini göstermektedir. Değişimin yönlendirilmesindeki etkiyi artırmak için ise okul liderlerinin güçlendirici liderlik konusunda profesyonel gelişimleri sağlanabilir. Kurumsal hedeflere ulaşmak, gelişimi teşvik etmek ve öğretim performansını artırmak için güçlendirici liderlik uygulamalarının kullanılması önemlidir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• öğretmen
• liderlik
• güçlendirici liderlik
• örgütsel gelişmişlik

Leading Education to Better Outcomes: Organizational Development Through Empowering Leadership

Öz

The objective of this study is to examine the impact of teachers' perceptions of empowering leadership on the extent of organizational development. The study sample comprises teachers employed at educational institutions in Rize province that are affiliated with the Ministry of National Education. In accordance with the requirements of the study, a simple random sampling method was employed, leading to the participation of 228 teachers. The data were collected using the Empowering Leadership Scale and the Organizational Development Level Determination Scale. The data were analyzed using a T-test, one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA), and simple linear regression analysis. The findings indicate that perceptions of empowering leadership vary according to gender and the duration of employment with the current school administrator. Additionally, teachers' perceptions of organizational development differed according to gender and the type of school they worked in. It was concluded that teachers' perceptions of empowering leadership were highly related to their perceptions of organizational development, and that empowering leadership was an important predictor of organizational development. The findings suggest that adopting an empowering leadership approach can increase the development levels of schools. The professional development of school leaders in empowering leadership can be provided to enhance their effectiveness in driving change. It is of great importance to utilize empowering leadership practices to achieve organizational goals, promote development, and improve teaching performance.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• teacher
• leadership
• empowering leadership
• organizational development

Kaynakça

1. Abdurrezzak, S., Yıldızbaş, Y. V., Özkul, R., and Doğan, Ü. (2023). Investigation of teachers' perception levels of organizational cynicism and organizational loneliness. International Journal of Educational Research Review, 8(3), 396-406.
2. Allen, S., Winston, B. E., Tatone, G. R., and Crowson, H. M. (2018). Exploring a model of servant leadership, empowerment, and commitment in nonprofit organizations. Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 29(1), 123-140. https://doi.org/10.1002/nml.21311
3. Ana, N., Masrukhi, M., Samsudi, S., and Prihatin, T. (2020). Service quality model, organizational commitment, and tqm-based education leadership in organizational development. International Journal of Innovative Research in Multidisciplinary Education, 3(5)710-714. https://doi.org/10.4108/eai.29-6-2019.2290234
4. Birdi, K., Clegg, C., Patterson, M., Robinson, A., Stride, C. B., Wall, T. D., and Wood, S. J. (2008). The impact of human resource and operational management practices on company productivity: A longitudinal study. Personnel Psychology, 61(3), 467-501.
5. Burhan, Q. (2024). From identification to innovation: how empowering leadership drives organizational innovativeness. Leadership and Organization Development Journal, 45(3), 478-498. https://doi.org/10.1108/lodj-05-2023-0215
6. Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2016). Sosyal bilimler için veri analizi el kitabı. (22. Baskı). Pegem Akademi.
7. Can, A. (2017). SPSS ile bilimsel araştırma sürecinde nicel veri analizi. (5. Baskı). Pegem Akademi.
8. Chen, G., Kirkman, B. L., Kanfer, R., Allen, D., and Rosen, B. (2007). A multilevel study of leadership, empowerment, and performance in teams. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(2), 331.

9. Çelik, O. T., ve Konan, N. (2020). Okul müdürlerinin güçlendirici liderliği ile öğretmenlerin özyeterliği ve örgütsel vatandaşlık davranışları arasındaki ilişki. Eğitim ve Bilim, 46(206), 241-261. http://dx.doi.org/10.15390/EB.2020.8841
10. Çetin, M., and Karaokur Akdağ, Ş. (2022). Organizational development level determination scale: A validity and reliability study. Journal of Education and Learning, 11(4), 174-192. https://doi.org/10.5539/jel.v11n4p17
11. Dash, S. S., and Vohra, N. (2019). The leadership of the school principal. Management Research Review, 42(3), 352-369. https://doi.org/10.1108/mrr-11-2017-0384
12. Durmuş, B., Yurtkoru, E. S., ve Çinko, M. (2018). Sosyal bilimlerde SPSS’le veri analizi. (7. Baskı). Beta Basım Yayım Dağıtım A.Ş.
13. Fong, K. and Snape, E. (2013). Empowering leadership, psychological empowerment and employee outcomes: testing a multi‐level mediating model. British Journal of Management, 26(1), 126-138. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8551.12048
14. Garren, S. and Osborne, K. (2021). Robustness of t-test based on skewness and kurtosis. Journal of Advances in Mathematics and Computer Science. Journal of Advances in Mathematics and Computer Science, 36(2), 102-110. https://doi.org/10.9734/jamcs/2021/v36i230342
15. Hair, J. F., Anderson, R. E., Tatham, R. L., and Black, W. C. (2010). Multivariate data analysis (7th ed.). Pearson.
16. Hou, L., and Cai, W. (2024). Effect of empowering leadership on employees’ workplace loneliness: a moderated mediation model. Frontiers in Psychology, 15. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1387624
17. Johnson, B., and Christensen. (2014). Eğitim araştırmaları: Nitel, nicel ve karma yaklaşımlar (S. Beşir Demir, Trans. Ed.) Eğiten Yayınevi.
18. Joseph, M.S., Bankole, S. A., and Oluwadare Deji O. (2024). School Principals' Support for Distributed Leadership: A Review of Transformational and Distributed Leadership Literature. International Journal of Innovative Research in Multidisciplinary Education 3(5), 710-714
19. Jung, K. H., Kang, S., and Choi, S. B. (2020). Empowering leadership, risk-taking behavior, and employees’ commitment to organizational change: the mediated moderating role of task complexity. Sustainability, 12(6), 2340. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12062340
20. Jung, K., Kang, S., and Choi, S. (2020). Empowering leadership, risk-taking behavior, and employees’ commitment to organizational change: the mediated moderating role of task complexity. Sustainability, 12(6), 2340. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12062340
21. Karagözoğlu, A. A., and Ozan , M.B., (2022). The relationship between empowering leadership, self-efficacy and organizational resilience. International Online Journal of Educational Sciences, 14(5). 10.15345/iojes.2022.05.008
22. Kazlauskaitė, R., Bučiūnienė, I., and Turauskas, L. (2011). Organisational and psychological empowerment in the hrm‐performance linkage. Employee Relations, 34(2), 138-158. https://doi.org/10.1108/01425451211191869
23. Khan, M. (2021). A retrospective analysis of organizational change: a case study of octaware technologies. International Journal of Business Strategies, 6(1), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.47672/ijbs.688
24. Kim, M. and Beehr, T. (2019). The power of empowering leadership: allowing and encouraging followers to take charge of their own jobs. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 32(9), 1865-1898. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2019.1657166
25. Kim, M., Beehr, T. A., and Prewett, M. S. (2018). Employee responses to empowering leadership: a meta-analysis. Journal of Leadership and Organizational Studies, 25(3), 257-276. https://doi.org/10.1177/1548051817750538
26. Konan, N., ve Çelik, O. T. (2018). Güçlendirici liderlik ölçeğinin eğitim örgütleri için Türkçe’ye uyarlaması: geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışması. Kastamonu Education Journal, 26(4), 1043-1054.
27. Konczak, L. J., Stelly, D. J., and Trusty, M. L. (2000). Defining and measuring empowering leader behaviors: development of an upward feedback instrument. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 60(2), 301-313.
28. Kurniawan, A., and Soeling, P. D. (2023). The effectiveness of empowering leadership on organizational commitment in the police institution: a systematic literature review. Journal of Economics, Finance and Management Studies, 06(03). https://doi.org/10.47191/jefms/v6-i3-07
29. Lajoie, D., Boudrias, J., Rousseau, V., and Brunelle, É. (2017). Value congruence and tenure as moderators of transformational leadership effects. Leadership and Organization Development Journal, 38(2), 254-269. https://doi.org/10.1108/lodj-04-2015-0091
30. Leach, D. J., Wall, T. D., and Jackson, P. R. (2003). The effect of empowerment on job knowledge: an empirical test involving operators of complex technology. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 76(1), 27-52.
31. Lee, A., Willis, S., and Tian, A. (2017). Empowering leadership: a meta‐analytic examination of incremental contribution, mediation, and moderation. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 39(3), 306-325. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.2220
32. Li, S., Huo, Y., and Long, L. (2015). Chinese traditionality matters: effects of differentiated empowering leadership on followers’ trust in leaders and work outcomes. Journal of Business Ethics, 145(1), 81-93. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-015-2900-1
33. Lorcu, F. (2015). Örneklerle veri analizi: SPSS uygulamalı. (1. Baskı). Detay Yayıncılık.
34. Mangundjaya, W. L. (2014). The role of communication, trust and justice in commitment to change. International Conference on Business, Management and Corporate Social Responsibility (ICBMCSR'14). Batam, Indonesia.
35. Morales, V., Jiménez-Barrionuevo, M., and Gutiérrez, L. (2012). Transformational leadership influence on organizational performance through organizational learning and innovation. Journal of Business Research, 65(7), 1040-1050. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2011.03.005
36. Morgan, G. A., Leech, N. L., Gloeckner, G. W., and Barrett, K. C. (2004). SPSS for introductory statistics: Use and interpretation. Psychology Press.
37. Munawar, U., Haider, S., and Suleman, Q. (2023). Leadership empowering behaviors: gender-based comparative study at secondary school level. Gomal University Journal of Research, 39(01), 80-90. https://doi.org/10.51380/gujr-39-01-08
38. Mutonyi, B. R., Slåtten, T., and Lien, G. (2020). Empowering leadership, work group cohesiveness, individual learning orientation and individual innovative behaviour in the public sector: empirical evidence from Norway. International Journal of Public Leadership, 16(2), 175-197. https://doi.org/10.1108/ijpl-07-2019-0045
39. Robbins, S. P. ve Judge, T. A. (2013). Liderlik. In A. Yalçın (Trans.) Örgütsel davranış (pp. 374-416). Nobel Akademik Yayıncılık Eğitim Danışmanlık Tic. Ltd. Şti.
40. Schober, P., Boer, C., and Schwarte, L. A. (2018). Correlation coefficients: appropriate use and interpretation. Anesthesia and Analgesia, 126(5), 1763-1768.
41. Senger, H. (2013). A statistical power comparison of the kolmogorov-smirnov two-sample test and the wald wolfowitz test in terms of fixed skewness and fixed kurtosis in large sample sizes. Chinese Business Review, 12(07). https://doi.org/10.17265/1537-1506/2013.07.003
42. Sparrowe, R. T. (1994). Empowerment in the hospitality industry: an exploration of antecedents and outcomes. Hospitality Research Journal, 17(3), 51-73.
43. Spreitzer, G. M. (1997). Toward a common ground in defining empowerment. In W. A. Pasmore, and R. W. Woodman (Eds), Research in organizational change and development (pp. 31-62). Elsevier Science/JAI Press
44. Sungur, O. (2010). Korelasyon analizi. In Ş. Kalaycı (Ed.), SPSS uygulamalı çok değişkenli istatistik teknikleri (5th ed., pp. 115-127). Asil Yayın Dağıtım Ltd. Şti.
45. Üstel, Ö. (2022). Öğretmen algılarına göre okul yöneticilerinin güçlendirici liderlik düzeyleri ile öğretmenlerin motivasyonları arasındaki ilişkinin incelenmesi. (Non-thesis project). https://gcris.pau.edu.tr/handle/11499/45467
46. Wang, C., and Yang, I. (2021). Why and how does empowering leadership promote proactive work behavior? an examination with a serial mediation model among hotel employees. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(5), 2386. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18052386
47. Xu, Y. and Zhang, M. (2022). The study of the impact of empowering leadership on adaptive performance of faculties based on chain mediating. Frontiers in Psychology, 13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.938951
48. Zhang, X., and Bartol, K. M. (2010). Linking empowering leadership and employee creativity: the influence of psychological empowerment, intrinsic motivation, and creative process engagement. Academy of Management Journal, 53(1), 107-128.