AB VE TÜRKİYE’NIN BATI BALKAN POLİTİKALARININ BİR DEĞERLENDİRMESİ: ELEŞTİREL BİR BAKIŞ VE GELECEKTEKİ İŞBİRLİĞİNE DAİR BEKLENTİLER

Öz

Bir yumuşak güç olan AB, başta Batı Balkanlar olmak üzere uluslararası alanda etkinliğini kısıtlayıcı birçok problemle karşı karşıyadır. Bu gölgede yumuşak gücünün dönüştürücülüğü azımsanmayacak ölçüde azalmıştır. Bu makale AB’nin yakın çevresinde ve özellikle de Batı Balkanlar’da uyguladığı yumuşak güç politikalarının önündeki problemler tartışılacak ve Birliğin etkinliğini sürdürebilmesi ve bu etkinliğe yeni boyutlar katabilmesinin muhtemel yolları tartışılacaktır. Makalenin araştırma sorusu AB’nin acil olarak yüzleşmek zorunda olduğu konuların neler olduğudur. AB mekanizmalarının Birliğin yakın çevresinde istikrarı, demokrasiyi ve barışı arttırmakta başarılı olamadığı düşünüldüğünde, alternatiflerin dikkate alınması gerektiği bir gerçektir. Bu şekilde düşünüldüğünde Türkiye on yıl önceki performansıyla Batı Balkanlarda etkili olabildiğini göstermştir. Fakat ekonomik olarak zayıflayan günümüz Türkiyesi on yıl önce olduğu gibi bölge üzerinde egemenlik kurmak değil sadece bölge devletleriyle ilişkilerini güçlendirmek istemektedir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Batı Balkanlar,Avrupa Birliği,Türkiye,Şartlılık,Ortak Güvenlik ve Savunma Politikası

AN ASSESSMENT OF EU’S AND TURKEY’S WESTERN BALKAN POLICIES: A CRITIQUE AND PROSPECTS FOR FUTURE COOPERATION

Öz

The EU, which is commonly referred as a soft power, is facing various challenges that limit its effectiveness in the international scene, most importantly in the Western Balkans. The transformative capacity of its soft power is not properly utilized in this region. This article explores the challenges to the EU’s soft power and evaluates possible ways for the Union to maintain its effectiveness adding new dimensions to its foreign policy in the area–specifically in the Western Balkans region. The primary issue addressed by this article deals with the immediate changes facing the EU as a soft power today. Given the fact that political mechanisms that EU has utilized have proved to be ineffective in promoting stability, democracy peace in its area, alternatives should be considered. Meanwhile, a decade ago Turkey has proven its capacity to influence Western Balkan countries by creating and consolidating its soft power through various ways. However under the most present circumstances an economically weak Turkey is nothing but an actor which attempts to strengthen its relationship with Western Balkans countries

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Western Balkans,European Union,Turkey,Conditionality,Common Security and Defense Policy

Kaynakça

1. ANASTASAKIS, Othon, “The EU’s Political Conditionality in the Western Balkans: Towards a More Pragmatic Approach”, Southeast European and Black Sea Studies, Volume 8, Number 4, 2008, pp. 365-77.
2. AYDIN-DÜZGIT, Senem, KALİBER, Alper, “Encounters with Europe in an era of domestic and international turmoil: is Turkey a de-Europeanising candidate country?”, South European Society and Politics, Volume 21, Number 3, 2016, pp. 1-14.
3. BARLAS, Dilek, “Turkish Diplomacy in the Balkans and the Mediterranean. Opportunities and Limits for Middle-power Activism in the 1930s”, Journal of Contemporary History, Volume 40, Number 3, 2005, pp. 441-464.
4. BECHEV, Dimitar, and SVETLOZAR Andreev. “Top-down vs. bottom-up aspects of the EU institution-building strategies in the Western Balkans”, SEESOX Occasional Paper, Volume 3, Number 5, 2005.
5. DABROWSKI, Marek, MYACHENKOVA, Yana, “The Western Balkans on the road to the European Union”, Bruegel Policy Contribution, Issue No 4, 2018, pp. 1-23.
6. DEMİRTAŞ, Birgül, “Reconsidering Turkey’s Balkan Ties: Opportunities and Limitations”, in Pınar Gözen Ercan (Ed.) Turkish Foreign Policy, International Relations, Legality and Global Reach, Palgrave Macmillan, Cham, 2017, pp. 129-149.
7. DIMITROVA, Antoaneta, GEOFFREY Pridham, “International Actors and Democracy Promotion in Central and Eastern Europe: The Integration Model and Its Limits”, Democratisation, Volume 11, Number 5, 2004, pp. 91-112.
8. DUCHÂNE, Francis, “Europe’s Role in World Peace”, Europe Tomorrow: Sixteen Europeans Look Ahead, in Richard Mayne(ed.), Fontana, London 1972, pp. 32-47.

9. EKINCI, Mehmet Uğur, “Turkey’s Balkan Policy and Its Skeptics”, Insight Turkey, Volume 21, Number 2, 2019, pp. 37-49.
10. EVERTS, Steven, KEOHANE, Daniel, “The European Convention and EU Foreign Policy: Learning from Failure”, Global Politics and Strategy, Volume 45, Number 3, 2003, pp. 167-86.
11. FREYBURG, Tina, and Solveig RICHTER. “National identity matters: the limited impact of EU Political Conditionality in the Western Balkans”, Journal of European Public Policy, Volume 17, Number 2, 2010, pp. 263-281.
12. GOWAN, Richard, “The US, Europe and Asia’s Rising Multilateralists”, Look East, Act East: Transatlantic Agendas in the Asia Pacific, in Patryk Pawlak (ed.), Report No. 13 of the EU Institute for Security Studies, 2012, pp. 24-30
13. GREENHILL, Kelly M., “Open arms behind barred doors: fear, hypocrisy and policy schizophrenia in the European migration crisis”, European Law Journal, Volume 22, Number 3, 2016, pp. 317-332.
14. GROSS, Eva, “Civilian and Military Missions in the Western Balkans”, Evaluating the EU’s Crisis Missions in the Balkans, in Michael Emerson and Eva Gross (eds.), Brussels: Centre for European Policy Studies 2007, pp. 126-151.
15. GÜNER, Serdar Ş., KOÇ, Dilan E., “The Syrian Conflict: Driving Forces of Balances and Imbalances”, MERIA Journal, Volume 33, Number 3, 2017, pp. 15-25
16. HEISBOURG, François, “Brexit and European Security”, Survival, Volume 58, Number 3, 2016, pp. 13-22.
17. KALIN, İbrahim, “Soft Power and Public Diplomacy in Turkey,” Perceptions, Volume 16, Number 3, 2011, pp. 5-23.
18. KEUKELEIRE, Stephan, Delreux, Tom, The Foreign Policy of the European Union, Macmillan International Higher Education, 2014.
19. KOÇ, Zeynep Elif, ÖNSOY, Murat, “An Evaluation of Turkey’s Western Balkans Policy under the Akp and Prospects for the Post-Davutoğlu Era”, Selçuk Üniversitesi Türkiyat Araştırmaları Dergisi, Volume 43, Number 1, 2018, pp. 355-367.
20. LANE, David, “Post-communist states and the European Union”, Journal of Communist Studies and Transition Politics, Volume 23, Number 4, 2007, pp. 461-477.
21. MAGEN, Amichai, MORLINO, Leonardo, “Preface,” International Actors, Democratization and the Rule of Law: Anchoring Democracy? in Amichai Magen and Leonardo Morlino (eds.), Routledge, London 2009, pp. xiii-xvi.
22. MATTELAER, Alexander, “The CSDP Mission Planning Process of the European Union: Innovations and Shortfalls”, in Sophie Vanhoonacker, Hylke Dijkstra, and Heidi Maurer (eds.), Understanding the Role of Bureaucracy in the European Security and Defence Policy, European Integration online Papers (EIoP), Special Issue 1, Volume 14, 2010, pp. 1-18.
23. NITOIU, Cristian, “Towards conflict or cooperation? The Ukraine Crisis and EU-Russia Relations”, Southeast European and Black Sea Studies, Volume 16, Number 4, 2016, pp. 375-390.
24. NYE, Joseph, Soft Power: The Means To Success In World Politics, Public Affairs, New York 2004.
25. ÖNİŞ, Ziya, YILMAZ, Şuhnaz, “Turkey and Russia in a shifting global order: cooperation, conflict and asymmetric interdependence in a turbulent region”, Third World Quarterly, Volume 37, Number 1, 2016, pp. 71-95.
26. ÖNSOY, Murat, “Coping with Bosnia-Herzegovina’s Critical Problems: Reconsidering the International Community’s Role”, Uluslararası Hukuk ve Politika, Volume 7, Number 25, 2011, pp. 121-150.
27. ÖZTÜRK, Ahmet Erdi, GÖZAYDIN, İştar, “A Frame for Turkey’s Foreign Policy via the Diyanet in the Balkans”, Journal of Muslims in Europe, Volume 7, Number 3, 2018, pp. 331-350.
28. PETROVIC, Zarko, RELJIC, Dusan, “Turkish Interests and Involvement in the Western Balkans: A Score-Card”, Insight Turkey, Volume 13, Number 3, 2011, pp. 159-72.
29. PRIDHAM, Geoffrey, “EU/Ukraine Relations and the Crisis with Russia, 2013-14: A Turning Point”, The International Spectator, Volume 49, Number 4, 2014, pp. 53-61.
30. RICHARDSON, Jeremy, “Brexit: The EU Policy‐Making State Hits the Populist Buffers”, The Political Quarterly, Volume 89, Number 1, 2018, pp. 118-126.
31. RODT, Annemarie Peen, WOLFF, Stefan, “EU Conflict Management in Bosnia and Herzegovina and Macedonia”, The EU as a Global Conflict Manager, in Richard G. Whitman and Stefan Wolff (eds.), New York 2012, pp. 138-152.
32. RUPNIK, Jacques, “The Balkans as a European Question”, The Western Balkans and the EU: ‘The Hour of Europe, in Jacques Rupnik (ed.), Report published by the EU Institute for Security Studies, 2011, pp. 17-30.
33. RÜMA, İnan, “Turkish Foreign Policy towards the Balkans: Overestimated Change within Underestimated Continuity?”, Turkey in the 21st Century: Quest for a New Foreign Policy, in Özden Zeynep Oktav (ed.), Ashgate Publishing, Burlington 2012, pp. 132-158.
34. SCHIMMELFENNIG, Frank, and SEDELMEIER, Ulrich, “Governance by conditionality: EU rule transfer to the candidate countries of Central and Eastern Europe”, Journal of European Public Policy, Volume 11, Number 4, 2004, pp. 661-679.
35. SCIPIONI, Marco, “Failing forward in EU migration policy? EU Integration After the 2015 Asylum and Migration Crisis”, Journal of European Public Policy, Volume 25, Number 9, 2018, pp. 1357-1375.
36. SILBER, Laura, LITTLE, Allan, Yugoslavia: Death of a Nation, TV Books, New York 1996.
37. STETTER, Stephan, “Regulating Migration: Authority Delegation in Justice and Home Affairs”, Journal of European Public Policy, Volume 7, Number 1, 2000, pp. 80-103.
38. TOCCI, Nathalie, The EU and Conflict Resolution: Promoting Peace in the Backyard, Routledge/UACES Contemporary European Studies, New York, 2007.
39. ÜLGEN, Sinan, “The Evolving EU, NATO, and Turkey Relationship,” in Frances G. Burwell (ed.), The Evolution of US-Turkish Relations in a Transatlantic Context, Colloquim Report published by the Strategic Studies Institute of the US Army War College, April 2008, 101. pp. 97-109.
40. YILMAZ, Gözde, “From Europeanization to De-Europeanization: The Europeanization Process of Turkey in 1999–2014”, Journal of Contemporary European Studies, Volume 24, Number 1, 2016, pp. 86-100.
41. YOUNGS, Richard, “Idealists at Bay”, The European Union and Democracy Promotion: A Critical Global Assessment, in Richard Youngs (ed.), Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore 2010, pp. 1-15.
42. ZUOKUI, Liu, “EU’s Conditionality and the Western Balkans’ Accession Roads”, European Perspectives, Volume 2, Number 1, 2010, pp. 79-98.
43. Internet Sources
44. “Overlapping Interests of US and Turkey in the Post-Cold War Balkans,” Bilgesam, 14 December 2011. Available at: http://www.bilgesam.org/en/incele/1873/-the-overlapping-interests-of-us-and-turkey-in-the-post-cold-war-balkans/#.XStmAC3BLfZ, (Accessed on 2 July 2019).
45. “Turkey’s International Security Initiatives and Contributions to NATO and EU Operations,” website of the Turkish Ministry of Foreign Affairs. See:http://www.mfa.gov.tr/iv_-european-security-and-defence-identity_policy-_esdi_p_.en.mfa, (Accessed on 2 July 2019).
46. Al Monitor “Turkey's response to US-led Syria strikes: Not enough but welcomed”. 15 April 2018. https://www.al-monitor.com/pulse/originals/2018/04/turkey-responds-syria-strikes-assad-russia-iran-erdogan.html, (Accessed on 20 July 2018).
47. ARAS, Bülent, “Turkey and the Balkans: New Policy in a Changing Regional Environment”, Report published by The German Marshall Fund of the United States, 31 October 2012. Available at: http://www.gmfus.org/archives/turkey-and-the-balkans-new-policy-in-a-changing-regional-environment/, (Accessed on 28 June 2019).
48. ARCHICK, Kristin, European Union Enlargement, CRS Report for Congress, 4 February 2013, 1. Available at: http://www.fas.org/sgp/crs/row/RS21344.pdf, (Accessed on 1 July 2019).
49. BALFOUR, Rosa, STRATULAT, Corina, The Democratic Transformation of the Balkans, Issue Paper No. 66 published by the European Policy Centre, 2011.Available at: http://www.epc.eu/documents/uploads/pub_1363_the_democratic_transformation_of_the_balkans.pdf, (Accessed on 1 July 2019).
50. BALFOUR, Rosa, STRATULAT, Corina, The Enlargement of the European Union, European Policy Centre Discussion Paper, 10 December 2012. Available at: http://www.epc.eu/documents/uploads/pub_3176_enlargement_of_the_eu.pdf, (Accessed on 1 July 2019).
51. BECHEV, Dimitar, The Periphery of the Periphery: The Western Balkans and the Euro Crisis, European Council on Foreign Relations Policy Brief, ECFR/60, August 2012,7. Available at: http://ecfr.eu/page/-/ECFR60_WESTERN_BALKANS_BRIEF_AW.pdf, (Accessed on 1 July 2019).
52. BEICHELT, Timm, “The Research Field of Democracy Promotion”, Living Reviews in Democracy, 3, 2012. Available at: https://ethz.ch/content/dam/ethz/special-interest/gess/cis/cis-dam/CIS_DAM_2015/WorkingPapers/Living_Reviews_Democracy/Beichelt.pdf, (Accessed on 1 july 2019).
53. BLANCHARD, Christopher M., HUMUD, Carla E., NIKITIN, Mary Beth D., “Armed conflict in Syria: Overview and US response”, Library of Congress Washington DC Congressional Research Service, 2014. https://fas.org/sgp/crs/mideast/RL33487.pdf, (Accessed on 28 November 2019).
54. BÖRZEL, Tanja A., and RISSE Thomas. “Venus approaching Mars? The EU as an emerging civilian world power”, Draft Conference Paper Prepared for the Bi-Annual Conference of the European Union Studies Association (EUSA), Montreal, Canada, May 17-19, 2007, pp. 1-31. Available at: http://aei.pitt.edu/7708/1/borzel-t-11a.pdf, (Accessed on 30 November 2019)
55. BUGAJSKI, Janusz, CONLEY, Heather A, A New Transatlantic Approach for the Western Balkans: Time for Change in Serbia, Kosovo, and Bosnia-Hercegovina, Report published by the Center for Strategic International Studies, November 2011, p. 30. Available at: https://csis.org/files/publication/111110_Bugajski_TransatlanticApproach_web.pdf, (Accessed on 1 July 2019).
56. CALIC, Marie-Janine, “The Western Balkans on the Road Towards European Integration”, Internationale Politikanalyse Frieden Und Sicherheit, December 2005, pp. 1-15. Available at: https://library.fes.de/pdf-files/id/03273.pdf, (Accessed on 30 November 2019).
57. Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament and the Council: Enlargement Strategy and Main Challenges 2011-2012, European Commission, Brussels, 12 October 2011. Available at: http://ec.europa.eu/enlargement/pdf/key_documents/2011/package/strategy_paper_2011_en.pdf, (Accessed on 1 July 2019).
58. Council of the European Union, Joint Action 2003/681/CFSP of 29 September on the European Union Police Mission in the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia (EUPOL ‘Proxima’), OJ L 249, 01.10.2003(c). Available at: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/en/ALL/?uri=CELEX:32003R1726, (Accessed 30 November 2019).
59. CONCORDIA/FYROM, EU Common Security and Defence Policy, European Union External Action. Available at: http://www.eeas.europa.eu/archives/csdp/missions-and-operations/concordia/index_en.htm, (Accessed on 1 July 2019).
60. Council Conclusions on Common Security and Defence Policy, Report for the Council of the European Union at the 3130th Foreign Affairs Council Meeting, Brussels,1 December 2012. Available at:http://www.consilium.europa.eu/uedocs/cms_data/docs/pressdata/EN/foraff/126504.pdf, (Accessed on 1 July 2019).
61. DIKOV, Ivan, “Looking behind France’s Shameful Veto on Albania, N. Macedonia’s EU Accession Talks”, European Views, Available at: https://www.european-views.com/2019/10/looking-behind-frances-shameful-veto-on-albania-n-macedonias-eu-accession-talks/, (Accessed on 13 November 2019).
62. EU Report on, “Trade Sustainability Impact Assessment of the Free Trade Agreement between the European Union and Japan”, http://trade.ec.europa.eu/doclib/docs/2016/may/tradoc_154522.pdf, (Accessed on 24 July 2018).
63. EU-Western Balkans Summit, Thessaloniki, 21 June 2003: http://europa.eu/rapid/press-release_PRES-03-163_en.htm, (Accessed on 1 July 2019).
64. EUPAT, EU Common Security and Defence Policy, European Union External Action. Available at: http://www.eeas.europa.eu/archives/csdp/missions-and-operations/eupat/index_en.htm, (Accessed on 1 July 2019).
65. EUPM/BiH, Common Security and Defence Policy, European Union External Action. Available at: http://www.eeas.europa.eu/archives/csdp/missions-and-operations/eupm-bih/index_en.htm, (Accessed on 1 July 2019).
66. EUPOL/PROXIMA FYROM, EU Common Security and Defence Policy, European Union External Action. Available at: http://www.eeas.europa.eu/archives/csdp/missions-and-operations/proxima-fyrom/index_en.htm, (Accessed on 1 July 2019).
67. EUROPEAN UNION, https://europa.eu/european-union/about-eu/countries_en#tab-0-1, (Accessed on 20 July 2018).
68. GROSS, Eva, The End of the EU Police Mission in Bosnia and Herzegovina: What Lessons for the Common Security and Defence Policy?, Policy Brief for the European Policy Centre, 13 June 2012. Available at: http://www.operationspaix.net/DATA/DOCUMENT/7291~v~The_End_of_the_EU_Police_Mission_in_Bosnia_and_Herzegovina__What_Lessons_for_the_Common_Security_and_Defence_Policy_.pdf, (Accessed on 30 November 2019).
69. HAKE, Mariya, RADZYNER, Alice, “Western Balkans: Growing economic ties with Turkey, Russia and China”, Institute for Economies in Transition (BOFIT) Policy Brief. 15.2.2019. https://helda.helsinki.fi/bof/bitstream/handle/123456789/16048/bpb0119.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y, (Accessed on November 28, 2019)
70. Impact of the EU Civilian Crisis Management Operations in the Balkans: Lessons Identified and post-Lisbon Challenges, Report by the Finnish Institute of International Affairs, 29 November 2010. Available at: https://www.fiia.fi/en/event/impact-of-the-eu-civilian-crisis-management-operations-in-the-balkans-lessons-identified-and-post-lisbon-challenges, (Accessed on 1 July 2019).
71. Institution-Building Strategies in the Western Balkans, Occasional Paper No. 3/05 of the European Studies Centre, St. Antony’s of Oxford, 6. Available at: http://ecfr.eu/page/-/ECFR60_WESTERN_BALKANS_BRIEF_AW.pdf, (Accessed on 1 July 2019).
72. Integrating the Western Balkans into Europe, The Aftermath of the Greek Presidency, Report by the Centre for Liberal Strategies, March 2003. Available here: http://www.cls-sofia.org/en/media/-299.html, (Accessed on 2 July 2019).
73. KAGAN, Robert, “Power and Weakness”, Policy Review, No. 113 of the Hoover Institution, June 2002. Available at: https://www.hoover.org/research/power-and-weakness, (Accessed on 1 July 2019).
74. KIRCHNER, Emil, “Common Security and Defence Policy Peace Operations in the Western Balkans: Impact and Lessons Learned”, European Security, 3 January 2013. Available at:http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/09662839.2012.749865, (Accessed on 1 July 2019).
75. KORSKI, Daniel, GOWAN, Richard Can the EU Rebuild Failing States?: A Review of Europe’s Civilian Capacity, Report of The European Council on Foreign Relations, October 2009. Available at: http://ecfr.eu/content/entry/civilian_capacities_report_page, (Accessed on 28 November 2019).
76. LUCARELLI, Sonia. Peace and Democracy: The Rediscovered Link. The EU, NATO, and the European System of Liberal-Democratic Security Communities, Report funded by NATO Euro-Atlantic Partnership Council Individual Research Fellowships: 2000-2002 Programme, 43. pp. 1-71. Available at: https://www.nato.int/acad/fellow/00-02/Lucarelli's.pdf, (Accessed on 30 November 2019).
77. MÖLLING, Christian, BRUNE, Sophie-Charlotte, The Impact of the Financial Crisis on European Defence, Study for the European Parliament Directorate-General for External Policies, April 2011. Available at: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/document/activities/cont/201106/20110623ATT22404/20110623ATT22404EN.pdf, (Accessed on 1 July 2019).
78. NIELSEN, Nikolaj, “EU Report: Western Balkan States Held Back by Lawlessness”, EU Observer, 5 October 2012. Available at: http://euobserver.com/enlargement/117769, (Accessed on 1 July 2019).
79. POULAIN, Loic, SAKELLARIOU, Akis, Western Balkans: Is Turkey Back?, Report published by the Center For Strategic and International Studies, 25 April 2011 Available at: http://csis.org/print/30115, (Accessed on 23 June 2016).
80. SMITH, Karen E., Still, “Civilian Power EU?”, Working Paper of the European Foreign Policy Unit, 2005. Available at: https://www.cairn.info/revue-politique-europeenne-2005-3-page-63.htm#, (Accessed on 30 November 2019).
81. SOLANA, Javier, “Shaping an Effective EU Foreign Policy”, 24 January 2005. http://www.consilium.europa.eu/uedocs/cms_data/docs/pressdata/en/discours/83461.pdf (Accessed on 22 July 2018).
82. SOROS, G., SOROS, A, “In the Balkans, A Chance to Stabilize Europe,” The New York Times, June 18, 2018, retrieved from https://www.nytimes.com/2018/06/18/opinion/northern-macedonia-rename-greece.html, (Accessed on 15 November 2019).
83. Third Report on the Post-Visa Liberalisation Monitoring for the Western Balkan Countries in accordance with the Commission Statement of 8 November 2010, Report from the European Commission to the European Parliament and Council, Brussels, 28 August 2012. Available at: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=COM:2012:0472:FIN:EN:PDF, (Accessed on 2 July 2019).
84. UN Comtrade Database, https://comtrade.un.org/data/, (Accessed on 21 July 2018).
85. Understanding the Role of Bureaucracy in the European Security and Defence Policy, European Integration Online Papers: Special Issue, 1i Volume 14, 2010. Available at: http://eiop.or.at/eiop/texte/2010-009a.htm, (Accessed on 1 July 2019).
86. VACHUDOVA, Milada, The European Union, the Balkans and Turkey: Can “Soft Power” Bring Stability and Democracy, Report for the Wilson Center’s Global Europe Program, No: 280. Available at: http://www.wilsoncenter.org/publication/280-the-european-union-the-balkans-and-turkey-can-soft-power-bring-stability-and, (Accessed on 2 July 2019).
87. WAGNER, Wolfgang. Für Europa sterben? Die demokratische Legitimität der Europäischen Sicherheits- und Verteidigungspolitik (Frankfurt am Main: Hessische Stiftung Friedens- und Konfliktforschung, 2004. Available at: http://www.hsfk.de/downloads/report0304.pdf. See also: European Security Strategy: A Secure Europe in a Better World, Report for Council of the European Union, Brussels, 12 December 2003. Available at: ülgen (Accessed on 2 July 2019).