Ergenlerde Farkındalık, Psikolojik İyi Oluş, Sosyal Medya Kullanımı ve İnternet Kullanım Süresi: Bir Yapısal Eşitlik Modellemesi

Öz

Amaç: Psikolojik iyi oluş, farkındalık ve sosyal medya kullanımı ile ilişkili bir kavramdır. Literatürde bu ilişkinin doğası ve altında yatan aracı mekanizmalar hakkında sınırlı bilgi mevcuttur. Ayrıca bilinçli farkındalık ve psikolojik iyi oluş arasındaki ilişkide sosyal medya kullanımı ve internette geçirilen zamanın aracı rolünü belirlemek amaçlanmıştır. Yöntem: Bu çalışmaya 429 genç dahil edilmiştir. Veriler, tanıtıcı bilgi formu, sosyal medya kullanım ölçeği, psikolojik iyi oluş ölçeği ve bilinçli farkındalık ölçeği aracılığıyla toplanmıştır. Verilerin analizinde yapısal eşitlik modelleme yöntemi kullanılmıştır. Bulgular: Bulgular, bilinçli farkındalık ve psikolojik iyi oluş arasında anlamlı bir pozitif korelasyon bulunduğunu ve farkındalık ile internette harcanan zaman arasında anlamlı bir negatif korelasyon bulunduğunu göstermiştir. Farkındalık ve psikolojik iyi oluş arasındaki ilişkide sosyal medya kullanımı bir aracı rolü oynamazken, internette harcanan zaman bir aracı rolü olduğu görülmektedir. Sonuç: Adölesanlarda bilinçli farkındalık artıkça psikolojik iyi oluşun arttığı, internette harcanan zamanın azaldığı saptanmıştır. Bilinçli farkındalık ile psikolojik iyi oluş arasındaki ilişkide sosyal medya kullanımının aracı bir rolü yokken, internette geçirilen süre aracı bir etkiye sahiptir. Sosyal medya kullanımının psikolojik iyi oluş ve bilinçli farkındalık üzerindeki etkisi konusunda gelecekte farklı grup ve değişkenlerle araştırma yapılması gerektiği düşünülmektedir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Ergenler
• bilinçli farkındalık
• psikolojik iyi oluş
• sosyal medya kullanımı
• internet kullanımı

Mindfulness, Psychological Well-being, Social Media Use, and Internet Use Time among Adolescents: A Structural Equation Modeling

Abstract

Objective: Psychological well-being is a concept associated with mindfulness and the use of social media. Limited information is available in the literature on the nature of this relationship and the underlying intermediary mechanisms. We also aimed to determine the mediator role of social media use and time spent online in the association between mindfulness and psychological well-being. Method: This study included 429 teenagers. Data was collected through introductory information form, social media use scale, psychological well-being scale, and mindful attention awareness scale. Structural equation modeling method was used in the analysis of the data. Results: A significant positive correlation was found between mindfulness and psychological well-being, and a significant negative correlation was found between mindfulness and time spent online. Social media use did not play a mediator’s role in the correlation between mindfulness and psychological well-being, while the daily time spent online played a mediator’s role. Conclusion: As mindfulness increases in adolescents, psychological well-being increases and the time spent on the internet decreases. While the use of social media does not have a mediating role in the relationship between mindfulness and psychological well-being, the time spent on the internet has a mediating effect. Future research should be conducted with different groups and variables on the impact of social media use on psychological well-being and mindfulness.

Keywords

• Adolescents
• mindfulness
• psychological well-being
• social media use

Kaynakça

1. 1. Ryan, R.M., & Deci, E.L. (2001). On happiness and human potentials: A review of research on hedonic and eudaimonic well-being. Annual review of psychology, 52(1), 141-166. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.52.1.141
2. 2. Howell, A.J., Digdon, N.L., Buro, K., & Sheptycki, A.R. (2008). Relations among mindfulness, well-being, and sleep. Personality and Individual Differences, 45, 773–777. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2008.08.005
3. 3. Diener, E., Wirtz, D., Tov, W., Kim-Prieto, C., Choi,D., Oishi, S., & Diener, R.B. (2010). New well-being measures: Short scales to assess flourishing and positive and negative feelings. Social Indicators Research, 97(2), 143-156. DOI 10.1007/s11205-009-9493-y
4. 4. Branström, R., Duncan, L.G., & Moskowitz, J.T. (2011). The association between dispositional mindfulness, psychological well-being, and perceived health in a Swedish populationbased sample. British Journal of Health Psychology, 16, 300–316. DOI:10.1348/135910710X501683
5. 5. Yobas, P.K., Ramirez, D., Fernandez, Z., Sarmiento, J., Thanoi, W., & Ignacio, J. (2016). Examining the predicting effect of mindfulness on psychological well-being among undergraduate students: A structural equation modelling approach. Personality and Individual Differences, 91, 63–68. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2015.11.034
6. 6. Huynh, T., & Torquati, J.C. (2019). Examining connection to nature and mindfulness at promoting psychological well-being. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 66, 101370.
7. 7. Tang, Y.Y., Tang, R., & Gross, J.J. (2019). Promoting psychological well-being through an evidence-based mindfulness training program. Frontiers in human neuroscience, 13, 237.
8. 8. Kuyumcu, B. (2011). Examining the relationship between university students' emotional awareness, expressing feelings, self-construct and subjective well-being. International Journal of Social Sciences Education, 1(2), 104-113.

9. 9. Mulisa, F. & Getahun D.A. (2018). Perceived benefits and risks of social media: ethiopian secondary school students’ perspectives. Journal of Technology in Behavioral Science: 3, 294-300. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41347-018-0062-6
10. 10. Cağır, G., & Gürgan, U. (2010). The relationship between the levels of high school and university students’ problematic use of internet and their perceived wellness and loneliness levels. Journal of Balikesir University Institute of Social Sciences, 13(24), 70– 85.
11. 11. Jung, Y., Pawlowski, S.D., & Kim, H.W. (2017). Exploring associations between young adults’ facebook use and psychological well-being: A goal hierarchy approach. International Journal of Information Management, 37(1), 1391-1404. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2016.10.005
12. 12. Söner, O., & Yılmaz, O. (2018). The relationship between social media dependency and psychological well-being levels of high school students. Journal of Ufuk University Institute of Social Sciences, 7(13), 59-73.
13. 13. Çikrıkci, Ö. (2016). The effect of internet use on well-being: Meta-analysis. Computers in Human Behavior 65, 560-566. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.09.021
14. 14. Marino, C., Gini, G., Vieno, A., & Spada, M.M. (2018). The associations between problematic facebook use, psychological distress and well-being among adolescents and young adults: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Affective Disorders, 15(226), 274-281. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2017.10.007.
15. 15. Gámez-Guadix, M., & Calvete, E. (2016). Assessing the relationship between mindful awareness and problematic internet use among adolescents. Mindfulness, 7, 1281–1288. DOI 10.1007/s12671-016-0566-0
16. 16. Cigolla, F., & Brown, D. (2011). A way of being: bringing mindfulness into individual therapy. Psychotherapy Research, 21(6), 709-721. DOI: 10.1080/10503307.2011.613076
17. 17. Özyeşil, Z., Arslan C., Kesici Ş. & Deniz M.E. (2011). Adaptation of the mindful attention awareness scale into Turkish. Education and Science, 36(160), 224-235.
18. 18. Sampath, H., Biswas, A. G., Soohinda, G., & Dutta, S. (2019). Mindfulness and its role in psychological well-being among medical college students. Open Journal of Psychiatry & Allied Sciences, 10(1).
19. 19. Chu, S.T.W., & Mak, W.W.S. (2020). How mindfulness enhances meaning in life: a metaanalysis of correlational studies and randomized controlled trials. Mindfulness, 11, 177- 193. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12671-019-01258-9
20. 20. Hofmann, S.G., & Gómez, A.F. (2017). Mindfulness-based interventions for anxiety and depression. Psychiatr Clin North Am., 40(4), 739-749. doi: 10.1016/j.psc.2017.08.008.
21. 21. Crego, A., Yela, J. R., Gómez-Martínez, M. Á., & Karim, A. A. (2020). The contribution of meaningfulness and mindfulness to psychological well-being and mental health: A structural equation model. Journal of Happiness Studies, 21, 2827-2850. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-019-00201-y
22. 22. Lev-On, A. (2017). The third-person effect on Facebook: The significance of perceived proficiency. Telematics and Informatics, 34(4), 252-260. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2016.07.002
23. 23. Bányai, F., Zsila, Á., Király, O., Maraz, A., Elekes, Z., Griffiths, M. D., Andreassen, C. S., & Demetrovics, Z. (2017). Problematic social media use: results from a large-scale nationally representative adolescent sample. PloS one, 12(1), e0169839. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0169839
24. 24. Akar, F. (2016). Purposes and Characteristics of Internet Use of Adolescents’ and A Study of Internet Use Purposes of Adolescents with Various Variables (Example of Yozgat Province). Bozok University International Bozok Symposium, Proceedings Book, Volume 3, 147-165. Yozgat, Turkey
25. 25. Liu, D., Baumeister, FR., Yang, C., & Hu, B. (2019). Digital communication media use and psychological well-being: A meta-analysis. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 24(5), 259-273. https://doi.org/10.1093/jcmc/zmz013
26. 26. Huang, C. (2017). Time spent on social network sites and psychological well-being: A metaanalysis. Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw., 20(6), 346-354. doi: 10.1089/cyber.2016.0758.
27. 27. Poon, KT., & Jiang, Y. (2020). Getting less likes on social media: mindfulness ameliorates the detrimental effects of feeling left out online. Mindfulness, 11, 1038–1048. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12671-020-01313-w
28. 28. Apaolaza, V., Hartmann, P., D'Souza, C., & Gilsanz, A. (2019). Mindfulness, compulsive mobile social media use, and derived stress: the mediating roles of self-esteem and social anxiety. Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw., 22(6), 388-396. doi: 10.1089/cyber.2018.0681.
29. 29. Sriwilai, K., & Charoensukmongkol, P. (2016). Face it, don't facebook it: impacts of social media addiction on mindfulness, coping strategies and the consequence on emotional exhaustion. Stress Health, 32(4), 427-434. doi: 10.1002/smi.2637.
30. 30. Jenkins-Guarnieri, M.A., Wright, S.L., & Johnson, B. (2013). Development and validation of a social media use integration scale. Psychology of Popular Media Culture, 2(1), 38-50. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0030277
31. 31. Akin, A., Özbay, A.,& Baykut, İ. (2015). The validity and reliability of the turkish version of the social media use integration scale. Journal of International Social Research, 8 (38), 647-650.
32. 32. Telef, B.B. (2013). The adaptation of psychological well-being into Turkish: A validity and reliability study. Hacettepe University Faculty of Education Journal, 28(3), 374-384.
33. 33. Brown, K.W., & Ryan, R.M. (2003). The benefits of being present: mindfulness and its role in psychological well-being. Journal of personality and social psychology, 84(4), 822-848. DOI: 10.1037/0022-3514.84.4.822
34. 34. Gürbüz, S., & Şahin, F. (2018). Sosyal Bilimlerde Araştırma Yöntemleri: Felsefe-Yöntem Analiz. (Keşfedici Faktör Analizi ve Güvenirlilik Analiz.) Seçkin Yayıncılık; 322-335.
35. 35. Jöreskog, K., & Sörbom, D. (2004). Scientific software international, Inc. Copyright.
36. 36. Kline, R.B. (2011). Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling. New York: Guilford Press; 154-186
37. 37. Marsh, H.W., Balla, J.R., & McDonald, R.P. (1988). Goodness-of-fit indexes in confirmatory factor analysis: The effect of sample size. Psychological Bulletin, 103 (3), 391-410. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.103.3.391
38. 38. Sun, J. (2005). Assessing goodness of fit in confirmatory factor anaiysis. measurement and evaluation in counseling and deuelopmeni, Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 37(4), 240-256. https://doi.org/10.1080/07481756.2005.11909764
39. 39. Nar, E. (2007). Nobody Understands Me? Everything wondered in the name of youth and adolescent psychology. The 4th edition. Istanbul: Porte Culture Publishing. pp. 15
40. 40. Steyer, J.P. (2014). Raising a child in the age of facebook. A.Birkan (trans.) Istanbul: Doğan Book (original edition 2012).
41. 41. Huang, Y.R. (2006). Identity and intimacy crisis and their relationship to internet dependence among college students. Cyberpsychology Behavior, 9, 571-576. DOI: 10.1089/cpb.2006.9.571
42. 42. Ceyhan, A.A. (2011). Predictors of adolescents’ problematic internet use levels. Journal of Child and Youth Mental Health, 18(2), 85-94.
43. 43. Ngar-sze, L., & Ming-tak, H. (2011). Preliminary outcomes of a mindfulness-based programme for Hong Kong adolescents in schools: well-being, stress and depressive symptoms. International Journal of Children's Spirituality, 16(4), 315-330. https://doi.org/10.1080/1364436X.2011.639747
44. 44. Savcı, M., & Aysan, F. (2017). Technological addictions and social connectedness: predictor effect of internet addiction, social media addiction, digital game addiction and smartphone addiction on social connectedness. Dusunen Adam The Journal of Psychiatry and Neurological Sciences, 30, 202-216. DOI: 10.5350/DAJPN2017300304
45. 45. Cardak, M. (2013). Psychological well-being and internet addiction among university students. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 12(3), 134-141.
46. 46. Mei, S., Yau, Y.H., Chai, J., Guo, J., & Potenza, M.N. (2016). Problematic internet use, wellbeing, self-esteem and self-control: Data from a high-school survey in China. Addictive Behaviors, 61, 74-79. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2016.05.009.