12-18 Yaş Arası Çocuklarda Sorunlu İnternet Kullanımı

Yıl 2019, Cilt: 20 Sayı: 2, 61 - 71, 30.06.2019

Hakkı Polat Bayram Kök Muhammed Refik Tekeli

Öz

Amaç: Bu çalışmanın amacı, 12-18 yaş arası çocuklarda internet bağımlılığı üzerinde etkili olan faktörleri araştırmaktır.

Yöntem: Araştırmanın örneklemini 12-18 yaş arası toplam 1956 çocuk oluşturmaktadır. Bu örneklem için Eskişehir’de 3 ortaokul ve 8 lise rassal olarak seçilmiştir. Çocuklara uygulanan anketler sayesinde, çocukların demografik ve internet bağımlılığı durumları hakkında veriler elde edilmiştir. Toplanan veriler analiz edilerek, çocuklarda mevcut internet bağımlılığı durumu ve bu bağımlılığa etkili faktörler araştırılmıştır.

Bulgular: Çocukların yaklaşık %15’inin internet bağımlısı oldukları ve yine çocukların %30’a yakınının risk grubunda olduğu tespit edilmiştir. Ayrıca çocukların sosyal çevreleri ile olan ilişkileri ve demografik özelliklerinin internet bağımlılığı üzerinde etkili olduğu görülmüştür.

Sonuç: İnternet bağımlısı çocuklarda, sosyal izolasyon ve kontrol güçlüğü gibi konularda problemler olduğu görülmüştür. Ayrıca internet bağımlılığının akademik başarısızlığın sebebi olarak görüldüğü ve sosyal ilişkileri zayıf çocukların internet bağımlısı olma riskinin daha fazla olduğu tespit edilmiştir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Bağımlılık, Sosyal Koşullar, Sosyal Davranış

Problematic Internet Use in Children Between Ages of 12-18

Öz

Objective: The aim of this study is to investigate the factors affecting internet addiction in children aged 12-18 years.

Method: The study sample consisted of a total of 1956 children aged at 12-18 years old. For this sampling, 3 middle school and 8 high school were selected randomly in Eskişehir. There have been obtained data for demographic properties and internet addiction status by the surveys which applied to children. Existing internet addiction status at the children and effective factors on this addiction were researched by the analyzing the collected data. 

Results:  Aapproximately 15% of the children were addicted to internet use, and about 30% of the children were in the risk group. In addition, it was seen that the relationships and demographic characteristics of children with their social environment were effective on internet addiction.

Conclusion: Children with internet addiction have problems in social isolation and control difficulties. However, it was determined that internet addiction is seen as the reason of academic failure and children with low social relations have higher risk of being addicted to internet.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Dependency, Social Conditions, Social Disorder

Kaynakça

• Ak Ş, Koruklu N, Yılmaz Y. A. study on Turkish adolescent's Internet use: possible predictors of Internet addiction. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 2013; 16(3), 205-209.
• Beard Keith W. "Internet Addiction: A Review of Current Assessment Techniques and Potential Assessment Questions". CyberPsychology & Behavior. 2005; 8 (1): 7–14.
• Byun S, Ruffini, C, Mills J. E, Douglas A. C, Niang, M, Stepchenkova, S, ... Blanton, M. Internet addiction: Metasynthesis of 1996–2006 quantitative research. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 2009; 12(2), 203-207.
• Caplan S. E. Problematic Internet use and psychosocial well-being: Development of a theory based cognitivebehavioural measurement instrument. Computers in Human Behavior, 2002; 18, 553–575.
• Caplan S. E. Relations among loneliness, social anxiety, and problematic Internet use. CyberPsychology & behavior, 2006; 10(2), 234-242.
• Chou C, Condron L., Belland J. C. A review of the research on Internet addiction. Educational Psychology Review, 2005; 17(4), 363-388.
• Davis R. A. A cognitive-behavioral model of pathological internet use. Computers in Human Behavior, 2001; 17, 187-195.
• Easterlin R. A. Income and happiness: Towards a unified theory. The economic journal, 2001; 111(473), 465-484.
• Egger, O, Rauterberg, M. Internet Behaviour and Addiction. Work and Organisaitonal Psycology Unit (IfAP), Swiss Fderal Institute of Technology (ETH) Zurich. 1996.Frey B. S. Happiness: A revolution in economics. MIT press. 2008.
• Giddens A. The consequences of modernity. 1990.
• Greenfield D. N. Virtual addiction: Sometimes new technology can create new problems. 1999. Erişim tarihi 20.5.2008, http://www.virtual-addiction.com/pdf/ nature_internet_addiction.pdf.
• Griffiths M. D. Internet Addiction: Fact or Fiction?. The Psychologist, 1999; 12(5), 246-250.
• Günüç S, Kayri, M. Türkiye’de internet bağımlılık profili ve internet bağımlılık ölçeğinin geliştirilmesi: Geçerlik-güvenirlik çalışması. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 2010; 39(39), 220-232.
• Holden C. 'Behavioral'addictions: do they exist?.2001.
• Gonzalez N. A. Internet addiction disorder and its relation to impulse control. Unpublished master’s thesis, 2002; Texas A&M University – Kingsville.
• Kaltiala H. R, Lintonen, T, Rimpela, A. Internet Addiction? Potentially Problematic Use of The Internet in a Population of 12–18 Year-Old Adolescents. Addiction Research and Theory, 2004; 12(1), 89–96.
• Kim, S, Kim, R. A Study of Internet Addiction: Status, Causes, and Remedies- Focusing on the alienation factor - International Journal of Human Ecology, 2002; 3(1), 1-19.
• Kiralla L. V. Internet addiction disorder: A descriptive study of college counselors in four-year institutions. Unpublished doctorate’s thesis, Department of Organizational Leadership, University of La Verne, 2005.
• Nestler E. J. Cellular basis of memory for addiction. Dialogues in clinical neuroscience, 2013; 15(4), 431.
• Ritter C, Hobfoll S. E, Lavin J, Cameron, R. P, Hulsizer, M. R. Stress, psychosocial resources, and depressive symptomatology during pregnancy in low-income, inner-city women. Health Psychology, 2000; 19(6), 576.
• Robertson R. Globalization: Social theory and global culture (Vol. 16). 1992; Sage.
• Ruffle J. K. Molecular neurobiology of addiction: what’s all the (Δ) FosB about?. The American journal of drug and alcohol abuse, 2014; 40(6), 428-437.
• Selfhout M. H, Branje, S. J, Delsing M., ter Bogt T. F, Meeus, W. H. Different types of Internet use, depression, and social anxiety: The role of perceived friendship quality. Journal of adolescence, 2009; 32(4), 819-833.
• Soule L. C, Shell L. W, Kleen B. A. Exploring Internet addiction: Demographic characteristics and stereotypes of heavy Internet users. Journal of Computer Information Systems, 2003; 44(1), 64-73.
• Taylor S. B, Lewis, C. R, Olive M. F. The neurocircuitry of illicit psychostimulant addiction: acute and chronic effects in humans. Substance abuse and rehabilitation, 2013; 4, 29.
• Türel Y. K, Toraman M. The relationship between Internet addiction and academic success of secondary school students. Anthropologist, 2015; 20(1), 2.
• Tvedt H. Internet Use and Related Factors Among Fifth-Graders. Unpublished master’s thesis, 2007; Umeå University, Department of Psychology
• Yang C. K, Choe B. M, Baity, M. SCL-90-R and 16PF Profiles of Senior High School Students With Excessive Internet Use. Canadian Journal of Psychiatry, 2005; 50(7), 407.
• Yellowlees P, Marks S. Problematic Internet use or Internet addiction?. Computers in Human Behaviour, 2007; 23.
• Young K. S, Case C. J. Internet Abuse in the Workplace: New Trends in Risk Management. Cyberpsychology & Behavior, 2004; 7(1). 105-111.