Mandarin (Citrus spp.) Çeşitlerinin Kâğıt Kromatografi Tekniği İle Tanımlanması Üzerinde Araştırmaları

Öz

Citrus cinsi, evriminde en yüksek düzeyine ulaşmış bulunmaktadır. Gerek bu cinse giren türler, gerekse akraba cinsler arasındaki hibritlerin aseksüel üretim yollarıyla stabilize oluşları, taksonomik sorunlar doğurmuştur. Bu sorunu çözmek için klâsik taksonomik karakterler yanında, kimyasal karakterler de kullanılmaktadır. Bu araştırmada yaprak fenolik bileşikleri kâğıt kromatografi yoluyla belirlenmiş; çeşitli ayıraçlar, UV ve spektroskopi yardımıyla da sınıflandırılmışlardır. Özgün spotların ele alınan Rize, Satsuma owari, Yerli, Wilking, Kinnow, Klemantin, Ponkan, Fremont, Fortune ve Fairchild varyetelerindeki varlığı bilgisayarla değerlendirilerek varyeteler arası ilişkiler dendogram olarak saptanmıştır. Dendogram, üç farklı grubun birbirine farklı düzeylerde bağlandığını göstermiştir. Araştırma, fenolik bileşiklerin sınıflandırma amacıyla çeşit düzeyinde kullanılabileceğini göstermektedir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Mandarin
• Citrus spp.
• Kâğıt Kromatografi Tekniği

The Recognition of Mandarin (Citrus spp.) Cultivars by Paper Chromatography

Öz

The genus Citrus reached its peak of progressive evolution after a very long period. The taxonomic problem of this genus is complicated by the broad inter fertility, not only of intrageneric hybrids, but also intergeneric hybrids and a long period of natural hybridization. To solve this complication, chemical characters have been used with together botanical ones in taxonomical studies. In this study, ten different mandarin cultivars, Rize, Satsuma Owari, Yerli, Wilking, Kinnow, Klemantin, Ponkan, Frement, Fairchild and Fortune, were screened for their leaf phenolic patterns with the help of paper chromatography. The dendrogram showed three distinct groups of cultivars, linked with each other at different levels. In contrast to other chemical characters of which most art used at the species level; phenolic compounds can be used at the varietal level for classification.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Mandarin
• Citrus spp.
• Paper Chromatography Technique

Kaynakça

1. Albach, R.F., G.H. Redman, 1969. Compotation and inheritance of flavanones in citrus fruits. Photochemistry, 8:127-143.
2. Barrett, H.C., A. M. Rhodes, 1976. A numerical taxonomy study of affinity relationships in cultivated Citrus and its close relatives. Systematic Botany, 1(2):105-136.
3. Button, J., A. Vardi, P. Spigel-Roy, 1976. Root peroxidase isoenzymes as an aid in Citrus breeding and taxonomy. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 47:119-123.
4. Cameron, J.W., H.B. Frost, 1968. Citrus Breeding. Citrus Industry (Eds. H.J. Webber, W. Reuther and L.D. Batchelor) Vol.2. Univ. of Calif. Press,
5. Dass, H.C., G.M. Weaver, 1972. Cellulose thin-layer chromatography of phenolic substances. J. Chrom. 67:105-111.
6. Dass, H.C., G.S. Randhawa, M. Kaur, 1974. Usefulness of leaf phenolic in Citrus taxonomy. Proceedings of the 19. Int. Hort. Congr. Sect. 1.A Varşova. pp:18.
7. Esen, A., G. Geraci, 1976. Distribution of coagulation of young shoot homogenates in the Aurantioideae. Amer. J. Bot. 63(3):329-334.
8. Furr, J.R., P.C. Reece, 1946. Identification of hybrid and nucellar Citrus seedlings by a modification of the rootstock color test. Proc. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 46:141-146.

9. Giacometti, D.C., 1957. Distinction between five types of rough lemon. Revista Ceres, Brazil. 10:111-118.
10. Gross, J., M. Gabai, A. Lifshitz, 1972. A comparative study of carotenoid pigments in juice of shamouti, Valencia and Washington oranges, three varieties of C.sinensis. Photochemistry, 11:303-308.
11. Halma, F.F., A.R.C. Haas, 1929. Identification of certain species of Citrus by colorimetric test. Plant Physiol 4:265-268.
12. Harborne, J.B., 1973. Phytochemical methods. Chapman and Hall. London.
13. Hendrickson, H.C., 1928. Identification of Citrus budding stock. Puerto Rican method for testing root system. Florida Grower. 36:14-15.
14. Hodgson, R.W., 1961 Proceedings of the 2. conf. of int. org. of Citrus Virologist (Ed. W.C. Price). Unique. of Florida Press, pp:1-7.
15. Horowitz, R.M., 1961. Studies on the structures and bitterness of the flavonoid glycosides of Citrus. Symposium on biochemistry on plant phenolic substances (Ed. C.Johnson, T.A. Giesmann. pp:1-8).
16. Hooker, J.D., 1875. Flora of British India. Reeves and Co., London. Rutaceae 1:484-617.
17. Kamiyama, S., M. Amaha, 1972. Studies of the leaf oils of Citrus spedes Butt. Brew. Sci. 18:17-27.
18. Linneaus, C., 1753. Spedes Plantarum.
19. Mabry, T.J., K.R. Markham, N.B. Thomas, 1970. The systematic identification of flavonoids. Springer-Verlag. Berlin.
20. Malik, M.N., 1973. A new concept in Citrus classification. Pakistan J. of Sci. Res. 25:268-271.
21. Magy, S., H.E. Nordby, 1972. Saturated and mono saturated long chain, hydrocarbon profiles from orange, grapefruit, mandarin and lemon juice sacs. Lipids, 7:666-675.
22. Nishiura, M., S. Esaki, S. Kamiya, F. Ito, 1971. Flavonoids in Citrus and related genera. Part 2. Agr. Biol Chem. 35:1683-1690.
23. Nordby, H.E., S. Nagy, 1969. Fatty adds profiles of Citrus and seed lipids. Photochemistry 8:2027-2038.
24. Nordby, H.E., S. Nagy, 1974. Fatty adds composition of sterol esters from C.sinensis, C.paradisi, C.limon, C.aurantifolia and C.limettioides sacs Photochemistry 13: 443-452.
25. Nordby, H.E., S. Nagy, J.M. Smoot, 1979. Selected leaf wax alkanes in chemotaxonomy of Citrus. J. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 104(1):3-8.
26. Scora, R.W., M.N. Malik, 1970. Chemical characterization of Citrus as a tool in phylogeny. Taxon, 19(2):215-228.
27. Selle, R.N., 1958. Spot chromatography identification of Citrus rootstock. Nature 181:506-607.
28. Singh, D., C.A Schroeder, 1962. Taxonomic and physiological relationships of the so-called mandarin-lime group of Citrus. Proc. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 80:291-295.
29. Sokal, R.R., P.H.A. Sneath, 1963. Principles of Numerical Taxonomy. W.H. Freeman, San Francisco.
30. Stanley, W.L., L. Jurd, 1971. Citrus coumarins. J. Agr. Food Chem. 19:1106-1110.
31. Swain, T. (Ed.), 1963. Chemical plant taxonomy. Academic Press. New York.
32. Swingle, W.T., 1943. The botany of Citrus and its wild relatives of the orange subfamily (The Citrus Industry). Eds. (H.J. Webber and L.D. Batchelor) Cilt:1, 129-174. Univ. of Calif. Press. USA.
33. Tanaka, T., 1954. Species problem in Citrus (Revised Aurantiacearum IX) Jap. Soc. Promotion of Sc., Ueno, Tokyo. pp:152.
34. Tanaka, T., 1961. Citrologia semi centennial commemoration papers on Citrus studies. Osaka Univ. 114p.
35. Ueno, I., M. Nishura, M. Iwamasa, 1972. The use of PC identifying Citrus species and their hybrids. Bull of the Hort. Res. St. B. (Okifsu) Japan, 12:15-29.
36. Wolfe, H.S., 1959. Some problems in Citrus nomenclature. Proc. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. Caribbean Region. 7:18-21.