Model Predictive Control of an Indirect Matrix Converter with Active Damping Capability

Öz

In this paper, a model predictive control (MPC) scheme is proposed to control indirect matrix converter (IMC), which is used for three phase-to-three phase direct power conversion. IMC is composed of back-to-back connected conventional current source rectifier (CSR) and voltage source inverter (VSI) without any intermediate energy storage component between them. The aim in the control of CSR side is generally to have unity power factor with relatively low total harmonic distortion (THD) and the aim in the control of VSI side is to be able to synthesize sinusoidal load currents with desired peak value and frequency. Imposed source current MPC technique in abc frame is used for the rectifier side and cost function evaluation process calculates three-phase supply current errors respect to its reference. Supply currents for next sampling interval are predicted using the discrete form of input filter model. The peak value of sinusoidal supply current reference is generated from the error in load current space vector using a PI compensator. This generated reference is synchronized with supply voltage by the multiplication of Proportional-Integral (PI) compensator output value and instantaneous three-phase supply voltage. An active damping technique, which does not require to select an optimum value for fictitious damping resistor, is also included in the proposed control scheme in order to mitigate the resonance phenomenon of lightly damped input LC filter to suppress the higher order harmonics in supply currents. Load currents with desired peak and frequency are also obtained by imposing sinusoidal currents in abc frame. The cost function for VSI stage evaluates output load current error. Load current predictions are obtained by using the discrete form of load model. These two cost functions are combined into a single cost function without any weighting factor since both error terms are in the same nature. The switching state that minimizes this pre-defined cost function among the 24-valid switching combinations of IMC is selected and applied to converter. The proposed model predictive control with active damping method shows good performance in terms of THD levels in supply currents even at low current demands from supply side. The proposed model predictive control method combined with active damping strategy guarantees unity power factor operation and draws sinusoidal load currents at desired peak and frequency.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Indirect matrix converter,ac-ac power conversion,model predictive control,active damping

Kaynakça

1. J. W. Kolar, M. Baumann, F. Schafmeister, and H. Ertl, “Novel three-phase AC-DC-AC sparse matrix converter,” pp. 777–791, 2003.
2. M. Rivera, L. Tarisciotti, P. Wheeler, and P. Zanchetta, “Predictive control of an indirect matrix converter operating at fixed switching frequency and without weighting factors,” IEEE Int. Symp. Ind. Electron., vol. 2015-Septe, pp. 1027–1033, 2015.
3. K. Iimori, K. Shinohara, O. Tarumi, Zixum Fu, and M. Muroya, “New current-controlled PWM rectifier-voltage source inverter without DC link components,” pp. 783–786, 2002.
4. C. Klumpner, F. Blaabjerg, I. Boldea, and P. Nielsen, “New modulation method for matrix converters,” IEEE Trans. Ind. Appl., vol. 42, no. 3, pp. 797–806, 2006.
5. L. Helle, K. B. Larsen, A. H. Jorgensen, S. Munk-Nielsen, and F. Blaabjerg, “Evaluation of Modulation Schemes for Three-Phase to Three-Phase Matrix Converters,” IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron., vol. 51, no. 1, pp. 158–171, 2004.
6. J. Rodriguez, M. Rivera, J. W. Kolar, and P. W. Wheeler, “A review of control and modulation methods for matrix converters,” IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron., vol. 59, no. 1, pp. 58–70, 2012.
7. J. W. Kolar, F. Schafmeister, S. D. Round, and H. Ertl, “Novel three-Phase AC-AC sparse matrix converters,” IEEE Trans. Power Electron., vol. 22, no. 5, pp. 1649–1661, 2007.
8. S. Vazquez, J. Rodriguez, M. Rivera, L. G. Franquelo, and M. Norambuena, “Model Predictive Control for Power Converters and Drives: Advances and Trends,” IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron., vol. 64, no. 2, pp. 935–947, 2017.

9. J. Lei et al., “Predictive Power Control of Matrix Converter with Active Damping Function,” IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron., vol. 63, no. 7, pp. 4550–4559, 2016.
10. M. Rivera, P. Correa, J. Rodríguez, I. Lizama, and J. Espinoza, “Predictive control of the indirect matrix converter with active damping,” 2009 IEEE 6th Int. Power Electron. Motion Control Conf. IPEMC ’09, pp. 1738–1744, 2009.
11. J. Rodriguez, J. Kolar, J. Espinoza, M. Rivera, and C. Rojas, “Predictive current control with reactive power minimization in an indirect matrix converter,” Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. Ind. Technol., pp. 1839–1844, 2010.
12. P. Correa, J. Rodríguez, M. Rivera, J. R. Espinozav, and J. W. Kolar, “Predictive control of an indirect matrix converter,” IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron., vol. 56, no. 6, pp. 1847–1853, 2009.
13. C. F. Garcia, M. E. Rivera, J. R. Rodriguez, P. W. Wheeler, and R. S. Pena, “Predictive Current Control with Instantaneous Reactive Power Minimization for a Four-Leg Indirect Matrix Converter,” IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron., vol. 64, no. 2, pp. 922–929, 2017.
14. R. Vargas, U. Ammann, and J. Rodríguez, “Predictive approach to increase efficiency and reduce switching losses on matrix converters,” IEEE Trans. Power Electron., vol. 24, no. 4, pp. 894–902, 2009.
15. M. Siami, D. Arab Khaburi, and J. Rodriguez, “Simplified Finite Control Set-Model Predictive Control for Matrix Converter-Fed PMSM Drives,” IEEE Trans. Power Electron., vol. 33, no. 3, pp. 2438–2446, Mar. 2018.
16. P. Zavala et al., “Predictive control of a current source rectifier with imposed sinusoidal input currents,” IECON Proc. (Industrial Electron. Conf., pp. 5842–5847, 2013.
17. M. Rivera, L. Tarisciotti, and P. Wheeler, “Indirect model predictive control with imposed sinusoidal source currents for a Direct Matrix Converter Working at fixed switching frequency,” Proc. - 2017 IEEE South. Power Electron. Conf. SPEC 2017, vol. 2018-Janua, pp. 1–6, 2018.
18. M. Gokdag and O. Gulbudak, “Model predictive control of AC-DC matrix converter with unity input power factor,” Proc. - 2018 IEEE 12th Int. Conf. Compat. Power Electron. Power Eng. CPE-POWERENG 2018, pp. 1–5, 2018.
19. M. Rivera, C. Uribe, L. Tarisciotti, P. Wheeler, and P. Zanchetta, “Predictive control of an indirect matrix converter operating at fixed switching frequency and unbalanced AC-supply,” Proc. - 2015 IEEE Int. Symp. Predict. Control Electr. Drives Power Electron. Preced. 2015, pp. 38–43, 2016.
20. M. Rivera, L. Tarisciotti, P. Wheeler, and P. Zanchetta, “Predictive control of an indirect matrix converter operating at fixed switching frequency,” Int. Conf. Power Eng. Energy Electr. Drives, vol. 2015-Septe, pp. 635–640, 2015.
21. M. Rivera, M. Amirbande, A. Vahedi, L. Tarisciotti, and P. Wheeler, “Predictive control strategies operating at fixed switching frequency for input filter resonance mitigation in an indirect matrix converter,” Proc. - 2017 IEEE South. Power Electron. Conf. SPEC 2017, vol. 2018-Janua, pp. 1–6, 2018.
22. P. Cortés, J. Rodríguez, P. Antoniewicz, and M. Kazmierkowski, “Direct power control of an AFE using predictive control,” IEEE Trans. Power Electron., vol. 23, no. 5, pp. 2516–2523, 2008.
23. M. Gokdag and O. Gulbudak, “Model Predictive Control for Battery Charger Applications with Active Damping,” in 2019 1st Global Power, Energy and Communication Conference (GPECOM), 2019, pp. 140–145.
24. S. Vazquez, A. Marquez, R. Aguilera, D. Quevedo, J. I. Leon, and L. G. Franquelo, “Predictive Optimal Switching Sequence Direct Power Control for Grid-Connected Power Converters,” IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron., vol. 62, no. 4, pp. 2010–2020, 2015.