ÜÇLÜ VE DÖRTLÜ SARMAL MODELİN BEŞLİ SARMAL MODELE EVRİLMESİ: BİR BİBLİYOMETRİK ANALİZ

Öz

Ulusal İnovasyon Sistemlerinin çevresel ve toplumsal farkındalıkla bütünleştirilmesinin önemini vurgulayan Beşli Sarmal Model, literatürde yeni bir kavramdır. Beşli Sarmal Model, üniversite-sanayi-devlet üçgeni arasında sinerjik bir ilişki kurmanın önemini ifade eden Üçlü Sarmal Model ve bu modele toplum unsurunun dahil edilmesiyle geliştirilen Dörtlü Sarmal Modelin ardından geliştirilen bir inovasyon modeli olmaktadır. Bu sarmalın her yönü, sürdürülebilir rekabet avantajı sağlamak ve ülkelerin ekonomik kalkınması açısından kritik öneme sahiptir. Ayrıca bu model, çevresel faktörler ve yaratıcılık arasında derin bağlantılar kurarak, disiplinler arası analiz, problem çözme ve karar verme becerileriyle de yakın bir ilişki içerisinde olmaktadır. Bu araştırmanın amacı, Beşli Sarmal Modelin oluşumdan geliştirilmesine kadar geçen süreci inceleyerek, konuya ilişkin bilgi sağlamak ve daha sonra bu model üzerine yapılan çalışmaları bibliyometrik analiz yöntemiyle analiz etmektir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• İnovasyon
• Üçlü Sarmal Model
• Dörtlü Sarmal Model
• Beşli Sarmal Model
• Bibliyometrik Analiz

EVOLUTION OF TRIPLE AND QUADRUPLE HELIX MODEL TO QUINTUPLE HELIX MODEL: A BIBLIOMETRIC ANALYSIS

Öz

The Quintuple Helix Model, which emphasises the significance of integrating National Innovation Systems with environmental and social awareness, is a novel concept in the literature. The Quintuple Helix Model is an innovation model that was developed after the Triple Helix Model, which expresses the importance of establishing a synergetic relationship between the university-industry-goverment triangle, and the Quadruple Helix Model, which was developed by including the element of society. Every aspect of this helix is critical to providing a sustainable competitive advantage and to the economic development of countries. Furthermore, by creating strong links between environmental factors and creativity, this model has a close relationship with multidisciplinary analysis, problem solving, and decision making abilities. The purpose of this research is to provide a knowledge of the topic by examining the process from the formation of the Quintuple Helix Model through its development, and then to analyse studies on this model using the bibliometric analysis approach.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Innovation
• Triple Helix Model
• Quadruple Helix Model
• Quintuple Helix Model
• Bibliometric Analysis

Kaynakça

1. Akerson, V. L., Burgess, A., Gerber, A., Guo, M., Khan, T. A., & Newman, S. (2018). Disentangling the meaning of STEM: Implications for science education and science teacher education. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 29(1), 1-8.
2. Afonso, O., Monteiro, S., & Thompson, M. (2012). A growth model for the quadruple helix. Journal of Business Economics and Management, 13(5), 849-865.
3. Afzal, M. N. I., Sulong, R. S., Dutta, S., & Mansur, K. (2018). An investigation on triple helix model and national innovation systems: The case of malaysia. Asian Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, 3(3), 299-313.
4. Arranz, N., Arroyabe, M. F., & Schumann, M. (2020). The role of NPOs and international actors in the national innovation system: A network-based approach. Technological Forecasting & Social Change, 159, 1-15.
5. Artsın, M. (2020). Bir metin madenciliği uygulaması: Vosviewer. Eskişehir Teknik Üniversitesi Bilim ve Teknoloji Dergisi B-Teorik Bilimler, 8(2), 344-354.
6. Barcellos-Paula, L., De La Vela, I., & Gil-Lafuente, A. M. (2021). The quintuple helix of innovation model and the SDGs: Latin-American countries’ case and its forgotten effects. Mathematics, 9(4), 416-438.
7. Bartoloni, S., Calò, E., Marinelli, L., Pascucci, F., Dezi, L., Carayannis, E., Revel, G. M., & Gregori, G. L. (2022). Towards designing society 5.0 solutions: The new quintuple helix-design thinking approach to technology. Technovation, 113, 102413, 1-14.
8. Bellandi, M., Donati, L., & Cataneo, A. (2021). Social innovation governance and the role of universities: Cases of quadruple helix partnerships in Italy. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 164, 120518.

9. Bustard, J. R., Hsu, D. H., & Fergie, R. (2022). Design thinking innovation within the quadruple helix approach: a proposed framework to enhance student engagement through active learning in digital marketing pedagogy. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 1-16.
10. Carayannis, E. G., & Campbell, D. F. (2009). ’Mode 3’ and ‘quadruple helix’: Toward a 21st century fractal innovation ecosystem. International Journal of Technology Management, 46(3-4), 201-234.
11. Carayannis, E. G., & Campbell, D. F. (2010). Triple helix, quadruple helix and quintuple helix and how do knowledge, innovation and the environment relate to each other? A proposed framework for a transdisciplinary analysis of sustainable development and social ecology. International Journal of Social Ecology and Sustainable Development, 1(1), 41-69.
12. Carayannis, E. G., & Campbell, D. F. (2011). Open innovation diplomacy and a 21st century fractal research, education, and innovation (FREIE) ecosystem: Building on the quadruple and quintuple helix innovation concepts and the “mode 3” knowledge production system. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 2(3), 327-372. Carayannis, E. G., & Campbell, D. F. (2012). Mode 3 knowledge production in quadruple helix innovation systems. Springer, NY, 1-63.
13. Carayannis, E. G., & Campbell, D. F. (2015). Art and artistic research in quadruple and quintuple helix innovation systems. Arts, Research, Innovation and Society, 29-51.
14. Carayannis, E. G., & Campbell, D. F. (2019). Conclusion: Smart quintuple helix innovation systems. Springer, 51-54. Carayannis, E. G., & Campbell, D. F. (2019). Mode 1, mode 2 and mode 3: Triple helix and quadruple helix. Springer, 17-30.
15. Carayannis, E. G., & Campbell, D. F. (2021). Democracy of climate and climate for democracy: The evolution of quadruple and quintuple helix innovation systems. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 12(4), 2050-2082.
16. Carayannis, E. G., & Campbell, D. F. (2022). Towards an emerging unified theory of helix architectures (EUTOHA): Focus on the quintuple helix innovation framework as the integrative device. Triple Helix, 9, 65-75.
17. Carayannis, E. G., & Rakhmatullin, R. (2014). The quadruple/quintuple innovation helixes and smart specialisation strategies for sustainable and inclusive growth in europe and beyond. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 5(2), 212-239.
18. Carayannis, E. G., Barth, T. D., & Campbell, D. F. (2012). The quintuple helix innovation model: Global warming as a challenge and driver for innovation. Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, 1(1), 1-12.
19. Carayannis, E. G., Campbell, D. F., & Grigoroudis, E. (2022). Helix trilogy: The triple, quadruple and quintuple innovation helices from a theory, policy and practice set of perspectives. Journal of Knowledge Economy, 13(3), 2272-2301.
20. Carayannis, E. G., Cherepovitsyn, A. E., & Ilinova, A. A. (2017). Sustainable development of the Russian arctic zone energy shelf: The role of the quintuple innovation helix model. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 8(2), 456-470.
21. Carayannis, E. G., Dezi, L., Gregori, G., & Calo, E. (2021). Smart enviroments and techno-centric and human-centric innovations for industry and society 5.0: A quintuple helix innovation system view towards smart, sustainable and inclusive solutions. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 1-30.
22. Carayannis, E. G., Grigoroudis, E., Campbell, D. F., Meissner, D., & Stamati, D. (2018). The ecosystem as helix: An exploratory theory-building study of regional co-opetitive entrepreneurial ecosystems as quadruple/quintuple helix innovation models. R&D Management, 48(1), 148-162.
23. Chung, S. (2002). Building a national innovation system through regional innovation systems. Technovation, 22(8), 485-491.
24. Demirel, E. (2022). Dinamik yetenekler yaklaşımının görsel haritalama tekniğine göre bibliyometrik analizi. Uluslararası Yönetim, İktisat ve İşletme Dergisi, 18(1), 102-125.
25. Dudin, M., Frolova, E., Gryzunova, N., & Shuvalova, E. (2015). The triple helix model as a mechanism for partnership between the state, business, and the scientific-educational community in the area of organizing national innovational development. Asian Social Science, 1(1), 230-238.
26. Duran-Romero, G., Lopez, A. M., Beliaeva, T., Ferasso, M., Garonne, C., & Jones, P. (2020). Bridging the gap between circular economy and climate change mitigation policies through eco-innovation and quintuple helix model. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 160, 120246.
27. Dziallas, M., & Blind, K. (2019). Innovation indicators throughout the innovation process: An extensive literature analyses. Technovation, 80-81, 3-29.
28. Dzisah, J., & Etzkowitz, H. (2008). Triple helix circulation: The heart of innovation and development. International Journal of Technology Management & Sustainable Development, 7(2), 101-115.
29. Etzkowitz, H. (2003). Innovation in innovation: The triple helix of university-industry-government relation. Social Science Information, 42(3), 293-337.
30. Etzkowitz, H., & Carvalho de Mello, J. M. (2004). The rise of a triple helix culture: Innovation in Brazilian economic and social development. International Journal of Technology Management & Sustainable Development, 2(3), 159-171.
31. Etzkowitz, H., & Klofsten, M. (2005). The innovating region: Toward a theory of knowledge-based regional development. R&D Management, 35(3), 243-255.
32. Etzkowitz, H., & Leydesdorff, L. (2000). The dynamics of innovation: From national systems and “mode 2” to a triple helix of university-industry-goverment relations. Research Policy, 29(2), 109-123.
33. Etzkowitz, H., Webster, A., Gebhardt, C., & Terra, B. R. C. (2000). The future of the university and university of the future: Evolution of ivory Tower to entrepreneurial paradigm. Research Policy, 29(2), 313-330.
34. Fagerberg, J., & Srholec, M. (2008). National innovation system, capabilities and economic development. Research Policy, 37(9), 1417-1435.
35. Fagerberg, J., Mowery, D. C., & Verspagen, B. (2009). The evolution on Norway’s national innovation system. Science and Public Policy, 36(6), 431-444.
36. Feola, R., Vesci, M., Botti, A., & Parente, R. (2019). The determinants of entrepreneurial intention of young researchers: Combining the theory of planned behaviour with the triple helix model. Journal of Small Business Management, 57(4), 1424-1443.
37. Ferreira, V., & Lisboa, A. (2019). Innovation and entrepreneurship: From Schumpeter to industry 4.0. In Applied Mechanics and Materials, 890, 174-180.
38. Fini, R., Grimaldi, R., Santoni, S., & Sobrero, M. (2011). Complements or subtitutes? The role of universities and local context in supporting the creation of academic spin-offs. Research Policy, 40(8), 1113-1127.
39. Flynn, M., Dooley, L., O’Sullivan, D., & Cormican, K. (2003). Idea management for organizational innovation. International Journal of Innovation Management, 7(4), 417-442.
40. Galvao, A., Mascarenhas, C., Marques, C., Ferreira, J., & Ratten, V. (2019). Triple helix and its evolution: A systematic literature review. Journal of Science and Technology Policy Management, 10(3), 812-833.
41. Ganzer, P. P., Chais, C., & Olea, P. M. (2017). Product, process, marketing and organizational innovation in industries of the flat knitting sector. RAI Revista de Administração e Inovação, 14(4), 321-332.
42. García-González, A., & Ramírez-Montoya, M. S. (2019). Higher education for social entrepreneurship in the quadruple helix framework: co-construction in open innovation. In Proceedings of the Seventh International Conference on Technological Ecosystems for Enhancing Multiculturality, 925-929.
43. Godin, B. (2009). National innovation system: The system approach in historical perspective. Science, Technology & Human Values, 34(4), 476-501.
44. Gregersen, B., & Johnson, B. (1997). Learning economies, innovation systems and european integration. Regional Studies, 31(5), 479-490.
45. Harwiki, W., & Malet, C. (2020). Quintuple helix and innovation on performance SMEs within ability of SMEs as a mediator variable: A comparative study of creative industry in Indonesia and Spain. Management Science Letters, 10(6), 1389-1400.
46. Herliana, S. (2015). Regional innovation cluster for small and medium enterprises (SME): A triple helix concept. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 169, 151-160.
47. Hoarau, H., & Kline, C. (2014). Science and industry: Sharing knowledge for innovation. Annals of Tourism Research, 46, 44-61.
48. Işık, C., & Keskin, G. (2013). Bilgi ekonomilerinde rekabet üstünlüğü oluşturulması açısından inovasyonun önemi. Atatürk Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi, 27(1), 41-57.
49. Keskin, H., & Ovalı, E. (2022). Dörtlü ve beşli sarmal üniversite-sanayi iş birliği modelleri. Business & Management Studies: An International Journal, 10(1), 447-461.
50. Kholiavko, N., Grosu, V., Safonov, Y., Zhavoronok, A., & Cosmulese, C. G. (2021). Quintuple helix model: Investment aspects of higher education impact on sustainability. Management Theory and Studies for Rural Business and Infrastructure Development, 43(1), 111-128.
51. Knight, K. E. (1967). A descriptive model of the intra-firm innovation process. The Journal of Business, 40(4), 478-496.
52. König, J., Suwala, L., & Delargy, C. (2021). Helix models of innovation and sustainable development. Springer International Publishing, 473-487.
53. Leydesdorff, L. (2010). The knowledge-based economy and the triple helix model. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 44, 367-417.
54. Leydesdorff, L. (2012). The triple helix, quadruple helix, …, and an n-tuple of helices: Explanatory models for analyzing of knowledge-based economy? Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 3(1), 25-35.
55. Leydesdorff, L., & Etzkowitz, H. (1998). The triple helix as a model for innovation studies. Science and Public Policy, 25(3), 195-203.
56. Leydesdorff, L., & Ivanova, I. (2016). “Open innovation” and “triple helix” models of innovation: Can synergy in innovation systems be measured. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market and Complexity, 2(1), 1-12.
57. Lindberg, M., Danilda, I., & Torstensson, B. M. (2012). Women resource centre-a creative knowledge enviroment of quadruple helix. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 3(1), 36-52.
58. Liyanage, S. I. H., & Netswera, F. G. (2021). Greening universities with mode 3 and quintuple helix model of innovation-production of knowledge and innovation in knowledge-based economy, Botswana. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 13(2), 1126-1156.
59. Lundvall, B. A. (2007). National innovation systems-analytical concept and development tool. Industry and Innovation, 14(1), 95-119.
60. Maruccia, Y., Solazzo, G., Vecchio, P. D., & Passiante, G. (2020). Evidence from network analysis application to innovation system and quintuple helix. Technological Forecasting & Social Change, 161, 1-14.
61. Morawska-Jancelewicz, J. (2022). The role of universities in social innovation within quadruple/quintuple helix model: Practical implications from Polish experience. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 13(3), 2230-2271.
62. Muritala, B. A., Sanchez-Rebull, M. V., & Hernandez-Lara, A. B. (2020). A bibliometric analysis of online reviews research in tourism and hospitality. Sustainability, 12(23), 9977.
63. Neely, A., & Hii, J. (1998). Innovation and business performance: A literature review. The Judge Institute of Management Studies, University of Cambridge, 1-57.
64. Nonaka, I. (1994). A dynamic theory of organizational knowledge creation. Organization Science, 5(1), 14-37.
65. Nordberg, K. (2015). Enabling regional growth in peripheral non-university regions: The impact of a quadruple helix intermediate organization. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 6, 334-356.
66. Nordberg, K., Mariussen, Å., & Virkkala, S. (2020). Community-driven social innovation and quadruple helix coordination in rural development. Case study on LEADER group Aktion Österbotten. Journal of Rural Studies, 79, 157-168.
67. Olavarrieta, S., & Villena, M. G. (2014). Innovation and business research in Latin America: An overview. Journal of Business Research, 67(4), 489-497.
68. Önel, B. (2021). İşletmelerin yeşil yönetim algıları ve sürdürülebilirlik bilinci. Uluslararası Afro-Avrasya Araştırmaları Dergisi, 6(11), 21-33.
69. Park, H. W. (2014). Transition from the triple helix to n-tuple helices? An interview with Elias G. Carayannis and David F. J. Campbell. Scientometrics, 99(1), 203-207.
70. Park, H. W., & Leydesdorff, L. (2010). Longitudinal trends in networks of university-industry-goverment relations in South Korea: The role of programmatic incentives. Research Policy, 39(5), 640-649.
71. Popadiuk, S., & Choo, C. W. (2006). Innovation and knowledge creation: How are these concepts related? International Journal of Information Management, 26(4), 302-312.
72. Provenzano, V., Arnone, M., & Seminara, M. R. (2016). Innovation in the rural areas and the linkage with the quintuple helix model. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 223, 442-447.
73. Quacoe, D., Kong, Y., & Quacoe, D. (2023). Analysis of How Green Growth and Entrepreneurship Affect Sustainable Development: Application of the Quintuple Helix Innovation Model in the African Context. Sustainability, 15(2), 907.
74. Quintane, E., Casselman, R. M., Reiche, B. S., & Nylund, P. A. (2011). Innovation as a knowledge-based outcome. Journal of Knowledge Management, 1-36.
75. Razak, A. A., & White, G. R. (2015). The triple helix model for innovation: A holistic exploration of barriers and enablers. International Journal of Business Performance and Supply Chain Modelling, 7(3), 278-291.
76. Safiullin, L. N., Fatkhiev, A. M., & Grigorian, K. A. (2014). The triple helix model of innovation. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 5(18), 203-205.
77. Sarpong, D., AbdRazak, A., Alexander, E., & Meissner, D. (2017). Organizing practices of university, industry and government that facilitate (or impede) the transition to a hybrid triple helix model of innovation. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 123, 142-152.
78. Schartinger, D., Schibany, A., & Gassler, H. (2001). Interactive relations between universities and firms: Empirical evidence for Austria. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 26(3), 255-268.
79. Sheng, M. L., & Chien, I. (2016). Rethinking organizational learning orientation on radical and incremental innovation in high-tech firm. Journal of Business Research, 69(6), 2302-2308.
80. Shinn, T. (1999). Change or mutation? Reflections on the foundations of contemporary science. Social Science Information, 38(1), 149-176.
81. Tavassoli, S., & Karlsson, C. (2015). Persistence of various types of innovation analyzed and explained. Research Policy, 44(10), 1887-1901.
82. Varis, M., & Littunen, H. (2010). Types of innovation, sources of information and performance in entrepreneurial SMEs. European Journal of Innovation Management, 13(2), 128-154.
83. Visnjic, I., Wiengarten, F., & Neely, A. (2016). Only the brave: Product innovation, service business model innovation and their impact on performance. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 33(1), 36-52.
84. Yoda, N., & Kuwashima, K. (2020). Triple helix of university-industry-goverment relations in Japan: Transitions of collaborations and interactions. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 11(3), 1120-1144.
85. Yun, J. J., & Liu, Z. (2019). Micro-and macro- dynamics of open innovation with a quadruple-helix model. Sustainability, 11(12), 1-17.
86. Zheng, P., & Harris, M. (2007). The university in the knowledge economy: The triple helix model and its implications. Industry and Higher Education, 21(4), 253-263.
87. Zhou, C., & Etzkowitz, H. (2021). Triple helix twins: A framework for achieving innovation and UN sustainable development goals. Sustainability, 13(12), 1-19.