The Effects of Different Sowing Dates of Fiddleneck (Phacelia tanacetifolia) During the Autumn and Spring Sowing Periods on the Forage Yield and Quality

Öz

The objective of this study was to determine the best sowing period and sowing dates for fiddleneck in Western Black Sea Region and in similar ecologies. The study was conducted at the Akmanlar village of the city of Bartın during the autumn and spring vegetation periods of 2012-2013 and 2013-2014 with randomized block design with three replications. This research was conducted in the autumn and spring sowing periods. At the end of the study, the highest amount of dry matter (8.97 t ha-1 –September 30 and 8.96 t ha-1- September 15) and crude protein yield (1.10 t ha-1 September 15 -1.09 September 30 t ha-1) were obtained in September from the sowings conducted during the autumn period, whereas for the spring period the highest dry matter was obtained beginning of March sowing date (4.07 t ha-1). The fiber ratios of fiddleneck were determined on average as ndf 44.14%, adf 37.79%, adl 23.91% during the autumn sowing period and as ndf 42.51%, adf 34.63%, adl 22.82% during the spring sowing period. As a result, it is suggested to prefer autumn sowing period for hay and to carry out the sowing in the months of September and October during this time frame.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• ADF,crude protein,NDF,spring and autumn,Western Black Sea Region

Kaynakça

1. Anon. 1988. SAS/STAT User’s Guide. Version 6. Fourth edn. Vol.2 SAS Instute Inc.. Cary. NC. USA. 1686 p.Altınok S, Karakaya A. 2002. Forage Yield Of Different Alfalfa Cultivers Under Ankara Conditions. Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry. Vol, 26 (1):11-12.
2. Ateş E, Coşkuntuna L, Tekeli AS. 2010. Plant growth stage effects on the yield, feding value and some morphological characters of the fiddleneck (Phacelia tanacetifolia Benth.) Cuban J. Agric. Sci., 44;73-78.
3. Ateş E. 2012. The Mineral, Aminoacid and fiber contents and forage yield of field pea (Pisum arvense L.), Fiddleneck (Phacelia tanacetifolia Benth.) And Their Mixtures Under Dry Land Conditions In The Western Turkey. Romanian Agricultural Research No:29.
4. Başbağ M, Saruhan V, Gül İ. 2001. Diyarbakır Koşullarında Farklı Tohumluk Miktarlarının Arıotu (Phacelia tanacetifolia Benth.)’nda Bazı Tarımsal Özellikler Üzerine Etkisi, GAP 2. Tarım Kongresi, 24-26 Ekim 2001, Şanlıurfa, s: 985-992 .
5. Geren H, Kaymakkavak D. 2007. Farklı Sıra Arası Uzaklıklarının Kimi Arıotu (Phacelia tanacetifolia Bentham) Çeşitlerinde Ot Verimi ile Verim ve Kalite Özelliklerine Etkileri. Ege Üniv. Ziraat Fak. Derg., 2007, 44 (1): 71-85
6. Karadağ Y, Büyükburç U. 1999. Tokat Koşullarında Yetiştirilen Arıotunun (Phacelia tanacetifolia Benth.) Verim ve Adaptasyonu Üzerinde Bir Araştırma, GOÜ. Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi, 16 (1):155-169
7. Karadağ Y, Büyükburç U. 2001. Arıotunda (Phacelia tanacetifolia Benth.) Farklı Sıra Aralığının Ot ve Tohum Verimlerine Etkileri, Türkiye 4. Tarla Bitkileri Kongresi, 17-21 Eylül 2001, Tekirdağ. s: 143-148.
8. Karadağ Y, Büyükburç U. 2003a. Tokat Koşullarında Arı otunun (Phacelia tanacetifolia Benth.) Yazlık Ekim Zamanı Üzerinde Araştırmalar. I-Ot Verimi İle İlgili Özellikler, A.Ü. Ziraat Fakültesi Tarım Bilimleri Dergisi, 9 (4), 435-439.

9. Karadağ Y, Büyükburç U. 2003b. Researches on spring sowing date of Phacelia (Phacelia tanacetifolia Benth.) under Tokat Conditions. II Seed Yield Characteristics. The journal of Agricultural Faculty Gaziosmanpasa University 20:143.
10. Martin RC, Harvey HD, Smith DL. 1990. İntercropping corn and soybean for silage in a cool temperate region; yield, protein and economic effects. Field Crops Research, 23:295-310.
11. Sağlamtimur T, Tansı V, Baytekin H. 1989. Çukurova Koşullarında Kışlık Ara Ürün Olarak Yetiştirilen Arıotu (Phacelia californica Cham.)'nda Biçim Zamanının Bitki Boyu ve Ot Verimine Etkisi Üzerinde Bir Araştırma. ÇÜZF Dergisi. 4(1)76-83.
12. Uçar H, Tansı V. 1996. Çukurova Koşullarında Farklı Ekim Zamanı ve Sıra Aralığının Arı Otunun (Phacelia tanacetifolia Bentham) Tane Verimi ve Arı Mer’ası Olarak Kullanılması Bakımından Etkileri. Türkiye 3. ÇayırMer’a Yem Bitkileri Kongresi 17-19 Haziran 1996 Erzurum, s;415-421.
13. Van Soest PJ, Robertson JB, Lewis BA. 1991. Methods for dietary fiber, neutral detergent fiber, non-starch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition. Journal of Dairy Science 71: 3583-3597.