Türkiye’nin A2 Karesinin Karayosunları (Musci) Kontrol Listesi

Öz

Bu kontrol listesi, Henderson’ın (1961) Türkiye kareleme sistemine göre A2 karesi içerisinde yapılan

karayosunu (Musci) çalışmalarının bir derlemesidir. Son literatürel araştırmaları sonucu şimdiye kadar A2

karesinden Bryopsida sınıfına ait 42 familya ve 136 cinse ait 359 takson kaydı tespit edilmiştir. Bu kare

içerisinde dikkat çeken en zengin cinsler sırasıyla şu şekildedir: Bryum (26), Orthotrichum (14), Grimmia (13),

Didymodon (11), Hypnum (10), Syntrichia (9), Brachythecium (9), Fissidens (8), Tortula (7), Schistidium (7),

Encalypta (7), Dicranum (7), Plagiomnium (7), Plagiothecium (7). Bu listede; cinsler, türler, alttürler, varyeteler

gibi sistematik kategoriler Hill et al. (2006)’ya göre verilmiş olup, sonunda sinonim listesi de sunulmuştur. En

son nomenklatürel değişikliklere göre hazırlanan A2 karesinin karayosunu listesinde, bazı türler farklı cinsler

içerisinde bahsedilirken, bazıları da farklı familyalar içerisinde anılmıştır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Bryopsida,Kareleme sistemi,Kontrol listesi,Türkiye

The Mosses (Musci) Check-List for A2 Square of Turkey

Öz

The check-list is a review of moss (Musci) studies done in A2 square according to Turkey grid square of

Henderson (1961). According to latest studied literatures in this grid, 359 moss taxa belonging to 136 genera and

42 families were recorded up to now. The richness of genera in terms of species in this square is as follows:

Bryum (26), Orthotrichum (14), Grimmia (13), Didymodon (11), Hypnum (10), Syntrichia (9), Brachythecium

(9), Fissidens (8), Tortula (7), Schistidium (7), Encalypta (7), Dicranum (7), Plagiomnium (7), Plagiothecium

(7). In this list; systematic categories as genera, species, subspecies, varieties were given according to Hill et al.

(2006) and finally synonym lists were also given. In the moss list of A2 square prepared according to the latest

nomenclatural differences, some species were cited in different genera and some others were mentioned in

different families.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Bryopsida,Grid system,Check-list,Turkey

Kaynakça

1. o Alteyrac, J., Cloutier, A., Zhang, S.Y. 2006. Characterization of juvenile wood to mature wood transition age in black spruce (Picea mariana (Mill.) B.S.P.) at different stand densities and sampling heights, Germany. Wood Science Technology 40: 124–138.
2. o Bao, F. C., Jiang, Z. H., Jiang, X. M., Lu, X. X., Luo, X. Q., Zhang, S. Y. 2001. Different in wood properties between juvenile wood and mature wood in 10 species grown in China, Germany. Wood Science and Technology, 35:363-375.
3. o Bhat, K.M., Priya, P.B., Rugmini, P. 2001. Characterisation of juvenile wood in teak, Germany. Wood Science and Technology 34:517–532.
4. o Deresse, T., Shepard, R.K., Shaler, S.M. 2003. Microfibril angle variation in red pine (Pines resinosa Ait.) and its relation to the strength and stiffness of early juvenile wood, USA. Forest Products Journal 53: 34- 40.
5. o Guler C., Copur Y., Akgul M., Buyuksari U. 2007. Some Chemical, Physical and Mechanical Properties of Juvenile Wood from Black Pine (Pinus Nigra Arnold) Plantations Journal of Applied Science, 7 (5): 755- 758. Gilani M.S., Sunderland H., Navi, P. 2005. Microfibril angle non-uniformities within normal and compression wood tracheids, Germany. Wood Science and Technology 39: 419-430.
6. o Krahmer R.L. 1986. Fundamental anatomy of juvenile and mature wood, in: Proc. Technical Workshop: Juvenile wood - What does it means to forest management and forest products. For. Prod. Res. Soc. Madison.
7. o Kretschmann D. E. 1998. Properties of juvenile wood. Techline: Properties and Use of Wood, Germany. Composites, and Fiber Products, Forest Service, Issued 9.
8. o Larson, P.R., Kretschmann, D.E., Clark, A III, Isebrands, J.G. 2001. Formation and properties of juvenile wood in southern pines: a synopsis. Gen. Tech. Rep. FPL-GTR-129. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Forest Products Laboratory, Madison, USA.

9. o Oluwafemi, O. A. 2007. Wood properties and selection for rotation length in caribbean pine (Pinus caribaea Morelet) grown in Afaka, Nigeria. Am-Eurasian J. Agric. & Environ. Sci. 2(4): 359-363.
10. o Peszlen, I. 1995. Juvenile wood characteristics of plantation wood species. Abstract XX, IUFRO, World Congress, Finland. IAWA Journal 16:14.
11. o Passialis, C., Kiriazakos, A. 2004. Juvenile and mature wood of naturally-grown fir trees, Germany. Holz Roh Werkst 62: 476-478.
12. o Pikk, J., Kask, R. 2006. Mechanical properties of juvenile wood of Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.) on Myrtillus forest site type. Baltic Forestry, Lithuanian Forest Research Institute, Estonia.
13. o Reiterer, A., Lichtenegger H, Tschegg S, Fratzl P. 1999. Experimental Evidence for a Mechanical Function of the Cellulose Microfibril Angle in Wood Cell Walls. Philosophical Magazine A, 79–9, 2173–2184.
14. o Rowell, R. M., 2005. Handbook of Wood Chemistry and Wood Composite. CRC Press, 1st Edition, 135- 140 pages.
15. o Smith, W.R., Briggs, D.G. 1986. Juvenile Wood: Has It Come of Age?, in: Proc. Technical Workshop: Juvenile wood - What does it mean to forest management and forest products? For. Prod. Res. Soc. Madison.
16. o Williams, R.S., Feist, W.C. 1999. Selection and application of exterior stains for wood. Gen. Tech. Rep. FPL–GTR–106. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Forest Products Laboratory, Madison.
17. o Yang, C.K. 2002. Impact of spacing on juvenile wood and mature wood properties of white spruce (Picea glauca). Taiwan J. of For Sci 17: 13-29. o Yeh, T.-F., Braun, J.L., Goldfarb, B., Chang,H.-M. and Kadla, J.F. 2006. Morphological and chemical variations between juvenile wood, mature wood, and compression wood of loblolly pine (Pinus taeda L.),
18. Germany. Holzforschung 60:1-8.