Araştırma Makalesi
BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster

Nijerya'da Kauçuk Arazilerin Kenar Topluluklarına Etkilerinin Geliştirilmesi

Yıl 2019, Cilt: 21 Sayı: 2, 466 - 476, 15.08.2019

Öz



Ekonomik gelişme Nijerya'da kauçuk endüstrisi kurmanın temel amacıdır.
Bu çalışma için belirlenen amaç, Nijerya'nın bazı bölgelerinde kauçuk sitelerin
kurulmasının, ev sahibi (saçak) topluluklarının sosyal ve ekonomik gelişimine
katkıda bulunup bulunmadığını bulmaktı. 210 kişiden oluşan örneklem büyüklüğünü
seçmek için basit bir rastgele örnekleme tekniği kullanılmıştır. Birincil
verileri toplamak için iyi yapılandırılmış anketler ve görüşme programı
kullanılmıştır. Tanımlayıcı istatistikler (ortalama, mod, sıklık, yüzde ve
tablolar) ve çıkarımsal istatistikler (Logit regresyon modeli), topluluklardaki
lastik sitelerin sosyal ve ekonomik etkilerine ilişkin olarak halkın görüşü
üzerine toplanan bilgileri analiz etmek için kullanılmıştır. Kauçuk sitenin,
saçak topluluklar üzerindeki ana sosyal etkisinin, insanların topluluklara
toplu göç (akınım) (p <0.01) ve eğitim tesislerinin sağlanması (p <0.05)
olduğunu tespit ettik. Kauçuk sitelerinin saçak toplulukları üzerindeki
ekonomik etkisi, yardımcı sanayilerin kurulması (p <0.01) ve istihdam
sağlanmasıdır (p <0.05). Saçak topluluklardaki kauçuk mülkün istihdam ve
gelir çarpanı endeksi sırasıyla% 30,53 ve% 45,84 olarak hesaplanmıştır. Hükümet
ve kalkınma ajanslarının, toplum ve ulusal kalkınma için daha fazla kauçuk alan
oluşturmasını tavsiye ediyoruz. Kauçuk sitelerin, sosyal sorumluluk alanı
olarak saçaklı topluluklara gerekli yararlar sağladığından emin olmak için
önlemler alınmalıdır.




Kaynakça

  • Majumder A, Datta S, Choudhary BK, Majumdar K (2014). Do Extensive Rubber Plantation Influences Local Environment? A Case Study From Tripura, Northeast India. Current World Environment, 9(3), 768.
  • Abolagba EO., Aigbekaen EO, Omokhafe KO (2003). Farm gate marketing of natural rubber in the south east rubber growing zone of Nigeria. Nigeria Journal of Agriculture and Rural Development, 6,40-48.
  • Aghimen EA, Udo EJ, Aga O (1997). Profile distribution of forms of Iron and Aluminum in the hydromorphic soils of Southern Nigeria. Journal of West Africa Science Association 31: 57 -70.
  • Aigbekaen EO, Imarhiagbe EO, Omokhafe KO (2000). Adoption of some recommended Agronomic practices of natural rubber in Nigeria. J. Agric. Forest. Fisher, 2, 51-56.
  • Beesley KB (1993) Sustainable Development and the Rural-Urban Fringe: A Review of the Literature, Issues in Urban Sustainability No. 3.
  • Bunce M (1981). "Rural Sentiment and the Ambiguity of the Urban Fringe," pp. 1 09-20 in K. B. Beesley and L.H. Russwurm, eds., The Rural-Urban Fringe: Canadian Perspectives. Toronto: York University, Atkinson College, Geographical Monographs No. 1 0.
  • Crombie D (1990). Watershed. Toronto: Royal Commission on the Future of the Toronto Waterfront.
  • FAOSTAT, (2017). FAOSTAT, Annual Report.
  • IUCN & NERI (International union for conservation of Nature) and NERI (The Natural Economic Research Institute) (2011). Mini Study of Planning and investment of lao IDR. Assessment of Economic, Social and Environmental cost and benefits of Dak Lak Rubber Plantation. Case Study in Saravan Province.
  • Manning EW (1986). Towards Sustainable Land Use: A Strategy. Ottawa: Environment Canada, Lands Directorate, Working Paper No. 47.
  • Roy M, Saha A, Roy M (2014). Ecological impact of rubber plantations: Tripura perspective. Int. J. Curr. Res, 2(11), 10334-10340.
  • Ogowewo N (1987). Past and present features of Natural Rubber production. A paper presented at the International Seminar on Applied Agricultural Research and Mechanized farming in tropical areas. Federal Ministry of Science and Technology Lagos, Nigeria. Nov. 10th 1987. pp 1 – 12.
  • Okuneye PA, Adebayo K (1995), ‘Socio-economic issues in the management of bio-diversity and the environment, Nigerian Journal of Ecology, Vol 1, pp 79–86.
  • Okunomo K, Achoja FO (2010). Economic Impact Assessment of African Timber and Plywood Company in Sapele, Delta state, Nigeria. African Journal of General Agriculture, 6 (3), pp. 159-168.
  • Purseglove JW (1968). Tropical crops: Dicotyledons. Longman: London.
  • Statistica (2018). www.statista.com/statistics/275399/world-consumption-of-natural-and-synthetic-caoutchouc/ Consumption of natural and synthetic rubber worldwide from 1990 to 2018 (in 1,000 metric tons).
  • URL-1 2018. www.uky.edu/AS/Courses/GEO260/Powerpoint/Concept_of_Development. Accessed date: 03.06.2018
  • Yamane T (1973). Statistics, An Introductory Analysis, 3rd Ed., New York: Harper and Row.

Development Impact of Rubber Estate on Fringe Communities in Nigeria

Yıl 2019, Cilt: 21 Sayı: 2, 466 - 476, 15.08.2019

Öz



Economic development is the core objective for establishing rubber
industry in Nigeria. The objective that was set for this study was to find out
whether or not the establishment of rubber estates in some parts of Nigeria has
contributed to social and economic development of the host(fringe) communities.
A simple random sampling technique was used to select a sample size of 210
respondents. Well structured questionnaires and interview schedule were used to
collect primary data. Descriptive statistics (mean, mode, frequency, percentage
and tables) and inferential statistics (Logit regression model) were used to
analyze the information that were collected on the opinion of the people with
respect to the social and economic impact of rubber estates in the communities.
We found out that the major social impact of rubber estate on fringe
communities were identified to be mass migration (influx) of people into the
communities (p<0.01) and provision of education facilities (p<0.05).
Economic impact of rubber estate on fringe communities were, establishment of
auxiliary industries (p<0.01) and provision of employment (p<0.05). The
employment and income multiplier index of the rubber estate on fringe
communities were computed to be 30.53% and 45.84% respectively. We recommend
that Government and development agencies should establish more rubber estates
for community and national development. Measures should be put in place to
ensure that rubber estates provide due benefits to fringe communities as a form
of social responsibility.

Kaynakça

  • Majumder A, Datta S, Choudhary BK, Majumdar K (2014). Do Extensive Rubber Plantation Influences Local Environment? A Case Study From Tripura, Northeast India. Current World Environment, 9(3), 768.
  • Abolagba EO., Aigbekaen EO, Omokhafe KO (2003). Farm gate marketing of natural rubber in the south east rubber growing zone of Nigeria. Nigeria Journal of Agriculture and Rural Development, 6,40-48.
  • Aghimen EA, Udo EJ, Aga O (1997). Profile distribution of forms of Iron and Aluminum in the hydromorphic soils of Southern Nigeria. Journal of West Africa Science Association 31: 57 -70.
  • Aigbekaen EO, Imarhiagbe EO, Omokhafe KO (2000). Adoption of some recommended Agronomic practices of natural rubber in Nigeria. J. Agric. Forest. Fisher, 2, 51-56.
  • Beesley KB (1993) Sustainable Development and the Rural-Urban Fringe: A Review of the Literature, Issues in Urban Sustainability No. 3.
  • Bunce M (1981). "Rural Sentiment and the Ambiguity of the Urban Fringe," pp. 1 09-20 in K. B. Beesley and L.H. Russwurm, eds., The Rural-Urban Fringe: Canadian Perspectives. Toronto: York University, Atkinson College, Geographical Monographs No. 1 0.
  • Crombie D (1990). Watershed. Toronto: Royal Commission on the Future of the Toronto Waterfront.
  • FAOSTAT, (2017). FAOSTAT, Annual Report.
  • IUCN & NERI (International union for conservation of Nature) and NERI (The Natural Economic Research Institute) (2011). Mini Study of Planning and investment of lao IDR. Assessment of Economic, Social and Environmental cost and benefits of Dak Lak Rubber Plantation. Case Study in Saravan Province.
  • Manning EW (1986). Towards Sustainable Land Use: A Strategy. Ottawa: Environment Canada, Lands Directorate, Working Paper No. 47.
  • Roy M, Saha A, Roy M (2014). Ecological impact of rubber plantations: Tripura perspective. Int. J. Curr. Res, 2(11), 10334-10340.
  • Ogowewo N (1987). Past and present features of Natural Rubber production. A paper presented at the International Seminar on Applied Agricultural Research and Mechanized farming in tropical areas. Federal Ministry of Science and Technology Lagos, Nigeria. Nov. 10th 1987. pp 1 – 12.
  • Okuneye PA, Adebayo K (1995), ‘Socio-economic issues in the management of bio-diversity and the environment, Nigerian Journal of Ecology, Vol 1, pp 79–86.
  • Okunomo K, Achoja FO (2010). Economic Impact Assessment of African Timber and Plywood Company in Sapele, Delta state, Nigeria. African Journal of General Agriculture, 6 (3), pp. 159-168.
  • Purseglove JW (1968). Tropical crops: Dicotyledons. Longman: London.
  • Statistica (2018). www.statista.com/statistics/275399/world-consumption-of-natural-and-synthetic-caoutchouc/ Consumption of natural and synthetic rubber worldwide from 1990 to 2018 (in 1,000 metric tons).
  • URL-1 2018. www.uky.edu/AS/Courses/GEO260/Powerpoint/Concept_of_Development. Accessed date: 03.06.2018
  • Yamane T (1973). Statistics, An Introductory Analysis, 3rd Ed., New York: Harper and Row.
Toplam 18 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil İngilizce
Konular Orman Endüstri Mühendisliği
Bölüm Biodiversity, Environmental Management and Policy, Sustainable Forestry
Yazarlar

Felix Achoja 0000-0002-9705-4923

Rosecollet Chisom Esumaı Bu kişi benim

Yayımlanma Tarihi 15 Ağustos 2019
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2019 Cilt: 21 Sayı: 2

Kaynak Göster

APA Achoja, F., & Esumaı, R. C. (2019). Development Impact of Rubber Estate on Fringe Communities in Nigeria. Bartın Orman Fakültesi Dergisi, 21(2), 466-476.


Bartin Orman Fakultesi Dergisi Editorship,

Bartin University, Faculty of Forestry, Dean Floor No:106, Agdaci District, 74100 Bartin-Turkey.

Tel: +90 (378) 223 5094, Fax: +90 (378) 223 5062,

E-mail: bofdergi@gmail.com