A Review on the Relationships Between Marchalina hellenica Genn. and the Chemical Contents of its Hosts in Pine Honey Production

Öz

Turkey is the leader in world pine honey production. The essence of pine honey is Marchalina hellenica, which are hosted pine trees. After sucking the sap of the host tree and receiving the nutrients it requires, the insect secretes the remainder rectally. This secretion, called honeydew, is then collected by bees and converted into pine honey. Coniferous trees can have an attracting or deterrenting effect for insects with some extractives they contain. There are some studies in the literature on the determination of such a relationship between Marchalina hellenica and its hosts. In this study, the relationship of Marchalina hellenica with the extractives of coniferous trees was examined and similar situations in Muğla forests were evaluated comparatively with the literature.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Marchalina hellenica
• pine
• pine honey
• extractives

Çam Balı Üretiminde Basra Böceği (Marchalina hellenica Genn.) ile Konukçu Ağaçların Kimyasal İçeriği Arasındaki İlişkiler Üzerine Bir İnceleme

Öz

Türkiye dünya çam balı üretiminde lider konumdadır. Çam balının özünü ise, çam ağaçlarına konuk olan basra böceği (Marchalina hellenica Genn.) oluşturmaktadır. Basra böceği konuk olduğu ağacın bitki özsuyu ile beslenmekte, ihtiyacı olan besini aldıktan sonra geri kalan kısmını ise rektal yolla dışarı bırakmaktadır. ‘Bal özü’ adı verilen bu salgı, daha sonra arılar tarafından toplanarak bala dönüştürülmektedir. Elde edilen bu salgı balı ise ‘çam balı’ olarak adlandırılmaktadır. İbreli ağaçlar içerdikleri bazı ekstraktif maddeler nedeniyle böcekler için cezbedici ya da uzaklaştırıcı etkiye sahip olabilmektedir. Basra böceği ile konukçuları arasında böyle bir ilişkinin belirlenmesi üzerine literatürde bazı çalışmalar mevcuttur. Bu çalışmada, basra böceğinin konuk olduğu ibreli ağaçların ekstraktif maddeleri olan ilişkisi incelenmiş ve literatür bilgileriyle Muğla ormanlarındaki benzer durumlar karşılaştırmalı olarak değerlendirilmiştir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Basra böceği
• çam
• çam balı
• ekstraktif madde

Kaynakça

1. Al-Manary, M., Al-Meeri, A., Al-Habori, M. (2002). Antioxidant activities and total phenolics of different types of honey. Nutrition Research, 22: 1041-1047. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0271-5317(02)00406-2
2. Allsop, K. A., Miller, J. B. (1996). Honey revisited: a reappraisal of honey in pre-industrial diets. British Journal of Nutrition, 75: 513-520. https://doi.org/10.1079/BJN19960155
3. Anonim, (2016). Muğla Orman Bölge Müdürlüğünün 06.09.2016 tarih ve 1980896 sayılı yazısı
4. Avcı, M., Sarıkaya, O. (2008). Marchalina hellenica Gennadius'nın Biyolojisi ve Kızılçam Ormanlarındaki Yönetimi. 1. Uluslararası Arıcılık ve Çam Balı Kongresi, 25-27 Kasım, Muğla, s. 289-296.
5. Avcı, M. (2016). Marchalina hellenica: morfolojisi, biyolojisi, ekolojisi, arıcılık için önemi, kızılçamlarda beslenmesi. Edt. Avcı, M., Korkmaz, M. Muğla Kızılçam Ormanlarında Arıcılık Ormancılık İlişkileri, Muğla, ss. 53-63
6. Bacandritsos, N. (2002). A scientific note on the first successful establishment of the monophlebine coccid Marchalina hellenica (Coccoidea, Margarodidae) on the fir tree (Abies cephalonica). Apidologie 33: 353–354. https://doi.org/10.1051/apido:2002012
7. Bacandritsos, N. (2004). Establishment and honeydew honey production of Marchalina hellenica (Coccoidea Margarodidae) on fir tree (Abies cephalonica). Bulletin of Insectology 57(2): 127-130 http://www.bulletinofinsectology.org/pdfarticles/vol57-2004-127-130bacandritsos.pdf
8. Bacandritsos, N., Saitanis, C., Papanastasiou, I. (2004). Morphology and life cycle of Marchalina hellenica (Gennadius) (Hemiptera: Margarodidae) on pine (Parnis Mt.) and fir (Helmos Mt.) forests of Greece. Annals Societe Entomologique France 40: 169-176. https://doi.org/10.1080/00379271.2004.10697413

9. Besçeli, Ö., Ekici, M. (1968). Çam pamuklu biti (Monophlebus hellenicus Genn) ve arıcılık. Ormancılık Araştırma Enstitüsü Dergisi 14(1): 73-78.
10. Bogdanov S., Jurendic T., Sieber R., Gallmann P. (2008). Honey for nutrition and health: a review. American Journal of the College of Nutrition, 27: 677-689. https://doi.org/10.1080/07315724.2008.10719745
11. Callaham, R. Z. (1966). Nature of Resistance of Pines to Bark Beetles. Breeding Pest-Resistant Trees, Proceedings of a N.A.T.O. and N.S.F. Symposium Held at The Pennsylvania State University, August 30 to September 11, Pennsylvania, pp 197-201.
12. Cates, R., Henderson, C. B. Redak, R. A. (1987). Responses of the western spruce budworm to varying levels of nitrogen and terpenes. Oecologia, 73: 312–316. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00377524
13. Chen Z., Kolb, T. E., Clancy, K. M. (2002). The role of monoterpenes in resistance of douglas fir to western spruce budworm defoliation. Journal of Chemical Ecology, 28: 897–920. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015297315104
14. Duru, M.E., Taş, M., Çayan, F., Küçükaydın, S., Tel-Çayan, G. (2021). Characterization of volatile compounds of Turkish pine honeys from different regions and classification with chemometric studies, European Food Research and Technology https://doi.org/10.1007/s00217-021-03817-8.
15. Erbilgin N., Christiansen, E., Krokene, P., Zeneli, G., Gershenzon, J. (2006). Exogenous application of methyl jasmonate elicits defenses in norway spruce (Picea abies) and reduces host colonization by the bark beetle Ips typographus. Oecologia, 148: 426-436. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-006-0394-3
16. Fan, J., Sun, J., Shi, J. (2007). Attraction of the Japanese pine sawyer, Monochamus alternatus, to volatiles from stressed host in China. Annals of Forest Science, 64(1): 67-71. https://doi.org/10.1051/forest:2006089
17. FAO, (2017). Detection of Marchalina hellenica in Victoria and South Australia. Report Number: AUS-69/1. https://www.ippc.int/en/countries/australia/pestreports/2015/07/detection-of-marchalina-hellenica-in-victoria-and-south-australia-1/
18. Franceschi, V. R., Krokene, P., Christiansen, E., Krekling, T. (2005). Anatomical and chemical defenses of conifer bark against bark beetles and other pests. New Phytologist, 167: 353–376. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8137.2005.01436.x
19. Gallis, A., Carlos, A., Papageorgiou, A.C., Garciα-Vallejo, M. C. (2011). Needle Terpenoid Composition of Pinus halepensis (Mill.) Trees Infested by the Scale Insect Marchalina hellenica (Genn.) in Greece. Proceedings of the Fourth İnternational Workshop on the Genetics of Host-Parasite Interactions in Forestry: Disease and Insect Resistance in Forest Trees. July 31 to August 5, Oregon, pp 304-308.
20. Gounari, S. (2003). Seasonal development and ovipositing behavior of Marchalina hellenica (Hemiptera: Margarodidae). Entomologia Hellenica, 15: 27-38. http://dx.doi.org/10.12681/eh.14045
21. Gounari, S. (2006). Studies on the phenology of Marchalina hellenica (Gen.) (Hemiptera: Coccoidea, Margarodidae) in relation to honeydew flow. Journal of Apicultural Research 45(1): 8-12. https://doi.org/10.1080/00218839.2006.11101305
22. Gounari, S. (2008). Aspects on Biology of Marchalina hellenica (Coccoidea, Marchalinidae). 1. Uluslararası Arıcılık ve Çam Balı Kongresi, Muğla, 25-27 Kasım, 2008, ss 133-140.
23. Göksu, E., Saner, G. (2021). Çam balı üretici satış fiyatlarının Box-Jenkins modeli ile öngörüsü. Turkish Journal of Forestry, 22(2): 111-116. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/tjf/issue/63166/917303
24. Gösterit, A., Gürel, F. (2011). Orman-arıcılık ilişkisi ve arıcılığın orman köylüleri ve kırsal kesimin kalkınmasındaki önemi. Orman ve Av Dergisi, 2: 26-29.
25. Gürkan, B., Boşgelmez, A. (1989). Çam Pamuklu Koşnili Marchalina hellenica (Gennadius)’ın Biyo-Ekolojisi Ve Populasyon Dinamiği. Doktora Tezi, Hacettepe Üniversitesi, Ankara, 87 s
26. Harris, L. J., Borden, J. H., Pierce, H. D. Jr., Oehlschlager, A. C. (1983). Cortical resin monoterpenes in sitka spruce and resistance to the white pine weevil, Pissodes strobi (Coleoptera: Curculionidae). Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 13: 350-352. https://doi.org/10.1139/x83-051
27. Hatjina, F., Bouga, M. (2009). Portrait of Marchalina hellenica Gennadius (Hemiptera: Margarodidae), the main producing insect of pine honeydew- biology, genetic variability and honey production. Uludag Bee Journal, 9(4): 162-167.
28. Hodgson, C., Gounari, S. (2006). Morphology of Marchalina hellenica (Gennadius) (Hemiptera: Coccoidea: Marchalinidae) from Greece, with a discussion on the identity of M. caucasica Hadzibeyli from the Caucasus. Zootaxa, 1196: 1-32. http://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.2646249
29. Hussein, S. Z., Yusoff, K. M., Makpol, S., Yusof, Y. A. (2011). Antioxidant capacities and total phenolic contents ıncrease with gamma irradiation in two types of Malaysian honey. Molecules, 16: 6378-6395. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules16086378
30. Jactel, H., Kleinhentz, M., Marpeau-Bezard, A., Marion-Poll, F., Menassieu, P., Burban, C. (1996). Terpene variations in maritime pine constitutive oleoresin related to host tree selection by Dioryctria sylvestrella Ratz. (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae). Journal of Chemical Ecology, 22(5): 1037-1050. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02029953
31. Jones, R. (2009). Prologue: honey and healing through the ages. Journal of ApiProduct and ApiMedical Science, 1(1): 2-5. https://doi.org/10.3896/ibra.4.01.1.02
32. Kantarcı, M. D., Avcı, M. (2016). Muğla ili basralı ormanları: alanlar, yapıları ve özellikleri. Edt. Avcı, M., Korkmaz, M. Muğla Kızılçam Ormanlarında Arıcılık Ormancılık İlişkileri. Muğla, ss. 71-121.
33. Keçeci, M., Baysal, Ö., Soysal, M., Tekşam, İ. (2007). Bitkilerde böceklere dayanıklılık mekanizmaları. Derim, 24(1): 19-31.
34. Keeling, C. I., Bohlmann, J. (2006). Genes, enzymes and chemicals of terpenoid diversity in the constitutive and induced defence of conifers against insects and pathogens. New Phytologist 170: 657–675. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8137.2006.01716.x
35. Konak, F., Türkmen, V. (2011). Çam Koşnili. Arıcılık Araştırma Dergisi, 5: 18-19.
36. Kondo, T., Gullan, P. J., Williams, D. J. (2008). Coccidology. The study of scale insects (Hemiptera: Sternorrhyncha: Coccoidea). Revista Corpoica – Ciencia Y Tecnologí Agropecuaria, 9(2): 55-61. https://doi.org/10.21930/rcta.vol9_num2_art:118
37. Korkmaz, M. (2016). Muğla ili basralı ormanları: alanlar, yapıları ve özellikleri. Edt. Avcı, M., Korkmaz, M. Muğla Kızılçam Ormanlarında Arıcılık Ormancılık İlişkileri. Muğla, ss. 122-142.
38. Margaritopoulos J. T., Bacandritsos N., Pekas A. N., Stamatis C., Mamuris Z., Tsitsipis J. A. (2003). Genetic variation of Marchalina hellenica (Hemiptera: Margarodidae) sampled from different host and localities in Greece. Bulletin of Entomological Research 93: 447-453. https://doi.org/10.1079/BER2003260
39. Mita, E., Tsitsimpikou, C., Tsiveleka, L., Petrakis, P. V., Ortiz, A., Vagias, C., Roussis, V. (2002). Seasonal variation of oleoresin terpenoids from Pinus halepensis and Pinus pinea and host selection of the scale insect Marchalina hellenica (Homoptera, Coccoidea, Margarodidae, Coelostonidiinae). Holzforschung, 56: 572-578. https://doi.org/10.1515/HF.2002.087
40. Morales, C. F., Hill, M. G., Walker, A.K. (1988). Life history of the sooty beech scale (Ultracoelostoma assimile) (Maskell), (Hemiptera: Margarodidae) in New Zealand Nothofagus forests. New Zealand Entomologist, 11: 24-37. https://doi.org/10.1080/00779962.1988.9722532
41. Özkök, A., D’arcy, B., Sorkun, K. (2010). Total phenolic acid and total flavonoid content of turkish pine honeydew honey. Journal of ApiProduct and ApiMedical Science, 2(2): 65-71. https://doi.org/10.3896/IBRA.4.02.2.01
42. Robert, J. A., Madilao, L. L., White, R., Yanchuk, A., King, J., Bohlmann, J. (2010). Terpenoid metabolite profiling in sitka spruce identifies association of dehydroabietic acid, (+)-3-carene and terpinolene with resistance against white pine weevil. Botany, 88: 810–820. https://doi.org/10.1139/B10-049
43. Rocchini, L. A., Lindgren, B. S., Bennett, R.G. (2000). Effects of resin flow and monoterpene composition on susceptibility of lodgepole pine to attack by douglas-fir pitch moth, Synanthedon novaroensis (Lep., Sesiidae). Journal of Applied Entomology, 124: 87–92. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1439-0418.2000.00449.x
44. Rybak-Chmielewska, H., Szczęsna, T., Waś, E., Jaśkiewicz , K., Teper, D. (2013). Characteristics of polish unifloral honeys IV. honeydew honey, mainly Abies alba L. Journal of Apicultural Science, 57(1): 51-59. https://doi.org/10.2478/jas-2013-0006
45. Sadof, C. S., Grant, G. G. (1997). Monoterpene composition of Pinus sylvestris varieties resistant and susceptible to Dioryctria zimmermani. Journal of Chemical Ecology, 23(8): 1917-1927. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:JOEC.0000006479.39087.60
46. Santas L.A. (1983). Insects producing honeydew exploited by bees in Greece. Apidologie, 14(2): 93-103. https://doi.org/10.1051/apido:19830204
47. Sanz, M. L., Gonzalez, M., Lorenzo, C., Sanz J., Martinezcastro, I. (2005). A contribution to the differentiation between nectar honey and honeydew honey. Food Chemistry, 91: 313-317. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2004.06.013
48. Selmi, E. (1983). Marchalina hellenica (Gennadius) (Homoptera, Margarodidae)’nın Marmara Bölgesindeki biyolojisi. İstanbul Üniversitesi Orman Fakültesi Dergisi, 33: 93-103.
49. Silici, S. (2011). Determination of volatile compounds of pine honeys. Turkish Journal of Advances In Experimental Medicine and Biology, 35: 641-645. https://doi.org/10.3906/biy-1009-112
50. Sorkun, K., Özkök Tüylü, A. (2008). Muğla Bölgesi’nde Üretilen Çam Balı ve Propolis’in Mikroskobik, Organoleptik ve Kimyasal Analizi. TUBİTAK-TOVAG 104 0 137 Proje Sonuç Raporu, 153 s.
51. Tananaki, C., Thrasyvoulou, A., Giraudel, J. L., Montury, M. (2007). Determination of volatile characteristics of Greek and Turkish pine honey samples and their classification by using Kohonen self organising maps. Food Chemistry, 101: 1687-1693. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2006.04.042
52. Thrasyvoulou, A., Manikis, J. (1996). Some physicochemica and microscopic characteristics of Greek unifloral honeys. Apidologie 26: 441-452. https://doi.org/10.1051/apido:19950601
53. Tiberi, R., Niccoli, A., Curini, M., Epifano, F., Marcotullio, M. C., Rosati, O. (1999). The role of the monoterpene composition in Pinus spp. needles, in host selection by the pine processionary caterpillar, Thaumetopoea pityocampa. Phytoparasitica, 27(4): 263-272. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02981482
54. Tomlin, E. S., Borden, J. H., Pierce, H. D. Jr. (1996). Relationship between cortical resin acids and resistance of sitka spruce to white pine weevil. Canadian Journal of Botany, 74: 599–606. https://doi.org/10.1139/b96-076
55. Tomlin, E. S., Antonejevic, E., Alfaro, R. I., Borden, J. H. (2000). Changes in volatile terpene and diterpene resin acid composition of resistant and susceptible white spruce leaders exposed to simulated white pine weevil damage. Tree Physiology 20: 1087–1095. https://doi.org/10.1093/treephys/20.16.1087
56. Topcan, Z. P. (2017). Marchalina hellenica Genn. Varlığının Pinus brutia Ten. İbrelerindeki Terpen Profili Üzerine Olan Etkisinin Araştırılması. Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Pamukkale Üniversitesi, Denizli, Türkiye, 50 s.
57. Ülgentürk, S., Kıran, K., Ayhan, B., Civelek, H. S., Eskin, A. (2012a). Türkiye’de Marchalina hellenica Gennadius (Hemiptera: Marchalinidae) ile ilişkili karınca (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) türleri. Türkiye Entomoloji Bülteni 2(4): 263-270.
58. Ülgentürk, S., Civelek, H. S., Şahin, Ö., Evren, H., Sarıbaşak, H. (2012b). Çam Pamuklu Koşnili Biti Marchalina hellenica Genn. (Hemiptera: Margarodidae) ’nın Biyo-Ekolojisi, Ege ve Akdeniz Bölgesindeki Yayılış Alanları. TÜBİTAK- TOVAG-108O359 Proje Sonuç Raporu, 144 s.
59. Yeşil, A. (2004). Çam pamuklu koşnilinin kızılçam ormanlarında çap ve göğüs yüzeyi artımı üzerine etkileri. Orman Mühendisliği, 10-11-12: 16-19.
60. Yeşil A., Gürkan, B., Saraçoğlu, O., Zengin, H. (2005). Effect of the pest Marchalina hellenica Gennadius (Homoptera, Margarodidae) on the growth parameters of Pinus brutia Ten in Mugla Region (Turkey). Polish Journal of Ecology, 53: 451-458.
61. Yücel, B., Kösoğlu, M., Doğaroğlu, M. (2007). Physicochemical properties of Turkish honeydew honey, 1st Balkan Countries Beekeeping Congress, 29 March-1 April, İstanbul-Turkey, p. 18.