AN ANALYSIS OF THE ECONOMIC-ENVIRONMENTAL DIMENSION OF THE ORGANIZATION FOR SECURITY AND CO-OPERATION IN EUROPE: JUST A RHETORIC OR REALITY?

Hakan Karaaslan

doi:10.11616/asbed.v18i38800.459476

AN ANALYSIS OF THE ECONOMIC-ENVIRONMENTAL DIMENSION OF THE ORGANIZATION FOR SECURITY AND CO-OPERATION IN EUROPE: JUST A RHETORIC OR REALITY?

Öz

This article aims to provide a critical analysis with regard to economic and environmental dimension of the Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe (OSCE), namely ‘Second Dimension of the Organization’. The article also aims to portray the OSCE’s perceptions towards economic and environmental issues as well as their link to security. As a reflection of its comprehensive security approach, the OSCE is always concerned with the economic and environmental matters. This article argues that although the OSCE’s involvement in the economic and environmental dimension reflects the Organization’s comprehensive approach to security, economic and environmental dimension turns out to be the weakest dimension of the OSCE in terms of the overall contribution of the Organization to the efforts aiming at achieving comprehensive security. In other words, economic and environmental matters have remained secondary in comparison to the non-military issues in the field of human dimension and non-military aspects of the politico-military dimension within the OSCE context.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Security,Comprehensive Security,Comprehensive Approach to Security,Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe,Economic and Environmental Dimension

Kaynakça

Brichambaut, Marc Perrin de (2007), “The OSCE and the 21st Century”. Helsinki Monitor: Security and Human Rights No.3: 180-187.
Buzan, Barry; Wæver, Ole; and Wilde, Jaap de (1998). Security: a new framework for analysis. Boulder, Colo.: Lynne Rienner Pub.
Chasek, Pamela S.; Downie, David L.; and Brown Janet Welsh (2006). Global Environmental Politics. Colorado: Westview Press.
Cottey, Andrew (2002). “The OSCE: Crowning Jewel or Talking Shop?”. Uncertain Europe: Building a New European Security Order?. in Martin A. Smith and Graham Timmins (eds). London: Routledge. 43-61.
Evers, Frank (2010). “Balancing by Cross-Linking Renewed Dialogue on the OSCE Economic and Environmental Dimension”. Center for OSCE Research (CORE) Working Paper 21.
Evers, Frank; Kahl, Martin; and Zellner, Wolfgang (2005). “The Culture of Dialogue The OSCE Acquis 30 Years after Helsinki”. Center for OSCE Research (CORE). Vienna.
Fonblanque, John de (2005). “Strengthening the economic and environmental dimension of the OSCE (EED)”. Helsinki Monitor No.3: 180-183.
Gärtner, Heinz and Hyde-Price, Adrian (2001). “Introduction”. Europe’s New Security Challenges. in Heinz Gärtner, Adrian Hyde-Price, and Erich Reiter (eds). London: Lynne Rienner Publishers. 1-23.

Greene, Owen (2001). “Environmental Issues”. Globalization of World Politics. in John Baylis and Steve Smith (eds). Oxford: Oxford University Press. 385-413.
Hurrel, Andrew and Kingbury, Benedict (1992). “The International Politics of the Environment: An Introduction”. The International Politics of the Environment. in Andrew Hurrel and Benedict Kingsbury (eds). Oxford: Clarendon Press. 1992.
Kingham, Ronald A. (2011).”Discussion Paper on Economic and Environmental Confidence-and Peace-building Measures and the Role of the OSCE”. Institute for Environmental Security, For the OSCE Chairmanship Workshop on Economic and Environmental Activities as Confidence Building Measures. Vienna.
Mérand, Frédéric; Irondelle, Bastien; and Foucault, Martial (2011). “Theorizing the change in the European Security Environment”. European Security since the Fall of the Berlin Wall. in Frédéric Mérand, Martial Foucault, and Bastien Irondelle (eds). Toronto: University of Toronto Press. 1-22.
Oberschmidt, Randolf and Zellner, Wolfgang (2001). “OSCE At the Crossroads”. Institute for Peace Research and Security Policy-Center for OSCE Research (CORE). Working Paper 2. Hamburg.
Reuchlin, Philip (2007). “Environmental security: ways ahead for the OSCE”. Helsinki Monitor: Security and Human Rights No.1. 64-76.
Rosner, Kevin (2010). “How the OSCE Can Contribute to Energy Security”. Journal of Energy Security.
Snoy, Bernard (2006). “Energy Security: An OSCE perspective”. Helsinki Monitor No.4. 291-294.
Soroos, Marvin S. (1999). “Global Institutions and the Environment: An Evolutionary Perspective”. The Global Environment Institutions, Law, and Policy. in Norman J. Vig and Regina S. Axelrod (eds). Washington, D.C.: CQ Press. 27-51.
Wheeler, Richard (2012). “The OSCE and Energy Security, Meetings of the Energy Efficiency 21 Programme: The OSCE and Sustainable Energy” (Presentation). Geneva. Energy Security-OSCE general mandate, CEIP, economic and geo-political, legal dimensions.
Williams, Paul D. (2013). “Security Studies: An Introduction”. Security Studies: An Introduction. in Paul D. Williams (ed). London and New York: Routledge. 1-12.
Wohlfeld, Monika (2008). “Reconceptualization of Security in the CSCE and OSCE”. Globalization and Environmental Challenges Hexagon Series on Human and Environmental Security and PeaceVol.3 Part VII. 643-650.
“The OSCE Concept of Comprehensive and Co-operative Security An Overview of Major Milestones”. OSCE Secretariat Conflict Prevention Centre Operations Service. Vienna. June 2009.
“Common Purpose Towards a More Effective OSCE – Final Report and Recommendations of the Panel of Eminent Persons On Strengthening the Effectiveness of the OSCE”. 27 June 2005.
“Document of the Bonn Conference on Economic Co-operation in Europe”. Bonn. 1990.
“OSCE Strategy to Address Threats to Security and Stability in the 21st Century”. OSCE Ministerial Council Maastricht 2003.
Interview with Mid-level Government Official 3. Permanent Mission of Turkey to the OSCE. Vienna. 19 October 2012.
Interview with Esra Buttanri. Environmental Affairs Adviser. Office of the Co-ordinator of OSCE Economic and Environmental Activities. Vienna. 14 November 2012.
Interview with Richard Wheeler. Senior Programme Officer. Energy Security. Office of the Co-ordinator of OSCE Economic and Environmental Activities. Vienna. 14 November 2012.
OSCE, ‘Economic and Environmental Sub-Committee’, available at http://www.osce.org/eea/13910?download=true, Accessed on 20 November 2013.
OSCE-, ‘Energy Security Dialogue’, available at http://www.osce.org/eea/45052, Accessed on 24 August 2014.
OSCE, ‘Factsheet of the Office of the Co-ordinator of OSCE Economic and Environmental Activities, OSCE Economic and Environmental Dimension’, (20 February 2012), available at http://www.osce.org/secretariat/30348?download=true, Accessed on 10 November 2013.
OSCE, ‘OSCE-Secretariat – Office of the Co-ordinator of OSCE Economic and Environmental Activities’, available at http://www.osce.org/eea, Accessed on 10 November 2013.
OSCE, OSCE States Review Implementation of Economic and Environmental Commitments’, available at http://www.osce.org/eea/96420, Accessed on 15 November 2013.
OSCE, ‘Economic Activities’, available at http://www.osce.org/what/economic, Accessed on 15 November 2013.
OSCE, ‘Environmental Activities’, available at http://www.osce.org/what/environmental, Accessed on 15 November 2013.
OSCE, ‘OSCE Strategy Document for the Economic and Environmental Dimension’, OSCE Ministerial Council, Maastricht 2003, (2 December 2003), available at http://www.osce.org/eea/20705?download=true, Accessed on 20 November 2013.
OSCE, ‘OSCE Secretariat, OCEEA, Activities, Economic and Environmental Forum’, available at http://www-old.osce.org/eea/43229, Accessed on 20 November 2013.
OSCE, ‘OSCE Meeting in Vienna to Discuss Implementation of Commitments, Future Priorities in Economic and Environmental Dimension’, (17 October 2011), available at http://www.osce.org/eea/84019, Accessed on 20 November 2013.
OSCE, ‘Economic Activities’, available at http://www.osce.org/what/economic, Accessed on 1 December 2013.
OSCE, ‘OSCE Special Expert Meeting, Vilnius (13-14 September 2010) Factsheet’, available at www.osce.org/eea/71241, Accessed on 10 December 2013. OSCE, ‘OSCE Mission to Serbia and Montenegro, Renewable Energy for Energy Security’, available at http://osce.org/serbia/16332, Accessed on 5 December 2013.
OSCE, ‘OSCE Ministerial Council Brussels 2006, Decision No.12/06 on Energy Security Dialogue in the OSCE’, available at http://www.osce.org/mc/23354?download=true, Accessed on 5 December 2013.
OSCE, ‘Security Implications of Climate Change’, available at http://www.osce.org/eea/climatechange, Accessed on 26 December 2013.
OSCE, ‘Hazardous Waste’, available at ttp://www.osce.org/eea/43653, Accessed on 26 December 2013.
OSCE, ‘ENVSEC Initiative’, available at http://www.osce.org/eea/43651, Accessed on 27 December 2013.
OSCE, ‘Civic Action for Security & Environment’, available at http://www.osce.org/eea/72778, Accessed on 28 August 2014.
OSCE, ‘Secretariat-Office of the Co-ordinator of OSCE Economic and Environmental Activities, Overview’, available at http:/osce.org/eea/43176, Accessed on 15 November 2013.
OSCE, ‘2012 OSCE Economic and Environmental Dimension Implementation Meeting’, available at http://www.osce.org/eea/96401, Accessed on 20 November 2013.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil

İngilizce

Konular

-

Bölüm

Araştırma Makalesi

Yazarlar

Hakan Karaaslan Bu kişi benim

Yayımlanma Tarihi

3 Nisan 2018

Gönderilme Tarihi

21 Ağustos 2017

Kabul Tarihi

-

Yayımlandığı Sayı

Yıl 2018 Cilt: 18 Sayı: 1

DOI

https://doi.org/10.11616/asbed.v18i38800.459476

IZ

https://izlik.org/JA68JC22ER

Kaynak Göster

RIS / Bibtex

APA

Karaaslan, H. (2018). AN ANALYSIS OF THE ECONOMIC-ENVIRONMENTAL DIMENSION OF THE ORGANIZATION FOR SECURITY AND CO-OPERATION IN EUROPE: JUST A RHETORIC OR REALITY? Bolu Abant İzzet Baysal Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 18(1), 165-191. https://doi.org/10.11616/asbed.v18i38800.459476

AMA

1.Karaaslan H. AN ANALYSIS OF THE ECONOMIC-ENVIRONMENTAL DIMENSION OF THE ORGANIZATION FOR SECURITY AND CO-OPERATION IN EUROPE: JUST A RHETORIC OR REALITY? ASBİ. 2018;18(1):165-191. doi:10.11616/asbed.v18i38800.459476

Chicago

Karaaslan, Hakan. 2018. “AN ANALYSIS OF THE ECONOMIC-ENVIRONMENTAL DIMENSION OF THE ORGANIZATION FOR SECURITY AND CO-OPERATION IN EUROPE: JUST A RHETORIC OR REALITY?”. Bolu Abant İzzet Baysal Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi 18 (1): 165-91. https://doi.org/10.11616/asbed.v18i38800.459476.

EndNote

Karaaslan H (01 Nisan 2018) AN ANALYSIS OF THE ECONOMIC-ENVIRONMENTAL DIMENSION OF THE ORGANIZATION FOR SECURITY AND CO-OPERATION IN EUROPE: JUST A RHETORIC OR REALITY? Bolu Abant İzzet Baysal Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi 18 1 165–191.

IEEE

[1]H. Karaaslan, “AN ANALYSIS OF THE ECONOMIC-ENVIRONMENTAL DIMENSION OF THE ORGANIZATION FOR SECURITY AND CO-OPERATION IN EUROPE: JUST A RHETORIC OR REALITY?”, ASBİ, c. 18, sy 1, ss. 165–191, Nis. 2018, doi: 10.11616/asbed.v18i38800.459476.

ISNAD

Karaaslan, Hakan. “AN ANALYSIS OF THE ECONOMIC-ENVIRONMENTAL DIMENSION OF THE ORGANIZATION FOR SECURITY AND CO-OPERATION IN EUROPE: JUST A RHETORIC OR REALITY?”. Bolu Abant İzzet Baysal Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi 18/1 (01 Nisan 2018): 165-191. https://doi.org/10.11616/asbed.v18i38800.459476.

JAMA

1.Karaaslan H. AN ANALYSIS OF THE ECONOMIC-ENVIRONMENTAL DIMENSION OF THE ORGANIZATION FOR SECURITY AND CO-OPERATION IN EUROPE: JUST A RHETORIC OR REALITY? ASBİ. 2018;18:165–191.

MLA

Karaaslan, Hakan. “AN ANALYSIS OF THE ECONOMIC-ENVIRONMENTAL DIMENSION OF THE ORGANIZATION FOR SECURITY AND CO-OPERATION IN EUROPE: JUST A RHETORIC OR REALITY?”. Bolu Abant İzzet Baysal Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, c. 18, sy 1, Nisan 2018, ss. 165-91, doi:10.11616/asbed.v18i38800.459476.

Vancouver

1.Hakan Karaaslan. AN ANALYSIS OF THE ECONOMIC-ENVIRONMENTAL DIMENSION OF THE ORGANIZATION FOR SECURITY AND CO-OPERATION IN EUROPE: JUST A RHETORIC OR REALITY? ASBİ. 01 Nisan 2018;18(1):165-91. doi:10.11616/asbed.v18i38800.459476