ARAP BAHARI SONRASI FIRAT DİCLE HAVZASI SU KONTEKSTİNDE YAŞANAN “HİDRO-KAOSU” ANLAMAK

Öz

Ortadoğu’daki en önemli su kaynaklarından biri olan Fırat Dicle havzası sularının kullanımı meselesi, hidropolitik alanında yapılmış olan birçok çalışmanın temel konusunu oluşturmuştur. Ancak bu çalışmaların büyük bölümü, 1960-2000 arası devletler arası çatışma ve/veya 2000’lerde gerçekleşen işbirliği süreçlerini incelemektedir. Buna karşın havza hidropolitiğinde son dönemde yaşanan değişimi analiz eden çalışma sayısı görece daha az sayıdadır. Bu çalışma, Waterscape (Su Konteksti) kavramından yola çıkarak 2010 sonrası Arap Baharı süreciyle birlikte Suriye ve Irak’ta gittikçe derinleşen siyasi krizler ve istikrarsızlıklar neticesinde Fırat Dicle havzası su kontekstindeki hidropolitik dinamiklerin dramatik bir biçimde değiştiğini ve bu değişimin havzayı bir “Hidro-kaosa” sürüklediğini savunmaktadır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Firat Dicle Havzası,Arap Baharı,Su Konteksti

Kaynakça

1. Ahmad, George Abu (2013). “Order, Freedom and Chaos: Sovereignties in Syria”. Middle East Policy. 20 (2) :47-54.
2. Allouche, Jeremy (2005). Water nationalism: An explanation of the past and present conflicts in Central Asia, the Middle East and the Indian Subcontinent?. Yayımlanmamış Doktora Tezi.Geneve: Universite´ de Geneve.
3. Alantar, Z. Özden Oktav (2000). “Turkish Syrian Relations at the Crossroads”. Turkish Review of Middle East Studies 11: 149-170.
4. Annunziato, Alessandro vd. ( 2016). Impact of flood by a possible failure of the Mosul dam. EUR 27923 EN. doi:10.2788/689469. Bari, Zohurul (1997). “Syrian-Iraqi Dispute Over the Euphrates Waters”. International Studies 16 (2) :227-244.
5. BBC (2017). “IS conflict: Raqqa warning over 'risk to Tabqa dam'', (http://www.bbc.com/news/world-middle-east-39399803, 11 Ağustos 2017’de erişildi)
6. Baysal Başar ve Lüleci Çağla (2015). “Kopenhag Okulu ve Güvenlikleştirme Teorisi”. Güvenlik Stratejileri Dergisi, 11(22): 61-95. Benli-Altunışık, Meliha (2016). “The Inflexibility of Turkeys Policy in Syria”. IEMed Mediterranian. Yearbook:39-44,http://www.iemed.org/observatori/arees-danalisi/arxius-adjunts/anuari/med.2016/IEMed_MedYearbook_2016_keys_Turkey_Syrias_Policy_Benli_Altunisik.pdf 10 Ağustos 2017’de erişildi)
7. Benli-Altunışık, Meliha ve Özlem Tür (2006). “From Distant Neighbours to Partners? Changing Syrian–Turkish Relations”. Security Dialogue 37(2): 229-248.
8. Bibbo, Barbara (2016). “Mosul Dam collapse 'will be worse than a nuclear bomb''. Al Jazeera (11 Aralık 2016) http://www.aljazeera.com/indepth/features/2016/11/mosul-dam-collapse-worse-nuclear-bomb-161116082852394.html 2 Ağustos 2017’de erişildi)

9. Bilen, Özden (2009). Turkey&Water Issues in the Middle East. Ankara: DSI İdari ve Mali isler Dairesi Baskanligi, Basim Foto Film Şube Müdürlüğü
10. Budds, Jessica ve Hinojosa, Leonith (2012). “Restructuring and Rescaling Water Governance in Mining Contexts: The Co-Production of Waterscapes in Peru”. Water Alternatives 5(1): 119-137.
11. Buzan, Barry, Waever, Ole ve De-Wilde, Jaap. (1998). Security A new Framework for Analysis. London: Lynne Rienner Publishers Inc.
12. Conker, Ahmet (2017). “Water Wars or Battles of Water: Understanding Resurrection of Water Wars Discourse in the Middle East”. International Congress of Management Economy amd Policy. İstanbul
13. Conker, Ahmet (2014). An enhanced notion of power for inter-state and transnational hydropolitics: an analysis of Turkish-Syrian water relations and the Ilısu Dam conflict between the opponents and proponents of the Dam.Yayımlanmamış Doktora Tezi. Norwich: University of East Anglia
14. Daoudy, Marwa (2007). “Benefit-sharing as a tool of conflict transformation: applying the Inter-SEDE model to the Euphrates and Tigris river basins”. Economics of Peace and Security Journal 2 (2): 26-32.
15. Daoudy, Marwa (2009). “Asymmetric Power: Negotiating Water in the Euphrates and Tigris”. International Negotiation 14 (2): 361-391. Daoudy, Marwa, “Back to Conflct: The Securitization of Turkish-Syrian Relations”. Turkey-Syria relations: between enmity and amity. Ed.Raymond Hinnebusch ve Özlem Tür. Surrey: Routledge. 133-143
16. De Châtel, Francesca (2014). “The role of drought and climate change in the Syrian uprising: Untangling the triggers of the revolution”. Middle Eastern Studies 50 (4): 521-535.
17. De Pimodan, Quantin (2016). The Dams War: How Water Scarcity Helped Create ISIS and Why Combatting It Would Undo It. Research Institute for European and American Studies. Athens, (http://www.rieas.gr/images/publications/rieas172.pdf, 10 Şubat 2017’de erişildi)
18. Elhance, Aaron (1997). “Conflict and cooperation over water in the Aral Sea basin”. Studies in Conflict & Terrorism 20: 207-218.
19. Erdem, Mete (2003). “The Tigris and Euphrates Rivers Contreversy and the Role of Internatıonal Law”. (http://sam.gov.tr/tr/the-tigris-euphrates-rivers-controversy-and-the-role-of-international-law/, 10 Ocak 2013’te erişildi)
20. FAO (2012) , Euphrates-Tigris river basin. (http://www.fao.org/nr/water/aquastat/basins/euphrates-tigris/index.stm 10 Temmuz 2016’da erişildi)
21. Ferguson, James (24 Nisan 2015). “The World Soon be at War Over Water”. Newsweek (http://www.newsweek.com/2015/05/01/world-will-soon-be-war-over-water-324328.html 3 Ağustos 2017’de erişildi)
22. Freeman, Kevin (2001). “Water wars? Inequalities in the Tigris-Euphrates river basin”. Geopolitics 6 (2): 127-140.
23. Furlong, Kathryn (2006) .“Hidden theories, troubled waters: International relations, the ‘territorial trap’, and the Southern African Development Community's transboundary waters”. Political Geography 25 (4): .438-458.
24. Gleick, Peter H. (2014). “Water, drought, climate change, and conflict in Syria”. Weather, Climate, and Society, 6 (3): 331-340.
25. Haftendorn, Helga (1991). “The Security Puzzle: Theory-Building and Discipline-Building in International Security”. International Studies Quarterly 35(1): 3-17.
26. Harris, Leila (2006). “Irrigation, gender, and social geographies of the changing waterscapes of southeastern Anatolia”. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 24: 187-213.
27. Hateahet, Sinan (2015). “Suriye’de ‘İŞİD’”. ORSAM Bölgesel Gelişmeler Değerlendirme Raporu No 20, Ankara: ( http://www.orsam.org.tr/files/Degerlendirmeler/20/20tr.pdf 22 Şubat 2016’da erişildi)
28. Hinnebusch, Raymond (2015) . "Back to Enmity: Turkey-Syria Relations since the Syrian Uprising". Orient, Journal of German Orient Institute 56 (1) : 14-22.
29. Johnson, Keith (1 Haziran 2014). "Water Wars in the Land of Two Rivers ". Foreign Policy (http://foreignpolicy.com/2014/07/01/water-wars-in-the-land-of-two-rivers/ 3 Temmuz 2017’de erişildi)
30. Julien, Fredrick. (2012). “Hydropolitics is what societies make of it (or why we need a constructivist approach to the geopolitics of water)”. Int. J. Sustainable Society 4: 45-71.
31. Kibaroğlu, Ayşegül (2012). “Evolution of Transboundary Water Politics in the Euphrates and Tigris Basin System: New Perspectives and Political Challenges”. Advancing Cooperation in the Euphrates and Tigris Region: Institutional Development and Multidisciplinary Perspectives. İstanbul: Okan Üniversitesi
32. Kibaroglu, Ayşegül. ve Scheumann, Waltina (2011). “Euphrates-Tigris Rivers System: Political Rapprochement and Transboundary Water Cooperation”. Turkey’s Water Policy: National Frameworks and International Cooperation, Ed. Ayşegül Kibaroglu vd. , London :Springer-Verlag. 277-299.
33. Kibaroğlu, Ayşegül (2008). “The Role of Epistemic Communities in Offering New Cooperation Frameworks in The Euphrates -Tigris Rivers System”. Journal of International Affairs 61(2) : 183-198.
34. Kibaroglu, Ayeşegül ve Unver Olcay (2006), “Fırat ve Dicle'de İşbirliği İçin Yeni Açılımlar”. Stratejik Analiz 80:32-45.
35. King, Marcus D.(2015). “The Weaponization of Water in Syria and Iraq”. The Washington Quarterly 38(4) : 153-169.
36. Kıran, Abdullah (2005). Ortadoğu da Su: Bir Çatışma ya da Uzlaşma Alanı İstanbul: Kitap Yayınevi
37. Kut, Gün (1993). “Burning Waters: The Hydropolitics of the Euphrates and Tigris”. New Perspectives on Turkey 9: 1-17.
38. Loftus, Alex (2007).“Working the Socio-Natural Relations of the Urban Waterscape in South Africa”. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 1 (1): 41-59.
39. Lopez-Gunn, Elena, '" Agua para todos": The new regionalist hydraulic paradigm in Spain”. Water Alternatives 2(3): 370-384 Maden, E. Tuba (2011). “Türkiye-Suriye İlişkilerinde Suyun Rolü (The Role of Water in Turkey-Syria Relations)”. Ortadoğu Analiz 3 (35): 33-40.
40. McKernan, Bethan (5 Ocak 2017). “Mosul Dam could collapse at any minute 'killing 1.5 million people'', Independent (,http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/middle-east/mosul-dam-breach-fail-northern-iraq-isis-kill-million-nuclear-catastrophe-engineers-risk-a7510686.html, 5 Temmuz 2017’de erişildi)
41. Makovsky, Alan (1999). “Defusing the Turkish-Syrian Crisis: Whose Triumph?”, Middle East Insight, http://www.washingtoninstitute.org/policy-analysis/view/defusing-the-turkish-syrian-crisis-whose-triumph 5 Mayıs 2009’da erişildi)
42. Martínez, Jose Ciro ve Brent Eng (2016). “The unintended consequences of emergency food aid: neutrality, sovereignty and politics in the Syrian civil war, 2012–15”. International Affairs 92 (1): 153-173.
43. Menga, Flippo (2015). “Building a nation through a dam: the case of Rogun in Tajikistan”. Nationalities Papers 43(3): 479-494. Mirumachi, Naho. (2010). Study of Conflict and Cooperation in International Transboundary River Basins: The TWINS Framework Yayımlanmamış Doktora Tezi. London:King's College London
44. Molle, Francois vd. (2009). “Introduction: Changing Waterscapes in the Mekong Region – Historical Background and Context”. Contested Waterscapes in the Mekong Region: Hydropower, Livlehoods, Governance, Ed. Francois Molle vd. London: Earthscan. 1-19.
45. Mollinga, Peter (2001). Water and politics: levels, rational choice and South Indian canal irrigation. Futures, 33: 733-752.
46. Ohlsson, Leif (1995). The Role of Water and the Origins of Conflict Hydropolitics. London: Zed Books.
47. Olson, Robert (1997). “Turkey-Syria Relations since the Gulf War: Kurds and Water”. Middle East Policy 5 (2): 168-192.
48. Pearce, Fred (2014). “Mideast Water Wars: In Iraq, A Battle for Control of Water”, Yale Enviornment360, 2014, (http://e360.yale.edu/features/mideast_water_wars_in_iraq_a_battle_for_control_of_water 5 Ağustos 2017’de erişildi)
49. Perysinaki, Aliki-Myrto (2010). “Su Peyzajı Projeleri, Kültür ve Doğayı Buluşturmak İçin Peyzaj Tasarımı ve Doğal Süreçleri Nasıl Bir Araya Getirir , Boston Park Sistemleri Örneği ve Günes Şehir”. Çev. Dicle Oğuz ve Işıl Çakçı, Ankara Üniversitesi Çevrebilimleri Dergisi 2 (2) : 223-229.
50. Russia Today (11 Ağustos 2014). “Islamic State militants threaten Turkey with violence if Euphrates water supply not restored”. Russia Today, (https://www.rt.com/news/179352-euphrates-is-militants-turkey/ 5 Ağustos 2017’de erişildi )
51. Samson, Paul ve Charrier, Bertrand (1997). International freshwater conflict: issues and prevention strategies. Green Cross Draft Report.
52. Shamout, Nouar ve Lahn Glade (2013). The Euphrates in Crisis: Channels of Cooperation for a Threatened River.
53. Chatam House (https://www.chathamhouse.org/sites/files/chathamhouse/field/field_document/20150413Euphrates_0.pdf 10 Haziran 2017’de erişildi)
54. Sputnik (8 Mart 2017). “Thirst Wars: Turkey Applies Political Pressure by Cutting Off Water to Syria”, Sputnik,, (https://sputniknews.com/middleeast/201703081051370769-turkey-syria-water-euphrates/ 10 Ağustos 2017’de erişildi )
55. Syria Direct (26 Ocak 2017). “Sukran, Abdullah J., Former Tabqa Dam engineer: “We could see an immediate humanitarian crisis of historic proportions”. (http://syriadirect.org/news/former-tabqa-dam-engineer-%E2%80%98we-could-see-an-immediate-humanitarian-crisis-of-historic-proportions%E2%80%99/, 3 Ağustos 2017’de erişildi)
56. Starr, Joyce R. (1991). “Water Wars”. Foreign Policy. 82: 17-36.
57. Swyngedouw, Erik (1999). “Modernity and Hybridity: Nature, Regeneracionismo, and the Production of the Spanish Waterscape, 1890-1930”. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 89(3): 443-465.
58. Vidal, John, (15 Nisan 2013) “Azzam Alwash wins Goldman prize: 'Saddam's marsh drainage project was war by other mean”', The Guardian.
59. (https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2013/apr/15/azzam-alwash-goldman-prize, (20 Ağustos 2017’de erişildi )
60. Von Lossow, Tobias (2016) “The Rebirth of Water as a Weapon: IS in Syria and Iraq”. The International Spectator 51(3): 82-99.
61. Von Lossow, Tobias (2016a) “Water as Weapon: IS on the Euphrates and Tigris”, 2016, (https://www.swp-berlin.org/fileadmin/contents/products/comments/2016C03_lsw.pdf, 10 Mart 2017’de erişildi)
62. Warner , Jeroen (2012), “Three Lenses on water war, peace and hegemonic struggle on the Nile”. Interrnational Journal of Sustainable Society, 4, (1/2) : 173-179.
63. Wolf, Aaron vd, . (2003) . International waters: identifying basins at risk. Water Policy, 5: 29-60.
64. Wolf, Aaron (1999). “The Transboundary Freshwater Dispute Database Project”. Water International, 24 (2): 160-163.
65. World Bank MENA Development Report (2012) . Renewable Energy
66. Desalination An Emerging Solution to Close the Water Gap in the Middle East and North Africa. Washington: The World Bank
67. Yetim, Müşerref (2010). A Bargaining Framework for Explaining International Water Rights Conflicts: The Case of the Euphrates and Tigris. Doktora Tezi, Austin: The University of Texas
68. Zeitoun, Mark vd. (2012). “Hydropolitical baseline of the upper Upper Jordan Waterscape: Control and Use of the Flows”. Water Alternatives 6 (1), 2012: 86-106
69. Zinzani, Andrea and Menga, Flippo (2017). “The Circle of Hydro-Hegemony between riparian states, development policies and borderlands: Evidence from the Talas waterscape (Kyrgyzstan- Kazakhstan)”. Geoforum 85: 112-121.