AN ECOCRITICAL READING OF TED HUGHES’S “HAWK ROOSTING”
Öz
Best known for his nature and animal poetry, Ted Hughes (1930-98) has an
important place in the history of twentieth century English literature with his
poems, stories for children, plays, essays, letters and translations. He has
been fascinated with the forces of nature, the world of animals and the
challenges of postindustrial society. His diction and controlled language give
a sense of order to the violent and chaotic natural world, drawing attention to
the immediate experiences. Ecocriticism, “the study of the
relationship between literature and physical environment” (Glotfelty:1996, xviii) is chosen for reading “Hawk Roosting”
since this poem presents Hughes’s intense insights into the natural world. This
article exemplifies the ways in which Hughes explores both violence and order
in nature through the daily experiences of a hawk in its own habitat. The hawk
acts in an instictive manner in line with the natural order.
Anahtar Kelimeler
Kaynakça
- Armbruster, K. (2001). Beyond Nature Writing: Expanding the Boundaries of Ecocriticism. University of Virginia Press. Bandyopadhyay, N. (2013). Ted Hughes and his Animal World: Analysis of the Poems of Ted Hughes by the Yardstick of Ecocriticism. Galaxy: International Multidisciplinary Research Journal, 2(4), 2-17. Bate, J. (2015). Ted Hughes: The Unauthorized Life, New York: Harper. Branch, M. P. and O’Grady, S. (1994). Defining Ecocritical Theory and Practice: 1994 Western Literature Association Meeting, Salt Lake City, Utah. http://www. asle. umn. edu/conf/other_conf/wla/1994/1994. html Clark, H. (2010). The Grief of Influence: Sylvia Plath and Ted Hughes. Plath Profiles: An Interdisciplinary Journal for Sylvia Plath Studies, 3, 158. Cokinos, C. (1994). What is Ecocriticism?, Utah: Kansas State University Press. Cook, N. (1994). What is Ecocriticism? Rhode Island: University of Rhode Island Press. Gifford, T. (2009). Ted Hughes, London: Routledge. Glotfelty, C. and Fromm, H. (Eds.). (1996). The Ecocriticism Reader: Landmarks in Literary Ecology, Athens and London: University of Georgia Press. Hasan, S. M. (2012). Ted Hughes’s Animal Poems: An Embodiment of Violence or vitality? The Dawn Journal, 1(1), 174-187. Istiak, A. (2016). Human Animals in Ted Hughes’ Poetry: A Thorough Study of the Animal Poems of Ted Hughes, Bangladesh: Green University of Bangladesh Press. Lidström, S. (2015). Nature, Environment and Poetry: Ecocriticism and the Poetics of Seamus Heaney and Ted Hughes, London: Routledge. Love, G. A. (2003). Practical Ecocriticism: Literature, Biology, and the Environment, Charlottesville and London: University of Virginia Press. Meyers, J. (2013). Ted Hughes: War Poet. Antioch Review, 71 (1), 30-39. Nash, R. F. (1989). The Rights of Nature: A History of Environmental Ethics, Wisconsin: University of Wisconsin Press. Oppermann, S. (1999). Ecocriticism: Natural world in the literary viewfinder. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Edebiyat Fakültesi Dergisi, 16(2), 29-46. Rudd, G. (2010). Greenery: Ecocritical readings of late medieval English literature, Oxford: Oxford University Press. Sagar, K. (Ed.). (1994). The Challenge of Ted Hughes, UK: Palgrave Macmillan. Worster, D. (1993). The Wealth of Nature: Environmental History and the Ecological Imagination, Oxford: Oxford University Press. Xu, J., Nangong, M. (2012). HW Longfellow: A Poetical-Dwelling Poet of Ecological Wisdom from the Perspective of Ecocriticism. English Language Teaching, 5(5), 85-100. Zerenler, D. (2002). Nature in the Short Stories of Ted Hughes: Snow, The Harvesting and The Rain Horse, Doctoral Dissertation, Selçuk Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Konya.
Ayrıntılar
Birincil Dil
İngilizce
Konular
-
Bölüm
Araştırma Makalesi
Yayımlanma Tarihi
15 Aralık 2018
Gönderilme Tarihi
23 Aralık 2017
Kabul Tarihi
17 Ekim 2018
Yayımlandığı Sayı
Yıl 2018 Cilt: 21 Sayı: 40
Cited By
Representation of Human Violence Against Nature in Ted Hughes’ Selected Poems
Andalas International Journal of Socio-Humanities
https://doi.org/10.25077/aijosh.v4i2.41A Comprehensive Survey of Ecocritical Studies in Turkish Academia
Hacettepe Üniversitesi Edebiyat Fakültesi Dergisi
https://doi.org/10.32600/huefd.904890