Araştırma Makalesi
BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster

KİŞİ-İŞ UYUMU VE YAŞAM DOYUMU İLİŞKİSİNDE İŞTE KENDİNİ YETİŞTİRMENİN ARACI ETKİSİ

Yıl 2019, , 237 - 252, 15.06.2019
https://doi.org/10.31795/baunsobed.581782

Öz

Bu
çalışmanın amacı, özel sektör beyaz yaka çalışanlarının kişi iş uyumu ile yaşam
doyumları arasındaki ilişkide işte kendini yetiştirmenin aracı rolünü
inceleyerek kişi-iş uyumunun genel hayat doyumuna etki etmesini sağlayan
mekanizmaya ışık tutmaktır. Bilindiği üzere yaşamımızın önemli bir bölümü iş
hayatında geçmektedir. Bu nedenle iş hayatından elde edilen doyum, kişinin
genel yaşam doyumunu etkileme gücüne sahiptir. Dolayısıyla kişinin çalışmış
olduğu iş ile uyumunun kişinin yaşamdan elde ettiği doyum üzerindeki etkisini
ve buna aracılık eden değişkenleri belirlemek önemlidir. Bu araştırmada kişinin
işi ile ilişkisinde önemli bir değişken olan “işte kendini yetiştirme”nin aracı
rolü incelenmiştir. Kolayda örnekleme yöntemi kullanılarak ulaşılan 284 kişiden
toplanan verilerle araştırma gerçekleştirilmiştir. Verilerin analizi için
doğrulayıcı faktör ve yol analizleri dahil olmak üzere yapısal eşitlik
modellemesi ve aracı değişken etkisi için bootstrap yöntemi kullanılmıştır.
Çalışmada elde edilen sonuçlar işte kendini yetiştirmenin kısmi aracı değişken
etkisi olduğunu göstermektedir

Kaynakça

  • Arbuckle, J. L. (2010). IBM SPSS Amos 19 user’s guide. Crawfordville, FL: Amos Development Corporation, 635.
  • Avşaroğlu, S., Deniz, M. E. ve Kahraman, A. (2005). Teknik öğretmenlerde yaşam doyumu iş doyumu ve mesleki tükenmişlik düzeylerinin incelenmesi. Selçuk Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, (14), 115-129.
  • Bowen, N. K., & Guo, S. (2011). Structural equation modeling. Oxford University Press.
  • Cable, D. M. ve DeRue, D. S. (2002). The convergent and discriminant validity of subjective fit perceptions. Journal of applied psychology, 87(5), 875-884.
  • Chacko, T. I. (1983). Job and life satisfactions: A causal analysis of their relationships. Academy of Management Journal, 26(1), 163-169.
  • Chin, W. W., Gopal, A., & Salisbury, W. D. (1997). Advancing the theory of adaptive structuration: The development of a scale to measure faithfulness of appropriation. Information systems research, 8(4), 342-367.
  • Deiner, E. (2000). Subjective well-being: The science of happiness and a proposal for a national index. American Psychologist, Vol 55(1), 34-43.
  • Diener, E. D., Emmons, R. A., Larsen, R. J. ve Griffin, S. (1985). The satisfaction with life scale. Journal of personality assessment, 49(1), 71-75.
  • Diener, E., Sapyta, J. J., & Suh, E. (1998). Subjective well-being is essential to well-being. Psychological Inquiry, 9, 33-37.
  • Dikmen, A. A. (1995). İş doyumu ve yaşam doyumu ilişkisi. Ankara Üniversitesi SBF Dergisi, 50(03), 115-140.
  • Doyum, 2017. In Turkish Language Institution Dictionary. Erişim tarihi:25.06.2017, http://www.tdk.gov.tr/index.php?option=com_bts&arama=kelime&guid=TDK.GTS.5955303bf0ac05.25323708
  • Dursun, S. ve İştar, E. (2014). Kadın Çalışanların Yaşamış Oldukları İş Aile Yaşamı Çatışmasının İş Ve Yaşam Doyumu Üzerine Etkisi. Atatürk Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi, 28(3), 127-137.
  • Edwards, J. R. (1991). Person–job fit: A conceptual integration, literature review, and methodological critique. In C.L. Cooper & I.T. Robertson (Eds), International Review of Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Vol.6, 283–357. New York: Wiley.
  • Elliott, E. S., & Dweck, C. S. (1988). Goals: An approach to motivation and achievement. Journal of personality and social psychology, 54(1), 5-12.
  • Erdogan, B., Bauer, T. N., Truxillo, D. M., & Mansfield, L. R. (2012). Whistle while you work: A review of the life satisfaction literature. Journal of Management, 38(4), 1038-1083.
  • Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of marketing research, 39-50.
  • Hair, J. F., Sarstedt, M., Pieper, T. M., & Ringle, C. M. (2012). The use of partial least squares structural equation modeling in strategic management research: a review of past practices and recommendations for future applications. Long range planning, 45(5), 320-340.
  • Hochschild, A. R. (1997). When work becomes home and home becomes work. California Management Review, 39(4), 79-97.
  • HU, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural equation modeling: a multidisciplinary journal, 6(1), 1-55.
  • Iris, B. ve Barrett, G. V. (1972). Some relations between job and life satisfaction and job importance. Journal of applied Psychology, 56(4), 301-304.
  • Judge, T. A., & Ferris, G. R. (1992). The elusive criterion of fit in human resources staffing decisions. People and Strategy, 15(4), 47-67.
  • Koçak, Ö. E. (2016). How to Enable Thriving at Work through Organizational Trust. International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science, 5(4), 40.
  • Koçak, Ö.E. (2017). How employees thrive at work? Importance of relationship quality, person-job fit and recovery experiences after work hours. (Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation). The Institue of Social Sciences, Marmara University, Istanbul.
  • Köker, S. (1991). Comparison of the level of life satisfaction of normal adolescents and adolescents with problems. Unpublished Master Thesis, the Institute of Social Sciences, Ankara University, Ankara. Kristof‐Brown, A. L., Zimmerman, R. D. ve Johnson, E. C. (2005). Consequences Of Individuals' fit At Work: A Meta‐Analysis Of Person–Job, Person–Organization, Person–Group, And Person–Supervisor Fit. Personnel psychology, 58(2), 281-342.
  • Lauver, K. J., & Kristof-Brown, A. (2001). Distinguishing between employees' perceptions of person–job and person–organization fit. Journal of vocational behavior, 59(3), 454-470.
  • Lewin, K. (1935). Dynamic theory of personality. New York: McGraw-Hill.
  • Lewin, K. (1951). Field theory in social science. Harper and Brothers.
  • London, M., Crandall, R. ve Seals, G. W. (1977). The contribution of job and leisure satisfaction to quality of life. Journal of Applied Psychology, 62(3), 328-334.
  • Nix, G. A., Ryan, R. M., Manly, J. B. ve Deci, E. L. (1999). Revitalization through self-regulation: The effects of autonomous and controlled motivation on happiness and vitality. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 35(3), 266-284.
  • Orpen, C. (1978). Work and Nonwork Satisfaction: A Causal-Correlational Analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 63(4), 530-532.
  • Özer, M. ve Karabulut, Ö. Ö. (2003). Life satisfaction in the elderly. Yaşlılarda yaşam doyumu. Geriatri, 6(2), 72-74.
  • Park, H. I., Monnot, M. J., Jacob, A. C., & Wagner, S. H. (2011). Moderators of the relationship between person-job fit and subjective well-being among asian employees. International Journal of Stress Management, 18(1), 67-87.
  • Paterson, T. A., Luthans, F. ve Jeung, W. (2014). Thriving at work: Impact of psychological capital and supervisor support. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 35(3), 434-446.
  • Peterson, C., Park, N., & Seligman, M. E. (2005). Orientations to happiness and life satisfaction: The full life versus the empty life. Journal of happiness studies, 6(1), 25-41.
  • Porath, C., Spreitzer, G., Gibson, C. ve Garnett, F. G. (2012). Thriving at work: Toward its measurement, construct validation, and theoretical refinement. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 33(2), 250-275.
  • Preacher, K. J., & Hayes, A. F. (2004). SPSS and SAS procedures for estimating indirect effects in simple mediation models. Behavior research methods, 36(4), 717-731.
  • Scroggins, W. A. (2008). Antecedents and outcomes of experienced meaningful work: A person-job fit perspective. Journal of Business Inquiry, 7(1), 68-78.
  • Sonenshein, S., Dutton, J. E., Grant, A. M., Spreitzer, G. M. ve Sutcliffe, K. M. (2013). Growing at work: Employees' interpretations of progressive self-change in organizations. Organization Science, 24(2), 552-570.
  • Spreitzer, G., Porath, C. L. ve Gibson, C. B. (2012). Toward human sustainability: How to enable more thriving at work. Organizational Dynamics, 41(2), 155-162.
  • Telef, B. B. (2011). Öğretmenlerin Öz-yeterlikleri, İş Doyumları, Yaşam Doyumları ve Tükenmişliklerinin İncelenmesi. İlkogretim Online, 10(1), 92-108.
  • Tokat, L. (2006). Farabi felsefesinde mutluluğun araştırılması. Dinbilimleri Akademik Araştırma Dergisi, 6(2), 133-157.
  • Uyguç, N., Arbak, Y., Duygulu, E. ve Çıraklar, N. H. (1998). İş Ve Yaşam Doyumu Arasındaki İlişkinin Üç Temel Varsayım Altında İncelenmesi. Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 13(2). 193-204.
  • Wixom, B. H., & Watson, H. J. (2001). An empirical investigation of the factors affecting data warehousing success. MIS quarterly, 17-41.

Mediating Effect of Thriving at Work on the Relationship between Person-Job Fit and Life Satisfaction

Yıl 2019, , 237 - 252, 15.06.2019
https://doi.org/10.31795/baunsobed.581782

Öz

The aim of this study is to shed light on the
underlying mechanism by which person-job fit affects general life satisfaction
through examining the mediating role of thriving at work. As it is known, a
significant part of our life is spent at work. For this reason, the
satisfaction obtained from work life may have the power to influence the
general life satisfaction of the person. Therefore, it is important to
determine the amount of effect of person-job fit on life satisfaction along
with the variables that mediate this effect. In this research, the mediating
role of "thriving at work" which is an influential variable in
relation to the work life of the person has been investigated. Data were
collected from 284 participants using the convenience sampling method. For the
analysis of the data, structural equation modelling was used. For mediation
effect test, the bootstrap method employed. The results of the study show that
thriving at work partially mediates the effect of person-job fit on general
life satisfaction.

Kaynakça

  • Arbuckle, J. L. (2010). IBM SPSS Amos 19 user’s guide. Crawfordville, FL: Amos Development Corporation, 635.
  • Avşaroğlu, S., Deniz, M. E. ve Kahraman, A. (2005). Teknik öğretmenlerde yaşam doyumu iş doyumu ve mesleki tükenmişlik düzeylerinin incelenmesi. Selçuk Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, (14), 115-129.
  • Bowen, N. K., & Guo, S. (2011). Structural equation modeling. Oxford University Press.
  • Cable, D. M. ve DeRue, D. S. (2002). The convergent and discriminant validity of subjective fit perceptions. Journal of applied psychology, 87(5), 875-884.
  • Chacko, T. I. (1983). Job and life satisfactions: A causal analysis of their relationships. Academy of Management Journal, 26(1), 163-169.
  • Chin, W. W., Gopal, A., & Salisbury, W. D. (1997). Advancing the theory of adaptive structuration: The development of a scale to measure faithfulness of appropriation. Information systems research, 8(4), 342-367.
  • Deiner, E. (2000). Subjective well-being: The science of happiness and a proposal for a national index. American Psychologist, Vol 55(1), 34-43.
  • Diener, E. D., Emmons, R. A., Larsen, R. J. ve Griffin, S. (1985). The satisfaction with life scale. Journal of personality assessment, 49(1), 71-75.
  • Diener, E., Sapyta, J. J., & Suh, E. (1998). Subjective well-being is essential to well-being. Psychological Inquiry, 9, 33-37.
  • Dikmen, A. A. (1995). İş doyumu ve yaşam doyumu ilişkisi. Ankara Üniversitesi SBF Dergisi, 50(03), 115-140.
  • Doyum, 2017. In Turkish Language Institution Dictionary. Erişim tarihi:25.06.2017, http://www.tdk.gov.tr/index.php?option=com_bts&arama=kelime&guid=TDK.GTS.5955303bf0ac05.25323708
  • Dursun, S. ve İştar, E. (2014). Kadın Çalışanların Yaşamış Oldukları İş Aile Yaşamı Çatışmasının İş Ve Yaşam Doyumu Üzerine Etkisi. Atatürk Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi, 28(3), 127-137.
  • Edwards, J. R. (1991). Person–job fit: A conceptual integration, literature review, and methodological critique. In C.L. Cooper & I.T. Robertson (Eds), International Review of Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Vol.6, 283–357. New York: Wiley.
  • Elliott, E. S., & Dweck, C. S. (1988). Goals: An approach to motivation and achievement. Journal of personality and social psychology, 54(1), 5-12.
  • Erdogan, B., Bauer, T. N., Truxillo, D. M., & Mansfield, L. R. (2012). Whistle while you work: A review of the life satisfaction literature. Journal of Management, 38(4), 1038-1083.
  • Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of marketing research, 39-50.
  • Hair, J. F., Sarstedt, M., Pieper, T. M., & Ringle, C. M. (2012). The use of partial least squares structural equation modeling in strategic management research: a review of past practices and recommendations for future applications. Long range planning, 45(5), 320-340.
  • Hochschild, A. R. (1997). When work becomes home and home becomes work. California Management Review, 39(4), 79-97.
  • HU, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural equation modeling: a multidisciplinary journal, 6(1), 1-55.
  • Iris, B. ve Barrett, G. V. (1972). Some relations between job and life satisfaction and job importance. Journal of applied Psychology, 56(4), 301-304.
  • Judge, T. A., & Ferris, G. R. (1992). The elusive criterion of fit in human resources staffing decisions. People and Strategy, 15(4), 47-67.
  • Koçak, Ö. E. (2016). How to Enable Thriving at Work through Organizational Trust. International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science, 5(4), 40.
  • Koçak, Ö.E. (2017). How employees thrive at work? Importance of relationship quality, person-job fit and recovery experiences after work hours. (Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation). The Institue of Social Sciences, Marmara University, Istanbul.
  • Köker, S. (1991). Comparison of the level of life satisfaction of normal adolescents and adolescents with problems. Unpublished Master Thesis, the Institute of Social Sciences, Ankara University, Ankara. Kristof‐Brown, A. L., Zimmerman, R. D. ve Johnson, E. C. (2005). Consequences Of Individuals' fit At Work: A Meta‐Analysis Of Person–Job, Person–Organization, Person–Group, And Person–Supervisor Fit. Personnel psychology, 58(2), 281-342.
  • Lauver, K. J., & Kristof-Brown, A. (2001). Distinguishing between employees' perceptions of person–job and person–organization fit. Journal of vocational behavior, 59(3), 454-470.
  • Lewin, K. (1935). Dynamic theory of personality. New York: McGraw-Hill.
  • Lewin, K. (1951). Field theory in social science. Harper and Brothers.
  • London, M., Crandall, R. ve Seals, G. W. (1977). The contribution of job and leisure satisfaction to quality of life. Journal of Applied Psychology, 62(3), 328-334.
  • Nix, G. A., Ryan, R. M., Manly, J. B. ve Deci, E. L. (1999). Revitalization through self-regulation: The effects of autonomous and controlled motivation on happiness and vitality. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 35(3), 266-284.
  • Orpen, C. (1978). Work and Nonwork Satisfaction: A Causal-Correlational Analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 63(4), 530-532.
  • Özer, M. ve Karabulut, Ö. Ö. (2003). Life satisfaction in the elderly. Yaşlılarda yaşam doyumu. Geriatri, 6(2), 72-74.
  • Park, H. I., Monnot, M. J., Jacob, A. C., & Wagner, S. H. (2011). Moderators of the relationship between person-job fit and subjective well-being among asian employees. International Journal of Stress Management, 18(1), 67-87.
  • Paterson, T. A., Luthans, F. ve Jeung, W. (2014). Thriving at work: Impact of psychological capital and supervisor support. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 35(3), 434-446.
  • Peterson, C., Park, N., & Seligman, M. E. (2005). Orientations to happiness and life satisfaction: The full life versus the empty life. Journal of happiness studies, 6(1), 25-41.
  • Porath, C., Spreitzer, G., Gibson, C. ve Garnett, F. G. (2012). Thriving at work: Toward its measurement, construct validation, and theoretical refinement. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 33(2), 250-275.
  • Preacher, K. J., & Hayes, A. F. (2004). SPSS and SAS procedures for estimating indirect effects in simple mediation models. Behavior research methods, 36(4), 717-731.
  • Scroggins, W. A. (2008). Antecedents and outcomes of experienced meaningful work: A person-job fit perspective. Journal of Business Inquiry, 7(1), 68-78.
  • Sonenshein, S., Dutton, J. E., Grant, A. M., Spreitzer, G. M. ve Sutcliffe, K. M. (2013). Growing at work: Employees' interpretations of progressive self-change in organizations. Organization Science, 24(2), 552-570.
  • Spreitzer, G., Porath, C. L. ve Gibson, C. B. (2012). Toward human sustainability: How to enable more thriving at work. Organizational Dynamics, 41(2), 155-162.
  • Telef, B. B. (2011). Öğretmenlerin Öz-yeterlikleri, İş Doyumları, Yaşam Doyumları ve Tükenmişliklerinin İncelenmesi. İlkogretim Online, 10(1), 92-108.
  • Tokat, L. (2006). Farabi felsefesinde mutluluğun araştırılması. Dinbilimleri Akademik Araştırma Dergisi, 6(2), 133-157.
  • Uyguç, N., Arbak, Y., Duygulu, E. ve Çıraklar, N. H. (1998). İş Ve Yaşam Doyumu Arasındaki İlişkinin Üç Temel Varsayım Altında İncelenmesi. Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 13(2). 193-204.
  • Wixom, B. H., & Watson, H. J. (2001). An empirical investigation of the factors affecting data warehousing success. MIS quarterly, 17-41.
Toplam 43 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil Türkçe
Konular İşletme
Bölüm İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler
Yazarlar

Hüseyin Çırpan Bu kişi benim 0000-0002-7554-5203

Pelin Vardarlıer 0000-0002-5101-6841

Ömer Erdem Koçak 0000-0002-4649-2042

Yayımlanma Tarihi 15 Haziran 2019
Gönderilme Tarihi 26 Kasım 2018
Kabul Tarihi 24 Haziran 2019
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2019

Kaynak Göster

APA Çırpan, H., Vardarlıer, P., & Koçak, Ö. E. (2019). KİŞİ-İŞ UYUMU VE YAŞAM DOYUMU İLİŞKİSİNDE İŞTE KENDİNİ YETİŞTİRMENİN ARACI ETKİSİ. Balıkesir Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 22(41), 237-252. https://doi.org/10.31795/baunsobed.581782

BAUNSOBED