Bölgesel Entegrasyon Anlaşmaları ve Üçüncü Ülkelere Etkileri

Öz

Araştırmanın temelleri: Savaş sonrası dönem, ülkeler arasındaki ticaretin derinleşmesi ve genişletilmesine yönelik ticaretin serbestleştirilmesi ve bölgesel entegrasyon anlaşmalarının hayata geçirildiği bir dönem olma özelliğine sahiptir. Bu kapsamda, bölgesel entegrasyon anlaşmaları ile ilgili güncel tartışmalar bu anlaşmaların birliğe üye olmayan ülkelere etkileri üzerinde yoğunlaşmıştır.Araştırmanın amacı: Bu çalışmanın amacı, bölgesel entegrasyon anlaşmalarını ve bunların üçüncü ülkeler üzerindeki etkilerini incelemektir. Bu kapsamda bölgesel entegrasyonun ticaret yaratıcı ve ticaret saptırıcı etkileri ele alınmaktadır. Veri kaynakları: Çalışma, bölgesel entegrasyon anlaşmalarının üçüncü ülkelere etkilerini teorik açıdan ele alan bir değerlendirme çalışmasıdır. Çalışmanın veri kaynakları, bölgesel entegrasyon anlaşmalarının etkilerinin araştıran çalışmalardır.Ana tartışma ve sonuçlar: Çalışma bölgesel entegrasyon anlaşmalarının fayda ve maliyetlerinin anlaşmaya üye ülkeler ile üye olmayan ülkeler üzerindeki etkilerini analiz etmeyi amaçlamaktadır. Çalışma, bölgeselleşme ile üye ülkeler arasında ticaretin önündeki engellerin azaltılmasının yanında üçüncü ülkelerle ticarette ticaretin saptırıcı etkilerinin çıkmasına neden olduğu sonucuna varmıştır

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Ekonomik entegrasyon,Bölgeselleşme,Bölgesel entegrasyon anlaşmaları

REGIONAL INTEGRATION AGREEMENTS AND THEIR IMPACTS ON THIRD COUNTRIES

Öz

Bases of the research: The postwar period has been characterized by the liberalization of trade and the formation of RIAs intended to deepen and widen the economic relations between member countries. In this context, most of the current debate on RIAs has focused on their impact on non-member countries.Purpose of the research: The purpose of this article is to discuss the aspects of RIAs and their implications on non-member countries. In this context, this study raises the question of the effects of trade creation and trade diversion. Data Sources: The study discusses the impacts of regional integration agreements on third countries from a theoretical approach. The data resources of the study are the research studies conducted on the role impact of regional integration agreements.Main argument and the results: This paper tries to find out how are the benefits and costs of RIAs are divided between member and non-member countries. The study concludes that regionalism not only reduce the barriers to trade among its member economies but also it result in at least some diversion of trade with non-member countries

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Economic Integration,Regionalism,Regional Integration Agreements

Kaynakça

1. Andriamananjara, S. (2004). “Preferential Trade Agreements: Endogenous Response of the Third Country”, Economics Bulletin, Vol.6, No.21, pp.1-11.
2. Baldwin, R. E. (1993). “A Domino Theory of Regionalism”, NBER Working Paper No.4465
3. Baldwin, R. E. (1997). “The Causes of Regionalism”, The World Economy, Vol.20, No.7, Nov., 865-888.
4. Bhagwati, J. (1992). “Regionalism versus Multilateralism”, The World Economy, Vol.15, No.5, Sept., pp.535-555.
5. Burfisher, M. E. and Jones, E. A. (1998). “Regional Trade Agreements and U.S. Agriculture”, Ag- ricultural Economics Report No. (AER771), November.
6. Chang, Won and Winters, A. L. (2001). “Preferential Trading Arrangements and Excluded Coun- tries: Ex-Post Estimates of the Effects on Prices”, The World Economy, Vol. 24, No. 6, pp.797-807.
7. De Rosa, Dean, A. (1998). “Regional Integration Arrangements: Static Economic Theory, Quantita- tive Findings, and Policy Guidelines”, August, World Bank Policy Research Working Paper, No.2007.
8. Fernández, R. and Portes, J. (1998). “Returns to Regionalism: An Evaluation of Nontraditional Gains from Regional Trade Agreements”, The World Bank Economic Review, Vol. 12, No. 2, pp. 197–220.

9. Healey, N. M. (1995). From the Treaty of Rome to Maastricht: The Theory and Practice of Euro- pean Integration, in The Economics of New Europe: From Community to Union, Healey, N.M. (eds.), Routledge: London.
10. Hitris, Theo (1998). European Union Economics, 4th Edition, Prentice Hall, Great Britain.
11. Jaumotte, F. (2004). “Foreign Direct Investment and Regional Trade Agreements: The Market Size Effect Revisited”, IMF Working Paper, WP/04/206.
12. Laird, S. (1999). “Regional Trade Agreements: Dangerous Liaisons?”, The World Economy, Vol.22, No.9, December, pp.1179-1200.
13. Matthews, A. (2003). “Regional Integration and Food Security in Developing Countries”, Prepared for the Agricultural Policy Support Service Policy Assistance Division, Food and Agricul- ture Organization of the United Nations, Rome
14. Mcmillan, J. (1993). “Does Regional Integration Foster Open Trade? Economic Theory And GATT’s Article XXIV”, in Regional Integration and the Global Trading System, K. Ander- son and R. Blackhurst, (eds.), London: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
15. Mole, J. de and Panagariya, A. (1992). The New Regionalism in Trade Policy, World Bank, Centre for Economic Policy Research, Washington, D.C.
16. Molle, W. (1997). The Economics of European Integration: Theory, Practice, Policy, Third Edition, Ashgate: USA.
17. Mussa, M. (2000). “Factors Driving Global Economic Integration”, Federal Reserve Bank of Kan- sas City Proceedings, August, pp.9-55.
18. Nevin, E. (1990). The Economics of Europe, Macmillan Pres: London.
19. Panagariya, A. and Duttagupta, R. (2000). “Politics of Free Trade Areas: Tariffs versus Quotas”, Paper originally prepared for presentation at the “Leitner Conference on Political and Eco- nomic Aspects of Regional Integration” at Yale University, April 7-8, 2000.
20. Pelkmans, J. (2001). European Integration: Methods and Economic Analysis, 2nd Edition, Eng- land: Prentice Hall.
21. Robson, P. (1998). The Economics of International Integration, 4th Edition, London: Routledge.
22. Sapir, A. (1992). “Regional Integration in Europe”, The Economic Journal, Vol. 102, Issue 415, November, pp.1491-1506.
23. Schiff, M. and Winters, A. L. (1998). “Dynamics and Politics in Regional Integration Arrange- ments: An Introduction”, The World Bank Economic Review, Vol. 12, No. 2: 177–95.
24. Torre, A. De La and Kelly, M. R. (1992). “Regional Trade Arrangements”, IMF Occasional Paper No.93, Washington DC.
25. Whalley, J. (1996). “Why Do Countries Seek Regional Trade Agreements”, NBER Working Paper No.W5552, April.
26. Wei, S. J. and Frankel, J. A. (1995). “Open Regionalism in a World of Continental Trade Blocs”, NBER Working Paper, No. W5272, September.
27. Winters, A. L. (1996). “Regionalism versus Multilateralism”, Policy Research Working Paper 1687, The World Bank, November.
28. WTO (2010). Annual Report 2010, Geneva: WTO Secretariat.
29. World Bank (2010). World Development Indicators 2010, Washington DC: World Bank.
30. Venables, A. J. (2003). “Winners and Losers from Regional Integration Agreements”, Economic Journal, Vol.113, October, pp.747-761.
31. Yeats, A. (1997). “Does Mercosur’s Trade Performance Raise Concerns about the Effects of Regional Trade Arrangements?, World Bank Policy Research Working Paper, No. 1729, February.