FİNANSAL FAKTÖRLERİN REEL PARA TALEBİ ÜZERİNDEKİ ROLÜ: TÜRKİYE ÖRNEĞİ

Öz

Araştırmanın Temeli: Değişen finansal koşullarda para talebi fonksiyonunun hareketi önemlidir. Para talebi üzerine yapılan çalışmalar para talebi belirleyicilerinin; reel gelir, faiz ve son zamanlarda hisse senedi fiyatları olduğunu göstermektedir. Bu finansal faktörlerin para talebi üzerindeki etkileri yatırımcıların karar verme davranışlarını belirleyecektir Araştırmanın Amacı: Bu çalışma Türkiye’deki finansal faktörlerin M1 ve M2 para talebinin davranışları üzerinde olan etkilerini analiz etmektedir. Bu amaçla çalışmada, 1988:01-2006:09 dönemi için çok değişenli kointegrasyon yaklaşımı kullanılarak M1 ve M2 para talebi fonksiyonları; reel gelir, faiz oranı, döviz kuru ve reel hisse senedi fiyatı ile tahmin edilmektedir. Tartışma ve Sonuç: Bulunan sonuçlar M1 ve M2 para taleplerinin uzun dönem ilişkilerini ve hem M1 hem de M2’nin dinamik yapılarındaki kararlılığı sergilemektedir. Ayrıca M1 üzerinde reel gelir, faiz ve reel hisse senedinin daha etkili olduğu bulunurken, M2 üzerinde döviz kurunun daha etkili olduğu bulunmaktadır. Döviz kuru para talebi üzerinde pozitif ve anlamlı bir etkiye sahip olduğu için bu durum Türkiyede dövizin gelecekte artacağı düşüncesinin hakim olduğunun göstergesidir. Reel hisse senedi, para talebi hem M1 hemde M2’de üzerinde pozitif ve anlamlı bir etkiye sahiptir. Bu yüzden, para talebi davranışında reel hisse senedinin anlamlı etkisi Türkiye’de para talebinin servet refah etkisi yarattığını göstermektedir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Para talebi,birim kök,kointegrasyon,hata düzeltme modeli,CUSUM ve CUSUMKARE kararlılık testi

The Roles of Financial Factors on the Real Money Demand: Turkey Case

Öz

Fundamental of Study: The action of a money demand function is important in a changing financial condition. The studies about money demand show that the determinants of demand money are real income, interest rate, and latterly stock prices. The affect of these financial factors on money demand will determine decide behavior of investors and will determine decide behavior of investors. Goal of Study: This study analyses the roles of financial factors on the behavior of M1 and M2 demands in Turkey. For this purpose in the study using the multivariate cointegration approach for the 1988:01–2006:09 period, M1 and M2 money demand functions is estimated by using real income, interest rate, exchange rate, and real stock prices. Discussion and Result: Our results exhibit that the long-run M1 and M2 money demands and structural stability in the dynamic specification of both M1 and M2 demand. In addition, we found that while exchange rate the more effect on M2, real income, interest rate and real stock price the more effect on M1. The exchange rate have a significant and positive effect on money demand, it is indicate that thinking of rising exchange rate in the future is dominate in Turkey. Real stock prices have a significant and positive effect on long-run money demand in both M1 and M2 . Therefore, we show the significance of real stock prices in influencing the demand behavior, indicating the dominance of the wealth effects in Turkey.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Money demand,unit root,contegration,error correction model,CUSUM and CUSUMQS stability test

Kaynakça

1. Abdullah, D. A. (1998), Money Growth Variability and Stock Returns: An Innovations Accounting Analysis, International Economic Journal, 12, 89-104.
2. Akinlo, A. E. (2006), The Stability of Modeny Demand in Nigeria: An Autoregressive Distributed Lag Approach, Journal of Policy Modeling, 28, 445-452.
3. Andrescu, A., Mohammadi, H. and Payne, J. E. (2004), Long-run Estimates of Money Demand in Romania, Applied Economics Letters, 11, 861-864.
4. Andrews, D. W. K. (1991), Heteroscedasticity and Autocorrelation Consistent Covariance Matrix Estimation, Econometrica, 59, 817-858.
5. Arango, S., and Nadiri, M. I. (1981), Demand for Money in Open Economies, Journal of Monetary Economics, 7, 69–83.
6. Arize, A.C., Malindretos, J. and Shwiff, S. S. (1999), Structual Breaks, Cointegration and Speed of Adjustments Evidence from 12 LDCs Money Demand, International Review of Economics and Finance, 8, 399-420.
7. Baharumshah, A. Z. (2004), Stock Prices and Long-run Demand for Money: Evidence from Malaysia, International Economic Journal, 18, 389-407.
8. Bahmani-Oskooee, M., and Pourheydarian, M. (1990), Exchange Rate Sensitivity of the Demand for Money and Effectiveness of Fiscal and Monetary Policies, Applied Economics, 22, 917–925.

9. Bahmani-Oskooee, M., Martin, M. A. G. and Niroomand, F. (1998), Exchange Rate Sensitivity of the Demand for Money in Spain, Applied Economics, 30, 607-612.
10. Bahmani-Oskooee, M. B. and Bohl, M. T. (2000), Germany Monetary Unification and the Stability of the German M3 Money Demand Function, Economics Letters, 66, 203-208.
11. Bahmani-Oskooee, M. (2001), How Stable is M2 Money Demand Function in Japan, Japan and the Word Economy, 13, 455-461.
12. Bahmani-Oskooee, M. B. and Techaratanachai A. (2001), Currency Substitution in Thailand, Journal of Policy Modeling, 23, 141-145.
13. Bahmani-Oskooee, M. (2002), Stabilitiy of the Demand for Money in Korea, International Economic Journal, 16, 85-95.
14. Bahmani-Oskooee, M. and Ng, R. C. W. (2002), Long-run Demand for Money in Hong Kong: An Application of the ARDL Model, International Journal of Business and Economics, 1, 147-155.
15. Bahmani-Oskooee, M. and Chomsisengphet, S. (2002), Stability of M2 Money Demand Function in Industrial Countries, Applied Economics, 34, 2075- 2083.
16. Bahmani-Oskooee, M. B. and Economidou C. (2005), How Stable is the Demand for Money in Greece?, International Economic Journal, 19, 461-472.
17. Bahmani-Oskooee, M. B. and Rehman H. (2005), Stability of the Money Demand Function in Asian Developing Countries, Applied Economics, 37, 773- 792.
18. Berument, H. ve Taşçı, H. (2002), Monetary Policy, Income and Prices: a Stability Assessment, Applied Economics Letters, 9, 685-694.
19. Brown, R. L., Durbin, J. and Evans, J. M. (1975), Techniques for Testing the Constancy of Regression Relations Over Time, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, 37, 149–63.
20. Choudhry, T. (1996), Real Stock Prices and the Long-Run Money Demand Function: Evidence from Canada and the USA, Journal of International Money and Finance, 15, 1-17.
21. Chowdhury, A. R. (1997), The Financial Structure and the Demand for Money in Thailand, Applied Economics, 29, 401-409.
22. Civcir, İ. (2003), Money Demand, Financial Liberalization and Currency Substitution in Turkey, Journal of Economic Studies, 30, 514-534.
23. Dickey, D. A. and Fuller, W. A. (1979), Distribution of the Estimator for Autoregressive Time Series with a Unit Root, Journal of the American Satatictical Assocation, 74, s. 427-431.
24. Dickey, D. A. and Fuller, W. A. (1981), Likelihood Ratio Statistics for Autoregressive Time Series with a Unit Root, Econometrica, 49, s. 1057-1072.
25. Engle, R. and Granger, C. (1987), Co-integration and Error Correction: Representation, Estimation, and Testing, Econometrica, 1987, 55, 251- 276.
26. Friedman, M. (1988), Money and the Stock Market, The Journal of Political Economy, 96, 221-245.
27. Furey, K., (1993), The Effect of Trading in Financial Markets on Money Demand, Eastern Economic Journal, 83-90.
28. Hafer, R. W. and Kutan, M. A. (2003), Financial Innovation and the Demand for Money: Evidence from the Philippines, International Economic Journal,17, 17-27.
29. Hamuri, N. and Hamuri, S. (1999), Stability of the Money Demand Function in Germany, Applied Economics Letters, 6, 329-332.
30. Hendry, D. F. and Ericsson, N. R. (1991), An Econometric Analysis of U.K. Money Demand in Monetary Trends in the United States and the United Kingdom By Milton Friedman and Anna J. Schwartz, American Economic Review, 8-38.
31. Ibrahim, M. H. (1998), An Econometric Analysis of Money Demand and Its Stability In the Malaysian Economy, Indian Economic Review, 33, 53- 66.
32. Ibrahim, M. H. (2001), Fınancial Factors and the Empirical Behavior of Money Demand: A Case Study of Malaysia, International Economic Journal, 15, 55-72.
33. Johansen, S. (1988), Statistical Analysis of Cointegrating Vectors, Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 12, 213–54.
34. Johansen, S. (1991), Estimation and Hypothesis Testing of Cointegration Vectors in Gaussian Autoregressive Models, Econometrica, 59, 1551-1580.
35. Karfakis, C. and Opoulos, M. S. (2000), On the Stability of the Long-run Money Demand in Greece, Applied Economics Letters, 7, 83-86.
36. Kwiatkowski, D., P., Phillips, C. B., Schmidt, P. and Shin, Y. (1992), Testing the Null Hypothesis of Stationarity Against the Alternative of A Unit Root, Journal of Econometrics, 54, 159-178.
37. Mundell, A. R. (1963), Capital Mobility and Stabilization Policy under Fixed and Flexible Exchange Rates, Canadian Journal of Economics and Political Science, 29, 475–485.
38. Ng, S. and Perron, P. (1995), Unit Root Tests in ARMA Models with Data- Dependent Methods for the Selection of the Truncation Lag, Journal of the American Statistical Association, 90, s. 268-281.
39. Onafowora, O. A. and Owoye O. (2005), Currency Substitution and the Stability of the Demand for Money in East Asia, Global Economic Review, 34, 233- 259.
40. Osterwald-Lenum, M. (1992), A Note with Quantiles of the Asymptotic Distribution of the Maximum Likelihood Cointegration Rank Test Statistics, Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 54, 461–72.
41. Pelipas, I. (2006), Money Demand and Inflation in Belarus: Evidence from Cointegrated VAR, Research in International Business and Finance, 20, 200-214.
42. Phillips, P. C. B. and Perron, P. (1988), Testing for Unit Roots in Time Series Regression, Biometrika, 75, 335-346.
43. Said, E. S. and Dickey, D. A. (1984), Testing for Unit Roots in Autoregressive- Moving Average Models of Unknown Order, Biometrika, 71, 599-607.
44. Schwert, G. W. (1989), Tests for Unit Roots: A Monte Carlo Investigation, Journal of Business and Economic Statistics, 7, 147-160.
45. Sevüktekin, M. (1995), Model Kararlılığının Belirlenmesi için Alternatif Bir Test: CUSUM ve CUSUMSQ Testi, Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 10, 313-321.
46. Sevüktekin, M. (1997), Parametrik Olmayan Spesifikasyon Testi-Türkiye 1970- 1995 Dönemi Para Talebi Modeli için Bir Uygulama, III. Ulusal Ekonometri ve İstatistik Sempozyumu Bildirileri, 665-678.
47. Sevüktekin, M. ve Nargeleçekenler, M. (2005), Zaman Serileri Analizi, Ankara: Nobel Yayın Dağıtım.
48. Siddiki, J. U. (2000), Demand for Money in Bangladesh: A Cointegration Analysis, Applied Economics, 32, 1977-1984.
49. Thornton, J. (1998), Real Stock Prices and the Long-Run Demand for Money in Germany, Applied Financial Economics, 8, 513-517.
50. Vamvoukas, G. A. (1998), The Relationship Between Budget Deficits and Mondey Demand: Evidence from a Small Economy, Applied Economics, 30, 375-382.
51. Weliwita, A. and Ekanayake, E. M. (1998), Demand for Money in Sri Lanka During the Post-1977 Period: A Cointegration and Error Correction Analysis, Applied Economics, 30, 1219-1229.