A Descriptive Analysis Study Regarding Use of Video Prompting Procedure as Evidence-Based Interventions in Special Education

Öz

Video prompting is an evidence-based intervention used in education of individuals with special needs. It is a teaching method that gives individuals the opportunity to apply target skills as soon as they watch them, provides acquisition, maintenance and generalization of the learned skills and provides less error rate during teaching. Therefore, we aimed that in this study to review single subject design investigations which independent variable is video prompting in the context of participants demographics, procedure, setting, target skill, teaching format, design, type of presentation and effectiveness of the video prompting. In the studies we reviewed, majority of the participants were students with autism spectrum disorders, the majority of students (aged 12-18) were young, the video prompting was used alone in most of the studies, majority of the interventions were conducted in school settings and in one-to-one format, the target skills of the investigations were largely leisure time and daily living skills. In addition, it was reported that the video prompting is effective in teaching target skills in the investigations we reviewed. We discussed the findings of the review in the context of variables and provided some suggestions for researchers and practitioners.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Literature Review,Special Education,Student with Special Needs,Video Prompting Procedure

BİLİMSEL DAYANAKLI UYGULAMALARDAN VİDEO İPUCU YÖNTEMİNİN ÖZEL EĞİTİMDE KULLANIMINA YÖNELİK BİR BETİMSEL ANALİZ ÇALIŞMASI

Öz

Video ipucu yöntemi özel gereksinimli bireylerin eğitiminde kullanılan bilimsel dayanaklı uygulamalardan biridir. Bireylerin izlediği becerileri anında yapma fırsatı vermesi, öğrenilen becerilerin edinim, kalıcılık ve genellemesini sağlaması ve öğretimin daha az hatayla gerçekleşmesinde önemli yöntemlerden biridir. Dolayısıyla bu çalışmada özel gereksinimli bireylerle yapılmış ve bağımsız değişkeni video ipucu olan tek denekli araştırmaların; katılımcı özellikleri, yöntem, ortam, hedef beceri, öğretim düzenlemesi, araştırma modeli, sunuluş biçimi ve yöntemin etkililiği bağlamında incelenmesi amaçlanmıştır. Araştırma kapsamına dahil edilen çalışmalar elektronik ortamda ve elle tarama yöntemi ile yapılmıştır. Ulaşılan çalışmalar ayrıntılı incelenmiş ve 20 çalışma belirlenen dahil etme ve dışlama ölçütleri dahilinde incelenmiştir. Ulaşılan çalışmalarda daha çok otizm spektrum bozukluğu bulunan öğrencilerin katılımcı olarak yer aldığı, öğrencilerin çoğunluğunun (12-18 yaş arası) genç olduğu, çalışmaların çoğunda video ipucunun tek başına kullanıldığı, uygulamaların daha çok okul ortamında ve birebir formatta yürütüldüğü, araştırmaların bağımlı değişkenlerinin büyük oranda serbest zaman ve günlük yaşam becerileri olduğu görülmüştür. Ayrıca incelenen araştırmalarda video ipucunun hedef davranışların öğretiminde etkili olduğu bildirilmiştir. Araştırma bulguları, incelenen değişkenler bağlamında tartışılmış ve paydaşlara önerilerde bulunulmuştur.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Literatür Tarama,Özel Eğitim,Özel Gereksinimli Öğrenci,Video İpucu Yöntemi

Kaynakça

1. Akmanoglu, N., ve Tekin-Iftar, E. (2011). Teaching Children with Autism How to Respond to the Lures of Strangers. Autism, 15(2), 205-222.
2. Alberto, P., ve Troutman, A. C. (2013). Applied Behavior Analysis for Teachers. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.
3. Altun, D. E., ve Yücesoy-Özkan, Ş. (2018). Serbest Zaman Becerilerinin Öğretiminde Hata Düzeltmesi Yapılarak ve Yapılmadan Sunulan Video İpucunun Karşılaştırılması. Ondokuz Mayıs Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 37(2), 1533. DOI: 10.7822/omuefd.357700
4. Aykut, Ç., Dağseven Emecen, D.,Dayı, E., ve Karasu, N. (2014). Teaching Chained Task to Students with İntellectual Disabilities By Using Video Prompting İn Small Group İnstruction. Educational Science : Theory & Practice, 14(3), 1082-1087.
5. Ayres, K. M., ve Langone, J. (2005).Interventionand İnstruction with Video for Students with Autism: A Review Of The Literature. Education and Training in Developmental Disabilities, 40, 183–196.
6. Bandura, A. (1977). Social learning theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall
7. Banda, D. R., Dogoe, M. S., ve Matuszny, R. M. (2011). Review of Video Prompting Studies with Persons with Developmental Disabilities. Education and Training in Autism and Developmental Disabilities, 46(4), 514-527.
8. Bellini, S., ve Akullian, J. (2007). A Meta-Analysis of Video Modeling and Video Self-Modeling İnterventions for Children and Adolescents with Autism Spectrum Disorders. Exceptional children, 73(3), 264-287.

9. Bellini, S., Akullian, J., ve Hopf, A. (2007). Increasing Social Engagement in Young Children with Autism Spectrum Disorders Using Video Self-Modeling. School Psychology Review, 36(1), 80-90.
10. Bereznak, S., Ayres, K. M., Mechling, L. C., ve Alexander, J. L. (2012). Video Self-Prompting and Mobile Technology to İncrease Daily Living and Vocational İndependence for Students with Autism Spectrum Disorders. Journal of Developmental and Physical Disabilities, 24, 269–285.
11. Buggey, T. (1995). An Examination of the Effectiveness of Videotaped Self-Modeling in Teaching Specific Linguistic Structures to Preschoolers. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 15, 434–458.
12. Buggey, T. (2007). A Picture is Worth: Video Self-Modeling Applications at School and Home. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 9(3), 151-158.
13. Cannella-Malone, H. I., Fleming, C., Chung, Y. C., Wheeler, G. M., Basbagill, A. R., ve Singh, A. H. (2011). Teaching Daily Living Skills to Seven İndividuals with Severe İntellectual Disabilities: A Comparison of Video Prompting to Video Modeling. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 13(3), 144-153.
14. Cannella-Malone, H. I., Miller, O., Schaefer, J. M., Jimenez, E. D., Justin, E., ve Sabielny, L. M. (2016). Using Video Prompting to Teach Leisure Skills to Students With Significant Disabilities. Exceptional Children, 82(4): 463–478.
15. Cannella-Malone, H. I., Wheaton, J. E., Wu, P. F., Tullis, C. A., ve Park, J. H. (2012). Comparing the Effects of Video Prompting with and Without Error Correction on Skill Acquisition for Students with İntellectual Disability. Education and Training in Autism and Developmental Disabilities, 47(3), 332-344.
16. Cannella-Malone, H., Fleming, C., Chung, Y. C., Wheeler, G. M., Basbagill, A. R., ve Singh, A. H. (2011). Teaching Daily Living Skills to Seven Individuals with Severe Intellectual Disabilities: A Comparison of Video Prompting to Video Modeling. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions 13(3) 144 –153.
17. Cannella-Malone, H., Sigafoos, J., O'Reilly, M., De La Cruz, B., Edrisinha, C., ve Lancioni, G. E. (2006). Comparing Video Prompting to Video Modeling for Teaching Daily Living Skills to Six Adults with Developmental Disabilities. Education and Training in Developmental Disabilities, 344-356.
18. Cay, E. ve Eldeniz Cetin, M. (2018). The Effectiveness of Video Prompting in Small Groups Teaching of Leisure Time Skills to Individuals with Intellectual Disabilities, International Online Journal of Educational Sciences, 10(4), 18-37.
19. Chan, J. M., Lambdin, L., Laarhoven, T. V., ve Johnson, J. W. (2013). Teaching Leisure Skills to an Adult with Developmental Disabilities Using a Video Prompting Intervention Package. Education and Training in Autism and Developmental Disabilities, 48(3), 412–420.
20. Charlop-Christy, M. H., Le, L., ve Freeman, K. A. (2000). A Comparison of Video Modeling with in Vivo Modeling for Teaching Children with Autism. Journal of autism and developmental disorders, 30(6), 537-552.Cihak, D. F., & Schrader, L. (2008).
21. Cihak, D. F., ve Schrader, L. (2008). Does the Model Matter? Comparing Video Self-Modeling and Video Adult Modeling for Task Acquisition and Maintenance By Adolescents with Autism Spectrum Disorders. Journal of Special Education Technology, 23(3), 9-20..
22. Cook, B. G., Tankersley, M., Cook, L., ve Landrum, T. J. (2008). Evidence-Based Practices in Special Education: Some Practical Considerations. Intervention in School and Clinic, 44, 69–75
23. Cook, B. G., Tankersley, M., ve Landrum, T. J. (2009). Determining Evidence-Based Practices in Special Education. Exceptional Children, 75(3), 365-383.
24. Cooper, J. O., Heron, T. E., & Heward, W. L. (2007). Applied Behavior Analysis (2nd ed.). Prentice Hall.
25. Darden-Brunson, F., Green, A., ve Goldstein, H. (2008). Video-Based İnstruction For Children With Autism. Luiselli, J. K., Russo, D. C., Christian, W. P., & Wilcyznski, S. M. (Eds.). Effective Practices for Children with Autism: Educational and Behavioral Support İnterventions that Work içinde, 241-268.
26. Dueñas, A. D., Plavnick, J. B., ve Bak, M. S. (2019). Effects of Joint Video Modeling on Unscripted Play Behavior of Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder. Journal of autism and developmental disorders, 49(1), 236-247.
27. Edrisinha, C., O’Reilly, M. F., Choi, H. Y., Sigafoos, J. ve Lancioni, G. E. (2011). “Say Cheese”: Teaching Photography Skills to Adults with Developmental Disabilities. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 32, 636-642.
28. Gardner, S., ve Wolfe, P. (2013). Use of Video Modeling and Video Prompting İnterventions for Teaching Daily Living Skills to İndividuals with Autism Spectrum Disorders: A Review. Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 38(2), 73-87.
29. Gies, M., ve Porretta, D. (2012). Video Prompting and Line Dancing for Boys With Autism. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport–Supplement 83, A-88
30. Giangreco, M. F. (2011). Educating Students with Severe Disabilities: Foundational Concepts and Practices. In M. E. Snell & F. Brown (Eds.), Instruction of students with severe disabilities (7th ed., pp. 1–30). Boston: Pearson.
31. Halle, S., Ninness, C., Ninness, S. K., ve Lawson, D. (2016). Teaching Social Skills to Students with Autism: A Video Modeling Social Stories Approach. Behavior and Social Issues, 25(1), 42-54.
32. Hanley, G. P., Iwata, B. A., ve McCord, B. E. (2003). Functional Analysis of Problem Behavior: A Review. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 36(2), 147-185. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1901/jaba.2003.36-147
33. Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance. (2014). The what works clearinghouse procedures and standards handbook, Version 3.0. Erişim adresi: https://ies.ed.gov/ ncee/wwc/FWW
34. Johnson, J. W., Blood, E., Freeman, A., ve Simmons, K. (2013). Evaluating the Effectiveness of Teacher İmplemented Video Prompting on an İpod Touch to Teach Food Preperation Skills to High School Students with Autism Spectrum Disorders. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 28, 147-158.
35. Kahveci, G. (2017). Çoklu Yetersizlikten Etkilenmiş Bir Çocukta Video İle İpucu Öğretim Yaklaşımının Çocuğun Oyun Oynama Beceri İlişkili Hareketleri Üstündeki Etkililiği. International Journal of New Trends in Arts, Sports & Science Education, 6(4), 2146 – 9466.
36. Kellems, R. O., ve Morningstar, M. E. (2012). Using Video Modeling Delivered through İpods to Teach Vocational Tasks to Young Adults with Autism Spectrum Disorders. Career Development and Transition for Exceptional Individuals, 35(3), 155-167.
37. Kellems, R. O., ve Morningstar, M. E. (2012). Using Video Modeling Delivered through İpods to Teach Vocational Tasks to Young Adults with Autism Spectrum Disorders. Career Development And Transition For Exceptional Individuals, 35(3), 155-167.
38. Kourassanis, J., Jones, E. A., ve Fienup, D. M. (2015). Peer-Video Modeling: Teaching Chained Social Game Behaviors to Children with ASD. Journal Of Developmental And Physical Disabilities, 27(1), 25-36.
39. Kırcaali-İftar, G. (2007). Otizm Spektrum Bozukluğu. İstanbul: Daktylos Yayınları
40. Kurt, O. (2012a). Otizm Spektrum Bozukluğu Olan ve Bilimsel Dayanaklı Uygulamalar. E. Tekin-İftar (Ed.), Otizm Spektrum Bozukluğu Olan Çocuklar ve Eğitimleri (Ss. 83-120). Ankara: Vize Yayıncılık
41. Laarhoven, T. V., Kraus, E., Karpman, K., Nizzi, R. ve Valentino, J. (2010). A Comparison of Picture and Video Prompts to Teach Daily Living Skills to Individuals with Autism. Focus On Autism And Other Developmental Disabilities, 25 (4), 195–208.
42. Le Grice, B., ve Blampied, N. M. (1994). Training Pupils with İntellectual Disability to Operate Educational Technology Using Video Prompting. Education And Training İn Mental Retardation And Developmental Disabilities, 321-330.
43. Maione, L., ve Mirenda, P. (2006). Effects of Video Modeling and Video Feedback on Peer-Directed Social Language Skills of a Child with Autism. Journal Of Positive Behavior Interventions, 8(2), 106-118.
44. Mason, R. A., Davis, H. S., Ayres, K. M., Davis, J. L., ve Mason, B. A. (2016). Video Self-Modeling for İndividuals with Disabilities: A Best-Evidence, Single Case Meta-Analysis. Journal Of Developmental And Physical Disabilities, 28(4), 623-642.
45. Mason, R. A., Ganz, J. B., Parker, R. I., Burke, M. D., ve Camargo, S. P. (2012). Moderating Factors of Video-Modeling with Other as Model: A Meta-Analysis of Single-Case Studies. Research İn Developmental Disabilities, 33(4), 1076-1086.
46. Mechling, L. C., ve Ortega-Hurndon, F. (2007). Computer-Based Video İnstruction to Teach Young Adults with Moderate İntellectual Disabilities to Perform Multiple Step, Job Tasks İn A Generalized Setting. Education And Training İn Developmental Disabilities, 42(1), 24-37.
47. Mechling, L. C., Gast, D. L., ve Fields, E. A. (2008). Evaluation of a Portable DVD Player and System of Least Prompts to Self-Prompt Cooking Task Completion By Young Adults With Moderate İntellectual Disabilities. Journal Of Special Education, 42, 179–190.
48. Mechling, L. C., ve Swindle, C. O. (2013). Fine and Gross Motor Task Performance When Using Computer-Based Video Models By Students with Autism and Moderate İntellectual Disability. The Journal Of Special Education, 47(3), 135-147.
49. Mechling, L. C., Ayres, K. M., Foster, A. L., ve Bryant, K. J. (2013). Comparing The Effects of Commercially Available and Custommade Video Prompting for Teaching Cooking Skills to High School Students with Autism. Remedial and Special Education, 34, 371–383.
50. Mechling, L. C., Gast, D. L., ve Gustafson, M. R. (2009). Use of Video Modeling to Teach Extinguishing of Cooking Related Fires to İndividuals with Moderate İntellectual Disabilities. Education And Training İn Developmental Disabilities, 67-79.
51. Mechling, L., ve Savidge, E. (2011). Using a Personal Digital Assistant to İncrease Completion of Novel Tasks and İndependent Transitioning by Students with Autism Spectrum Disorder. Journal Of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 41, 687–704.
52. National Autism Center-NAC. (2015). Findings and Conclusions: National Standards Project, Phase 2. 19 Şubat 2020 Tarihinde Https://Www.Nationalautismcenter.Org/National-Standards-Project/Phase-2/ Adresinden Erişilmiştir.
53. National Professional Development Center on Autism Spectrum Disorders-NPDC. What Are Evidencebased Practices? 19 Şubat 2020 Tarihinde Https://Autismpdc.Fpg.Unc.Edu/Evidence-Based-Practices Adresinden Erişilmiştir.
54. Nikopoulos, C. K., ve Keenan, M. (2004). Effects of Video Modeling on Social İnitiations by Children with Autism. Journal Of Applied Behavior Analysis, 37(1), 93-96.
55. Odom, S. L., Bratlinger, E., Gersten, R., Horner, R. H., Thompson, B., Harris, K. R. (2005). Research in Special Education: Scientific Methods and Evidence-Based Practices. Exceptional Children, 71, 137-148.
56. Ozen, A., Batu, S., ve Birkan, B. (2012). Teaching Play Skills to Children with Autism through Video Modeling: Small Group Arrangement and Observational Learning. Education And Training İn Autism And Developmental Disabilities, 47(1), 84-96.
57. Richter, S., ve Test, D. (2011). Effects of Multimedia Social Stories on Knowledge of Adult Outcomes and Opportunities among Transition-Aged Youth with Significant Cognitive Disabilities. Education and Training İn Autism and Developmental Disabilities, 46, 410–424.
58. Schreibman, L., Whalen, C., ve Stahmer, A. C. (2000). The Use of Video Priming to Reduce Disruptive Transition Behavior in Children with Autism. Journal Of Positive Behavior İnterventions, 2(1), 3-11.
59. Snell, M. E. (2007). Advances in İnstruction. In S. L. Odom, R. H. Horner, M. E. Snell & J. Blacher (Eds.), Handbook Of Developmental Disabilities (Pp. 249–268). NY: The Guilford Press.
60. Shukla-Mehta, S., Miller, T., & Callahan, K. J. (2010). Evaluating the Effectiveness of Video İnstruction on Social and Communication Skills Training for Children with Autism Spectrum Disorders: A Review of the Literature. Focus On Autism And Other Developmental Disabilities, 25(1), 23-36.
61. Tekin-İftar, E. (2012). Eğitim ve Davranış Bilimlerinde Tek Denekli Araştırmalar. Türk Psikologlar Derneği Yayınları: Ankara Tekin-İftar, E. ve Kırcaali-İftar, G. (2016). Özel Eğitimde Yanlışsız Öğretim Yöntemleri, Ankara: Vize Yayıncılık
62. Van Laarhoven, T., ve Van Laarhoven-Myers, T. (2006). Comparison of Three Video-Based İnstructional Procedures for Teaching Daily Living Skills to Persons with Developmental Disabilities. Education and Training in Developmental Disabilities, 365-381.
63. Whitcomb, S. A., Bass, J. D., ve Luiselli, J. K. (2011). Effects of a Computer-Based Early Reading Program (Headsprout) On Word List and Text Reading Skills in a Student with Autism. Journal of Developmental and Physical Disabilities, 23, 491–499.
64. Wilson, K. P. (2013). Teaching Social-Communication Skills to Preschoolers with Autism: Efficacy of Video Versus in Vivo Modeling in The Classroom. Journal of Autism And Developmental Disorders, 43(8), 1819-1831.
65. Yanardağ, M., Akmanoğlu, N., ve Yılmaz, İ. (2013). The Effectiveness of Video Prompting on Aquatic Play Skills for Children with Autism. Disability and Rehabilitation, 35(1), 47-56. Doi: 10.3109/09638288.2012.687030
66. Yavuz, M., ve Şafak, P. (2017). Otizm Spektrum Bozukluğu Olan Çocuklara Ev İçi Becerilerin Öğretiminde Videoyla Model Olma İle Videoyla İpucu Yöntemlerinin Etkililiğinin ve Verimliliklerinin Karşılaştırılması. Trakya Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 19(2), 341-365.
67. Yucesoy-Ozkan, S., Gulboy, E., ve Kaya, F. (2018). Teaching Children with Intellectual Disabilities through Video Prompting: Smartphone vs. Tablet. International Journal of Early Childhood Special Education (INT-JECSE), 10(1), 32-48. DOI: 10.20489/İntjecse.