Demografik değişkenlerin üniversite öğrencilerinin dijital medya kullanım alışkanlıkları üzerindeki etkileri: Analitik bir çalışma

Yıl 2025, Cilt: 28 Sayı: 53, 331 - 350, 12.06.2025

Abdullah Yılmaz , Hakan Gökhan Gündoğdu , Çağlar Karamaşa , Merve Esra Özer , Sevde Nur Önsür , Süleyman Şeker

https://doi.org/10.31795/baunsobed.1659698

Öz

Dijital medyanın hızla gelişmesi gençlerin medya alışkanlıklarını dönüştürmüş, üniversite öğrencilerinin bilgi edinimini ve medya tercihlerini etkileyen faktörlerin incelenmesini gerekli kılmıştır. Lisans öğrencilerinin medya tercihlerine dair az sayıda çalışma bulunmakta olup, bu araştırma İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi (İİBF) öğrencilerine özgün bir katkı sunmayı hedeflemektedir. Bu araştırmanın temel amacı, üniversite öğrencilerinin dijital medya araçlarını kullanım sıklığının, cinsiyet, aile durumu, akademik bölüm, sınıf seviyesi ve yaş gibi faktörlerle ilişkisini incelemektir. Araştırma, bu faktörlerin öğrencilerin medya kullanım alışkanlıkları, dijital medya tercihleri ve iletişim tarzları üzerindeki etkilerini daha derinlemesine anlamayı hedeflemektedir. Araştırmada, İİBF öğrencilerinden oluşan 500 öğrenciye ulaşmak için kota örnekleme yöntemi kullanılmış ve anket verileri toplanmıştır. Öğrencilerin medya kullanım seviyelerini değerlendirmek için yaş, cinsiyet ve hanehalkı geliri gibi bağımsız değişkenler dikkate alınmıştır. Veriler SPSS yazılımı kullanılarak analiz edilmiş ve bağımlı ve bağımsız değişkenler arasındaki ilişkileri test etmek için T-testleri ve ANOVA uygulanmıştır. Bulgular, İİBF öğrencilerinin dijital medya kullanımının cinsiyet, akademik bölüm ve sınıf seviyesine göre farklılaştığını göstermektedir. Kadın öğrencilerin dijital medyayı erkek öğrencilere göre daha aktif kullandığı, sosyal bilimler öğrencilerinin ise diğer alanlardaki öğrencilere göre daha fazla haber okuduğu bulunmuştur. Ayrıca, sınıf seviyesinin artmasıyla birlikte dijital medya kullanım sıklığının da arttığı gözlemlenmiştir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Dijital Medya , Demografik Faktörler , Medya Kullanım Alışkanlıkları , Medya Kullanım Tercihleri

Etik Beyan

Bu çalışma Anadolu Üniversitesi Etik Kurulu tarafından 31.10.2023 tarih ve 633076 protokol numarasıyla onaylanmıştır.

Destekleyen Kurum

TÜBİTAK

Proje Numarası

11919B012311648

Teşekkür

Bu çalışma TÜBİTAK'ın 11919B012311648 proje numarasıyla desteğiyle gerçekleştirilmiştir.

Effects of demographic variables on university students' digital media usage habits: An analytical study

Öz

The rapid development of digital media has transformed the media habits of young people, necessitating the examination of factors influencing university students' information acquisition and media preferences. Although there are relatively few studies focusing on the media preferences of undergraduate students, this research aims to make a unique contribution by focusing specifically on students from the Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences (FEAS). The primary objective of this study is to examine the relationship between the frequency of digital media usage among university students and various factors such as gender, family status, academic department, class level, and age. The study seeks to gain a deeper understanding of how these factors influence students' media usage habits, digital media preferences, and communication styles. To collect data, the study utilized a quota sampling method, targeting 500 FEAS students. Independent variables such as age, gender, and household income were considered to assess the levels of media usage. The collected data were analyzed using SPSS software, and T-tests and ANOVA were applied to examine the relationships between dependent and independent variables. The findings indicate that digital media usage among FEAS students varies significantly based on gender, academic department, and class level. Female students were found to use digital media more actively than their male counterparts, while students from social sciences departments reported reading news more frequently than students in other disciplines. Additionally, it was observed that as the class level increases, the frequency of digital media usage also rises.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Digital Media , Demographic Factors , Media Usage Habits , Media Usage Preferences

Etik Beyan

This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Anadolu University under protocol number 633076 on 31.10.2023.

Destekleyen Kurum

TÜBİTAK

Proje Numarası

11919B012311648

Teşekkür

This study was supported by TÜBİTAK under the project number 11919B012311648.

Kaynakça

• Abuloum, A., Farah, A., Kaskaloglu, E., & Yaakub, A. (2019). College students’ usage of and preferences for print and electronic textbooks. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (iJET), 14(7), 80. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v14i07.9871
• Alamri, M. M. (2019). Undergraduate students’ perceptions toward social media usage and academic performance: A study from Saudi Arabia. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 14(3), 61-79. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v14i03.9340
• Allahverdi, F. (2022). Relationship between perceived social media addiction and social media applications frequency usage among university students. Psychology in the Schools, 59(6), 1075–1087. https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.22662
• Auxier, B., & Anderson, M. (2021). Social media use in 2021. Pew Research Center: Internet, Science & Tech. Retrieved on 11 August 2024 from https://www.pewresearch.org/internet/2021/04/07/social-media-use-in-2021/
• Baron, N. S., Calixte, R. M., & Havewala, M. (2017). The persistence of print among university students: An exploratory study. Telematics and Informatics, 34(5), 590-604. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2016.11.008
• Bringula, R. P., Catacutan-Bangit, A. E., Garcia, M. B., Gonzales, J. P. S., & Valderama, A. M. C. (2022). Who is gullible to political disinformation?: predicting susceptibility of university students to fake news. Journal of Information Technology & Politics, 19(2), 165-179. https://doi.org/10.1080/19331681.2021.1945988 Buckingham, D. (2003). Media education: Literacy, learning and contemporary culture. Cambridge, UK: Polity.
• Castells, M. (1996). El surgimiento de la sociedad de redes. La era de la información, Economía, Sociedad y Cultura. Siglo XXI.
• Cherian, J., & Jacob, J. (2013). Analysis of attitude towards online and print publications: A case study among university students. Asian Social Science, 9(1), 52-59. https://doi.org/10.5539/ass.v9n1p52
• Cohen, J. W. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd edition). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
• Cumaoğlu, G., Sacici, E., & Torun, K. (2013). E-book versus printed materials: preferences of university students. Contemporary educational technology, 4(2), 121-135.
• Demir, K. A., & Turan, B. (2021). Developing trends in power and networking technologies for intelligent cities. In Developing and monitoring smart environments for intelligent cities (pp. 61-85). IGI Global.
• Eurostat. (2022). Consumption of online news rises in popularity. Retrieved on 26 August 2024 from https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/web/products-eurostat-news/-/ddn-20220824-1.
• Eynon, R., & Malmberg, L. E. (2011). A typology of young people’s Internet use: Implications for education. Computers & Education, 56(3), 585-595.
• Field, A. P. (2013). Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics: And sex and drugs and rock’nroll ´(4th ed.). Los Angeles: Sage.
• George, D. & Mallery, P. (2003). SPSS for Windows Step by Step: A Simple Guide and Reference (4th ed.). Allyn & Bacon.
• Gündoğdu, H. G., Aytekin, A., Toptancı, Ş., Korucuk, S., & Karamaşa, Ç. (2023). Environmental, social, and governance risks and environmentally sensitive competitive strategies: a case study of a multinational logistics company. Bus. Strat. Environ. 32(7), 4874-4906.
• Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2010). Multivariate Data Analysis (7th ed.). Prentice Hall.
• Haleem, A., Javaid, M., & Singh, R. P. (2022). An era of ChatGPT as a significant futuristic support tool: A study on features, abilities, and challenges. Bench Council transactions on benchmarks, standards and evaluations, 2(4), 100089. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tbench.2023.100089
• Hargittai, E. (2003). “The digital divide and what to do about it”. In D. C. Jones (Ed.), The New Economic Handbook (pp. 821-839). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
• Hargittai, E., & Hinnant, A. (2008). Digital inequality: Differences in young adults' use of the Internet. Communication research, 35(5), 602-621.
• Hargittai, E. (2010). Digital na(t)ives? Variation in Internet skills and uses among members of the “Net Generation.” Sociological Inquiry, 80(1), 92-113.
• Ito, M., Horst, H. A., Bittanti, M., Herr Stephenson, B., Lange, P. G., Pascoe, C. J., & Robinson, L. (2009). Living and learning with new media: Summary of findings from the digital youth project (p. 128). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
• Ito, M., Baumer, S., Bittanti, M., Cody, R., Herr-Stephenson, B., Horst, H. A., Lange, P. G., Mahendran, D., Martinez, K. Z., Pascoe, C., (2010). Hanging out, messing around, and geeking out. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
• Ispir, B., Birsen, H., Binark, F. M., Özata, F. Z., Bayraktutan, G., Öztürk, M. C., & Ayman, M. (2013). Dijital iletişim ve yeni medya. Web-Ofset. Eskişehir.
• Johnston, N., Salaz, A. M., & Alsabbagh, L. (2016). Print and digital reading preferences and behaviors of University students in Qatar. Commun Comput Inf Sci., 676, 247–255.
• Johnston, N., & Salaz, A. M. (2019). Exploring the reasons why university students prefer print over digital texts: An Australian perspective. Journal of the Australian Library and Information Association, 68(2), 126-145.
• Kline, P. (1999). The Handbook of Psychological Testing (2nd ed.). Routledge.
• LaRose, R., Mastro, D., & Eastin, M. S. (2001). Understanding Internet usage: A social-cognitive approach to uses and gratifications. Social Science Computer Review, 19(4), 395-413.
• Leeder, C. (2019). How college students evaluate and share “fake news” stories. Library & Information Science Research, 41(3), 100967. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lisr.2019.100967
• Lenhart, A., Purcell, K., Smith, A., & Zickuhr, K. (2010). Social media & mobile internet use among teens and young adults. Millennials: Pew Research Center.
• Livingstone, S., & Helsper, E. (2007). Gradations in digital inclusion: Children, young people and the digital divide. New media & society, 9(4), 671-696.
• Livingstone, S. (2008). Engaging with media—a matter of literacy?. Communication, culture & critique, 1(1), 51-62.
• Metzger, M. J., Flanagin, A. J., & Zwarun, L. (2003). College student Web use, perceptions of information credibility, and verification behavior. Computers & Education, 41(3), 271-290.
• Mizrachi, D., Salaz, A., Boustany, J., & Kurbanoğlu, S. (2018). Preferring Print in A Digital World: An International Study of Students’ Academic Reading Behaviors. In INTED 2018 Proceedings (pp. 1328-1336). IATED.
• Nahavandi, S. (2019). Industry 5.0—A human-centric solution. Sustainability, 11(16), 4371. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11164371
• Nunnally, J. C. (1978). Psychometric Theory (2nd ed.). McGraw-Hill.
• Özdamar, K. (2004). Paket programlarla istatistiksel veri analizi. Eskişehir: Kaan Kitabevi.
• Pew Research Center. (2023). Newspapers fact sheet. Retrieved on 26 August 2024 from https://www.pewresearch.org/journalism/fact-sheet/newspapers/.
• Pew Research Center. (2024). Social media fact sheet. Retrieved on 26 October 2024 from https://www.pewresearch.org/internet/fact-sheet/social-media/.
• Radmard, S., Sosyal, Y., Kutluca A. Y., & Turk, Z. (2020). Üniversite ögrencilerinin sosyal medya kullanım amaçlarının çesitli degişkenler acısından incelenmesi. Uluslararası Eğitim Arastırmacıları Dergisi, 3(2), 171-198.
• Rahman, F., & Amir, P. (2019). Trends in Reading Literary Fiction in Print and Cyber Media by Undergraduate Students of Hasanuddin University. International Journal of Education and Practice, 7(2), 66-77.
• Saxena, A. (2019). The impact of digital media on print media. IIS University Journal of Arts, 8(1), 70-80.
• Schmitt, N. (1996). Uses and abuses of coefficient alpha. Psychological Assessment, 8(4), 350-353.
• Sung, T. K. (2018). Industry 4.0: a Korea perspective. Technological forecasting and social change, 132, 40-45.
• Thoman, E., & Jolls, T. (2004). Media literacy—A national priority for a changing world. American behavioral scientist, 48(1), 18-29.
• Twenge, J. M., Martin, G. N., & Spitzberg, B. H. (2019). Trends in US Adolescents’ media use, 1976–2016: The rise of digital media, the decline of TV, and the (near) demise of print. Psychology of Popular Media Culture, 8(4), 329-345.
• Urista, M. A., Dong, Q., & Day, K. D. (2009). Explaining why young adults use MySpace and Facebook through uses and gratifications theory. Human communication, 12(2), 215-229.
• Vincent, J. (2016). Students’ use of paper and pen versus digital media in university environments for writing and reading–a cross-cultural exploration. Journal of Print Media and Media Technology Research, 5(2), 97-106.
• Zillien, N. & Hargittai, E. (2009). Digital distinction: Status-specific types of internet usage. Social Science Quarterly, 90(2), 274-291.