Students’ Views on the use of Interactive Whiteboards in the Secondary Schools for Enhancing Clasrooms Learning

Yıl 2016, Cilt: 11 Sayı: 2, 0 - 0, 23.12.2016

Ömer Çakıroğlu

Öz

This study was on students’ views on the use of Interactive Whiteboards (IWBs) for enhancing classroom learning in the secondary schools in 6^th  grades. Quantitative research method design was conducted in the study and participants were the sixth grades students (N=378) in 10 secondary schools. The necessary scale tables was developed by the researcher. Eleven closed questions (Yes/No) and forty items Likert-type questionnaire were used to collect data on the IWB use for classrooms learning. Mean score of 11 closed items were higher than fifty. Of 40 items, mean scores of 36 items were higher than 3.00 and only two items were lower than 3.00. Reliability for Likert-type items various between excellent (α=0.92) and good ( α=0.87

Kaynakça

• Abulhmaid, A. (2014). Teachers’ Perspectives on Interactive Whiteboards as Instructional Tools in Four Jourdanian Schools. Contempoarary Educational Technology., 5(1), 73-89.
• Akbaş, O. & Pektaş, H. M. (2011). The effects of using an interactive whiteboard on the academic achievement of university students. Asia-Pacific Forum on Science Learning and Teaching, 12(2). http://www.ied.edu.hk/apfslt/v12_issue2/
• Akkoyunlu, B. & Baskan, G. (2015). School Principals’ Opinions on the FATIH Project in Turkey. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences , 174, 1497 – 1502.
• Al-Salee, B.I.A. (2012). The Interactive White Board in English as Foreign Language (EFL) Classroom. European Scientific Journal, 8(3), 126-134.
• Ardichvili, A. (2008). Learning and knowledge sharing in virtual communities of practice:Motivators, barriers, and enablers. Advances in Developing Human Resources, 10 (4): 541-554.
• Armstrong, V., Barnes, S., Sutherland, R., Curran, S., Mills, S. & Thompson, I. (2005). Collaborative research methodology for investigating teaching and learning: The use of interactive whiteboard technology. Educational Review, 57(4): 457–469.
• Aubusson, P., Burke, P., Schuck, S., Kearney, M. & Frischknect. (2014). Teachers Choosing Rich Tasks The Moderating Impact of Technology on Student Learning, Enjoyment, and Preparation. Education & Educational Research, 43, 219-229.
• Aytac, T. (2013). Interactive Whiteboard factor in Education: Students’ points of view and their problems. Educational Research and Review, 8(20), 1907-1915, October 2013.
• DOI: 10.5897/ERR2013.1595
• Balta, N. & Duran, M. (2015). Attitudes of Students and Teachers towards the Use of Interactive Whiteboards in Elementary and Secondary School Classrooms. TOJET: The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 14, 2, 1-23.
• Beeland, W.D. 2003. Student Engagement, Visual Learning and Technology: Can Interactive Whiteboards Help? Retrieved April 18, 2003, from the University of New Castle website: http://plato75.ncl.ac.uk/beeland.pdf
• Becta. (2006). Teaching Interactively with Electronic Whiteboards in the Primary Phase. Retrieved October 18, 2009 fro httppublications. becta. org.ukdisplay. cfmres ID=25918.
• Betcher, C. & Lee, M. (2009). The interactive whiteboard revolution–Teaching with IWBs. Victoria, Australia: ACER Press. schoolnet.org.za/CoL/../iwb_revolution.
• Blue, E. & Tirotta, R. (2011). The benefits & drawbacks of integrating cloud computing and interactive whiteboards in teacher preparation. TechTrends, 55(3), 31–39.
• Cakiroglu, O. (2015). Teachers’ views on the use of Interactive Whiteboards in Secondary Schools. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 11(2), 251-259.
• Celik, S. (2012). Competency Levels of Teachers in Using Interactive Whiteboards. Contemporary Educational Technology. 3 (2), 115-129
• Demir, R., Öztürk, N. & Dökme, I. (2011). Elementary School 6th Grade Students’ Attitude Towards Technology Course Through Interactive Whiteboard. J.of Educational and Instructional Studies in the World. 1(1), 64-71.
• Digregorio, P. & Sobel-Lojeski, K. (2010). Effects of Interactive Whiteboards (IWBs) on Student Performance and Learning: A Literature Review. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 38 (3), 255-312
• Duran A, Cruz M 2011. The Interactive Whiteboard and Foreign Language Learning: A Case Study. Porta. Linguarum 15. Enero, 211-231.
• Emron, S. & Dhindsa, H. S. (2010). Integration of Interactive Whiteboard Technology to Improve Secondary ScienceTeaching and Learning. International Journal for Research in Education. 28:1-24.
• European Commission Report. (2013). ec.europa.eu/digital.../KK-31-13-401-EN-N.pdf
• Friedman, G.A. (2010). Increasing Students’ Attention by Use of Interactive Whiteboards. Thesis Masters of Arts in Teaching. Sierra Nevada College robeywankenobe.wordpress.com
• Glover, D., Miller, D., Averis, D. and Door, V. (2007). The evolution of an effective pedagogy for teachers using the interactive whiteboard in mathematics and modern languages: An empirical analysis from the secondary sector. Learning, Media and Technology, 32 (1), 5-20.
• Gray C, Hagger-Vaughan L, Pilkington R, Tomkins S A 2005. The pros and cons of interactive whiteboards in relation to the key stage 3 strategy and framework. Language Learning Journal, 32 (1): 38-44.
• Hall, R, (2011). Interactive White Boards: Changing Students’ Attitudes about Science. Leadership Research, 28(1).
• Hartsell, T., Herron, S. S., Fang, H. and Rathod, A. (2010). Improving teachers’ self-Confidence in Learning technology Communication. Technology Education, 6(2), 47-60.
• Hennessy, S. and Warwick, P. (2010). Research into School Teaching and Learning with Whole Class Interactive Technologies. Technology, Pedagogy and Education (Special Edition), 19, 2, 127-131.
• Higgins S, Wall K, Smith H 2005. 'The visual helps me understand the complicated things': pupil views of teaching and learning with interactive whiteboards. British J. of Educational Technology, 36(5): 851-867
• Hodge, S. and Anderson, B. (2007). Teaching and learning with an interactive whiteboard: a teacher’s journey. Learning Media and Technology, 32 (3), 271-282
• Interactive Whiteboards in Education 2010, www.teachlearn.ac.uk , email: [e-mail] Interactive Technology for Special Education Teachers - Bright Hub, Published Mar 24, 2010
• www.brighthub.com/education/special/articles/67034.aspx.
• Karsenti, T. (2016). The Interactive Whiteboard (IWB):Uses, Benefits, and Challenges. Library and Archives Canada, ISBN: 978-2-923808-52-9 February 2016.
• Kennewell S, Beauchamp G 2007. The features of interactive whiteboards and their influence on learning. Learning, Media and Technology, 32(3): 227–24.1
• Khamis, M. N., & Wafa, M. (2014). The Effect of Using Smart Board on Mathematics Achievement and Retention of Seventh Grade Students. International Journal of Education, 6, 4, 107-118.
• Kilic, E., Guler, C., Celik, H. E., Tatli, C. (2015). Learning with interactive whiteboards: Determining the factors on promoting ıwbs to students by Technology Acceptance Model. Interactive Technology and Smart Education, 12, 4, 285–297. Doi.org/10.1108/TTSE-05-2015-0011
• Kurt, A. A., Kuzu, A., Dutsun, O.O., Gullepinar, F. & Gultekin, M. (2013). Pilot Evaluation of Implementation Process of the Fatih Project: Teachers' Views. Journal of Instructional Technologies & Teacher Education, 2 (1).
• Lacina, J. (2009). Interactive whiteboards: creating higher-level thinkers? Childhood Education, 85(4):270-272.
• Lai, H. J. (2010). Secondary school teachers’ perceptions of interactive whiteboard training workshops: A case study from Taiwan. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology., 26, 511-522.
• Liang, T.H., Huang, Y.M. & Tsai, C.C. (2012). An Investigation of Teaching and Learning Interaction Factors for the Use of the Interactive Whiteboard Technology. Educational Technology and Society, 15 (4), 356–367.
• Luo, Yi-F., & Yang, S.C. (2016). The Effect of the Interactive Functions of Whiteboards on Elementary Students’ Learning. Journal of Educational Computing Research, January 28.
• Mavers, D. (2009). Teaching and learning with a visualiser in the primary classroom: modelling graph making. Learning, Media and Technology, 34 ( 1):11-26
• Mathews-Aydinli, M. J. & Elaziz, F. (2010). Turkish students' and teachers' attitudes toward the use of IWBs in EFL classrooms. Computer Assisted Language Learnin., 23(3), 235-252.
• Morgan, G.L. (2008). Improving Student Engagement: Use of the Interactive Whiteboard as an Instructional Tool to Improve Engagement and Behavior in the Junior High School Classroom. The Faculty of the School of Education Liberty University. Ph.Thesis.
• Parker M A, Martin F 2010. Using Virtual Classrooms: Student Perceptions of Features and Characteristics in an Online and a Blended Course. MERLOT Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 6(1):135-147.
• Sarsa, J. & Soler, R. (2011). Special features of Interactive Whiteboard software for motivating students. International Journal of Information and Education Technology, 1(3), 235-240.
• SMART Technologies Inc. (2006). Interactive Whiteboards and Learning: Improving student learning outcomes and streamlining lesson planning. 1-13.
• Smith, S. Global Interactive White board Market 2012-2016. http://www.reportbuyer.com/
• Streiner, D. L. (2003). Starting at the beginning: an introduction to coefficient alpha and internal consistency. Journal of Personality Assessment,. 80, 99-103.
• Tataroglu, B. & Erduran, A. (2010). Examining Students’attitudes and views towards usage an interactive whiteboard in mathematics lessons. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2: 2533 2538.
• Tertemiz, N., Sahin, D., Can, B., & Duzgun, S. (2015). Views of Primary School Teachers and Students about The Interactive Whiteboard. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, Volume 186, 1289–1297. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.04.099.
• Tomei, L.A. (2013). Top 10 Technologies for Designing 21st Century Instruction. International Journal of Information and Communication Technology Education (IJICTE), 9(3), 1-14.
• Urška, F.P. & Ljubica, M.U. (2015). Positive and negative aspects of the IWB and tablet computers in the first grade of primary school: a multiple-perspective approach. Early Child Development and Care, 185, 6.
• Wood, R. & Ashfield, J. (2008). The use of the interactive whiteboard for creative teaching and learning in literacy and mathematics: A case study. British Journal of Educational Technology, 39(1): 84-96.
• Yang, J.Y. & Teng, Y.W. (2014). Perceptions of Elementary School Teachers and Students Using IWB in English Teaching and Learning. J. of Interactive Whiteboards Research. 25(1),125-154.