Avrupa Birliği Ülkelerinin Çevresel Performanslarının MPI ve AMPI Yöntemleri ile Değerlendirilmesi

Hasan Türe; Seyyide Doğan

doi:10.25229/beta.1297889

EN TR

Avrupa Birliği Ülkelerinin Çevresel Performanslarının MPI ve AMPI Yöntemleri ile Değerlendirilmesi

Öz

Sanayileşme, hızlı kentleşme, doğal kaynakların yok edilmesi ve kimyasal atıklar gibi birçok temel sebepten, toplumların güvenilir suya, havaya, toprağa ve gıdaya ulaşabilme imkanları büyük ölçüde kısıtlanmıştır. Bu durum toplumların daha da genel anlamda dünyanın, çevresel sürdürülebilirliğini sağlayamayacağına işaret etmektedir. Bu noktada ekosistemin ve insan sağlığının korunması adına girişimde bulunmak gereklilikten öte zorunluluk haline gelmiştir. Bu çalışma AB ülkelerinin çevresel performanslarını değerlendirmelerine olanak sağlamak için ortaya konulmuştur. Çalışma performans ölçümünde zamanı da dikkate almasından dolayı benzer çalışmalardan farklılaşmaktadır. Çalışma sonucunda Fransa, Almanya, Danimarka, İrlanda, Avusturya ve İsveç gibi çoğunluğu Kuzey Avrupa’da ve görece batıda yer alan ülkelerin ele alınana göstergeler çerçevesinde çevresel performans yönünden daha başarılı oldukları söylenebilir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Çevresel Performans, Sürdürülebilirlik, MPI, AMPI

Kaynakça

Allen, M., Babiker, Chen, Y.& de Coninck, H. C. (2018). IPCC SR15: Summary for Policymakers — Eindhoven University of Technology Research Portal. https://research.tue.nl/en/publications/ipcc-sr15-summary-for-policymakers
Baettig, M. B., Wild, M., & Imboden, D. M. (2007). A Climate Change Index: Where Climate Change May Be Most Prominent in the 21st Century. Geophysical Research Letters, 34(1). https://doi.org/10.1029/2006GL028159
Bauer, S. (2007). The Ozone Secretariat. (No. 28).
Bericat, E. (2012). The European Gender Equality Index: Conceptual and Analytical Issues. Social Indicators Research, 108(1), 1–28. https://doi.org/10.1007/S11205-011-9872-Z/TABLES/7
Bodansky, D. (2021). The United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change: A Commentary. Yale Journal of International Law. https://openyls.law.yale.edu/handle/20.500.13051/6301
Brundtland G. H. (1987). Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development: Our Common Future.
Casadio Tarabusi, E., & Guarini, G. (2013). An Unbalance Adjustment Method for Development Indicators. Social Indicators Research, 112(1), 19–45. https://doi.org/10.1007/S11205-012-0070-4/TABLES/7
Chambers, N., Simmons, C., & Wackernagel, M. (2000). Sharing Nature’s Interest: Ecological Footprints as an Indicator of Sustainability. Earthscan. https://www.routledge.com/Sharing-Natures-Interest-Ecological-Footprints-as-an-Indicator-of-Sustainability/Chambers-Simmons-Wackernagel/p/book/9781853837395
Chan, K., Agard, J., Liu, J., Aguiar, A. P. D., Armenteras, D., Boedhihartono, A. K., Cheung, W. W. L., Hashimoto, S., Hernández-Pedraza, G. C., Hickler, T., Jetzkowitz, J., Kok, M., Murray-Hudson, M., O’Farrell, P., Satterfield, T., Saysel, A.
K., Seppelt, R., Strassburg, B., Xue, D., … Mohamed, A. A. A. (2019). Chapter 5. Pathways towards a Sustainable Future. Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/ZENODO.3832099

Chang, M., Dereczynski, C., Freitas, M. A. V., Chou, S. C., Chang, M., Dereczynski, C., Freitas, M. A. V., & Chou, S. C. (2014). Climate Change Index: A Proposed Methodology for Assessing Susceptibility to Future Climatic Extremes. American Journal of Climate Change, 3(3), 326–337. https://doi.org/10.4236/AJCC.2014.33029
de Muro, P., Mazziotta, M., & Pareto, A. (2011). Composite Indices of Development and Poverty: An Application to MDGs. Social Indicators Research, 104(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1007/S11205-010-9727-Z/FIGURES/4 EPI. (n.d.). Welcome | Environmental Performance Index. Retrieved May 1, 2023, from https://epi.yale.edu/
Esty, D. C., & Poerter, M. E. (2005). National Environmental Performance: An Empirical Analysis of Policy Results and Determinants. Environment and Development Economics, 10(4), 391–434. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1355770X05002275
EU. (2023). Environment Policy: General Principles and Basic Framework. European Commission. (n.d.). Biodiversity Strategy for 2030. Retrieved May 1, 2023, from https://environment.ec.europa.eu/strategy/biodiversity-strategy-2030_en
European Commission. (2023). CAP 2023-27. https://agriculture.ec.europa.eu/common-agricultural-policy/cap-overview/cap-2023-27_en
European Environment Agency. (2021, February 9). EU Achieves 20-20-20 Climate Targets, 55 % Emissions Cut by 2030 Reachable with More Efforts and Policies — European Environment Agency. https://www.eea.europa.eu/highlights/eu-achieves-20-20-20
European Environment Agency. (2023, February 7). Continued Drop in EU’s Greenhouse Gas Emissions Confirms Achievement of 2020 Target — European Environment Agency. https://www.eea.europa.eu/highlights/continued-drop-in-eus-greenhouse
European Parliament. (2011). One in Six People Have No Access to Clean Water | News | European Parliament. https://www.europarl.europa.eu/news/en/headlines/world/20110513STO19335/one-in-six-people-have-no-access-to-clean-water
Gallego-Álvarez, I., García-Sánchez, I. M., & da Silva Vieira, C. (2014). Climate Change and Financial Performance in Times of Crisis. Business Strategy and the Environment, 23(6), 361–374. https://doi.org/10.1002/BSE.1786
García-Álvarez, M. T., & Moreno, B. (2018). Environmental Performance Assessment in the EU: A Challenge for The Sustainability. Journal of Cleaner Production, 205, 266–280. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JCLEPRO.2018.08.284
García-Álvarez, M. T., Moreno, B., & Soares, I. (2016). Analyzing The Environmental and Resource Pressures from European Energy Activity: A Comparative Study of EU Member States. Energy, 115, 1375–1384. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ENERGY.2016.01.035
Guijarro, F. (2019). A Multicriteria Model for the Assessment of Countries’ Environmental Performance. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 16(16). https://doi.org/10.3390/IJERPH16162868
Hsu, A., & Zomer, A. (2016). Environmental Performance Index. Wiley StatsRef: Statistics Reference Online, 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118445112.STAT03789.PUB2
Jin, J., Zhou, D., & Zhou, P. (2014). Measuring Environmental Performance with Stochastic Environmental DEA: The Case of APEC Economies. Economic Modelling, 38, 80–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ECONMOD.2013.12.017
Matsumoto, K., Makridou, G., & Doumpos, M. (2020). Evaluating Environmental Performance Using Data Envelopment Analysis: The Case of European Countries. Journal of Cleaner Production, 272, 122637. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JCLEPRO.2020.122637
Mazziotta, C., Mazziotta, M., Pareto, A., & Vidoli, F. (2014). A Composite Index for Measuring Italian Regions Development Over Time. RIEDS - Rivista Italiana Di Economia, Demografia e Statistica - The Italian Journal of Economic, Demographic and Statistical Studies, 68(3–4), 127–134. https://doi.org/10.3280/REST2010-001002
Mazziotta, M., & Pareto, A. (2012). A Non-compensatory Approach for the Measurement of the Quality of Life. 27–40. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-3898-0_3
Mazziotta, M., & Pareto, A. (2013). Methods for Constructing Composite Indices: One for all or all for One?
Mazziotta, M., & Pareto, A. (2016). On a Generalized Non-compensatory Composite Index for Measuring Socio-economic Phenomena. Social Indicators Research, 127(3), 983–1003. https://doi.org/10.1007/S11205-015-0998-2/FIGURES/4
Mazziotta, M., & Pareto, A. (2017). Synthesis of Indicators: The Composite Indicators Approach. 159–191. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-60595-1_7
Mazziotta, M., & Pareto, A. (2018). Measuring Well-Being Over Time: The Adjusted Mazziotta–Pareto Index Versus Other Non-Compensatory Indices. Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, 136(3), 967–976. https://doi.org/10.1007/S11205-017-1577-5
Mazziotta, M., & Pareto, A. (2019). Use and Misuse of PCA for Measuring Well-Being. Social Indicators Research, 142(2), 451–476. https://doi.org/10.1007/S11205-018-1933-0/FIGURES/9
Mazziotta, M., & Pareto, A. (2022). Composite Indices Construction: The Performance Interval Approach. Social Indicators Research, 161(2–3), 541–551. https://doi.org/10.1007/S11205-020-02336-5/FIGURES/2
Moldan, B., Janoušková, S., & Hák, T. (2012). How to Understand and Measure Environmental Sustainability: Indicators and Targets. Ecological Indicators, 17, 4–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2011.04.033
Munda, G., & Nardo, M. (2011). Noncompensatory/Nonlinear Composite Indicators for Ranking Countries: A Defensible Setting. https://doi.org/10.1080/00036840601019364, 41(12), 1513–1523. https://doi.org/10.1080/00036840601019364
Rogge, N. (2012). Undesirable Specialization in The Construction of Composite Policy Indicators: The Environmental Performance Index. Ecological Indicators, 23, 143–154. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ECOLIND.2012.03.020
Saisana, M., Saltelli, A., & Tarantola, S. (2005). Uncertainty And Sensitivity Analysis Techniques as Tools for The Quality Assessment of Composite Indicators. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series A (Statistics in Society), 168(2), 307–323. https://doi.org/10.1111/J.1467-985X.2005.00350.X
Sanz-Díaz, M. T., Velasco-Morente, F., Yñiguez, R., & Díaz-Calleja, E. (2017). An Analysis of Spain’s Global and Environmental Efficiency from A European Union Perspective. Energy Policy, 104, 183–193. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ENPOL.2017.01.030
Senemoğlu, O. (2017). Tüketim, Tüketim Toplumu ve Tüketim Kültürü: Karşılaştırmalı Bir Analiz. İnsan ve İnsan, 4(12), 66–86. https://doi.org/10.29224/INSANVEINSAN.313030
Stoutenborough, J. W., & Vedlitz, A. (2014). The Effect of Perceived and Assessed Knowledge of Climate Change on Public Policy Concerns: An Empirical Comparison. Environmental Science & Policy, 37, 23–33. https://doi.org/10.1016 /J.ENVSCI.2013.08.002
Sueyoshi, T., & Yuan, Y. (2015). China’s Regional Sustainability and Diversified Resource Allocation: DEA Environmental Assessment on Economic Development and Air Pollution. Energy Economics, 49, 239–256. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ENECO.2015.01.024
Tarantola, S. (n.d.). European Innovation Scoreboard: Strategies to Measure Country Progress Over Time. EUR 23526 EN. Luxembourg (Luxembourg): OPOCE; April, 2008. JRC46943
Tilman, D., Cassman, K. G., Matson, P. A., Naylor, R., & Polasky, S. (2002). Agricultural Sustainability and Intensive Production Practices. Nature 2002 418:6898, 418(6898), 671–677. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature01014
UN. (2015). Transforming Our World: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development.
UN. (2015, September 25). United Nations News. https://news.un.org/en/story/2015/09/508202-deforestation-slows-we-need-do-better-sustainable-forest-use-un-agriculture.
UNFCCC. (n.d.). The Paris Agreement. Retrieved April 29, 2023, from https://unfccc.int/process-and-meetings/the-paris-agreement
Vidoli, F., & Maintainer, E. F. (2023). Type Package Title Composite Indicators Functions. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-014-0710-y
Weiss, E. B. (2009). The Vienna Convention for The Protection of The Ozone Layer and The Montreal Protocol on Substances That Deplete the Ozone Layer. www.un.org/law/avl
Whitmore, J. L. (1999). The Social and Environmental Importance of Forest Plantations with Emphasis on Latin America. Journal of Tropical Forest Science, 11(1), 255–269.
WHO. (2014). 7 million Premature Deaths Annually Linked to Air Pollution. https://www.who.int/news/item/25-03-2014-7-million-premature-deaths-annually-linked-to-air-pollution
WHO. (2022). Billions of People Still Breathe Unhealthy Air: New WHO Data. https://www.who.int/news/item/04-04-2022-billions-of-people-still-breathe-unhealthy-air-new-who-data
Woo, C., Chung, Y., Chun, D., Seo, H., & Hong, S. (2015). The Static and Dynamic Environmental Efficiency of Renewable Energy: A Malmquist Index Analysis of OECD Countries. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 47, 367–376. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.RSER.2015.03.070
World Bank. (2018). Global Waste to Grow by 70 Percent by 2050 Unless Urgent Action is Taken: World Bank Report. https://www.worldbank.org/en/news/press-release/2018/09/20/global-waste-to-grow-by-70-percent-by-2050-unless-urgent-action-is-taken-world-bank-report
Würth Karsten. (n.d.). What is the Kyoto Protocol? | UNFCCC. Retrieved April 29, 2023, from https://unfccc.int/kyoto_protocol
WWAP (United Nations World Water Assessment Programme). 2017. The United Nations World Water Development Report 2017. Wastewater: The Untapped Resource. Paris, UNESCO.
WWF. (2022). Living Planet Report. https://livingplanet.panda.org/
Yu-Ying Lin, E., Chen, P. Y., & Chen, C. C. (2013). Measuring Green Productivity of Country: A Generlized Metafrontier Malmquist Productivity Index Approach. Energy, 55, 340–353. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ENERGY.2013.03.055
Zhang, J., Zeng, W., & Shi, H. (2016). Regional Environmental Efficiency in China: Analysis Based on A Regional Slack-Based Measure with Environmental Undesirable Outputs. Ecological Indicators, 71, 218–228. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ECOLIND.2016.04.040
Zhang, N., Zhou, P., & Kung, C. C. (2015). Total-Factor Carbon Emission Performance of The Chinese Transportation Industry: A Bootstrapped Non-Radial Malmquist Index Analysis. Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews, 41, 584–593. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.RSER.2014.08.076

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil

Türkçe

Konular

İşletme

Bölüm

Araştırma Makalesi

Yazarlar

Hasan Türe ^*
0000-0002-1975-9063
Türkiye

Seyyide Doğan
0000-0001-7835-7905
Türkiye

Erken Görünüm Tarihi

30 Aralık 2023

Yayımlanma Tarihi

30 Aralık 2023

Gönderilme Tarihi

16 Mayıs 2023

Kabul Tarihi

13 Temmuz 2023

Yayımlandığı Sayı

Yıl 2023 Cilt: 8 Sayı: 2

DOI

https://doi.org/10.25229/beta.1297889

IZ

https://izlik.org/JA57ZE63LJ

APA

Türe, H., & Doğan, S. (2023). Avrupa Birliği Ülkelerinin Çevresel Performanslarının MPI ve AMPI Yöntemleri ile Değerlendirilmesi. Bulletin of Economic Theory and Analysis, 8(2), 225-253. https://doi.org/10.25229/beta.1297889

AMA

1.Türe H, Doğan S. Avrupa Birliği Ülkelerinin Çevresel Performanslarının MPI ve AMPI Yöntemleri ile Değerlendirilmesi. beta. 2023;8(2):225-253. doi:10.25229/beta.1297889

Chicago

Türe, Hasan, ve Seyyide Doğan. 2023. “Avrupa Birliği Ülkelerinin Çevresel Performanslarının MPI ve AMPI Yöntemleri ile Değerlendirilmesi”. Bulletin of Economic Theory and Analysis 8 (2): 225-53. https://doi.org/10.25229/beta.1297889.

EndNote

Türe H, Doğan S (01 Aralık 2023) Avrupa Birliği Ülkelerinin Çevresel Performanslarının MPI ve AMPI Yöntemleri ile Değerlendirilmesi. Bulletin of Economic Theory and Analysis 8 2 225–253.

IEEE

[1]H. Türe ve S. Doğan, “Avrupa Birliği Ülkelerinin Çevresel Performanslarının MPI ve AMPI Yöntemleri ile Değerlendirilmesi”, beta, c. 8, sy 2, ss. 225–253, Ara. 2023, doi: 10.25229/beta.1297889.

ISNAD

Türe, Hasan - Doğan, Seyyide. “Avrupa Birliği Ülkelerinin Çevresel Performanslarının MPI ve AMPI Yöntemleri ile Değerlendirilmesi”. Bulletin of Economic Theory and Analysis 8/2 (01 Aralık 2023): 225-253. https://doi.org/10.25229/beta.1297889.

JAMA

1.Türe H, Doğan S. Avrupa Birliği Ülkelerinin Çevresel Performanslarının MPI ve AMPI Yöntemleri ile Değerlendirilmesi. beta. 2023;8:225–253.

MLA

Türe, Hasan, ve Seyyide Doğan. “Avrupa Birliği Ülkelerinin Çevresel Performanslarının MPI ve AMPI Yöntemleri ile Değerlendirilmesi”. Bulletin of Economic Theory and Analysis, c. 8, sy 2, Aralık 2023, ss. 225-53, doi:10.25229/beta.1297889.

Vancouver

1.Hasan Türe, Seyyide Doğan. Avrupa Birliği Ülkelerinin Çevresel Performanslarının MPI ve AMPI Yöntemleri ile Değerlendirilmesi. beta. 01 Aralık 2023;8(2):225-53. doi:10.25229/beta.1297889

Cited By

Measuring Environmental Performance of Turkic Republics with Multicriteria Decision Making Methods

Politeknik Dergisi

https://doi.org/10.2339/politeknik.1655772

Bu dergide yayımlanan eserler Creative Commons Atıf 4.0 Uluslararası Lisansı ile lisanslanmaktadır.

Avrupa Birliği Ülkelerinin Çevresel Performanslarının MPI ve AMPI Yöntemleri ile Değerlendirilmesi

Evaluation of Environmental Performance of European Union Countries with MPI and AMPI Methods

Öz

Anahtar Kelimeler

Avrupa Birliği Ülkelerinin Çevresel Performanslarının MPI ve AMPI Yöntemleri ile Değerlendirilmesi

Öz

Anahtar Kelimeler

Kaynakça

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil

Konular

Bölüm

Yazarlar

Erken Görünüm Tarihi

Yayımlanma Tarihi

Gönderilme Tarihi

Kabul Tarihi

Yayımlandığı Sayı

DOI

IZ

Kaynak Göster

Cited By

Measuring Environmental Performance of Turkic Republics with Multicriteria Decision Making Methods