Exploring The Twin-Deficit Hypothesis by Considering the Energy Prices in Türkiye: The Evidence from the Rolling Window and the Spectral Causality Analyses

Yıl 2025, , 209 - 231, 28.02.2025

İlkay Güler

https://doi.org/10.25229/beta.1586293

Öz

Worsening the budget and current account balance has been one of the government’s most urgent issues, especially since the 1980s. Within this context, various studies have been conducted to find the accurate solution and whether there is a connection between the two unpleasant macroeconomic problems. The study aims to address the twin-deficit hypothesis at the full and sub-samples, with different frequencies, by employing the advanced causality test approaches in the case of the Turkish economy by considering energy prices. The Toda-Yamamoto, the Rolling-Window, and Breitung-Candelon Causality analyses are performed on the monthly data spanning from 2009:01 to 2024:08. When examining the evidence on the entire sample, the Ricardian Equivalence hypothesis is verified, and energy prices induce the budget deficit. However, the current account deficit and energy prices affect the budget defict in the short run due to the outcome of the spectral analysis. The Rolling window discloses the causality relationship among the variables at the varied time intervals. The final testament of the study approves the Ricardian Equaliance in the case of Türkiye and rejects the twin-deficit hypothesis. The policy actions are recommended for the policy-makers based on the evidence obtained in the study.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Budget Deficit, Current Account Deficit, Energy Prices, Macroeconomics, Twin-Deficit

Etik Beyan

This study which does not require ethics committee approval and/or legal/specific permission complies with the research and publication ethics.

İkiz Açık Hipotezini Türkiye'deki Enerji Fiyatlarını Dikkate Alarak Araştırmak: Kayan Pencere ve Spektral Nedensellik Analizlerinden Elde Edilen Kanıtlar

Öz

Bütçe ve cari işlemler dengesinin kötüleşmesi, özellikle 1980’lerden beri hükümetlerin en acil konularından biri olmuştur. Bu bağlamda, iki tatsız makroekonomik sorun arasında bir bağlantı olup olmadığı ve doğru çözümü bulmak için çeşitli çalışmalar yapılmıştır. Bu çalışma, ikiz açık hipotezini Türkiye ekonomisi örneğinde enerji fiyatlarını dikkate alarak gelişmiş nedensellik testi yaklaşımlarını kullanarak tam ve alt örneklemlerde, farklı frekanslara ele almayı amaçlamaktadır. Toda-Yamamoto, Kayan Pencere ve Breitung-Candelon Nedensellik analizleri 2009:01-2024:08 dönemini kapsayan aylık veriler üzerinden gerçekleştirilmiştir. Tüm örneklem üzerinde kanıtlar incelendiğinde, Ricardocu Denklik hipotezi doğrulanmakta ve enerji fiyatları bütçe açığını tetiklemektedir. Ancak, spektral analizin sonucuna göre cari açık ve enerji fiyatları kısa vadede bütçe açığını etkilemektedir. Kayan pencere, değişkenler arasındaki nedensellik ilişkisini farklı zaman aralıklarında ortaya koymaktadır. Çalışmanın nihai sonucu, Türkiye örneğinde Ricardocu Eşitliği onaylamakta ve ikiz açık hipotezini reddetmektedir. Çalışmada elde edilen kanıtlara dayanarak politika yapıcılar için politika eylemleri önerilmektedir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Bütçe Açığı, Cari İşlemler Açığı, Enerji Fiyatları, Makroekonomik, İkiz Açık

Etik Beyan

Etik komite onayı ve/veya yasal/özel izin gerektirmeyen bu çalışma, araştırma ve yayın etiğine uygundur.

Kaynakça

• Akyol, G., Turan, A., & Zeren, F. (2023). Avrupa Birliği ülkelerinde ikiz açık hipotezinin geçerliliğinin araştırılması: panel veri analizi yaklaşımı. Uluslararası Ticaret ve Ekonomi Araştırmaları Dergisi, 7(1), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.30711/utead.1130207
• Altunöz, U. (2014). İkiz açık hipotezinin geçerliliği sınır yöntemiyle sınanması: Türkiye örneği. Adıyaman Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 7(17), 426-446. https://doi.org/10.14520/adyusbd.763
• Asif, M., Sharma, V., Chandniwala, V. J., Khan, P. A., & Muneeb, S. M. (2023). Modelling the dynamic linkage amidst energy prices and twin deficit in India: Empirical investigation within linear and nonlinear framework. Energies, 16(6), 2712. https://doi.org/10.3390/en16062712
• Asrafuzzaman, A. Roy, A., & Gupta, S. D. (2013). An empirical investigation of budget and trade deficits: The case of Bangladesh. International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, 3(3), 570–579. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/ijefi/issue/31958/351936
• Ata, A. Y., & Yücel, F. (2003). Eş-bütünleşme ve nedensellik testleri altında ikiz açıklar hipotezi: Türkiye uygulaması. Çukurova Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 12(12), 97-110. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/cusosbil/issue/4368/59746
• Balcilar, M., Ozdemir, Z. A., & Arslanturk, Y. (2010). Economic growth and energy consumption causal nexus viewed through a bootstrap rolling window. Energy Economics, 32(6), 1398-1410. https://doi.org/10.1115/IMECE2010-38453
• Bayramoğlu, A. T., & Öztürk, Z. (2018). Assessing the twin and triple deficit hypotheses in developing economies: A panel causality analysis. Global Approaches in Financial Economics, Banking, and Finance, 209-225. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-78494-6_10
• Bölükbaş, M., Topal, M. H., & Hotunluoğlu, H. (2018). Testing twin deficits hypothesis for EU-27 and Turkey: Apanel Granger causality approach under cross-sectional dependence. Romanian Journal of Economic Forecasting, 21(4), 101-119. https://ideas.repec.org/a/rjr/romjef/vy2018i4p101-119.html
• Breitung, J., & Candelon, B. (2006). Testing for short-and long-run causality: A frequency-domain approach. Journal of Econometrics, 132(2), 363-378. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeconom.2005.02.004
• Brooks, C., & Hinich, M. J. (1998). Episodic nonstationarity in exchange rates. Applied Economics Letters, 5(11), 719-722.
• Caspi, I. (2017). Rtadf: Testing for bubbles with EViews. Journal of Statistical Software, 81, 1-16. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v081.c01
• Chang, T., Sethi, D., Tiwari, A. K., & Wang, M. C. (2024). Revisiting the twin deficits hypothesis in the United States: Further evidence based on system-equation ADL test for threshold cointegration. The Journal of International Trade & Economic Development, 33(4), 723-737. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638199.2023.2222418
• Darrat, A. F. (1988). Have large budget deficits caused rising trade deficits?. Southern Economic Journal, 54(4), 879-887. https://doi.org/10.2307/1059523
• Dogan, B., & Saykal, B. (2022). Relationship between the twin deficit hypothesis and the inflation: Case of Turkey (2010-2019). International Journal of Business and Social Science Research, 3(3), 8-25. https://doi.org/10.47742/ijbssr.v3n3p2
• Duman, K., & Belke, M. (2011). Türkiye’de bütçe açığı ile cari açık arasındaki ilişkinin VAR analizi ile incelenmesi (1998–2011). Finans Politik ve Ekonomik Yorumlar, 48(562), 53-68. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/fpeyd/issue/48072/607805
• Dumitrescu, E.I. ve Hurlin, C. (2012), “Testing for Granger Non-Causality in Heterogeneous Panels”, Economic Modelling, 29(4), 1450–1460.
• Emirmahmutoglu, Furkan, and Nezir Kose. 2011. Testing for Granger causality in heterogeneous mixed panels. Economic Modelling 28: 870–76. [
• Geweke, J. (1982). Measurement of linear dependence and feedback between multiple time series. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 77(378), 304-313. https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1982.10477803
• Gokcu, M. (2023). Ekonomi notları – Enerji ithalat fiyatlarının son dönem seyri ve belirleyicileri. Araştırma ve Para Politikası Genel Müdürlüğü, Türkiye Cumhuriyet Merkez Bankası. https://tcmb.gov.tr/wps/wcm/connect/8d4893c3-09f8-4aad-96cd-82673705066e/en2305.pdf?MOD=AJPERES&CACHEID=ROOTWORKSPACE-8d4893c3-09f8-4aad-96cd-82673705066e-oFGb6Gs
• Granger, C. W. (1969). Investigating causal relations by econometric models and cross-spectral methods. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society, 37(3), 424-438. https://doi.org/10.2307/1912791
• Güler, İ. (2023). Enerji dış ticareti ile döviz kuru volatilitesi ilişkisi: Türkiye örneği. In B. Darıcı, H. M. Ertuğrul, & F. Ayhan (Eds.), ICOAEF X International Conference On Applied Economics And Finance, 8-9 December 2023, University of Washington Rome Center – Abstract Proceeding Book (pp. 38-40). https://www.icoaef.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/12/icoaef_x_abstract_proceeding.pdf
• Hacker, R. S., & Hatemi, J, A. (2006). Tests for causality between integrated variables using asymptotic and bootstrap distributions: Theory and application. Applied Economics, 38(13), 1489-1500. https://doi.org/10.1080/00036840500405763
• Hatemi, J. A., & Irandoust, M. (2012). Asymmetric interaction between government spending and terms of trade volatility: New evidence from hidden cointegration technique. Journal of Economic Studies, 39(3), 368-378. https://doi.org/10.1108/01443581211245937
• Hoque, M. N., Islam, K. Z., & Munim, K. M. (2015). Validity of twin deficit hypothesis: Evidence from Asian developing countries using panel data. North South Business Review, 5(2), 53-75. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/336603962_VALIDITY_OF_TWIN_DEFICIT_HYPOTHESIS_EVIDENCE_FROM_ASIAN_DEVELOPING_COUNTRIES_USING_PANEL_DATA
• Hosoya, Y. (1991). The decomposition and measurement of the interdependency between second-order stationary processes. Probability Theory and Related Fields, 88(4), 429-444. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01192551
• Hussain, I., Hayat, U., Alam, M. S., & Khan, U. (2024). A dynamic analysis of the twin-deficit hypothesis: The case of a developing country. Asia-Pacific Financial Markets, 31(1), 25-52. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10690-023-09405-y
• İyidoğan, P. V., & Erkam, S. (2013). İkiz açıklar hipotezi: Türkiye için ampirik bir inceleme (1987-2005). Pamukkale Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, (15), 39-48.
• Karaş, G. (2024). Bütçe açığı ve cari açık arasındaki ilişkinin analizi Türkiye örneği (1975-2020). Dumlupınar Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, (79), 276-288. https://doi.org/10.51290/dpusbe.1391216
• Khalid, A. M., & Guan, T. W. (1999). Causality tests of budget and current account deficits: Cross-country comparisons. Empirical Economics, 24, 389-402. https://doi.org/10.1007/s001810050062
• Kılavuz, E., & Dumrul, Y. (2012). İkiz açıklar hipotezinin geçerliliği: Teori ve uygulama. Atatürk Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi, 26(3-4), 239-258. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/atauniiibd/issue/2707/35743
• Kiran, B. (2011). On the twin deficits hypothesis: Evidence from Turkey. Applied Econometrics and International Development, 11(1), 59-66. https://ideas.repec.org/a/eaa/aeinde/v11y2011i1_6.html
• Kousar, S., Sabir, S. A., Ahmed, F., & Bojnec, Š. (2022). Climate change, exchange rate, twin deficit, and energy inflation: Application of VAR model. Energies, 15(20), 7663. https://doi.org/10.3390/en15207663
• Li, J. (2017). System‐equation ADL test for threshold cointegration with an application to the term structure of interest rates. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 79(1), 1-24. https://doi.org/10.1111/obes.12123
• Liu, T. Y., & Gu, Z. C. (2023). Does the causal relationship between the twin deficits vary over time? Evidence from a bootstrap rolling window approach. The Singapore Economic Review, 68(05), 1613-1635. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0217590820500435
• Lubna, M. M., & Saha, S. K. (2024). Justification of the twin deficit hypothesis in Bangladesh. International Trade, Politics and Development, 8(2), 96-116. https://doi.org/10.1108/ITPD-04-2023-0009
• Mishkin, F. S. (2007). The economics of money, banking, and financial markets. Pearson education.
• Miteza, I. (2012). Fiscal deficits, current deficits and investment: a panel causality framework of 20 OECD countries. Applied Econometrics and International Development, 12(1), 6-19. https://ideas.repec.org/a/eaa/aeinde/v12y2012i1_1.html
• Okoli, T. T., Tewari, D. D., & Ileasanmi, K. D. (2021). Investigating a threshold effect in twin deficit hypothesis: Evidence from the BRICS economies. Cogent Economics & Finance, 9(1), 1886451. https://doi.org/10.1080/23322039.2021.1886451
• Özçalık, M., & Erataş, F. (2014). İkiz açıklar hipotezinin geçerliliği: Yükselen piyasa ekonomileri için bir örnek. Journal of Management and Economics Research, 12(22), 136-151. https://doi.org/10.11611/JMER194
• Rosensweig, J. A., & Tallman, E. W. (1993). Fiscal policy and trade adjustment: Are the deficits really twins?. Economic Inquiry, 31(4), 580-594. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1465-7295.1993.tb00892.x
• Shastri, S., Giri, A. K., & Mohapatra, G. (2017). An empirical investigation of the twin deficit hypothesis: Panel evidence from selected asian economies. Journal Of Economic Research, 22, 1-22.
• Tang, C. F. (2008). Wagner’s law versus Keynesian hypothesis: New evidence from recursive regression-based causality approaches. The IUP Journal of Public Finance, 6(4), 29-38. https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:icf:icfjpf:v:06:y:2008:i:4:p:29-38
• Toda, H. Y., & Yamamoto, T. (1995). Statistical inference in vector autoregressions with possibly integrated processes. Journal of Econometrics, 66(1-2), 225-250. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-4076(94)01616-8
• Türkiye İstatistik Kurumu, (2024). İstatistik Veri Portalı. https://data.tuik.gov.tr/Search/Search?text=GAZ%20F%C4%B0YAT, (12.09.2024)
• Türkiye Cumhuriyeti Merkez Bankası (TCMB). (2024). Elektronik Veri Dağıtım Sistemi (EVDS) https://evds2.tcmb.gov.tr/ (11.09.2024)
• Vamvoukas, G. A. (1997). A note on budget deficits and interest rates: Evidence from a small open economy. Southern Economic Journal, 63(3), 803-811. https://doi.org/10.2307/1061112
• Yılancı, V., & Bozoklu, Ş. (2014). Price and trade volume relationship in Turkish stock market: a time-varying asymmetric causality analysis. Ege Academic Review, 14(2), 211-220.
• Yılmaz, Ö., & Akıncı, M. (2012). Türkiye'de cari açıkların belirleyicileri: Bir zaman serisi analizi. TISK Akademi, 7(14), 54-83. https://www.tiskakademi.org/login